On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:04:56PM -0400, David wrote:
> On 8/8/2013 4:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote:
> >> I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
> >> Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly.
> >
> > The people doin
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank,
Here more information
Hello,
On a fedora 19 laptop, I use to experience frosing of the screen.
It may have different matter, like unable to compose in a terminal
window (but sill able to use the mouse), or in the worst situation,
the screen
On 08/08/2013 02:52 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
> I know this is an easy one, but I can't seem to find the current
> correct way to do it. I've got a TB HDD that I need to change the
> LABEL on. Currently it's 'LIVE' (it's an old production drive) and I
> really want to just remove the label altogether
On 08/08/2013 03:26 PM, David wrote:
What little 'programing skills' I have, or had, was Dos Basic, IBM OS/2
Warp Rexx, and copying Commodore 64 programs from magazines. Long lost
ancient skills. :-)
I certainly did not intend to hurt your feelings. Or those of anyone else.
Don't worry, yo
On 8/8/2013 6:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 02:44 PM, David wrote:
>> Gee. That I did not know. So you help here then? As a maintainer or
>> something?
>
> No. My programming skills are several decades out of date. I help (or
> try to) by sharing my computer and Linux knowledge and by t
On 8/8/2013 6:09 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, David wrote:
>> Thank you for that. So tell me wwy the Xulrunner dependency for Firefox
>> came out right away, it alwyas does, and Firefox was delayed? As it
>> always is.
>
> It looks like the maintainer made a mis
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, David wrote:
> Thank you for that. So tell me wwy the Xulrunner dependency for Firefox
> came out right away, it alwyas does, and Firefox was delayed? As it
> always is.
It looks like the maintainer made a mistake and accidentally bumped
the version in the RPM wron
On 08/08/2013 02:44 PM, David wrote:
Gee. That I did not know. So you help here then? As a maintainer or
something?
No. My programming skills are several decades out of date. I help (or
try to) by sharing my computer and Linux knowledge and by trying to find
answers to questions. Or, to pu
On 8/8/2013 5:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 02:08 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> Otherwise, it takes a couple days for us to test updates and get them
>> into the stable repository. A two-day turnaround on something that
>> updates as often as Firefox is perfectly reasonable.
>
> And,
On 8/8/2013 5:35 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 02:04 PM, David wrote:
>> Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular
>> Fedora Community users', sucjh as you, and not for myself? And that I
>> was asking because so many other Linux distributions already have them.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 5:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.08.2013 23:12, schrieb David:
>> I can not say anything about "extensions installed with yum". I
>> use the official extensions from Mozilla. And they work
>> regardless what Fedora does.
>
> wel
On 08/08/2013 02:08 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Otherwise, it takes a couple days for us to test updates and get them
into the stable repository. A two-day turnaround on something that
updates as often as Firefox is perfectly reasonable.
And, if you don't have the skills to do the packaging,
On 08/08/2013 02:04 PM, David wrote:
Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular
Fedora Community users', sucjh as you, and not for myself? And that I
was asking because so many other Linux distributions already have them.
I already have the latest releases.
What makes
On Aug 8, 2013 5:18 PM, "g" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/08/2013 02:52 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
> <>
>
>> What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking e2label
>> will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm playing it
>> safe.
>
>
> can not say about an lvm drive as i do not li
On 8/8/2013 5:08 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:34 PM, David wrote:
>> Not to insult anyone but... This same situation happens with each
>> official Mozilla release.
>>
>> I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
>> Betas but the official(s)
On 08/08/2013 02:52 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
<>
What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking e2label
will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm playing it
safe.
can not say about an lvm drive as i do not like them.
_man_ e2label_ should refresh your memory. :=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 5:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.08.2013 23:04, schrieb David:
>> On 8/8/2013 4:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote:
I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly,
Alphas and Betas b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 5:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.08.2013 22:56, schrieb David:
>> On 8/8/2013 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> I was wondering if there w
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:34 PM, David wrote:
> Not to insult anyone but... This same situation happens with each
> official Mozilla release.
