Re: Password In The Clear

On 19.07.2013 20:52, Mark LaPierre wrote: … > Does anyone else question the wisdom of sending out passwords "in the > clear" in unencrypted email? http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/security.html poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription o

Re: Kernel Panic

On 20.07.2013 02:59, Jim wrote: … > chroot /mnt/sysimage > su > cd /boot/grub2 > vi grub.cfg > > To the first Menu-list and remove NEW kernel , so it will boot on second > older kernel. > > Am i using the best procedure to get rid of the NEW kernel ? rpm -e foobar poma -- users mailing list

Re: Password In The Clear

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 02:52:56PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Does anyone else question the wisdom of sending out passwords "in > the clear" in unencrypted email? Wise or not, the sign-up form states that pretty clearly: > Do not use a valuable password as it will occasionally be emailed back

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

first: if the Fedora community *would* be really that hypocritical like Tim and Thomas to name the both most aggressive ones and their few the same way embittered acting friends *please unsubscribe me* because i do *not* want to be member of a "community" where only political correctness is the ho

Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record

Am 20.07.2013 03:16, schrieb Vinny Onelli: > Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:40:26 +0200 >> From: Heinz Diehl >> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Subject: Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record >> Message-ID: <20130719214026.ga7...@fritha.org> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >>

Re: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

Alan Gagne writes: >> >>/ "SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure >> />/ Maybe not, but when I had one of these drives going bad about a year >> ago. >> />/ It did a great job of warning that I had an impending drive failure. >> />/ The relocated sector count would jump

Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record

On 19.07.2013 22:58, Vinny Onelli wrote: > Hello, > Installed f19, during the prep didn't see any thing about boot so I > proceeded with installation on reboot this is what I got: > Booting from local disk ... > error:no such device:fe0662f9-2f9b-4a9c-81ff-2d77f98c331b > grub rescue> > I tried to i

Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record

Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:40:26 +0200 > From: Heinz Diehl > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record > Message-ID: <20130719214026.ga7...@fritha.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On 19.07.2013, Vinny Onelli wrote: > > > grub-inst

Kernel Panic

Fedora 18 Did a update and reboot, got a kernel panic in NEW kernel can't get into Linux. At Bootup at kernel Window I tried to hit Down-Arrow to goto second kernel in menu but hitting Down-Arrow won't respond. I guess i will have to go into the back door with a Fedora-18-Netinst CD and do

RE: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

>>/ "SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure />/ Maybe not, but when I had one of these drives going bad about a year ago. />/ It did a great job of warning that I had an impending drive failure. />/ The relocated sector count would jump in small blocks over time. / Intere

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, David wrote: > So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the Xfce > ISO did not build it exactly to your, personal specifications? Really? > How dare them to not build one just for you!! No, re-read my message. Im saying that OpenJDK was part

How to execute gpk-application from modern Gnome

I can't find a way to start gpk-application from modern Gnome desktop. It's nowhere to be found in Activities. Typing "software" brings up nothing. Of course, the brand-spanking new Gnome in F20 apparently feels its too cumbersome to list all installed applications, like in earlier versions.

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 15:27:15 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped in the last minute due to space limitations The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why are they still using 650MB appare

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:47:12 -0400 > Fernando Cassia wrote: > > Apparently the RPMs are 29MB compressed, including all deps... > > # yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Well, thanks Fernando. I too was used to s

Mate desktop, login produces up to ten caja instances

On F19 with Mate desktop, sometimes after login 8 or 9 or even 10 copies of Caja (Mate File Manger) are started up. Most of the time not, but perhaps once every day or two this will happen. the rest of the time it's completely normal. I found these /var/log/messages entries at around the right ti

Re: Password In The Clear

On 07/19/2013 03:15 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: I figured that, since mailman sent my password in the clear, I would take the opportunity to change my password. The password in the email was my old password. That's what I thought, but it was worth asking, Just In Case. -- users mailing list users

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

Then I'm really glad I'll be a burden to you for such a motive today. If coping with people humors is endorsing victimization, then damn it, I must be a really bad person. But guess what, I'll live with it. And you'll be the doubly pissed off one. Now I guess I'll stop answering to this, first b

