>
>
> It might be a good idea, then, to configure ip6tables to deny everything
and enable it just to be sure.
>
And this is one of the reasons that firewalld has come about... The same
rule (unless it specifies a family or has addressees in the rule of that
family) gets applied to both protocols.
>
> From what I've been reading, CentOS isn't upgradeable at all. If that's
> true, I'm surprised you're using it.
>
Red Hat does not support upgrades between major versions of enterprise
Linux... And the rebuilds thus have the same policy.
The point of using it of course is a stable environment
>
> I'd be wondering what 'g=,o=' actually does. You may want
>
> chmod u+rwx,go-rwx /home/psmith
>
> and you probably do *not* want to set all files in /home/psmith to be
> executable for their owner like you set them with '-R u=x'.
Indeed the better option is chmod -R u=rwX,go-rwx /home/psmith
On 07/13/2013 07:42 PM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1
On 07/13/2013 07:36 PM, Roger wrote:
On 07/14/2013 05:17 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 7/13/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
Once the fundamental Transhumanism technologies are fully
operational.
On 07/13/2013 06:51 PM, lee wrote:
Matthew Miller writes:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
replaced by more recent versions. Maybe this
On 07/11/2013 09:16 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Isaac Cortés González
wrote:
I support the idea, it should be done at least something like when
Verne was released and Dennis Ritchie, not only the Fedora Community
has lost a great developer; but also CentOS and RH
On 7/13/2013 4:36 PM, Roger wrote:
On 07/14/2013 05:17 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 7/13/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
Once the fundamental Transhumanism technologies are fully
operational.
On 07/13/2013 03:51 PM, lee wrote:
Automatic updates? I'd rather not do that since it sometimes seems
advisable to reboot after an update.
If you want to be sure, run needs-restarting in a terminal, as root.
About the only thing it doesn't list that I've seen is the kernel, but
for most othe
On 07/13/2013 05:28 PM, lee wrote:
What if the guy was called "Waterfalls"? "Waterfalls' cat"?
Either that or, "Waterfalls's cat." Both are currently acceptable, at
least in American English.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 07/13/2013 06:02 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
I recently submitted a crash report using the gnome-abrt
application/applet and would like to file a comment to it. Which
bugzilla did gnome-abrt submit it to? I had assumed that the gnome-abrt
user interface would tell me, or I would get an email
On 07/14/13 10:17, Powell, Michael wrote:
> Looks like someone beat me to it :)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984121
Yeah, and it seems you can download and test a potential fix at,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12886/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-4.fc19
--
The o
> On 07/14/13 09:39, Powell, Michael wrote:
> >> On 07/14/13 07:30, Powell, Michael wrote:
> >>> Greshko, Ed wrote:>
> /var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
> >>> Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the
> >> updates were applied to the machine, but instead,
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 13.07.2013 22:59, schrieb lee:
>> Reindl Harald writes:
>>
>>> don't get me wrong but if you hvae manually configured services
>>> especially a webserver it's your job to look *before* you upgrade
>>> if there is a major change and prepare your manual configuration
>>
On 07/14/13 09:39, Powell, Michael wrote:
>> On 07/14/13 07:30, Powell, Michael wrote:
>>> Greshko, Ed wrote:>
/var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
>>> Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the
>> updates were applied to the machine, but instead, I need a ti
> On 07/14/13 07:30, Powell, Michael wrote:
> > Greshko, Ed wrote:>
> >> /var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
> > Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the
> updates were applied to the machine, but instead, I need a timestamp of
> when those updates were posted
On 07/14/13 09:02, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I recently submitted a crash report using the gnome-abrt
> application/applet and would like to file a comment to it. Which
> bugzilla did gnome-abrt submit it to? I had assumed that the gnome-abrt
> user interface would tell me, or I would get an emai
On 07/13/2013 10:02 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
I recently submitted a crash report using the gnome-abrt
application/applet and would like to file a comment to it. Which
bugzilla did gnome-abrt submit it to? I had assumed that the gnome-abrt
user interface would tell me, or I would get an email
John Wendel writes:
> Can someone please post the incantation necessary to remove the
> nouveau driver in Fedora 19. I'd really like to install the driver
> directly from Nvidia, instead of from rpmfusion.