>
> I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
> Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly.
*All* Fedora updates
On 8/8/2013 4:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote:
>> I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
>> Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly.
>
> The people doing the packaging and testing aren't exactly getting paid
> for their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David:
>> On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora
>>
>>> mostly bad timing
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote:
I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly.
The people doing the packaging and testing aren't exactly getting paid
for their work. If you want the new releases available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.08.2013 21:50, schrieb David:
>> On 8/8/2013 3:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> * patience * koji * yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update
>>> firefox\* xulrunner\* thunderbird\*
>>
>>> choose one
Everyone:
It's taken me this long to realize what the problem is. But I cannot use
Find-and-replace with LibreOffice anymore. It either tries to replace
everything under the sun with my Replace text, or else it can't find the
search key (typically a multi-word phrase) even though I am staring
Since upgrading from Fedora 18 to Fedora 19, all tables, queries, and
forms in LibreOffice-base open maximized. This did not happen with
Fedora 18. Current Fedora 19 version:
libreoffice-base-4.1.0.4-5.fc19.x86_64.
Is there a solution or workaround?
Craig
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 3:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.08.2013 21:34, schrieb David:
>> On 8/8/2013 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David:
Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and
Thunde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know this is an easy one, but I can't seem to find the current
correct way to do it. I've got a TB HDD that I need to change the
LABEL on. Currently it's 'LIVE' (it's an old production drive) and I
really want to just remove the label altogether an
On 8/8/2013 2:53 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> Yes, I have already installed it. click on the update testings and you
> will find itand it works fine. Hope that help.
> On 08/08/2013 12:48 PM, David wrote:
>> Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird
>> 17.08?
>>
>
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/8/2013 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David:
>> Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and
>> Thunderbird 17.08?
>
> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird
> thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64
>
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 08:46:43 -0700
Jon Cosby wrote:
> I installed a GeForce 8400 GS graphics card to replace an integrated
> chipset and can't even boot to the live CD (F18) or rescue mode now.
> It stops with the output
>
> Raw EDID
> [rows of hex digits all 0]
> Nouveau EI [ DRM] DDC resp
On 08/08/2013 03:48 PM, David wrote:
Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird
17.08?
They are in updates-testing, at least for F19 :)
--
Germán A. Racca
Fedora Package Maintainer
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Skytux
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
Yes, I have already installed it. click on the update testings and you
will find itand it works fine. Hope that help.
On 08/08/2013 12:48 PM, David wrote:
Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird
17.08?
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov.
Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird
17.08?
--
David
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co
Thank,
Here more information
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On a fedora 19 laptop, I use to experience frosing of the screen.
> > It may have different matter, like unable to compose in a terminal
> > window (but sill able to use the mouse), or in the worst situation,
> > the screen remains black (no way t
On 08/08/2013 13:29, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 08.08.2013, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
I have already appended 'blacklist i915' to
/lib/modprobe.d/dist-blacklist.conf but it is still being loaded. What else
can I do?
On the long run, you could disable all CONFIG_DRM_i91
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
On a fedora 19 laptop, I use to experience frosing of the screen.
It may have different matter, like unable to compose in a terminal
window (but sill able to use the mouse), or in the worst situation,
the screen remains black (no way to use the ke
Hello,
On a fedora 19 laptop, I use to experience frosing of the screen.
It may have different matter, like unable to compose in a terminal
window (but sill able to use the mouse), or in the worst situation,
the screen remains black (no way to use the keyboard), ie. I need to
unpluck the laptop an
I installed a GeForce 8400 GS graphics card to replace an integrated
chipset and can't even boot to the live CD (F18) or rescue mode now. It
stops with the output
Raw EDID
[rows of hex digits all 0]
Nouveau EI [ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1
I have openSUSE installed on this machin
On 08/08/2013 01:50 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 08/08/13 13:19, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 08/08/2013 10:04 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>>
do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
>>>
>>> My understanding is that it is a 32 bit CPU (T2300), it does want
>>> to read a 64 bit iso DVD.
