On 13.11.2014 22:04, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 11/13/2014 10:40 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 13.11.2014 19:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2014 12:44 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:51 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> No error_log, only an access_log
Turn on verb
On 11/10/2014 09:02 AM, Mickey wrote:
On 11/09/2014 11:05 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Mickey wrote:
F20/KDE
Trying to determine what package provides /Settings/System
Settings/Display and Monitor ?
kscreen
-- Rex
Rex, thanks for your reply, I was thinking that kscreen was part of a
workspace
On 11/13/2014 08:05 PM, Keith wrote:
[posted to Community support for Fedora users
& emailed]
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:53:57 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed it with wine?
Safari for windows is abandon ware.
Maybe so,
but that is not what I asked about :)
--
users mai
[posted to Community support for Fedora users
& emailed]
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:53:57 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed it with wine?
Safari for windows is abandon ware.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
The drive is failing. Reallocated sectors is so high that they're are almost no
reserve sectors remaining at which point any additional bad sectors well result
in write failure. So in any case it needs to be replaced.
The array it's in is an Intel firmware RAID, sometimes annoyingly called "fake
Bill Davidsen wrote:
David A. De Graaf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:19:55PM -0400, David A. De Graaf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 04:01:30AM +0930, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 02 October 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
Cables are often the source of weird problems. Specifically it's the
David A. De Graaf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:19:55PM -0400, David A. De Graaf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 04:01:30AM +0930, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 02 October 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
Cables are often the source of weird problems. Specifically it's the
connectors that are f
Hi all, I'm having some issues. I'm a little confused, so I was checking
our servers today and saw something strange. cat /proc/mdstat shows that
1 device md0 is inactive. I'm not really sure why. I did a bit more
digging and testing using smartctl and it says that the device /dev/sdg
(part of
On 11/13/2014 10:40 AM, poma wrote:
On 13.11.2014 19:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/13/2014 12:44 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:51 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
No error_log, only an access_log
Turn on verbose logging:
su -c 'cupsctl --debug-logging'
Nope. Still no err
On 11/14/14 04:18, dustin kempter wrote:
You have hijacked thread
Please see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Starting_a_New_Subject
Resubmit you Q in the proper manner, please.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing li
On 13.11.2014 19:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 11/13/2014 12:44 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:51 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> No error_log, only an access_log
>> Turn on verbose logging:
>>
>> su -c 'cupsctl --debug-logging'
>
> Nope. Still no error_log.
>
> In acc
On 13.11.2014 21:18, dustin kempter wrote:
> Hi all, I'm having some issues. I'm a little confused, so I was checking
> our servers today and saw something strange. cat /proc/mdstat shows that
> 1 device md0 is inactive. I'm not really sure why. id did a bit more
> digging and testing using smar
Hi all, I'm having some issues. I'm a little confused, so I was checking
our servers today and saw something strange. cat /proc/mdstat shows that
1 device md0 is inactive. I'm not really sure why. id did a bit more
digging and testing using smartctl and it says that the device /dev/sdg
(part of
On 11/13/2014 12:44 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:51 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
No error_log, only an access_log
Turn on verbose logging:
su -c 'cupsctl --debug-logging'
Nope. Still no error_log.
In access_log I see:
localhost - - [13/Nov/2014:13:23:49 -0500] "POST /p
On 11/13/2014 02:23 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 11/13/2014 04:52 AM, Timothy Redmond wrote:
I have a Thinkpad W520 computer (4270CTO) and I am running Fedora 20 and
keeping its packages up to date. Often when I am working the cpu frequency
transitions beautifully and the computer is very res
Am 12.11.2014 um 19:53 schrieb jd1008:
Has anyone successfully installed it with wine?
Wine application db:
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=20398
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:51 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> No error_log, only an access_log
Turn on verbose logging:
su -c 'cupsctl --debug-logging'
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 11/13/2014 04:52 AM, Timothy Redmond wrote:
>
> I have a Thinkpad W520 computer (4270CTO) and I am running Fedora 20 and
> keeping its packages up to date. Often when I am working the cpu frequency
> transitions beautifully and the computer is very responsive. I have run some
> programs tha
On 11/12/2014 11:40 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:13 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Now why the 'Filter failed'? what 'simple' command line printing tools
should I test with?
The /var/log/cups/error_log file should tell you what went wrong.
No error_log, only an access_log
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 23:13 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Now why the 'Filter failed'? what 'simple' command line printing tools
> should I test with?
The /var/log/cups/error_log file should tell you what went wrong.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
On 11/12/2014 10:47 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 12:54 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It is TerminalRoom-8610 that only shows in the web interface.
That one isn't marked as 'shared', so remote views of the server won't
see it.
AH, that was the only difference I could see in the
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 12:54 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> It is TerminalRoom-8610 that only shows in the web interface.
That one isn't marked as 'shared', so remote views of the server won't
see it.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
users mailing
22 matches
Mail list logo