You can blacklist it in grub.cfg:
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.9.6-200.fc18.x86_64 [...] nouv
Paul Smith writes:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lee wrote:
>>> chmod 755 /home
>>>
>>> But what about
>>>
>>> /home/psmith
>>
>> It depends on what you want. There is some tradition that home
>> directories are readable for everyone and writable for their owners
>> only. It may be a good
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
>> like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
>> replaced by more recent versions. Maybe this could be done in Fedora as
>
Ian Malone writes:
> On 12 July 2013 21:45, lee wrote:
>> And there needs to be something like an option for extended partitioning
>> that allows you to do whatever you want. Having the installer do it for
>> you is a nice option to have and it's not enough.
>>
>
> On install from live discs at
Fernando Cassia writes:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, lee wrote:
>> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
>
> When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
> (Boot Manager for Humans)
I'm not sure if I want to be booted.
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
--
users
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 13.07.2013 17:50, schrieb Matthew Miller:
>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
>>> The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
>>> like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
>>> replaced by more recent
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish.
>> Are you saying that 'yum list installed' doesn't really tell you what
>> is actually installed and you need to use 'rpm -V' instead?
>>
>> What are
François Patte writes:
> Le 12/07/2013 22:45, lee a écrit :
>> "D. Hugh Redelmeier" writes:
>>
>
>> You're probably screwed when you need LVM or software raid or
>> encryption with the partitioning you need. Is there any way to get
>> that? Can you install Fedora on software raid with the par
Steven Stern writes:
> On 07/13/2013 02:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, lee wrote:
>>> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
>
> Will someone who sees the stuff with umlauts and a proper apostrophe
> please post their grub boot stanza? Thanks.
linux /bo
Fred Smith writes:
>> BTW, why is it "Schrödinger's" and not "Schrödingers"? Schrödinger
>> wasn't a cat.
>
> because "'s" is the possessive form (at least in English), meaning
> we're referring to something that belonged to "Schrödinger", while
> the second form you show (i.e., sans apostrophe)
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 05:57:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> what he menat was showing the difference between
>> present and new config file before updates and the
>> option to merge them - not that the merge is useful
>> in many cases but *that* is was Debian offers
Michael Hennebry writes:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
>
>> What are the main reasons not to upgrade?
>
> For me it was the aggravation.
> Installing was always a struggle.
> I was on F14 when I tried to do a fresh install of F16.
> Never got it to work.
> I'm running CentOS now, but keep F14
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
> On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
>> "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
>>
>>> On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
I recently submitted a crash report using the gnome-abrt
application/applet and would like to file a comment to it. Which
bugzilla did gnome-abrt submit it to? I had assumed that the gnome-abrt
user interface would tell me, or I would get an email from the bugzilla;
but neither has happened.
Tha
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:48:40 +0200 Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.07.2013 21:45, schrieb Paul Smith:
> > Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What
> > are the main reasons?
>
> because after F19 is released a month later F17 is EOL and
> get no security updates a
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:16:40 -0700 Richard Vickery
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Isaac Cortés González
> wrote:
> > I support the idea, it should be done at least something like when
> > Verne was released and Dennis Ritchie, not only the Fedora Community
> > has lost a great develop
On 07/14/13 07:30, Powell, Michael wrote:
> Greshko, Ed wrote:>
>> /var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
> Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the updates were
> applied to the machine, but instead, I need a timestamp of when those updates
> were posted to th
On 07/12/2013 09:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
coming up with a "link-local" address inside a network
which is*pure ipv4* on a server means *any* random
device which does the same may bypass all your firewall
rule ssince iptables and ip6tables are two different
services
It might be a good idea,
On 07/14/2013 05:17 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 7/13/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
Once the fundamental Transhumanism technologies are fully
operational.
That's the best answer I've seen in
Greshko, Ed wrote:>
> /var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the updates were
applied to the machine, but instead, I need a timestamp of when those updates
were posted to the yum server. My thought is that since I know 191
On 07/14/13 06:46, Powell, Michael wrote:
> Is there some way I can have yum update based on a timestamp or display a
> timestamp on when these updates were posted to help me narrow the field?
