On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:53 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Every sector Why would the drive which is supposed to be using
> it's own internal logic to do the secure erase, report write errors to the
> host?
> Does the host request notifications of such errors?
I've never had any drive report anything
On 03/20/2015 03:16 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/20/2015 02:13 PM, jd1008 wrote:
It made no difference :(
If nothing else, the test took very little time and completely
eliminated a possibility. Thanx for letting us know.
The funny thing, is I ran a thorough full disk drive stress test using
On 24/03/15 13:10, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mar 23, 2015 8:28 PM, "Stephen Davies" mailto:sdav...@sdc.com.au>> wrote:
>
> On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
>>>
>>> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>>>
On 03/23/2015 07:28 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:
I tried that but got:
No duplicates to remove
A paradox?
If so, it's not a most delightful paradox, that's for sure. Try this, JIC:
package-cleanup --problems
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscript
On 03/24/15 10:28, Stephen Davies wrote:
> On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
>>> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>>>
>>> [root@mustang ~]# yum check
>>> Loaded plugins: langpacks
>>> elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i
On Mar 23, 2015 8:28 PM, "Stephen Davies" wrote:
>
> On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
>>>
>>> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>>>
>>> [root@mustang ~]# yum check
>>> Loaded plugins: langpacks
>>> elfutils-l
On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
[root@mustang ~]# yum check
Loaded plugins: langpacks
elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of elfutils-libelf(x86-32)
= ('0', '
Chris Murphy wrote:
> OK I'm going to display some total KDE ignorance here, hopefully a KDE
> user can answer this.
>
> On GNOME, gnome-software + packagekit + systemd work together to make
> the user aware of software updates. This includes any installed
> applications, as well as OS + kernel
On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>
> [root@mustang ~]# yum check
> Loaded plugins: langpacks
> elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of
> elfutils-libelf(x86-32) = ('0', '0.161', '2.fc21')
> elfutils-
Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
[root@mustang ~]# yum check
Loaded plugins: langpacks
elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of
elfutils-libelf(x86-32) = ('0', '0.161', '2.fc21')
elfutils-libs-0.161-6.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with
elfutil
Hello Cameron,
Exactly! I absolutely agree with you.
In the past I never experienced such issues as the package manager my
previous distribution uses is written in C - without any external
dependencies other than its own libraries.
Thank you very much for your suggestions, I will implement my own
Hello Chris,
It's been awhile since I used KDE for last time but IIRC, both Apper (which
I tried back on Arch) and Muon (Kubuntu's package manager) supports offline
updates.
However at that time none of those systems where using systemd...
I will ask to my friends and let you know.
-M.
--
users
OK I'm going to display some total KDE ignorance here, hopefully a KDE
user can answer this.
On GNOME, gnome-software + packagekit + systemd work together to make
the user aware of software updates. This includes any installed
applications, as well as OS + kernel updates. The user clicks on
Resta
On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 23:49 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2015 2:54 PM, "Arthur Dent"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have, for some time, been getting these messages in my logs:
> >
> > =8<=
> > WARNING: General Protec
On 03/23/2015 11:52 AM, Kevin Abbey wrote:
I tried to reinstall gdm, yum reinstall gdm, but this did not make an
difference.
My understanding is that what you did only replaces missing or damaged
files, and isn't as thorough as you might think it is. (I'm sure
somebody will correct me if I'm
Update:
I tested the fedora OS disk by removing the disk physically and
connecting it to a completely different desktop, a dell with on-cpu
graphics. I edited the video drivers and discovered that the Gnome gdm
desktop manager continues to produce the same problem. I tested the
Lightdm and
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:03:21 -0400, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> called "dnf"?(Dandified Yum...or so they say!) I don't know why they
> feel they need to replace yum, it's been stable and has worked great
> since I've been using Fedora...(from around 13 / 14...) I guess progress
> dictate
17 matches
Mail list logo
