On 01/06/2014 07:37 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
It's obviously a matter of opinion, not fact, as evidenced by the lack of
universal agreement by fairly reasonable people. I think email is such amazing
piles of steaming poo that my happiness is inversely proportional to the
number/rate of emails I'
On Jan 5, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> In this light, replacing "mail" as notification mechanism is a substantial
> functional regression in generality of deployment.
It's obviously a matter of opinion, not fact, as evidenced by the lack of
universal agreement by fairly reasonabl
On 1-5-14 12:00:37 Steve Snyder wrote:
> How can I ensure that in Fedora 20 my wireless interface is *only*
> used for VPN traffic?
>
> After the initial connection to the access point I want to guarantee
> that no traffic passes through the interface other than through the
> OpenVPN tunnel.
You w
On 01/05/2014 11:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 5, 2014, at 2:31 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
No. IMO, this is just a defect of RH/Fedora based and other Linux distros. They
have not been able to provide a proper, out-of-the-box configuration.
If they had done so, everybody was using it.
On 05Jan2014 22:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:43:54 +1100
> Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> > Your call, but curious to know why you're setting it for all users
> > instead of just yourself.
>
> Everone
Yes I know. I was wondering why.
--
Cameron Simpson
It's my subconscious, t
On 01/05/2014 10:01 AM, JUSTIN TAYLOR wrote:
Sorry about leaving off the subject... I had a brain fart I guess.
So F17 doesn't support fedup huh? A little odd since yum installed it
for me. But no matter, I'll download an F18 ISO when I get the chance.
Thank you very much!
--
Isaac Cortés González wrote:
> Ok here's my problem: I'm trying to learn (Common) Lisp, so I installed
> GCL, to compile or run the scripts that I'm making for practice; but I'm
> having problems to run GCL itself, each time I try to run it it get killed
> and I get an alert of SELinux, I try to s
Hello,
I have been having a somewhat unusual problem after waking up from
hibernate with the Cisco VPN client. This only happens with F20 -- it
was fine till F19.
Here is what happens: I switch on the Cisco vpnui using:
/opt/cisco/anyconnect/bin/vpnui
The window to connect comes on and vanishe
On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:35:12 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
...
> I yearn for the days of /etc/rc.d. If something strange was going on duri
> ng system boot, a carefully crafted grep inevitably digs up a bunch of scrip
> ts to sift through for the answers.
>
> Now, there's all kinds of flotsam all
On Jan 5, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> I have a machine with a dual-boot setup with Windows 7 Pro and Fedora
> 20. I wonder if it is possible these days to run the Win7 installation
> in a virtual machine using the raw disk and still be able to boot it on
> the bare metal when ne
I have a machine with a dual-boot setup with Windows 7 Pro and Fedora
20. I wonder if it is possible these days to run the Win7 installation
in a virtual machine using the raw disk and still be able to boot it on
the bare metal when necessary. THe hardware is a Dell Latitude E6430
laptop, in case
On Jan 5, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 01/05/2014 03:00 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
>> On 01/05/2014 02:42 PM, David Shwatrz wrote:
>>> Is it OK to remove dnf with yum remove dnf ? will it cause any problems ?
>>
>> If you upgrade from F19 to F20 dnf will not be installed, so
On Jan 5, 2014, at 2:31 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
> No. IMO, this is just a defect of RH/Fedora based and other Linux distros.
> They have not been able to provide a proper, out-of-the-box configuration.
>
> If they had done so, everybody was using it.
So this long running defect is just *
Fixed by adding "fips = no" to the stunnel config file. I don't remember
what version was of stunnel I had before but apparently 4.56 enables it by
default.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:01 PM, slamp slamp wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Anyone able to use stunnel successfully in Fedora 20? It has been work
On 01/05/2014 03:00 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
> On 01/05/2014 02:42 PM, David Shwatrz wrote:
>> Is it OK to remove dnf with yum remove dnf ? will it cause any problems ?
>
> If you upgrade from F19 to F20 dnf will not be installed, so I see no harm in
> removing it from F20.
>
> yum is the m
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:43:54 +1100
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Your call, but curious to know why you're setting it for all users
> instead of just yourself.
>
> Cheers,
Everone
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change su
On 01/06/14 06:03, Rafnews wrote:
> Sorry i forgot the link for that info...here it is: http://prntscr.com/2gujs4
> i wonder if i can reinstall the VMWare tools under to text console ...
