Re: How to remove nouveau driver without using rpmfusion ?

On 13.07.2013, John Wendel wrote: > Can someone please post the incantation necessary to remove the nouveau > driver in Fedora 19. I'd really like to install the driver directly from > Nvidia, instead of from rpmfusion. You have to recompile your kernel with nouveau switched it off in your kerne

Re: R: F18 to F19: shutdown doesn't work in LXDE

On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote: > poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03: >> On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote: >>> >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738 >>> >>> here we are :-) >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi

Re: R: F18 to F19: shutdown doesn't work in LXDE

poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03: On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738 here we are :-) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800658 poma should it be already fixed in F19???

Re: Scala can't be installed in Fedora 19

2013/7/11 Rahul Sundaram : > This is a packaging issue. I assume the package maintainer is aware but you > can file a report in bugzilla if one doesn't exist already > > Rahul I though it, maybe I should do it, indeed. -Isaac C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi, >> Unfortunately those module options are currently not being honored (bug >> already opened). > What is written in the 'ipv6.txt' certainly works. Have you tried? Because there are other people on the list claiming it isn't working. >> About binaries requiring ipv6, that's like expecting a p

Re: what has 'yum update' done?

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:57:04PM +0200, lee wrote: > The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the > configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the > devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are > informed accordingly. > Where/how

Re: OpenJDK packaging bug in Fedora 19

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Tom Horsley said: >> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:54:36 -0500 >> Rex Dieter wrote: >> > Ditto. I've been meaning to write a packaging draft to the >> > alternatives guidelines to enforce the idea that packages MUST own >> > their 'alternatives' targets >> >> But

Re: questions on package management

On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200 lee wrote: > Hi, > > imagine you have the following: > > > package A, depends on C, installed > package B, depends on C, not installed > package C, installed > > > All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B, > and in the meantime,

How to remove nouveau driver without using rpmfusion ?

Can someone please post the incantation necessary to remove the nouveau driver in Fedora 19. I'd really like to install the driver directly from Nvidia, instead of from rpmfusion. Thanks John Wendel -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription optio

Re: questions on package management

On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote: Hi, imagine you have the following: package A, depends on C, installed package B, depends on C, not installed package C, installed All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B, and in the meantime, package B has been updated to vers

Re: what has 'yum update' done?

Joe Zeff writes: > On 07/11/2013 01:27 PM, lee wrote: >> I have been assuming that people re-install because their experience is >> that upgrading is so troublesome that they figure that they're better >> off re-installing. Why would anyone go to the lengths of re-installing >> if there weren't

Re: Problems running emacs under Fedora-19

Jonathan Ryshpan writes: > When I attempt to run emacs it fails: > System is Fedora-19 with all upgrades running on a 4 processor x86_64 > system. > > Ideas? Build from source? You can compile emacs just fine if you want. Follow the instructions in the INSTALL file and check the output of conf

Re: [GW-C] [ECOTONE] Re: rant of the day: installing fedora

"D. Hugh Redelmeier" writes: > | From: Tom Horsley > > | How did you get past the screen that only lets you pick a whole disk > | drive then, as the only possible option after that, click "Done"? > | (Or, as I did the first time I saw it, push the reset button :-). > | > | No power on earth cou

questions on package management

Hi, imagine you have the following: package A, depends on C, installed package B, depends on C, not installed package C, installed All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B, and in the meantime, package B has been updated to version 2 so that it now depends on versi

Re: what has 'yum update' done?

"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: > On 07/12/2013 03:19 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 07/11/2013 11:38 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote: >>> Only speaking for myself: I always try to upgrade first, having a >>> complete backup, of course. If it doesn't work, I reinstall. There's >>> nothing to loose, since I'm ex

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

Jon Dufresne writes: > Hello, > > I am currently running F17. > > In preparations for upgrading I tested out F19 Beta, Alpha, and final live > CD. All versions show the same bug, creating an unusable desktop. > > Any thoughts on what to do? You could install the NVIDIA drivers instead of using

Unable to access Samba from outside of my Fedora 19 box

Hello friends I am experiencing a problem to access my Samba shared resources on my Fedora 19 box... they are only visible/accessible from my linux box, but when trying to access from another computer, although the Samba server is shown while browsing the network, when I try to access from oth