/var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
--
The only thing worse than a poorly asked questi
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.07.2013 13:07, schrieb David Beveridge:
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Fernando Lozano
> wrote:
> >>
> >> If people on the users list don't agree with me, there's no point
> >> submiting to developers.
> >>
> > Well I for one
The question, should IPv6, be disabled by default, is asked of people of
the user list.
At the moment, I am on the fence.
Is there a compromise where, during the Fedora install, when the person is
asked for some network information and asked for time zone and root
password, can the question be po
The machine details:
- Dell XPS 17 (L702X) BIOS A19
- Intel Core i7-2720QM (2.2GHZ)
- Intel Sandybridge
- Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
>From a complete fresh install of F19, I’m seeing 214 updates. The updates
>break down into 8 security, 80 bugfix, 22 enhanceme
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:59:23PM +0200, lee wrote:
> > don't get me wrong but if you hvae manually configured services
> > especially a webserver it's your job to look *before* you upgrade
> > if there is a major change and prepare your manual configuration
> > for it - untouched configuration is
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> this is childish
>
> there is a difference between well aware ipv4 and
> all sorts of firewalls and proctections configured
> or startup in a network with ipv6 enabled without
> knowing it or not configured at all
>
> coming up with a "link-l
On 13/07/13 09:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.07.2013 14:49, schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the menu, like
in /etc/fedora-release:
Schrödinger’s Cat
that's a known problem and the result of careless
choosen release-names with sp
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 12.07.2013 21:57, schrieb lee:
>> The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the
>> configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the
>> devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are
>> informed accordingly.
>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:41 PM, John Wendel wrote:
> Can someone please post the incantation necessary to remove the nouveau
> driver in Fedora 19. I'd really like to install the driver directly from
> Nvidia, instead of from rpmfusion.
>
> Thanks
>
> John Wendel
> --
You might want to go to the
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 03:19 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> On 07/11/2013 11:38 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>>
>>> Only speaking for myself: I always try to upgrade first, having a
>>> complete backup, of course. If it doesn't work, I reinstall. There'
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rick Walker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did a fedup from F17 to F18 on my work desktop. Now I get an infinite
> boot loop. Fdisk can't look at the partition table of /dev/sda because
> it has been coverted to GPT format (who did that?).
>
> As near as I can tell, the bo
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Rick Walker wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
>> > I did a fedup from F17 to F18 on my work desktop. Now I get an
>> > infinite boot loop. Fdisk can't look at the partition table of
>> > /dev/sda because it has been coverted to GPT format (who did that?).
>
> Ian Chapman wri
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Isaac Cortés González
wrote:
> I support the idea, it should be done at least something like when
> Verne was released and Dennis Ritchie, not only the Fedora Community
> has lost a great developer; but also CentOS and RHEL.
>
> -Isaac C.
>
>
> 2013/7/11 Ra
Am 13.07.2013 15:47, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 13:43:37 +,
> Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the boot
>> messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in addition to
>> hiding those messages.
>
> You can modify t
Am 13.07.2013 14:49, schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the menu,
> like in /etc/fedora-release:
> Schrödinger’s Cat
that's a known problem and the result of careless
choosen release-names with special chars
signature.asc
Descripti
Am 13.07.2013 13:55, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> I'm getting a yum dependency problem when running "yum update"
> and I'm not sure how to solve it.
> I'd be very grateful for advice.
>
> Some exerpts from the error messages are:
> ---
> Error: Package: perl-core-5.10.1-
Am 13.07.2013 13:07, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Fernando Lozano
> wrote:
>>
>> If people on the users list don't agree with me, there's no point
>> submiting to developers.
>>
> Well I for one certainly don't agree with you.