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > For example the OpenJDK 8 version might have been picked up. (I didn't check > to see if that was what happened, but rather it is a plausible cause that > might have changed things without any of the XFCE guys noticing.) No, apparently the

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

Tim writes: > Allegedly, on or about 18 July 2013, Timothy Murphy sent: >> Surely it is the easiest thing in the world not to read his postings, >> if they offend you. > > You need to see the bigger picture. > > As we all stand idly by and watch someone harass someone else, you > endorse the vic

Re: alternate package manager

Hi On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, lee wrote: > > Hm, I am not so sure that it works reasonably well. Am I doing > something wrong here? > dnf clean all and try again and if you have problems, file a bug report Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or cha

Re: Error message that pops up in terminal windows.

"Michael D. Setzer II" writes: >> > This message shows up in terminal windows from time to time. >> > Any ideals on what is doing it and how to correct it. >> > >> > WARNING: Your hard drive is failing >> > Device: /dev/sda [SAT], 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors >> > >> > WARNING: Your hard dri

Re: alternate package manager

Rahul Sundaram writes: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, lee wrote: > >> >> Can yum and dnf used interchangeably? Does dnf work well? I might just >> try it out ... >> > > dnf is a experimental fork of yum but works reasonably well and can be used > interchangeably. > > https://fedoranext.wo

Re: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

Alan Gagne writes: >> "SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure > Maybe not, but when I had one of these drives going bad about a year ago. > It did a great job of warning that I had an impending drive failure. > The relocated sector count would jump in small blocks over time.

Re: Password In The Clear

On 07/19/2013 03:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 07/19/2013 11:52 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: Does anyone else question the wisdom of sending out passwords "in the clear" in unencrypted email? I'm not going to check, but I do hope that you didn't sent your real password to the entire list. No, I'm

Re: (F19 x64) No gedit's menu's "Edit Preferences" entry.

Thank you Rahul for your fast and decisive reply. Quicksort Le 19/07/2013 23:26, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : Hi On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Quicksort wrote: No gedit's menu's "Edit Preferences" entry. Is it a bug or a deliberate omission ? Would it be however possible to con

Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record

On 19.07.2013, Vinny Onelli wrote: > grub-install: command not found > did I missed some thing during the installation? You want "grub2-install" ;-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 21:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/18/13 21:37, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Thanks all the same. > > I just installed evo on my all KDE system.. > > Initially, it would start firefox when I clicked on a link > > I did > > xdg-settings set default-url-sch

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 11:43 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Evo 3.8.3, Fedora 19, KDE 4.10 > > > > I'm embarrassed to be asking this, but how do I set the default browser > > for embedded URLs to Chrome if I don't have the Gnome Desktop installed? > > > > I know this

Fedora 19 did not install boot record

Hello, Installed f19, during the prep didn't see any thing about boot so I proceeded with installation on reboot this is what I got: Booting from local disk ... error:no such device:fe0662f9-2f9b-4a9c-81ff-2d77f98c331b grub rescue> I tried to install grub by using rescue disk, shell and enter "chro

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 14:33 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 15:36 +0300, Veeti Paananen wrote: > > On 18/07/13 15:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Evo 3.8.3, Fedora 19, KDE 4.10 > > > > > > I'm embarrassed to be asking this, but how do I set the default browser > > >

(F19 x64) No gedit's menu's "Edit Preferences" entry.

(Fedora 19 x64) Hello everybody, No gedit's menu's "Edit Preferences" entry. Is it a bug or a deliberate omission ? Would it be however possible to configure gedit by some other means ? Quicksort-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On 7/19/2013 3:13 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include > the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?. > > This causes me lots of hassle. > :-( > > FC > So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the Xfce ISO did not build i

Re: Fedora 19 yum update error I dont understand

Am 19.07.2013 10:38, schrieb Roger: > Just now I did a yum update but got these errors; > > php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 is needed by (installed) > php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.2.svn313074.fc18.remi.x86_64 > php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 is needed by (installed) > php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.2.svn313074

Re: Error message that pops up in terminal windows.