Re: Cannot login into home directory

On 7/12/2013 3:27 PM, Paul Smith wrote: When I login, I get the following problem: -- psmith: /home/psmith: change directory failed: Permission denied I have the following: drwx--. 191 psmith psmith 12288 Jul 12 23:13 psmith Any ideas? Sounds like Selinux security contexts rel

Re: Disabling ipv6

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > and the answer comes back to exactly this port > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDP_hole_punching "On some routers where port randomization is performed on a per-outbound host basis, the ports

Cannot login with XFCE

Dear All, Something strange is happening. I have just installed F19 XFCE, and copied my home directory from an external drive, but now I cannot login via the graphical login manager; I need to go to CNTRL + ALT + F2 to login and then startx. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailin

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

On 12.07.2013 23:53, Fernando Lozano wrote: > Hi, >> On 12.07.2013 18:44, Fernando Lozano wrote: >> … >>> So, ifconfig or ip or whatever would have to disable IPv6 for any >>> interface that does not having an explicit IPv6 address. I'd think it >>> would be easier to have the default eth*-cfg file

Re: Disabling ipv6

> This kind of depends on what iptables or firewall rules you have, > but for a moment lets assume that you allow "related" connections on your input. > > What this means is to allow anything you connect outbound to to be > trusted to make a reverse connection back to you. > > So you are therefore

Re: Cannot login into home directory

On 07/12/2013 05:27 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All, > > When I login, I get the following problem: > > -- psmith: /home/psmith: change directory failed: Permission denied > > I have the following: > > drwx--. 191 psmith psmith 12288 Jul 12 23:13 psmith > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advan

Re: Disabling ipv6

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > > Can you give a practical example, please. I've no reason to disbelieve you, > but I've also never run across such a case and would like to see one. > This kind of depends on what iptables or firewall rules you have, but for a moment lets assume

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

On 12.07.2013 23:55, Jon Dufresne wrote: >>> Should I be able to test this on FC17 before upgrading to FC19 to test >> this >>> works before re-installing the system? >> >> Isn't it obvious? :) >> Keep in mind neither the upgrade doesn't guarantee anything regarding. >> >> > I see. > > In that cas

Cannot login into home directory

Dear All, When I login, I get the following problem: -- psmith: /home/psmith: change directory failed: Permission denied I have the following: drwx--. 191 psmith psmith 12288 Jul 12 23:13 psmith Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

> > Should I be able to test this on FC17 before upgrading to FC19 to test > this > > works before re-installing the system? > > Isn't it obvious? :) > Keep in mind neither the upgrade doesn't guarantee anything regarding. > > I see. In that case how could I verify if an updated kernel fixes the b

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi, > On 12.07.2013 18:44, Fernando Lozano wrote: > … >> So, ifconfig or ip or whatever would have to disable IPv6 for any >> interface that does not having an explicit IPv6 address. I'd think it >> would be easier to have the default eth*-cfg files and Network Manager >> disable IPv6 unless the us

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

On 07/12/2013 02:38 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote: IMHO "have to look" should not be required by most users. IPv6 today serves networing people. Fedora is not only for networking people, and I from my experience most Fedora users are not networking people. Do we have data about Fedora user demographi

Re: [389-users] Accessing TCP options data in 389ds Hello,

That is true but load balancer iptables see incoming requests as they are. I'm not sure that this is what you need. What information you wish to receive? Besides the real client IP? 12 lip 2013 23:48, "Justin Kinney" napisał(a): > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Grzegorz Dwornicki wrote: >

Re: TPM for rngd

On 07/12/2013 03:14 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Anyone know how to use rngd with a TPM? I've checked that the TPM is > turned on in my BIOS, and I'm able to load the tpm module, but rngd > still fails, because /dev/tpm0 doesn't exist. Had to install kernel-modules-extra to get tpm_tis.ko. -- =

possibly OT: finding the right plugins for Firefox on F19

Hi all! I've got F19 on one of my netbooks, and F17 on the other. the F17 netbook has no trouble playing itunes movie trailers, while the F19 one displays a black window with the video controls, but won't actually play anything. I've just spent over an hour comparing the FF plugins on the two mac

