Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Angelo Moreschini
I installed dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm !!! All was good . You had very much patience wit me Thank you very much [?] Regards Angelo On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:45:14 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > > No matter what is the

Re: dracut/grubby fails to update grub.cfg

2014-10-15 Thread Stefan Huchler
here some infos dnf reinstall kernel -v http://ix.io/eMK and my rootfs/home (btrfs) mounts: /dev/sda on / type btrfs (rw,noatime,compress=lzo,ssd,discard,space_cache) /dev/sda on /home type btrfs (rw,noatime,compress=lzo,ssd,discard,space_cache) I don't know how to debug that further or where

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:45:14 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > No matter what is the file to install... > *This is a problem of dependencies.* ??? > I found the file that can be good: dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm yum install dconf-editor -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: yum failure.

2014-10-15 Thread Alchemist
2014-10-15 23:31 GMT+03:00 William : > I have F20 on a 64-bit system. I'm a home user with no sysadmin training >> and no real sysadmin experience. I tried to do my weekly patches, and got >> this: >> >> bash.6[~]: yum update >> error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/process 2156/140591811774272 failed: B

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Angelo Moreschini
Hi Michel No matter what is the file to install... *This is a problem of dependencies.* I found the file that can be good: dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm So: as the old file (dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rmp) was not installed... I think that now I can try to install the new one:

Re: yum failure.

2014-10-15 Thread William
I have F20 on a 64-bit system. I'm a home user with no sysadmin training and no real sysadmin experience. I tried to do my weekly patches, and got this: bash.6[~]: yum update error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/process 2156/140591811774272 failed: BDB1507 Thread died in Berkeley DB library error: d

Re: yum failure.

2014-10-15 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:48:51 -0400 William wrote: > Good afternoon, > > I have F20 on a 64-bit system. I'm a home user with no sysadmin > training and no real sysadmin experience. I tried to do my weekly > patches, and got this: > > bash.6[~]: yum update > error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/proce

Re: yum failure.

2014-10-15 Thread Alchemist
2014-10-15 21:48 GMT+03:00 William : > Good afternoon, > > I have F20 on a 64-bit system. I'm a home user with no sysadmin training > and no real sysadmin experience. I tried to do my weekly patches, and got > this: > > bash.6[~]: yum update > error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/process 2156/1405918117

yum failure.

2014-10-15 Thread William
Good afternoon, I have F20 on a 64-bit system. I'm a home user with no sysadmin training and no real sysadmin experience. I tried to do my weekly patches, and got this: bash.6[~]: yum update error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/process 2156/140591811774272 failed: BDB1507 Thread died in Berkeley D

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 15.10.2014 18:08, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:46:57 +0200 poma wrote: > >> On 15.10.2014 17:11, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:49:16 +0200 poma wrote: >>> On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma > wr

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:19:34 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > dconf-Edit don't is installed because the environment (the dependencies) is > older than he wont. It is the opposite. The package you want to install is _older_ than what is included with Fedora 20. Watch this: $ rpmdev-vercmp 0.

Re: Latest updates for mate no longer remember what gui apps were running in previous login.

2014-10-15 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 14 October 2014, jd1008 sent: > Speaking of windows, which so many of my firnds and acquaintances use, > I find myself always in demand to properly disinfect them so they can > get back to doing whatever it is they do with it. I got out that some time ago, by repeatedly lett

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:46:57 +0200 poma wrote: > On 15.10.2014 17:11, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:49:16 +0200 poma wrote: > > > >> On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma > >>> wrote: > >>> > On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 15.10.2014 17:11, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:49:16 +0200 poma wrote: > >> On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma wrote: >>> On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma > wr

Re: F21: Changed behaviour of the "top" command

2014-10-15 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/15/14 18:44, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 17:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 10/15/14 17:56, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 10/15/14 16:32, Joachim Backes wrote: Maybe, the free memory part is marked by the red part of the bar, and the orange part signals the used

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Angelo Moreschini
Hi Michael, at the begin I thank you for your patience... I don't understand always well all of what you say. This because I am new in this environment. Now you put the focus on side of the problem that I think to understand: dconf-Edit don't is installed because the environment (the depende

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:49:16 +0200 poma wrote: > On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma wrote: > > > >> On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma > >>> wrote: > >>> > On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma wrote: > >> On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma wrote: >>> On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi. > > I have the following messages upon

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi. > > I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my dmesg > also): > > .. > [9.049204] systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+21 from PID 313 (plymouthd). > [9.076954] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3 > [9.07

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:48:57 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:35:50 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my dmesg > > also): > > > > Which one are you interested in? You refer to "messages", whic

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma wrote: > On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma wrote: > > > >> On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my > >>> dmes

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:22:49 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > >No, I refer to your 3rd message in this thread, where you wrote: > > OK you wont know what happened when I installed the new dconf-Editor > This is the complete output that I got then : Sigh. Slow down, please. Read the repl

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Angelo Moreschini
>No, I refer to your 3rd message in this thread, where you wrote: OK you wont know what happened when I installed the new dconf-Editor This is the complete output that I got then : -- [angelo_dev@zorro Downloads]$ sudo yum install dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 15.10.2014 12:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:35:50 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my dmesg >> also): >> > > Which one are you interested in? You refer to "messages", which is plural. > >>

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:35:50 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi. > > I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my dmesg > also): > Which one are you interested in? You refer to "messages", which is plural. > .. > [9.049204] systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+21 from P

Re: F21: Changed behaviour of the "top" command

2014-10-15 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 17:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/15/14 17:56, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 10/15/14 16:32, Joachim Backes wrote: > >> Maybe, the free memory part is marked by the red part of the bar, and > >> the orange part signals the used part of the memory? > > Actually, if you do "man

Re: what does this error message mean?

2014-10-15 Thread poma
On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma wrote: > >> On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my dmesg >>> also): >>> >>> .. >>> [9.049204] systemd[1]: Received S

Re: F21: Changed behaviour of the "top" command

2014-10-15 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/15/14 17:56, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/15/14 16:32, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Maybe, the free memory part is marked by the red part of the bar, and >> the orange part signals the used part of the memory? > Actually, if you do "man top" it has all the information. Just don't > have time t

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:23:03 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I installed fedora 20 not long ago, and now I'm customizing the > installation by adding programs not included by default in the installation. Just don't download programs from arbitrary web sites. Prefer sticking to official package

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

2014-10-15 Thread Angelo Moreschini
Hi Michel, > The problem is that nobody on this list does _know_ what exactly you've > done since you only mentioned troubles installing the _old_ dconf-editor > version you had downloaded somewhere. I installed fedora 20 not long ago, and now I'm customizing the installation by adding programs