On 07/19/2013 12:16 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > This message shows up in terminal windows from time to time. > Any ideals on what is doing it and how to correct it. > > WARNING: Your hard drive is failing > Device: /dev/sda [SAT], 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors > > WARNING: Your hard drive

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

Allegedly, on or about 18 July 2013, Timothy Murphy sent: > Surely it is the easiest thing in the world not to read his postings, > if they offend you. You need to see the bigger picture. As we all stand idly by and watch someone harass someone else, you endorse the victimisation. When you decl

Re: (F19 x64) No gedit's menu's "Edit Preferences" entry.

Hi On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Quicksort wrote: > > No gedit's menu's "Edit Preferences" entry. Is it a bug or a deliberate > omission ? > Would it be however possible to configure gedit by some other means ? > > If you are running GNOME, click on the gedit icon on the top panel Rahul --

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > F19 XFCE ISO image: > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 616562688 (588M) [application/x-iso9660-image] Apparently the RPMs are 29MB compressed, including all deps... # yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk Loaded plugins:

Password In The Clear

On 07/18/2013 11:59 PM, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > SNIP You can also visit your membership page at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/users/marklapier%40aol.com On your membership page, you can change various delivery options such as your email addre

Re: can't connect to avahi-daemon? Why not?!

On 19.07.2013 19:54, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: > On 07/19/2013 11:42 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having a hard time making the new cups server broadcast method work. >> The avahi-daemon on my print server is not cooperating. It appears to be >> running, but nothin

Re: Password In The Clear

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 02:52:56PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Does anyone else question the wisdom of sending out passwords "in > the clear" in unencrypted email? This is a known problem with mailman. However, it's actually not as bad as it sounds -- or rather, it's worse than you think, and ma

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 15:13:14 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote: Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?. You are not being excellent. This causes me lots of hassle. You can build your own custom live images relatively easily

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:27:15 -0400 Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram > wrote: > > Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped > > in the last minute due to space limitations > > The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why are they still using 650MB

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

Hi Oh, I see you did and I missed that. In any case, Xfce target is CD Size Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guid

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

Hi On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why are they still using 650MB apparently as > the CD size? > You never mentioned that you were using the Xfce image and yes, Xfce still targets CD size Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproj

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

Hi On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include > the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?. > > This causes me lots of hassle. > Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped in the last minute due to

Re: F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped in the last > minute due to space limitations The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why are they still using 650MB apparently as the CD size? F19 XFCE ISO image: HTTP request sent, await

Twitter does user-agent sniffing, can't login with F19 Midori browser @ Twitter.com

Web site programmers never cease to amaze me (for the worst). I loaded Fedora 19 XFCE and I'm overall VERY VERY impressed with its speed, there is a notable difference with the previous F18 release (also XFCE). However, loading the Midore XFCE web browser gives me one unpleasant surprise: twitter.

F19 no longer includes OpenJDK7-jre in the LiveCD :-(

Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?. This causes me lots of hassle. :-( FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

On 07/19/2013 10:48 AM, Tim wrote: As you all stand by and endorse the perpetrator while they victimise me, you piss me off as well. All I see at this time is you attacking Harald. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.f

Re: Error message that pops up in terminal windows.

On 19 Jul 2013 at 12:27, Steven Stern wrote: Date sent: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:27:46 -0500 From: Steven Stern To: Community support for Fedora users Subject:Re: Error message that pops up in terminal windows. > On 07/19/2013 12:1

Re: Password In The Clear

On 07/19/2013 11:52 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: Does anyone else question the wisdom of sending out passwords "in the clear" in unencrypted email? I'm not going to check, but I do hope that you didn't sent your real password to the entire list. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: [389-users] Fwd: Some cipher suites not working

Will do. Thanks. On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 07/19/2013 10:43 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> On 07/19/2013 08:38 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Rich Meggin

Re: can't connect to avahi-daemon? Why not?!

