I played around pressing and and the screen stopped
reporting booting info, and all of a sudden I am looking that the gnome
login.
So I am logged in. But maybe I stopped something from loading with
those keystrokes and things are still not right? Here is the end of the
journal:
# journa
Sending this via squirrel mail from another computer. My mine notebook
won't boot.
I came out of suspend this evening, and gnome was confused. So I first
did a yum update, thus getting everything through last night including a
new kernel.
I rebooted and the system gets a good ways through the b
It happened. It was known for years. It is fixed.
Job done
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://f
Just goes to show that no matter how hard you try not to offend, if
someone wants to be offended badly enough, he or she can manage it.
To quote Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story, he is looking at Woody and says
"You are a sad little man"
Funny how that "sad" needed no explanation and elicited no r
I would love to see that show again!.I.wonder if its possible to find it on
some stations out in the U.S. Midwest!
- Reply message -
From: "Mark Haney"
To:
Subject: OT meaning of sad [was: Serious OpenSSL vulnerability]
Date: Fri, Apr 11, 2014 11:21 am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME
I too think this is definitely somethi.g that is NECESSARY! I look forward to
anything regarding Fedora ...
- Reply message -
From: "Beartooth"
To:
Subject: Five Things in Fedora This Week (2014-04-01)
Date: Sat, Apr 12, 2014 1:13 pm
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:46:58 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrot
HI
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> . And, their attitude toward third-party extensions to Gnome 3 back when
> it first came out, did nothing to change my mind: it took quite a while, as
> I recall, before they were willing to make the slightest effort to avoid
> breaking them
On 04/12/2014 10:34 AM, Beartooth wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:08:12 +0200, lee wrote:
>Joe Zeff writes:
>It has been established that it is irrelevant what users think. []
Where? How? (if that's not sarcasm)
I'm not sure at this point, but I presume that I was referring to G
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:08:12 +0200, lee wrote:
> Joe Zeff writes:
> It has been established that it is irrelevant what users think. []
Where? How? (if that's not sarcasm)
There were long discussions in the Nineties on various lists
(particularly ones hosted at RedHat, pred
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:46:58 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:12:16PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
[]
>> This is the third installment of this series, and I'm still calibrating
>> a few things. I'm aiming at a wide audience, but I'm not quite sure how
>> much expla
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:04:00 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Reiterating doesn't help much when people jump to conclusions rather
> than read through the details which are widely available online but in
> any case, the compatibility layer is primary designed for running X apps that
> haven't migrat
Hi,
This is cross-posted at the forum which I found before I found the
mailing list:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/44983/mod_sslso-undefined-symbol-unixd_config/
(My luck has generally been better with mailing lists.)
This is a fresh Fedora 20 installation. I have not (yet) added any
On 04/12/14 19:12, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> 3 months ago, I submitted a bug: 1055054
> Since that time I contacted Michael Schwendt, but I cannot fix it.
> So, what is next?
> I cannot upgrade my other computers to fedora 20 without this bug fixed.
> Is there an alternative to this package?
One thin
Hello,
3 months ago, I submitted a bug: 1055054
Since that time I contacted Michael Schwendt, but I cannot fix it.
So, what is next?
I cannot upgrade my other computers to fedora 20 without this bug fixed.
Is there an alternative to this package?
Thank.
==
14 matches
Mail list logo