Firefox/Flash vs. Pulseaudio; Audio can't be directed to the desired device

Pulseaudio can control which output device receives main audio output via kmix->Mixer->Settings->Audio Setup->... which invokes Phonon. At this point select the audio stream you want to divert, "Prefer" the device you want to receive the stream to the top and "Apply". This sends the au

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:06 PM, myken wrote: > On 03/09/13 20:32, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Yes, it does. It's the 32-bit libs that are also required by this poorly >> made x86_64 package. > > What does this mean? That I should install all the 32 bit libraries to make > this work? Yes. Also, if

"Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable" after moving machine

Hi, "Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable" I am getting the above error and have tried all my normal mods to try and get a connection. I did move the SATA drive from one machine to another and back, changing the MAC address and putting it back

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On 03/09/13 20:32, Michael Schwendt wrote: Yes, it does. It's the 32-bit libs that are also required by this poorly made x86_64 package. What does this mean? That I should install all the 32 bit libraries to make this work? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:20:49 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > The result of rpm -qp --requires diamond_2_2-base_x64-101-x86_64-linux.rpm > > is: > > /bin/bash > > /bin/csh > > /bin/ksh > > /bin/sh > > /bin/sh > > /bin/sh > > /usr/bin/env > > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) > > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIB

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Björn Persson wrote: > > Nick Bebout wrote: > > > The Fedora Infrastructure team is pleased to announce that > > > keys.fedoraproject.org is now up and running as a GPG keyserver. > > [...] > > > Web interface at http://keys.fedoraproject.org or > > > https://keys.fedoraprojec

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, myken wrote: > On 03/09/13 18:44, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:23 AM, myken wrote: > >> On 03/09/13 18:15, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> I can't tell any problems based on this output... Try getting the raw >>> requires and see if something sti

Re: upgrading R

What do you get when you try this? sudo yum upgrade updates.testing R I get: . No Match for argument: updates.testing No package updates.testing available. No packages marked for update There you go...that is pretty indicative. You should try: sudo yum update --enablerepo updates-testin

upgrading R

I used to do this by scrolling up through the commands, but it's no longer there: I don't know if I remember it correctly: sudo yum upgrade updates.testing R Do I have this correct, or am I missing something? I don't want to forge ahead fearing that I might screw something up. Any ideas? Thanks

Re: [389-users] Consumer Initialization Failure

On 09/03/2013 10:27 AM, Wick, Samson wrote: Here is the full output of ‘rpm -qi 389-ds-base’: Name: 389-ds-base Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.2.10.12 Vendor: (none) Release : 1.el6 Build Date: Thu 28

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:23 AM, myken wrote: > On 03/09/13 18:15, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I can't tell any problems based on this output... Try getting the raw >> requires and see if something sticks out: >> >> rpm -qp --requires diamond_2_2-base_x64-101-x86_**64-linux.rpm >> >> Richard >> > Ho

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 21:48:20 +0930 Tim wrote: > On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 22:10 -0500, Nick Bebout wrote: > > The Fedora Infrastructure team is pleased to announce that > > keys.fedoraproject.org is now up and running as a GPG keyserver. We > > are also part of the sks-keyservers.net pool, which mea

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:43:04 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Nick Bebout: > > > The Fedora Infrastructure team is pleased to announce that > > keys.fedoraproject.org is now up and running as a GPG keyserver. We > > are also part of the sks-keyservers.net pool, which means that some > > people u

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On 03/09/13 18:44, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:23 AM, myken > wrote: On 03/09/13 18:15, Richard Shaw wrote: I can't tell any problems based on this output... Try getting the raw requires and see if something sticks out: rpm -qp

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:15:05 +0200 Björn Persson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Nick Bebout wrote: > > The Fedora Infrastructure team is pleased to announce that > > keys.fedoraproject.org is now up and running as a

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On 03/09/13 18:15, Richard Shaw wrote: I can't tell any problems based on this output... Try getting the raw requires and see if something sticks out: rpm -qp --requires diamond_2_2-base_x64-101-x86_64-linux.rpm Richard How do I know if something sticks out? I run the command and I got a lon

Re: [389-users] Consumer Initialization Failure

On 09/03/2013 09:30 AM, Wick, Samson wrote: The number of “userPassword;vucsn-#;deleted:” for these three particular users is apparently so high that it makes the object too big to import into a new replica. Understood. Is there a way to verify that these are being trimmed like they

Re: error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, myken wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry if this has been asked before, I couldn't find a meaningful answer > searching. > I need some help installing a package from Lattice ( > http://www.latticesemi.com). Lattice provides a linux x86_64 rpm package > but I have some diff