On 07/19/2013 11:42 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: Hi all, I'm having a hard time making the new cups server broadcast method work. The avahi-daemon on my print server is not cooperating. It appears to be running, but nothing can access it. Why? Figured it out... avahi-daemon was pegged a

Re: [389-users] Manual & help step by step

Dear Dan , Many thanks for your help .. we want use number one option as it is the most flexible and least headache. Let fox on it , Can you give more information on that . Best regards , Husam From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fe

Re: alternate package manager (was: Problem upgrading nvidia in Fedora-19)

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, lee wrote: > > Can yum and dnf used interchangeably? Does dnf work well? I might just > try it out ... > dnf is a experimental fork of yum but works reasonably well and can be used interchangeably. https://fedoranext.wordpress.com/2013/05/18/status-of-dnf-exp

Re: [389-users] Fwd: Some cipher suites not working

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 07/19/2013 08:38 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> On 07/19/2013 06:43 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have been setting up SSL/TLS with 389 DS on CentOS 6.4.

Re: [389-users] Fwd: Some cipher suites not working

On 07/19/2013 10:43 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Rich Megginson > wrote: On 07/19/2013 08:38 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Rich Megginson mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 07/19

Error message that pops up in terminal windows.

This message shows up in terminal windows from time to time. Any ideals on what is doing it and how to correct it. WARNING: Your hard drive is failing Device: /dev/sda [SAT], 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors WARNING: Your hard drive is failing Device: /dev/sda [SAT], 2 Offline uncorrectable s

Re: can't connect to avahi-daemon? Why not?!

On 07/19/2013 12:30 PM, Edward Martinez wrote: On 7/19/2013 8:42 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: I'm having a hard time making the new cups server broadcast method work. The avahi-daemon on my print server is not cooperating. It appears to be running, but nothing can access it. Why? Any hel

can't connect to avahi-daemon? Why not?!

Hi all, I'm having a hard time making the new cups server broadcast method work. The avahi-daemon on my print server is not cooperating. It appears to be running, but nothing can access it. Why? Any help most appreciated! Debugging output below... - Mike [root@ulmo ~]# avahi-browse -a Fail

Re: can't connect to avahi-daemon? Why not?!

On 7/19/2013 8:42 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: I'm having a hard time making the new cups server broadcast method work. The avahi-daemon on my print server is not cooperating. It appears to be running, but nothing can access it. Why? Any help most appreciated! Two likely cau

RE: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

>>/ >>/ >/ # cat /proc/mdstat />>/ />>/ />/ Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] />>/ />>/ />/ md124 : active raid1 sdb[1] sdc[0] />>/ />>/ />/293032960 blocks super external:/md125/0 [2/2] [UU] />>/ />>/ />/ />>/ />>/ />/ md125 : inactive sdb[1](S) sdc[0](S) />>/ />>/ />/

Re: [389-users] Fwd: Some cipher suites not working

On 07/19/2013 08:38 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Rich Megginson > wrote: On 07/19/2013 06:43 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: Hello, I have been setting up SSL/TLS with 389 DS on CentOS 6.4. I have been able to get it workin

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 11:04 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:48:26 +0100 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Since I don't have the full Gnome Desktop installed, there is no > > Settings tab. > > > > poc > > > > Is there check for "use as default" within browser options\tool

Re: alternate package manager

On 07/19/13 22:26, lee wrote: > Neal Becker writes: > >> Frédéric Bron wrote: >> A version conflict is making it impossible to upgrade my system to the >> And interestingly, I found dnf did the update without issues. That's +1 for >> dnf. > Can yum and dnf used interchangeably? Does dnf wo

Re: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

Alan Gagne writes: >> >>/ >/ # cat /proc/mdstat >> />>/ />/ Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] >> />>/ />/ md124 : active raid1 sdb[1] sdc[0] >> />>/ />/293032960 blocks super external:/md125/0 [2/2] [UU] >> />>/ />/ >> />>/ />/ md125 : inactive sdb[1](S) sdc[0](S) >> />>/ />/

alternate package manager (was: Problem upgrading nvidia in Fedora-19)

Neal Becker writes: > Frédéric Bron wrote: > >>> A version conflict is making it impossible to upgrade my system to the > > And interestingly, I found dnf did the update without issues. That's +1 for > dnf. Can yum and dnf used interchangeably? Does dnf work well? I might just try it out ...

