Hi all,
Does 389DS support Proxied Authorization Control (RFC 4370)?
Some googling and manual reading suggests it doesn’t, but need to confirm if I
am missing something?
Regards,
Graham
—
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
On 04/09/15 02:41, Neal Becker wrote:
> I know the plan is to use unbound to provide a local dns server in f22.
Where did you get this information? I see nothing referencing unbound in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/ChangeSet.
I'm also doing beta testing on F22 and unbound isn't ins
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 14:41 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I know the plan is to use unbound to provide a local dns server in f22.
>
> I believe my situation is common. I have f21 on my laptop, which I take
> between home and work.
>
> At work we have local dns info that is not public. Right now,
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 11:18 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 05:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Firefox has never asked me to update it on Fedora. As has already been
> > suggested, you should uninstall it and install the Fedora repo version
> > using yum.
>
> Fedora's firef
Hi all,
I have some Java code that is attempting to read the schema of returned LDAP
attributes from a 389ds server in an effort to work out what object to parse
the attribute as. This is being done generically, I don’t know the data types I
will be getting in the search result.
String numeric
Hello Neal,
The news you talk about somehow slipped under my radar...
I use to run pdnsd (a similar software) and while it worked good for most of the
time I still had to restart it from time to time to force a cache refresh,
specially when using with dnscrypt-proxy.
I will start reading about unb
On 04/08/2015 12:18 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
I tried testing out unbound (on f21) as recommended a month or 2 ago, and it
did not work. non-local names were resolved, but local ones were not.
So no, this is not just an assumption.
Thank you; asked and answered.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.
On 06.04.2015 17:57, Jonathan Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 06:21:53AM +0200, poma wrote:
>> Maximize / unmaximize windows
>> http://docs.xfce.org/xfce/xfwm4/getting-stated#maximizeunmaximize_windows
>>
>> You can make any window appear in fullscreen mode (it will then use all the
>> size
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 11:41 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Will NM still setup 'search' as provided by dhcp?
>
> Is there a reason to think it won't work correctly, or are you just
> assuming that the Fedora devs don't know their job?
I tried testing out unbound (on f21) as recommended a mo
On 04/08/2015 11:41 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Will NM still setup 'search' as provided by dhcp?
Is there a reason to think it won't work correctly, or are you just
assuming that the Fedora devs don't know their job?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
I know the plan is to use unbound to provide a local dns server in f22.
I believe my situation is common. I have f21 on my laptop, which I take
between home and work.
At work we have local dns info that is not public. Right now, NM is working
fine. At work, NM sets up resolv.conf:
# Generat
On 04/07/2015 05:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Firefox has never asked me to update it on Fedora. As has already been
suggested, you should uninstall it and install the Fedora repo version
using yum.
Fedora's firefox package overrides[1] some of Mozilla's default values. The in-app
update
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 14:44 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 23:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Firefox has never asked me to update it on Fedora.
>
> Likewise.
>
> And one the major benefits *we* have over other OSs is that all updates
> come from the same place, managed by the
13 matches
Mail list logo
