On 08/30/2015 08:25 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
So it was seeing them as 100% different because... shit.
Interesting, I do not understand this behaviour either. Anyone care to
elaborate?
Simple ... RTFM ...
From the man page for rsync:
A trailing slash on the source changes this behavior
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/30/2015 05:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Crippling an upstream tool is beyond anything other distros patch.
>
>
> It's not crippled. The efi modules are packaged separately. If you know
> that you want to run grub2-install, then you need
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Samuel Rakitničan
wrote:
> I have moved / partition to another partition formed in RAID 0
> consisting of two SSDs. I have updated fstab with new partition UUID,
Using blkid, make sure you use the UUID= value for the *filesystem
volume*, not PARTUUID=.
> reinsta
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:25:42AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:17:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Gordon Messmer
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 08/30/2015 10:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
Post URL for the grub.cfg.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/w
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:25:42AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:17:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Gordon Messmer
> > wrote:
> > > On 08/30/2015 10:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >>
> > >> # rsync -rvnc --delete /brick0 /brick1
> > >>
>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:17:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Gordon Messmer
> wrote:
> > On 08/30/2015 10:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> # rsync -rvnc --delete /brick0 /brick1
> >>
> >> I've confirmed that separate devices are mounted to /brick0 and
> >> /
On 08/30/2015 05:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
Crippling an upstream tool is beyond anything other distros patch.
It's not crippled. The efi modules are packaged separately. If you
know that you want to run grub2-install, then you need to install the
"grub2-efi-modules" package. When you run grub2-i
On 08/30/2015 02:09 PM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
Any thoughts why imsm RAID is not assembled in initramfs on boot?
Try updating /etc/mdadm.conf and rebuilding the initramfs, again.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.f
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 23:09:15 +0200
Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> Any thoughts why imsm RAID is not assembled in initramfs on boot?
I have no idea what the problem was, but I had the same
issue when I tried to move an existing f22 partition to
a raid (or maybe it was f20 or 21, I forget).
It started
I have moved / partition to another partition formed in RAID 0
consisting of two SSDs. I have updated fstab with new partition UUID,
reinstalled GRUB2 and rebuild initramfs using dracut -f. Now computer
boots fine from RAID partition but hangs on when initramfs needs to
boot kernel from / partition
Just as a matter of trivia and amusement, Fedora EFI System partitions
are FAT16. Windows and OS X create them as FAT32.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046577
I think since the EFI file system is actually a frozen in time FAT
implementation that shouldn't ever change (for compatibil
On 08/30/2015 10:18 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 08/30/2015 12:17 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Boot0005* Fedora
HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b-01e236404130,0x5ae5d800,0x2f800)/File(\EFI\FEDORA\shim.efi)
Boot0009* UEFI OS
HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b-01e236404130,0x5ae5d800,0x2f800)/File(\EF
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/30/2015 10:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> # rsync -rvnc --delete /brick0 /brick1
>>
>> I've confirmed that separate devices are mounted to /brick0 and
>> /brick1. What I'm seeing for ~ 20 minutes now is only the device
>> mounted at
On 08/30/2015 10:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
# rsync -rvnc --delete /brick0 /brick1
I've confirmed that separate devices are mounted to /brick0 and
/brick1. What I'm seeing for ~ 20 minutes now is only the device
mounted at brick0 is being accessed, and yet I'm seeing piles of files
(verbose opti
Installation of guacamole is not working on Fedora 22. We have tried
native install and docker installation. We seem to get closer with the
native install. We are able to login to the guacamole web page and try
and connect VNC to hosts but they have blank screens. We can connect
using vinagre so th
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Messmer
> wrote:
>> On 08/29/2015 01:03 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>>>
>>> I hadn't read that page. I stand corrected.
>>>
>>> How nice that Fedora diverges from upstream.
>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> do I need to delete duplicates, so there is only 1 fedora, 1 ubuntu, and
> 1 windows entry?
Only if you want to clean up the built-in boot manager listing.
--
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/30/2015 08:28 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> Doesn't the firmware boot screen correspond to the output of "efibootmgr"?
> it looks that way..
> so, tell me what the difference is between Fedora, 0005, and UEFI OS:
>
> Boot0005* Fedora
> HD(8,G
On 08/30/2015 01:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I've already hinted at this, because those entries are either wrong or
> suboptimal. Each distro has its own /etc/default/grub which contains
> its own unique GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= which really only applies to that
> distro. The Ubuntu GRUB menu entries f
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> ok, so I rebooted, and hit F12 when I saw the Dell logo..
> it gets me to a screen where I see:
>
> UEFI Boot
> Fedora
> UEFI OS
> UEFI OS
> ubuntu
> Windows...
> Fedora
> ubuntu
>
>
> not very descriptive to tell me what kernel or why dup
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 11:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> > grub2-mkconfig will add entries for other operating systems it can find.
>>> > That will be done based on the output of the os-prober tool.
>> This is why one of my first modifications post-
# rsync -rvnc --delete /brick0 /brick1
I've confirmed that separate devices are mounted to /brick0 and
/brick1. What I'm seeing for ~ 20 minutes now is only the device
mounted at brick0 is being accessed, and yet I'm seeing piles of files
(verbose option) being listed.