>>
>> Here says it
On 08/08/13 13:19, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 08/08/2013 10:04 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
My understanding is that it is a 32 bit CPU (T2300), it does want
to read a 64 bit iso DVD.
Here says it's a 64-bit CPU:
http://ark.intel.com/products/37160/Intel-Pentium-Proces
Hi,
> no lm flags,
> So 32 bits?
Jap, 32-bit.
The missing 800mb are most likely masked by IO address-ranges like PCI address
space etc.
regards
>
>
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > --
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Todor Petkov
> Sent: 08/08/13 02:26 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: 3.2Gb over 4Gb
>
> On 08/08/2013 12:04 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >>
> >> do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
> >
> > My understanding is that it is a 32 bit CPU (T2300),
On 08/08/2013 01:29 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> However, do you think that it will extend the accessible memory since it seems
> that it is a chipset issue?
I doubt it.
Andrew.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedora
OK,
Thank.
The bizard thing is that when I tried to run the x86_64 install DVD, it just
did want to do it!
However, do you think that it will extend the accessible memory since it seems
that it is a chipset issue?
> Subject: Re: 3.2Gb over 4Gb
>
> On 08/08/2013 10:04 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
On 08/08/2013 12:04 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
My understanding is that it is a 32 bit CPU (T2300), it does want
to read a 64 bit iso DVD.
See this link
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-how-to-find-if-processor-is-64-bit-or-not/
it says how to check your CPU.
On 08/08/2013 10:04 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>>
>> do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
>
> My understanding is that it is a 32 bit CPU (T2300), it does want
> to read a 64 bit iso DVD.
Here says it's a 64-bit CPU:
http://ark.intel.com/products/37160/Intel-Pentium-Processor-T3200-1M-Cache-2_00-GHz-667-
Hi folks.
After years of going to look at virtualisation and prompting from the threads
pm here about Virtualbox on here I decided to firstly install it on my newish
desktop to try it. I used the following instructions which worked a treat.
http://www.tecmint.com/install-virtualbox-on-redhat-ce
Am 08.08.2013 10:08, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
> 4Gb of RAM, but only 3.2Gb is accessible.
> The bios recognizes the 4Gb but says that only 3.2Gb will be available,
> but I expected that fedora 19 with be available
Hello,
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
As far as I can tell, the Intel Core Duo T2300 is an x86 (32 bit) processor, so
I suppose you are using a 32 bit flavour of Fedora, hence general purpose
memory should be properl
>
> do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
My understanding is that it is a 32 bit CPU (T2300), it does want
to read a 64 bit iso DVD.
>
> 2013/8/8 staticsafe
>
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:08:45AM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T230
> - Original Message -
> From: Joe Zeff
> Sent: 08/08/13 10:33 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: 3.2Gb over 4Gb
>
> On 08/08/2013 01:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
> > 4Gb of RAM, but only
On 08/08/2013 10:33 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 01:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
>> 4Gb of RAM, but only 3.2Gb is accessible.
>> The bios recognizes the 4Gb but says that only 3.2Gb will be available,
>> but I expecte
do you use 32 or 64 bits ?
2013/8/8 staticsafe
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:08:45AM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
> > 4Gb of RAM, but only 3.2Gb is accessible.
> > The bios recognizes the 4Gb but says that
On 08/08/2013 01:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
4Gb of RAM, but only 3.2Gb is accessible.
The bios recognizes the 4Gb but says that only 3.2Gb will be available,
but I expected that fedora 19 with be available to access the ent
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:08:45AM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
> 4Gb of RAM, but only 3.2Gb is accessible.
> The bios recognizes the 4Gb but says that only 3.2Gb will be available,
> but I expected that fedora 19
Hello,
I updated my inspiron 9400 (Genuine Intel® CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz × 2) with
4Gb of RAM, but only 3.2Gb is accessible.
The bios recognizes the 4Gb but says that only 3.2Gb will be available,
but I expected that fedora 19 with be available to access the entire RAM.
This there something that I sh
56 matches
Mail list logo