> If you disable it everywhere it's t
Am 12.07.2013 21:57, schrieb lee:
> The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the
> configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the
> devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are
> informed accordingly.
don't get me wrong but if you
Am 13.07.2013 01:18, schrieb poma:
>> Unfortunately those module options are currently not being honored (bug
>> already opened). Changing those defaults (specifically, disabled=1 being
>> the new default) would be a way to implement what I propose. But I guess
>> it would not be easy for Network
Am 13.07.2013 00:45, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> Can you give a practical example, please. I've no reason to disbelieve you,
>> but I've also never run across such a case and would like to see one.
>>
> This kind of depends on what iptables o
Am 13.07.2013 02:34, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> and the answer comes back to exactly this port
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall
>>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDP_hole_punching
> "On some routers where port randomizati
Am 13.07.2013 00:01, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 07/12/2013 02:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> so please read this and if possible please tell me the
>> magic where NM writes whatever in a unknown config file
>> to get rid of the ipv6-link-local address
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Am 12.07.2013 22:17, schrieb d...@davenjudy.org:
>>
>>
>> Am 12.07.2013 20:24, schrieb David G.Miller:
>>> Fernando Lozano lozano.eti.br> writes:
> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the
>>> kernel. Just the network interfaces configs
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps Fedora
Am 12.07.2013 23:33, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 07/12/2013 02:17 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>> 1. Users should be able to disable IPv6. Today they can't and this is a
>> bug that hopefully will be solved soon. I think no one ever intended
>> IPv6 to be mandatory. ;-)
>
> Actually, they can, but they
Am 12.07.2013 22:00, schrieb Paul Smith:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19:
>>>
>>> smpboot: CPU2: Not responding.
>>>
>>> The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it
>>> without hav
Am 12.07.2013 20:24, schrieb David G.Miller:
> Fernando Lozano lozano.eti.br> writes:
>>> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the
> kernel. Just the network interfaces configs
>
>
> Perhaps Fedora is the wrong distribution for you.
>
> The whole idea behind Fedor
Am 12.07.2013 19:49, schrieb Paul Smith:
> I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19:
>
> smpboot: CPU2: Not responding.
>
> The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it
> without having to power off the computer?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Document
Am 12.07.2013 19:41, schrieb Fernando Lozano:
>> hence it would be enough if "ifup" would respect the configuration
>> i can not see "just having IPv6 enabled means there is an IPv6 address"
>> below - where is there ipv6 enabled? there is even a "IPV6INIT=no"
> I have overlooked that. I'm not a
Am 12.07.2013 21:45, schrieb Paul Smith:
> Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What
> are the main reasons?
because after F19 is released a month later F17 is EOL and
get no security updates and no support and the same for F19
after F20 is released
if you do not wa
Am 12.07.2013 18:44, schrieb Fernando Lozano:
>> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel.
>> Just the network interfaces configs
>> that should come with IPv6 disabled by default, if the user wants it should
>> be easy to enable]
>> exactly *that* is my point
Am 12.07.2013 17:49, schrieb Fernando Lozano:
> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel.
> Just the network interfaces configs
> that should come with IPv6 disabled by default, if the user wants it should
> be easy to enable]
exactly *that* is my point
it is
this is childish
there is a difference between well aware ipv4 and
all sorts of firewalls and proctections configured
or startup in a network with ipv6 enabled without
knowing it or not configured at all
coming up with a "link-local" address inside a network
which is *pure ipv4* on a server means
Am 12.07.2013 16:04, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Tim said:
>> How is your firewall set up? When you allow something for IPv4, does it
>> make a corresponding rule for IPv6, at the same time. Likewise, for if
>> you block something. And I mean that in two ways, dealing with ports,
Am 13.07.2013 17:50, schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
>> like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
>> replaced by more recent versions. Maybe this could
Hello,
I tried to create an application launcher but I cannot find the clue
in fedora 19!
Right click does not offer such an option.
alacarte either.
firppery (add panel favorite), in theory yes, but not in pratice. Seceral
frippery applications do not work like SystemMonitor
Thank for any help.
I have just reported a crash in Libre Office. The system took about an
hour for it. Is this normal. I don't remember submitting crash reports
taking so long. The bulk of the time was spent in "Generating
backtrace", though "Initializing virtual root" also took a fair while.
Here's the log:
On 7/13/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
Once the fundamental Transhumanism technologies are fully
operational.