I'd expect that there'd be
On 08/30/2015 12:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I'm really trying to explain this in the simplest terms possible. So,
> again, the UEFI firmware loads boot loaders. The boot loaders load
> kernels.
>
> You hit F12 to get a list of UEFI boot targets. What are those
> targets? They're boot loaders
On 08/30/2015 12:17 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> so, tell me what the difference is between Fedora, 0005, and UEFI OS:
>>
>> Boot0005* Fedora
>> HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b-01e236404130,0x5ae5d800,0x2f800)/File(\EFI\FEDORA\shim.efi)
>>
>> Boot0009* UEFI OS
>> HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b
On 08/30/2015 06:21 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
so, tell me what the difference is between Fedora, 0005, and UEFI OS:
Boot0005* Fedora
HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b-01e236404130,0x5ae5d800,0x2f800)/File(\EFI\FEDORA\shim.efi)
Boot0009* UEFI OS
HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b-01e236404130,0x5ae
On 08/30/2015 03:58 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
not very descriptive to tell me what kernel or why duplicate Fedora &
ubuntu entries..
I'm really trying to explain this in the simplest terms possible. So,
again, the UEFI firmware loads boot loaders. The boot loaders load kernels.
You hit F1
On 08/30/2015 05:13 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
This task used to run very often on my machine and makes every slow.
How can I manage it?
rpm -q -a --queryformat
%{NAME}\n%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n%{EPOCH}\n%{GROUP}\n%{SUMMARY}\n\n
If you're asking how to avoid slowing down everything else, use "ni
Richard,
> Intel graphics is generally very well supported. I couldn't find which
> chipset the wireless is though in my quick search, if it's Intel as well
> you should be fine.
Thanks for that.
Jonathan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 30/08/2015 04:44 PM, Jonathan Allen wrote:
Dear Fedora Experts,
My daughter is looking at an Asus Zenbook UX305, which has a 128Gb
SSD but no hard-drive. It comes with Win 8.1, but is it likely to
work with Linux? Graphics are Intel HD5300.
Hi,
according to some blogs, it works well wit
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Allen wrote:
> Dear Fedora Experts,
>
> My daughter is looking at an Asus Zenbook UX305, which has a 128Gb
> SSD but no hard-drive. It comes with Win 8.1, but is it likely to
> work with Linux? Graphics are Intel HD5300.
Well technically the SSD is a
Dear Fedora Experts,
My daughter is looking at an Asus Zenbook UX305, which has a 128Gb
SSD but no hard-drive. It comes with Win 8.1, but is it likely to
work with Linux? Graphics are Intel HD5300.
Jonathan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
On 08/30/2015 08:28 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> > it gets me to a screen where I see:
>> >
>> > UEFI Boot
>> > Fedora
>> > UEFI OS
>> > UEFI OS
>> > ubuntu
>> > Windows...
>> > Fedora
>> > ubuntu
>> >
>> > not very descriptive to tell me what kernel or why duplicate Fedora &
>> > ubuntu entries..
>> > I se
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 11:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Practically, the user needs to use the UEFI firmware's built-in boot
>> manager (one time boot menu) to choose which OS to boot. In effect
>> this overrides the NVRAM BootOrder, and causes t
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 01:03 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>>
>> I hadn't read that page. I stand corrected.
>>
>> How nice that Fedora diverges from upstream.
>
> It does, considerably:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:25:02 +0200
Luigi Votta wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:13:49 +0200
> "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This task used to run very often on my machine and makes every slow.
> > How can I manage it?
> >
> > rpm -q -a --queryformat
> > %{NAME}\n%{VERSION}-%{RELE
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:13:49 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This task used to run very often on my machine and makes every slow.
> How can I manage it?
>
> rpm -q -a --queryformat
> %{NAME}\n%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n%{EPOCH}\n%{GROUP}\n%{SUMMARY}\n\n
>
> Thank.
>
Redirecting to a fil
Hello,
This task used to run very often on my machine and makes every slow.
How can I manage it?
rpm -q -a --queryformat
%{NAME}\n%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n%{EPOCH}\n%{GROUP}\n%{SUMMARY}\n\n
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
On 08/29/2015 11:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Practically, the user needs to use the UEFI firmware's built-in boot
> manager (one time boot menu) to choose which OS to boot. In effect
> this overrides the NVRAM BootOrder, and causes the firmware to execute
> the OS specific OSLoader (the particular
On 08/29/2015 11:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The one consequence of enabling Secure Boot is the GRUB menu entry for
> Windows will not work. And although I haven't tried this, I actually
> suspect that the os-prober menu entries for other OS's won't work
> either because, e.g. the Fedora GRUB cont
On 08/29/2015 11:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > And while it'd be fantastic if it weren't that way, it really can't be
>> > unless grub is "stable" in the sense that the configuration file syntax is
>> > finished, no new features will be added, grub2-mkconfig produces a
>> > predictable output, an
On 08/29/2015 11:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > grub2-mkconfig will add entries for other operating systems it can find.
>> > That will be done based on the output of the os-prober tool.
> This is why one of my first modifications post-install is to
> /etc/default/grub to add
>
> GRUB_DISABLE_OS_P
42 matches
Mail list logo