RE: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

>>/ >/ # cat /proc/mdstat />>/ />/ Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] />>/ />/ md124 : active raid1 sdb[1] sdc[0] />>/ />/293032960 blocks super external:/md125/0 [2/2] [UU] />>/ />/ />>/ />/ md125 : inactive sdb[1](S) sdc[0](S) />>/ />/6184 blocks super external:imsm />>/

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

On 18.07.2013, Thomas Dineen wrote: > If I were moderator I would have unsubscribed him by now > (To reduce the health care cost (Headaches) of everyone involved. I consider this whole thread as completely useless. Somebody doesn't want to read somebodys mail? No problem. Use your killfil

Re: Extra kernel in /boot

On 07/19/2013 12:05 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/19/13 11:51, Frank wrote: I have an extra kernel in /boot with a bizarre name: vmlinuz-0-rescue-9388a5eb453d59f4fd98567b37061720 It has a matching initramfs. initramfs-0-rescue-9388a5eb453d59f4fd98567b37061720.img I am running 19. They don't

Re: Problem upgrading nvidia in Fedora-19

Frédéric Bron wrote: >> A version conflict is making it impossible to upgrade my system to the >> latest kernel and/or native nvidia drivers. Usually these conflicts >> clear up after a few days, when the repositories come into sync but this >> one has been around for quite a while. > > I had th

Re: Problem upgrading nvidia in Fedora-19

Jonathan Ryshpan writes: > A version conflict is making it impossible to upgrade my system to the > latest kernel and/or native nvidia drivers. Usually these conflicts > clear up after a few days, when the repositories come into sync but this > one has been around for quite a while. See https:/

Re: cpu usage display conky vs. top

Suvayu Ali writes: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:13:12PM +0200, lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The >> values are different in conky and top, for example, top might show 11.6 >> for a process while conky says 3.01. > > Not on my system. T

Re: please discontinue to moderate Haralds posts

Thomas Dineen writes: > Gentle People: > >Think about how his behiaviour reflects on the effort of the entire > Fedora community? I don't understand why you insist that Harald speaks for "the entire Fedora community". Please keep in mind that how it deals with people who aren't entirely eas

Re: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot

Alan Gagne writes: >> >/ # cat /proc/mdstat >> />/ Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] >> />/ md124 : active raid1 sdb[1] sdc[0] >> />/293032960 blocks super external:/md125/0 [2/2] [UU] >> />/ >> />/ md125 : inactive sdb[1](S) sdc[0](S) >> />/6184 blocks super external:imsm >> />

Re: Fedora 19 yum update error I dont understand

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:38:35 +1000, Roger wrote: > Just now I did a yum update but got these errors; > > Downloading packages: > Running transaction check > ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: > php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 is needed by (installed) > php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.2.svn313074.fc18.

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:48:26 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Since I don't have the full Gnome Desktop installed, there is no > Settings tab. > > poc > Is there check for "use as default" within browser options\tools ? -- Regards, Frank "When in doubt PANIC!" I check for new mail app.

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 11:32 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:37:05PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > In fact I had already tried installing gconf-editor, however as the rest > > of the Gnome environment isn't there the options it offers are limited > > and desktop/gnome

Re: Setting the default web browser

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:37:05PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > In fact I had already tried installing gconf-editor, however as the rest > of the Gnome environment isn't there the options it offers are limited > and desktop/gnome/applications/browser is not one of them You want "Preferred a

Re: Fedora 19 yum update error I dont understand

On 07/19/13 16:38, Roger wrote: > Just now I did a yum update but got these errors; > > Downloading packages: > Running transaction check > ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: > php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 is needed by (installed) > php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.2.svn313074.fc18.remi.x86_64 > php(z

Fedora 19 yum update error I dont understand

Just now I did a yum update but got these errors; Downloading packages: Running transaction check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 is needed by (installed) php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.2.svn313074.fc18.remi.x86_64 php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 is needed by (insta

Re: emulate mouse middle-button on Dell XPS 13?

On 07/18/2013 11:39 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Thanks! I get the following: ! $sudo gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.peripherals.mouse middle-button-enabled true No such schema 'org.gnome.settings-daemon.peripherals.mouse' You wouldn't use "sudo" for that. It's a per-user setting. I am