--
An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest.
-Benjamin Franklin
--
u
On 07/13/2013 02:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, lee wrote:
>> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
>
> When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
> (Boot Manager for Humans)
>
> FC
>
I added this to the kernel line in grub.conf and it made t
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, lee wrote:
> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lee wrote:
>> chmod 755 /home
>>
>> But what about
>>
>> /home/psmith
>
> It depends on what you want. There is some tradition that home
> directories are readable for everyone and writable for their owners
> only. It may be a good idea to make them readable for
On 07/13/2013 11:57 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
Besides all the reasons already mentioned: It can be much more
manageable to adjust one or two things when upgrading from one release
to the next than it may be having to suddenly adjust five or ten after
skipping s
On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A p
On 07/13/2013 09:44 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
ALL!).And now for.."fedup-cli --network 19"...and I'll keep my
fingers crossedbut what's the time frame?like an
hour?2?...2+1/2?
About an hour or two --- it depends on how fast you can download
packages
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:20:49 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
> On 07/13/2013 07:49 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> > Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in
> > the menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödingerâs Cat.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> I also find this annonying. Appare
On 07/13/2013 02:13 PM, Doug wrote:
On 07/13/2013 10:39 AM, lee wrote:
Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
There's something about fonts in grub.c
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Assuming that package A doesn't work with the more recent version of
> package C?
Right, that was my assumption. If it does, then it would just update
them all.
...snip...
> Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish.
>
On 07/13/2013 10:39 AM, lee wrote:
> Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
>
>> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
>> menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
>
> Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
>
> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
>
/snip/
Schröding
On 13/07/13 09:43, Beartooth wrote:
I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the boot
messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in addition to
hiding those messages.
Hi, you should be able to set the default to show the boot messages with;
sudo plymouth-set-d
I posted about this issue on the devel list and it was recommended
that I try here. That conversation can be found at:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185305.html
Here's a description of the issue:
I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from
CentOS 6
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 05:57:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what he menat was showing the difference between
> present and new config file before updates and the
> option to merge them - not that the merge is useful
> in many cases but *that* is was Debian offers
Oh, I see. There used to be
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
Besides all the reasons already mentioned: It can be much more
manageable to adjust one or two things when upgrading from one release
to the next than it may be having to suddenly adjust five or ten after
skipping some releases.
What are the main reasons not to u
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
> The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
> like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
> replaced by more recent versions. Maybe this could be done in Fedora as
> well?
You could try using yu
On 10/07/13 07:05, Dick Roark wrote:
R
est in peace, Seth.
May he Rest In Peace and condolences for his family.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fe
>
> You could install the NVIDIA drivers instead of using nouveau. They're
> are at least ten times faster, so it makes sense anyway.
>
I think I'll give this a try. Originally I wanted to use the free drivers,
but if they will not work this seems like the most practical solution.
--
users maili
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:20:49 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
> I also find this annonying. Apparently the default font isn't unicode,
> but the OS name is coded that way.
Just show how successful unicode support has been after all
these decades :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/13/2013 07:49 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
> menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödingerâs Cat.
>
> Thanks
I also find this annonying. Apparently the default font isn't unicode,
but the OS name is coded that way.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 04:39:32PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
>
> > Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
> > menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
>
> Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
>
> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> imagine you have the following:
>>
>>
>> package A, depends on C, installed
>> package B, depends on C, not installed
>> package C, installed
>>
>>
>> All the packages are version 1. After a while, you ins
Paul Smith writes:
> Dear All,
>
> Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What
> are the main reasons?
Besides all the reasons already mentioned: It can be much more
manageable to adjust one or two things when upgrading from one release
to the next than it may be havin
Paul Smith writes:
> chmod 755 /home
>
> But what about
>
> /home/psmith
It depends on what you want. There is some tradition that home
directories are readable for everyone and writable for their owners
only. It may be a good idea to make them readable for their owners only
--- or a bad idea
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:57:04PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the
>> configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the
>> devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are
>> inf
Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
> menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
,
| [...]
| if [ x$feature_default_font_path = xy ] ; then
|
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
