I waited until I had calmed down and edited this post. Originally it
was written on Sunday April 12.
This is a rant and there are bug reports due to my issues. Some are
automatic from the install issues and others created or to be created by me.
I have been working on this laptop all weeken
On 04/14/2015 06:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 05:31 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/14/2015 06:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and s
On 04/14/2015 05:31 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/14/2015 06:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and swap are
available:
free -h
It's probably
On 04/14/2015 06:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and swap are
available:
free -h
It's probably not an issue, and you needn't post th
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and swap are
available:
free -h
It's probably not an issue, and you needn't post the results unless
there's something odd abo
On 03/16/2015 04:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/17/15 06:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
My laptop reports several kerneloops every time it boots. AFAIK, there's
nothing installed that taints the kernel, but 99% of the time abrt tells me
that the kernel is tainted and that I can't report it. Suggestions?
On 04/14/2015 04:30 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/14/2015 02:18 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I
agree.
It simply doesn't work..
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, usi
Thank you John.
Is anyone working on this bug?
I did not have this problem in 3.17 and prior.
On 04/14/2015 02:57 PM, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I
agree.
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 o
On 04/14/2015 02:18 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
It simply doesn't work..
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
> Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
It simply doesn't work..
> However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
> maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going to apply only until your
> frozen system
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going to apply only until your
frozen system image (that is, the image of your running kernel that was
running on a
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 09:22 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015 5:12 AM, "Patrick O'Callaghan"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 20:18 -0500, g wrote:
> > > > Has anyone else seen this?
> > >
> > > as yet, i have never been unable to accept a site's unrecognized
> > > certificate. [fi
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> So, use maxcpus=1 during first boot and 2nd boot?
The machine is a quadcore XEON, reducing it to a single-core is not really
something I want.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, James Hogarth wrote:
On 14 Apr 2015 18:47, "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is the background to question:
>
> Last week I set up my first Fedora (21) server - everything went well
until ... now, of course "I didn't do anything" (TM) ... all my network
config
On 04/14/2015 12:47 PM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
So now my question: What would be "the" Fedora 21 way to set up a NIC
permanently
from command line?
We have extensive documentation. :)
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Networking_Guide/sec-Using_the_NetworkManager_Command_
On 14 Apr 2015 18:47, "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is the background to question:
>
> Last week I set up my first Fedora (21) server - everything went well
until ... now, of course "I didn't do anything" (TM) ... all my network
configuration was gone.
> First Aid was to set my NIC
Hi,
this is the background to question:
Last week I set up my first Fedora (21) server - everything went well
until ... now, of course "I didn't do anything" (TM) ... all my network
configuration was gone.
First Aid was to set my NIC with the ip command - but this won't
survive a reboot.
Re
I simply use an expensive but fan-ridden cooler-master gaming pc chassis -
enabled me to install things like disk caddies etc - in fact the chassis is
more important if you ask me than The motherboard since I have upgraded mine
twice since getting the chassis and then I am about to install wate
On 04/13/2015 11:35 PM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 14:45 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
I agree that on cheap hardware this might be needed, however, I don't
think it's the case on good systems. A lot of thought goes into the
design of the hardware, so things like overheating don't occur.
Speak
On 04/14/2015 12:44 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
Does S2R work for you?
Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months, and my gut
On Apr 14, 2015 5:12 AM, "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 20:18 -0500, g wrote:
> > > Has anyone else seen this?
> >
> > as yet, i have never been unable to accept a site's unrecognized
> > certificate. [firefox 24.8.0]
>
> As I've explained, the problem is specifically with
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> simple-mtpfs.x86_640.2-3.fc21
so, did massive "yum update", installed that package, rebooted and i
got a mount point for my phone. which is weird since now i have no
idea why this ever worked before but ... i'll take the resu
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 02:29:42PM +0200, Damjan Činkole wrote:
> In Fedora SOAS there is no install link like in most other LInux
> distributions.
> Could you make it in some of the future versions?
Since this is about the Sugar on a Stick spin, you probably will get
better results in contacting
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 08:26 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/14/2015 07:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>> currently running fedora rawhide but i suspect this is a more
> >>> general fedora issue --
On 04/14/2015 08:50 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
>> On 04/14/2015 08:26 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>>>
On 04/14/2015 07:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> currently running fedora rawhide but i
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 08:26 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/14/2015 07:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>> currently running fedora rawhide but i suspect this is a more
> >>> general fedora issue --
On 04/14/2015 08:26 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
>> On 04/14/2015 07:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> currently running fedora rawhide but i suspect this is a more
>>> general fedora issue -- i could be wrong. whenever i plug in my HTC
>>> android
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 07:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > currently running fedora rawhide but i suspect this is a more
> > general fedora issue -- i could be wrong. whenever i plug in my HTC
> > android phone to my laptop (via USB), it's totally hit and m
On 04/14/2015 07:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> currently running fedora rawhide but i suspect this is a more
> general fedora issue -- i could be wrong. whenever i plug in my HTC
> android phone to my laptop (via USB), it's totally hit and miss
> whether i get the phone's content mounted under
currently running fedora rawhide but i suspect this is a more
general fedora issue -- i could be wrong. whenever i plug in my HTC
android phone to my laptop (via USB), it's totally hit and miss
whether i get the phone's content mounted under /run/user/1000/gvfs,
which allows me to copy pics out
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 20:18 -0500, g wrote:
> > Has anyone else seen this?
>
> as yet, i have never been unable to accept a site's unrecognized
> certificate. [firefox 24.8.0]
As I've explained, the problem is specifically with Firefox 37. I
already know it works with earlier versions.
poc
--
On 13.04.2015 17:39, sean darcy wrote:
> On 04/13/2015 03:11 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 12.04.2015 17:48, sean darcy wrote:
>>> Upgraded f21 XFCE.
>>>
>>> nm-applet is running:
>>>
>>>ps aux | grep nm-applet
>>> user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00 nm-applet
>>>
>>> but ther
On 14.04.2015 08:44, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
>
>> Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
>> something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
>
> Does S2R work for you?
>
> Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months,
33 matches
Mail list logo