I would consult the documentation for VMware as well as the support their
support groups.
You may also want
On 05.01.2014 14:17, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/05/14 20:45, Rafnews wrote:
On 05.01.2014 02:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:09:56 +0100
Rafnews wrote:
i replace the rhgb quiet by nomodeset and all the booting steps were
displayed.
and the virtual machine shutdown automatically
Hello All,
Anyone able to use stunnel successfully in Fedora 20? It has been working
for me for awhile prior to upgrading.
Stunnel starts up fine, but as soon as it is used, it crashes but no
indication as to why.
I really only use stunnel to interface my sendmail with my ISP, if there is
a simp
On 05Jan2014 10:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 08:40:59 +1100
> Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > Just overwrite it, or programs will be trying to use directories named
> > "/tmp:/var/tmp" or the like.
>
> Took your advise,
> /etc/profile.d/my_profile
> put what I need in there.
Your cal
Ok here's my problem: I'm trying to learn (Common) Lisp, so I installed
GCL, to compile or run the scripts that I'm making for practice; but I'm
having problems to run GCL itself, each time I try to run it it get killed
and I get an alert of SELinux, I try to solved by one of the solutions that
it
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 01:45:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Restricting the context to just Fedora, by default it is a desktop OS with
> a GUI. That's the default install from live desktop, DVD ISO, and netinst
> media. That is the primary Fedora deliverable and experience. It is simply
Well,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:54:28PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> I saw here:
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-January/024231.html
> this suggestion:
> mask the rule: ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules
> But I do not have /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-na
How can I ensure that in Fedora 20 my wireless interface is *only* used
for VPN traffic?
After the initial connection to the access point I want to guarantee
that no traffic passes through the interface other than through the
OpenVPN tunnel.
Ideally, I'd like to be able to ensure this from a
On Jan 5, 2014 9:21 AM, "bruce" wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> As a test, I want to have a complete remote/unattended install process
> for a box.
>
> The steps I'd like to have are:
>
> 1) ssh into the box, do a reboot.
> 2) the reboot process invokes an install process that installs the
> OS on the box
Hi.
As a test, I want to have a complete remote/unattended install process
for a box.
The steps I'd like to have are:
1) ssh into the box, do a reboot.
2) the reboot process invokes an install process that installs the
OS on the box
3) the install process uses http, to get the external iso/
I've installed Fedora 20 on a new desktop PC. I installed it from the
Live DVD and have been installing other packages as and when I notice
they are missing.
But one thing has been really bugging me. Gnome isn't prompting me for
my ssh key passphrase when I ssh to another machine. Instead I get a
I've had my laptop set up for dual boot between Fedora and Windows 7
for a couple of years. Everything has worked fine.
I updated from Fedora 19 to Fedora 20 using fedup recently. After
that, I was still able to boot into Windows when I wanted to.
But in the last couple of days, I've noticed that
Sorry about leaving off the subject... I had a brain fart I guess.
So F17 doesn't support fedup huh? A little odd since yum installed it for me.
But no matter, I'll download an F18 ISO when I get the chance.
Thank you very much!
From: Frank Murphy
To
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:22:35 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
> You can't use fedup to go from F17 --> F20 in one go.
> You would need to go to F18 first then maybe F20
>
Actually fedup want' available for F17, preupgrade was the method.
fedup was fro F18+
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:51:12 -0800 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/04/2014 09:56 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > sudo yum provides */10x20\*
>
> I presume that you meant to type \*10x20\*
No. The first */ is to ensure all paths. Though I guess I could have
also used
sudo yum provides */\*10x20\*
Many th
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 06:16:11 -0800 (PST)
JUSTIN TAYLOR wrote:
> I'm currently running Fedora 17, and I tried to use "fedup" to
> upgrade to 20. My PC has three HDD's. One has the OS, one has the
> swap partition and home dir's, and the last doesn't have a Linux
> partition.
>
>
You can't use fe
I'm currently running Fedora 17, and I tried to use "fedup" to upgrade to 20.
My PC has three HDD's. One has the OS, one has the swap partition and home
dir's, and the last doesn't have a Linux partition.
After running fedup and restarting, GRUB comes up with the default option of
"System Upg
On 01/05/2014 02:42 PM, David Shwatrz wrote:
Hello,
I have F20 with both yum and dnf.
