On 03/18/2015 08:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/19/15 09:03, Mickey wrote:
On 03/18/2015 08:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/19/15 08:45, Mickey wrote:
What is the shortcut key for making Firefox not covering the Panel Bar at
bottom ?
FWIW, I don't have this problem since I've got the panel
On 03/19/15 09:03, Mickey wrote:
>
>
> On 03/18/2015 08:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/19/15 08:45, Mickey wrote:
>>> What is the shortcut key for making Firefox not covering the Panel Bar at
>>> bottom ?
>> FWIW, I don't have this problem since I've got the panel settings configured
>> to "Al
On 03/18/2015 05:34 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 03/18/2015 06:26 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/18/2015 10:18 AM, jd1008 wrote:
Not in Joe Zeff's case!!!
To be more specific, there's nothing like that that I'm aware of. Yet.
Perhaps I misread your message???
I haven't had time to follow the suggestio
On 03/18/2015 08:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/19/15 08:45, Mickey wrote:
What is the shortcut key for making Firefox not covering the Panel Bar at
bottom ?
FWIW, I don't have this problem since I've got the panel settings configured to
"Always Visible".
My panel bar is always visiable,
On 03/19/15 08:45, Mickey wrote:
> What is the shortcut key for making Firefox not covering the Panel Bar at
> bottom ?
FWIW, I don't have this problem since I've got the panel settings configured to
"Always Visible".
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mai
What is the shortcut key for making Firefox not covering the Panel Bar
at bottom ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-con
On 03/18/2015 06:26 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/18/2015 10:18 AM, jd1008 wrote:
Not in Joe Zeff's case!!!
To be more specific, there's nothing like that that I'm aware of. Yet.
Perhaps I misread your message???
On 03/16/2015 04:25 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/16/2015 02:29 PM, Matthew Miller
On 03/18/2015 10:18 AM, jd1008 wrote:
Not in Joe Zeff's case!!!
To be more specific, there's nothing like that that I'm aware of. Yet.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedor
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Recently, I "fresh installed" F21 on a Dell i686 Inspiron Laptop.
I had been running F18 on it, and just wanted to jump to the newest release
w/o stepping through F19 and F20. I kept the /home partiti
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Recently, I "fresh installed" F21 on a Dell i686 Inspiron Laptop.
>
> I had been running F18 on it, and just wanted to jump to the newest release
> w/o stepping through F19 and F20. I kept the /home partition, and wiped
> everything else out.
>
Greetings,
Recently, I "fresh installed" F21 on a Dell i686 Inspiron Laptop.
I had been running F18 on it, and just wanted to jump to the newest
release w/o stepping through F19 and F20. I kept the /home partition, and
wiped everything else out.
Xfce and Mate Desktops start and are very fun
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:34 PM, stan wrote:
>
> Here's my Fedora rpmbuild procedure:
>
> I go to koji, the fedora central build repository for package
> maintainers, and download the src.rpm.
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
>
> I use rpm to install it into the ~/rpm
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 17.03.2015, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I don't know what the difference is between not compiling cgroup
>> suppport into the kernel and compiling it in but disabling all
>> controllers but it looks like that your assumption that cgroup support
>> is
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
>
>> An afterthought. I notice that you are compiling the kernel as root. I
>> do my build in the rpmbuild system as a user, so the compile is run as a
>> user. Do you think that would matter?
>
> For the kernel to ge
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:01 AM, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:53:33 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> "CONFIG_CGROUPS (it is OK to disable all controllers)" is listed under
>> "REQUIREMENTS" in the systemd README.
>>
>> I don't know what the difference is between not compiling cgroup
>> suppport
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:19:54 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> 1. Download a kernel tarball from kernel.org
> 2. Unpack it into /usr/src
> 3. Copy .config from the latest Fedora kernel into the kernel toplevel
>sourcedir (it is stored in /boot).
> 4. "make oldconfig"
> 5. "make"
> 6. "make modules_i
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:19:54 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> 1. Download a kernel tarball from kernel.org
> 2. Unpack it into /usr/src
> 3. Copy .config from the latest Fedora kernel into the kernel toplevel
>sourcedir (it is stored in /boot).
> 4. "make oldconfig"
> 5. "make"
> 6. "make modules_i
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Gary Stainburn <
gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk> wrote:
> While looking at my network I've spotted that my laptop is constantly
> sending
> DHCPREQUEST.
