On 04/27/14 09:02, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Just as a side issue to this, how do you get chrome to provide what you
> have shown?
> I know chrome has flash built in, and the adobe installer installs the
> plugin in /usr/lib64, plus I have a link to the adobe plugin in /usr/lib
> because t
On 04/26/2014 04:35 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Depending on what you don't like about current Fedoras, you might try
out the XFCE or Mate desktops. They provide an experience similar to
Gnome 2. If you have an old graphics card, you will want to use kdm or
lxdm instead of gdm.
If you pick Xfce
Hi Zeff,
You are right your method will work as long as the destination
location in local folders is empty as you are overwriting those files
when you do your copy.
The method I was suggesting was to get the second set of emails to
be listed as an inbox as I thought they were on the ori
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 22:19:47 +0200,
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
I'm not SSL/TLS guru and I'm not in-deep study heartbeat OpenSSL bug
(mainly because I consider Fedora 15+ as too problematic and stay at
F14 with eventual migration to CentOS 6 on my servers, thus they aren't
affected with this
On 04/27/14 05:57, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 04/26/2014 04:41 PM, Mickey wrote:
>> Fedora-20 / Chrome-34.0.1847.132/ FlashPlayer-11.2.202.350
>>
>> How do I get FlashPlayer working in Chrome, I went into settings and
>> imported Firefox setting,bookmarks,etc, Firefox is working fine with
>> Flashpl
On 04/26/2014 04:41 PM, Mickey wrote:
> Fedora-20 / Chrome-34.0.1847.132/ FlashPlayer-11.2.202.350
>
> How do I get FlashPlayer working in Chrome, I went into settings and
> imported Firefox setting,bookmarks,etc, Firefox is working fine with
> Flashplayer.
>
>
As far as I can tell, flash playe
Fedora-20 / Chrome-34.0.1847.132/ FlashPlayer-11.2.202.350
How do I get FlashPlayer working in Chrome, I went into settings and
imported Firefox setting,bookmarks,etc, Firefox is working fine with
Flashplayer.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subs
On 4/26/2014 1:19 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
I consider Fedora 15+ as too problematic and stay at
F14
yup...fedora version 19 or 20 bugs are far worse than a computer
security breach.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
Ian Malone wrote:
> On 26 April 2014 03:38, Tim wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 23:26 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> millions and millions of affected users who had to go ahead and change
>>> passwords for many many things they rely on
>>
>> One thing I haven't seen mentioned, here nor elsewhere
On 26 April 2014 03:38, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 23:26 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> millions and millions of affected users who had to go ahead and change
>> passwords for many many things they rely on
>
> One thing I haven't seen mentioned, here nor elsewhere, was whether the
> bug c
On 26.04.2014, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> That's not true. Swap will come into play and unreferenced data in
> the /tmp files will be paged out in favor of claiming that memory for
> other uses.
Did you actually try?
[htd@kiera ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/bigfile bs=1M count=3000
dd: error w
11 matches
Mail list logo
