yum whatprovides libX11.so.6
then yum install it a//
hth, ...
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:14 PM, William Biggs wrote:
> I using a app called quick and easy web builder that is look for
> libX11.so.6 I'm runing the beta I went to rpmfind.net I can not get the
> file installed . Dose any one kno
I using a app called quick and easy web builder that is look for
libX11.so.6 I'm runing the beta I went to rpmfind.net I can not get the
file installed . Dose any one know how to get it
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://adm
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 19:40:01 -0500,
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want to rely on their box for firewall rules, so I want to put
my own box behind theirs. But can't very well route to an internal
firewall a /28 v4 block. I would have to run a briding firewall.
Anyone know of bridgi
On 12/04/14 10:33, William Biggs wrote:
> If I install the beta of 21 and when the final release come out Do I need to
> reinstall it or just let it keep updating it ?
After release run "yum distro-sync" and then just let it keep updating.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly o
If I install the beta of 21 and when the final release come out Do I
need to reinstall it or just let it keep updating it ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Cond
Comcast has a business offering with '13' static IPv4 addresses. But if
you get this, you MUST use their router.
They will soon also be providing a /54 IPv6 static allocation along side
this.
I don't want to rely on their box for firewall rules, so I want to put
my own box behind theirs. Bu
New hardware is always trouble. As newer kernels catch up to the
hardware, your experience in Linux will improve.
--
Steven Rosenberg
http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog
http://blogs.dailynews.com/click
stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com
ste...@stevenrosenberg.net
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Joe Zeff w
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 23:41:01 poma wrote:
> Fedora 21 ain't released yet, so you and others, please stop
> spamming this list for nothing.
Thank you. I helped to put this together many years ago ...
www.spamcop.net
--
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
On 12/03/2014 05:41 PM, poma wrote:
On 03.12.2014 13:02, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took
a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
fedup --network 21 --
instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.or
On 03.12.2014 13:02, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
>> I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took
>> a while - it was completely painless!
>
> I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
>
> fedup --network 21 --
> instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/devel
On 12/03/2014 02:52 PM, Peter Reed wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:39:07 -0700
jd1008 wrote:
fc20.
using vlc, or wget or smplayer, how
do I download a stream which the FF plugin downloadhelper says
is made of many files, each one of which has the extension .f4f
When I download the .f4f files,
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:39:07 -0700
jd1008 wrote:
> fc20.
> using vlc, or wget or smplayer, how
> do I download a stream which the FF plugin downloadhelper says
> is made of many files, each one of which has the extension .f4f
>
> When I download the .f4f files, they are not playable by any media
On 12/03/2014 06:15 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
Looking a bit desperate.
package-cleanup --dupes | grep fc20 >dupes.txt
Then, remove them one by one with yum or, if it won't cooperate, rpm.
BTDT and it will take a lot of time, but if you're patient, you'll get
things cleaned up enough that -
On 12/03/2014 05:22 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
Can't go wrong with a "standard"
Celeron machine, right? ;-)
That depends on whether or not you care that the Celeron processors come
from the bottom of the barrel and just barely get past quality control.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
fc20.
using vlc, or wget or smplayer, how
do I download a stream which the FF plugin downloadhelper says
is made of many files, each one of which has the extension .f4f
When I download the .f4f files, they are not playable by any media player.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/03/2014 10:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:08 +, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it
took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
fedup --network 21 --
instrep
Hi
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Mickey wrote:
> How can I send pictures by fpaste.org
You can't. It is meant to handle only text content. There are dozens of
temporary image hosting sites available however.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On 03.12.2014 17:03, Mickey wrote:
> How can I send pictures by fpaste.org
>
Noway,
http://fpaste.org/doc/about
Powered by Sticky Notes
http://sayakb.github.io/sticky-notes/pages/home
A powerful open-source pastebin application for effortless *code* sharing.
You can use
http://picpaste.com
and
How can I send pictures by fpaste.org
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wik
On 28 November 2014 at 20:34, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
wrote:
> How can I set LC_TIME=en_DK.UTF-8 for all users, to get a sensible ISO
> date format in most programs?
>
> Setting /etc/locale.conf doesn't help:
>
> [mjc@xena ~]$ more /etc/locale.conf
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_TIME=en_DK.UTF-8
>
> Af
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:08 +, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> > > I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it
> > > took a while - it was completely painless!
> >
> > I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
> >
> > fedup --network 21 --
> > instrepo=http://dl.fedorapr
On 12/02/2014 10:54 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a
while - it was completely painless!
Considering that Final RC4 came out this morning, I will continue to
beta test and not update my production notebook for another w
On 12/03/14 22:15, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:58:11 Ed Greshko wrote:
>> package-cleanup --cleandupes
> I've tried that. Also tried...
>
> package-cleanup --cleandupes --skip-broken
>
> .. And it says ...
>
> --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
> S
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:58:11 Ed Greshko wrote:
> package-cleanup --cleandupes
I've tried that. Also tried...
package-cleanup --cleandupes --skip-broken
.. And it says ...
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
Skip-broken could not solve problems
Error: Depsolving loop
On 12/03/14 21:47, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:22:29 Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment. I don't
>> think they have their act fully together at this time.
> Disabled those and it says...
>
> Skip-broken could not solve problems
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:22:29 Ed Greshko wrote:
> Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment. I don't
> think they have their act fully together at this time.
Disabled those and it says...
Skip-broken could not solve problems
Error: Package: mpv-0.3.11-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusi
On 12/03/14 21:01, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> And it says .
>
>
> Skip-broken could not solve problems
> Error: Package: ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64
> (@/ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64/20)
>Requires: libswresample.so.0(LIBSWRESAMPLE_0)(64bit)
>Re
Hi there,
In need of a cheap and very portable notebook, but able to run a few
VMs, i got a HP Pavillion11 x360. Can't go wrong with a "standard"
Celeron machine, right? ;-) Hope anyone else has tried that machine and
can give me hints. If not, I'll start digging to try to provide useful
bug repor
> > I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it
> > took a while - it was completely painless!
>
> I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
>
> fedup --network 21 --
> instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21
> /x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skip
On 12/03/14 20:02, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
>> I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took
>> a while - it was completely painless!
> I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
>
> fedup --network 21 --
> instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development
> I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took
> a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation
fedup --network 21 --
instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/
--nogpgcheck --skipbroken
And it s
31 matches
Mail list logo
