Quite often I can see in TOP /usr/libexec/we action. Has anybody any
idea, what this might be and what makes it running? If I look into
/usr/libexec I can't find "we" from there.
Jarmo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin
even my laptop is affected, I have no idea where to look, I am not so
expert.Shall we file a bug against plymouth?
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F20 (Heisenbug)
on Fujitsu Lifebook A512
http://lugsaronno.altervista.org
http://www.campingmonterosa.com
--
users mailing list
users
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:36 +1000, Roger wrote:
> It happened. It was known for years.
>
> RE: request for citation.
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/institutional-failure-led-to-nsa-missing-the-heartbleed-flaw-728366/
>
>
> It's not outside the bounds of reason to suggest that the NSA, arguably
It happened. It was known for years.
RE: request for citation.
http://www.zdnet.com/institutional-failure-led-to-nsa-missing-the-heartbleed-flaw-728366/
It's not outside the bounds of reason to suggest that the NSA, arguably,
should have found the bug within days, weeks, or even months
Quoting Suvayu Ali :
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:38:11AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:15:04 -0400 Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > Roger wrote:
> >
> > > It happened. It was known for years.
> >
> > Everything I
Hello,
Are the FC20 yum repos down? I keep getting errors that they're
unavailable when attempting to update.
Thanks.
Dave.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Con
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:29:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/12/14 19:12, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > 3 months ago, I submitted a bug: 1055054
The ticket has been opened by me in response to you only writing about
such issues on the mailing-list.
> > Since that time I contacted Michael Schwendt, b
On Apr 13, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Richard England wrote:
>
> Curious, since the -w command-line option is suppose to cause warning
> messages to be displayed indicating questionable Perl code
Yes, quite curious, and were it me I would not consider that a solution. I
would run strace on it to fin
On 02/09/14 19:19, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Everyone,
I have created a new F20 install on a Toshiba laptop this afternoon, and
everything has gone well until I tried to set the laptop up for our
system with some perl scripts.
Some of the perl scripts worked fine, but one script would not activate
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 17:12 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 15:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 12:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 15:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 12:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arthur De
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 15:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 12:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> >
> > This means that I get get system mail for root (m
> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:48:23 +0200
> From: fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Serious OpenSSL vulnerability
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:38:11AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:15:04 -0400 Rahul Sundaram
> > wrote:
> >
> >
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:48:23 +0200 Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:38:11AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:15:04 -0400 Rahul Sundaram
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > > Roger wro
Suvayu Ali writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:38:11AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:15:04 -0400 Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >
> > > Roger wrote:
> > >
> > > > It happened. It was known for years.
>
Hi
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
>
> So, a valgrind -tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes
> --track-fds=yes --track-origins=yes would not have helped?
>
Correct. GCC -fstack-protecter-all might help. Also valgrind runs are
costly so a lot of people do
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:38:11AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:15:04 -0400 Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >
> > > Roger wrote:
> > >
> > > > It happened. It was known for years.
> > >
> > > Everythi
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 12:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > >
> > > Can anybody help me achieve what I want - either avoid the need for an
> > > MTA altogether, or configure
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:15:04 -0400 Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > Roger wrote:
> >
> > > It happened. It was known for years.
> >
> > Everything I have seen says it has been known for about 1 week.
> >
> > Incidentally, I am no pro
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 12:43 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> >
> > Can anybody help me achieve what I want - either avoid the need for an
> > MTA altogether, or configure a simple MTA to process internal mail
> > internally?
>
> If you are
Hi
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Roger wrote:
>
> > It happened. It was known for years.
>
> Everything I have seen says it has been known for about 1 week.
>
> Incidentally, I am no programmer but I would have thought
> it would be relatively simple to set up a test
>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
>
> Can anybody help me achieve what I want - either avoid the need for an
> MTA altogether, or configure a simple MTA to process internal mail
> internally?
If you are not sending emails over the internet, no configuration is
required.
Roger wrote:
> It happened. It was known for years.
Everything I have seen says it has been known for about 1 week.
Incidentally, I am no programmer but I would have thought
it would be relatively simple to set up a test
to see if a "malloc"-ed space could be transgressed.
--
Timothy Murphy
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 09:24 +1000, Roger wrote:
> It was known for years.
Your references?
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 17:42 +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 04:47pm on Thursday, April 10, 2014 (UK time), Arthur Dent wrote:
>
> > OK - So if just do "yum install sendmail" will everything work as
> > before? Or will I have to spend a fortune on coffee and pizzas as I sit
> > up night after n
25 matches
Mail list logo