>
This looks like some kind of firewall issue. The laptop sends a request,
the server sees it and sends the ack
On 03/18/2015 01:22 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 03/18/2015 05:30 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
For some reason, after LOTS of idle chatter between my F21 SSH client
and the server (I am assuming these are SSH application keep-alives), my
F21 SSH client sends a TCP keep-alive. This is after some
On 03/17/2015 11:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/18/15 12:42, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/17/2015 08:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
2. how to provide useful debugging info - if the user will not test a
non-tainted kernel I see no possible way for an automated system to
know where to file the bug
You ar
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
> Heinz, what does cat /proc/cgroups show?
[htd@chiara ~]$ cat /proc/cgroups
#subsys_namehierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 2 1 1
memory 3 1 1
devices 4 74 1
freezer 5 1 1
net_cls 6 1 1
blkio
On 17.03.2015, Tom H wrote:
> I don't know what the difference is between not compiling cgroup
> suppport into the kernel and compiling it in but disabling all
> controllers but it looks like that your assumption that cgroup support
> isn't required is wrong.
Thanks for pinting this out!
You ar
On 03/18/2015 05:30 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
For some reason, after LOTS of idle chatter between my F21 SSH client
and the server (I am assuming these are SSH application keep-alives), my
F21 SSH client sends a TCP keep-alive. This is after some long time of
the client NOT sending an SSH idle
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
> An afterthought. I notice that you are compiling the kernel as root. I
> do my build in the rpmbuild system as a user, so the compile is run as a
> user. Do you think that would matter?
For the kernel to get properly installed, you have to be root. Precisely, there
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
> Would you be willing to give a recipe that you use?
> i.e. what steps do you perform to do this?
1. Download a kernel tarball from kernel.org
2. Unpack it into /usr/src
3. Copy .config from the latest Fedora kernel into the kernel toplevel
sourcedir (it is stored
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:18 AM, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/17/2015 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Taint is always caused by out of tree kernel modules. If you haven't
>> installed anything that installs kernel modules, most typically that's
>> video drivers, then it could be an MCE in which
On 03/17/2015 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Taint is always caused by out of tree kernel modules. If you haven't
installed anything that installs kernel modules, most typically that's
video drivers, then it could be an MCE in which case that's a legit
Fedora kernel bug to file, but probably als
Based on the symptoms you describe in this email and your earlier ones,
I would most strongly suspect that one of the systems you're using has
an IP address conflict. Use arping on both the client and server to
verify that they are the only device on their respective broadcast
domains to use t
Hi folks,
While looking at my network I've spotted that my laptop is constantly sending
DHCPREQUEST. Everything appears to be working fine, both on my laptop and
elsewhere apart from this. One other client, a Win7 PC appears to have the
same problem, but everything else on the network seems fi
I think I have found what is happening.
The entry in fstab for this device (recognized by label) has the
"user" option. It is mounted using ntfs-3g with fuser, so the binary
is suid to be able to mount as ordinary user.
After mounting, the mount point has the same owner as the user who
mounted the
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:01:35 -0700
stan wrote:
> Heinz, what does cat /proc/cgroups show?
Should have included this in my response:
$ cat /proc/cgroups
#subsys_namehierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 2 1 1
cpu 3 1 1
cpuacct 3 1 1
blkio
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:52:23 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> This is the top output when compiling a kernel with -j8 (4 cores/8
> threads):
>
> top - 18:47:16 up 9:07, 4 users, load average: 1.77, 0.39, 0.13
> Tasks: 263 total, 10 running, 253 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> %Cpu0 : 92.3 us,
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:34:08 +0100
poma wrote:
>
> Borislav, can you help explain the man why this is happening with his
> Piledriver.
> http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Bulldozer/AMD-FX-Series%20FX-6300.html
>
>
> poma
>
Thanks, poma.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:53:33 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Heinz Diehl
> wrote:
> > CFS is not required at all, and so are cgroups. Any kernel with the
> > BFS patch applied will run just fine on Fedora. In fact, most of
> > the time I run a kernel using both BFS and the
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:52:23 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
>
> Directly from source.
>
Would you be willing to give a recipe that you use?
i.e. what steps do you perform to do this?
There is a vanilla source tree included in the fedora src.rpm for the
kernel, so maybe I could use your steps on th
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:52:23 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Lucky? The machine was fully unusable.
Yes, but you have full control of your machine.
> Yes, this machine is on F21.
>
> [htd@chiara ~]$ uname -a
> Linux chiara.fritha.org 3.19.2-rc1-bfq #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 16
> 16:16:07 CET 2015 x86_
For some reason, after LOTS of idle chatter between my F21 SSH client
and the server (I am assuming these are SSH application keep-alives), my
F21 SSH client sends a TCP keep-alive. This is after some long time of
the client NOT sending an SSH idle packet.
As soon as the server receives this
37 matches
Mail list logo