Re: [389-users] Consumer Initialization Failure

The number of “userPassword;vucsn-#;deleted:” for these three particular users is apparently so high that it makes the object too big to import into a new replica. Is there a way to verify that these are being trimmed like they should? Does this behavior have something to do with the repl

error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

Hello, Sorry if this has been asked before, I couldn't find a meaningful answer searching. I need some help installing a package from Lattice (http://www.latticesemi.com). Lattice provides a linux x86_64 rpm package but I have some difficulties installing it. If I run: rpm --test -Uvh diamon

Re: Copy-pasting without transferring format

Hello, On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:07:14PM -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Suvayu Ali < > fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:54PM -0400, Oli

RE: A couple of random questions about login

-Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Bryn M. Reeves Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 6:42 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: A couple of random questions about login On 09/02/2013 04:

Re: Yum and dkms -

On 03/09/13 06:51, Andre Robatino wrote: What command do I need to execute to fix this or should I just forget dkms? It did exactly what it was supposed to. By installing dkms, the host will automatically build the kernel modules for each kernel when installing it, and remove them (which is what

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 22:10 -0500, Nick Bebout wrote: > The Fedora Infrastructure team is pleased to announce that > keys.fedoraproject.org is now up and running as a GPG keyserver. We > are also part of the sks-keyservers.net pool, which means that some > people using pool.sks-keyservers.net will

Re: A couple of random questions about login

On 3 September 2013 12:45, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: >> >> My wife turned to me and said, "If I were the bad guy, I'd just have the >> computer delete everything if someone entered the boat name, or at least >> send me a text. The boat was

Re: A couple of random questions about login

On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 15:42 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > My wife turned to me and said, "If I were the bad guy, I'd just have > the computer delete everything if someone entered the boat name, or at > least send me a text. In the normal run of things, I think a someone breaking into your place is j

Re: A couple of random questions about login

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: > My wife turned to me and said, "If I were the bad guy, I'd just have the > computer delete everything if someone entered the boat name, or at least > send me a text. The boat was an obvious guess, and I would never > accidentally type it in."

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/02/2013 11:10 PM, Nick Bebout wrote: > You could also put in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf: keyserver > hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org > Might be worth opening a BZ against the gnupg2 package to have this made the default for the Fedora package. -BEGIN

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Nick Bebout wrote: > The Fedora Infrastructure team is pleased to announce that > keys.fedoraproject.org is now up and running as a GPG keyserver. [...] > Web interface at http://keys.fedoraproject.org or > https://keys.fedoraproject.org If it's sup

Re: Yum and dkms -

Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wildblue.net> writes: > After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms > for some reason after installing vbox but don't recall the reason for > it. I assume there is some action required on my part but what? It seems > easier to ask

Re: Today update problem - fixed

On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 11:44 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote: > Hi, > Updating today I got this: > > [ ... ]# sudo yum update > ... > ** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: > kde-settings-kdm-19-23.1.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with > kde-settings-kdm-19-23.fc19.noarch > >

Re: Yum and dkms -

On 03/09/13 04:43, Jon Ingason wrote: 2013-09-03 10:29, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA skrev: On 03/09/13 04:25, Markus Schönhaber wrote: 03.09.2013 10:10, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms for some reason after inst

Today update problem

Hi, Updating today I got this: [ ... ]# sudo yum update ... ** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: kde-settings-kdm-19-23.1.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with kde-settings-kdm-19-23.fc19.noarch When trying to delete the old package: [ ... ]# sudo yum remove kde-settin

Re: Yum and dkms -

2013-09-03 10:29, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA skrev: > On 03/09/13 04:25, Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> 03.09.2013 10:10, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: >> >>> After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms >>> for some reason after installing vbox but don't recall

Re: Announcing Fedora GPG Key Server - keys.fedoraproject.org

(Apologies to announce mods, I accidentally sent my reply there instead of the users list) Unrelated question: On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:10:29PM -0500, Nick Bebout wrote: > This server may be accessed in the following ways: > Web interface at http://keys.fedoraproject.org or > https://keys.fedor

Re: Yum and dkms -

On 03/09/13 04:25, Markus Schönhaber wrote: 03.09.2013 10:10, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms for some reason after installing vbox but don't recall the reason for it. I assume there is some action required on my part b

Re: Yum and dkms -

03.09.2013 10:10, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: > After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms > for some reason after installing vbox but don't recall the reason for > it. I assume there is some action required on my part but what? It seems > easier to ask here

Re: Yum and dkms -

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:10:15AM -0400, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms for > some reason after installing vbox but don't recall the reason for it. I > assume there is some action required on my part but what?

Yum and dkms -

After"yum update" this morning I have this notice. I recall needing dkms for some reason after installing vbox but don't recall the reason for it. I assume there is some action required on my part but what? It seems easier to ask here than to muddle through this again. What command do I need