Is it OK to remove dnf with yum remove dnf ?
Yes, from yum's and rpm's perspective, dnf is just an arbitrary package
like any other.
will it cause any problems ?
Except that removing dnf doesn't cleanup its
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 15:42:02 +0200
David Shwatrz wrote:
> Is it OK to remove dnf with yum remove dnf ? will it cause any
> problems ?
>
> regards.
> David
No, though you can safely keep both installed.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/05/2014 02:42 PM, David Shwatrz wrote:
Is it OK to remove dnf with yum remove dnf ? will it cause any problems ?
If you upgrade from F19 to F20 dnf will not be installed, so I see no
harm in removing it from F20.
yum is the main tool to use, dnf is installed to be tested.
Lars
--
Lars
Hello,
I have F20 with both yum and dnf.
Is it OK to remove dnf with yum remove dnf ? will it cause any problems ?
regards.
David
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code
On 01/05/14 20:45, Rafnews wrote:
> On 05.01.2014 02:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:09:56 +0100
>> Rafnews wrote:
>>> i replace the rhgb quiet by nomodeset and all the booting steps were
>>> displayed.
>>> and the virtual machine shutdown automatically :(
>>>
>>> the second t
On 05.01.2014 02:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:09:56 +0100
Rafnews wrote:
i replace the rhgb quiet by nomodeset and all the booting steps were
displayed.
and the virtual machine shutdown automatically :(
the second time i changed the rhgb quiet by nomodeset i got the
follow
Have the following as I want anacron to do the buisness
#!/bin/bash
# Bleachbit as user
USER=user
/usr/bin/bleachbit --preset -c
But is still wants to clobber root jetsam
I'd prefer not to do user crontab -e
//* being fussy on a wet Sunday
* morning.
*/
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
On 04/01/14 10:16, William Biggs wrote:
I would like to know witch one would you use and why gnome 3 or kde ?
If I had to choose only between the two, it would be KDE. I find 'Gnome
3' practically unusable. For me though, I'm a cinnamon desktop convert.
--
Ian Chapman.
--
users mailing list
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 08:40:59 +1100
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Just overwrite it, or programs will be trying to use directories named
> "/tmp:/var/tmp" or the like.
Took your advise,
/etc/profile.d/my_profile
put what I need in there.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
us
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 10:19:52 +0100
"Lars E. Pettersson" wrote:
> Have you tried sshfs?
No,
We moved to that at work years ago (to share
> between Linux boxes, but windows applications for sshfs also exist).
>
> Lars
Will give it a test
http://linhost.info/2012/09/sshfs-in-windows/
___
Rega
On 01/04/2014 09:45 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 3, 2014, at 11:24 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
This is as close as I can get to the "end" of this discussion since I get
the digest so it will have to do. I've seen you claim over and over that
"no one" uses e-mail for system notifications.
On 01/05/2014 09:25 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
I use nfs from Windows 8.1 to Fedora (filestore\backup etc..)
As well as between Fedora Boxes
Have you tried sshfs? We moved to that at work years ago (to share
between Linux boxes, but windows applications for sshfs also exist).
Lars
--
Lars E. Pe
On 01/05/2014 02:27 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I suspect it's used a ton more than an MTA. I enable sshd on all of my Macs and
Fedora installs as one of the first things done. MTA? Never. Not configured
even one time in 24 years.
Do you have any numbers on that (MTA vs. sshd)?
So sshd should st
On 01/04/2014 03:13 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 3, 2014, at 6:41 PM, "Lars E. Pettersson" wrote:
On 01/04/2014 02:40 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
What I fail to follow is, why break the existing mechanism *before* we
have these other future notification mechanisms ready?
*Exactly*
Please, SN
Hi,
Looking to create a test process to be able to do unattended installs
to a machine based on kickstart/http process.
As I go through this, I'm looking to be able to talk to/exchange
kickstart files, as well as thoughts/information on putting this
together, wiht someone.
Anyone interested in c
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 01:12:40 +
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
I've used Fedora for as long as it
> exists, and I've never seen anyone actually use NFS in real life
> scenarios on a typical desktop machine with a GUI. That's also got to
> be in the 99% of cases...
I use nfs from Windows 8.1 to Fedora
49 matches
Mail list logo