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi joe, > On 07/12/2013 02:17 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote: >> 1. Users should be able to disable IPv6. Today they can't and this is a >> bug that hopefully will be solved soon. I think no one ever intended >> IPv6 to be mandatory. ;-) > > Actually, they can, but they have to take the time to configur

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

On 07/12/2013 02:17 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote: 1. Users should be able to disable IPv6. Today they can't and this is a bug that hopefully will be solved soon. I think no one ever intended IPv6 to be mandatory. ;-) Actually, they can, but they have to take the time to configure the connection i

Re: [389-users] Accessing TCP options data in 389ds Hello,

On 07/12/2013 03:25 PM, Justin Kinney wrote: Hello, I'm investigating the possibility of logging client IP address where 389ds is deployed behind a load balancer. Today, we lose the true client IP address as the source IP is replaced with the load balancer's before the packet hits the 389 hos

[389-users] Accessing TCP options data in 389ds Hello,

Hello, I'm investigating the possibility of logging client IP address where 389ds is deployed behind a load balancer. Today, we lose the true client IP address as the source IP is replaced with the load balancer's before the packet hits the 389 host. Has anybody solved this issue before? For HTTP

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi, >> Have you checked https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982740? > yes i have "NETWORKING_IPV6=no" since virtually forever > in "/etc/sysconfig/network" as well as "IPV6INIT=false" > in the interface configurations > > this was most time ignored I wasn't aware this bug was so serious. P

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

On 12.07.2013 22:05, Jon Dufresne wrote: >> lspci -nn | grep VGA > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation G80 [GeForce > 8800 GTX] [10de:0191] (rev a2) > >> yum install >> > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel/3.11.0/0.rc0.git6.1.fc20/x86_64/kernel-3.11.0-0.r

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi, >> Perhaps Fedora is the wrong distribution for you. >> >> The whole idea behind Fedora is for it to be an "engineering proving >> ground" where new technologies (like IPv6) are rolled out for real world >> use. Not all Fedora users work in the networking fields. Many are developers who doesn't

Re: how to pxe boot using Fedora 19 live CDs

On 07/12/2013 01:44 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: Yup. I have tried that. I get an out of memory error or the connection times out. That doesn't sound right. How much RAM and swap do you have? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https:

Re: R: F18 to F19: shutdown doesn't work in LXDE

On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738 > > here we are :-) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800658 poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: ht

Re: F18 to F19: shutdown doesn't work in LXDE

On 12.07.2013 10:58, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote: > > > Fedup worked fine also on a small old laptop. > > We have a minor issue, when we try to switch off from the menu, machine > doesn't shut down and we have to use the power button to poweroff > > But if we issue poweroff or reboot w

Re: Computer blocked because of error smpboot CPU2: Not responding

On 07/12/2013 01:43 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Power cycling (more specifically thermal cycling) is harder on the hardware than simply leaving it on. In my 35+ years in electronics, generally if a piece of equipment is going to die, it's going to do so during power up or a really big swing in temper

Re: how to pxe boot using Fedora 19 live CDs

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Jerome Yanga wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jerome Yanga >wrote: > > > > > I have tried many configs and have failed to pxe boot a live Fedora 19 > cd. > > > I need help in the boot para

Re: Computer blocked because of error smpboot CPU2: Not responding

On 07/12/2013 01:00 PM, Paul Smith issued this missive: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19: smpboot: CPU2: Not responding. The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it without having to p

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

> > > Am 12.07.2013 20:24, schrieb David G.Miller: >> Fernando Lozano lozano.eti.br> writes: [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the >> kernel. Just the network interfaces configs >> >> >> Perhaps Fedora is the wrong distribution for you. >> >> The whole idea behi

TPM for rngd

Anyone know how to use rngd with a TPM? I've checked that the TPM is turned on in my BIOS, and I'm able to load the tpm module, but rngd still fails, because /dev/tpm0 doesn't exist. Any pointers appreciated. Thanks! -- I

Re: Fwd: Touchpad is not working anymore

On 12.07.2013 21:27, Diego Vargas wrote: > Hello All, > > I just wanted to let you know that I fixed my problem. Finally. > It seems Windows unactivated the touchpad with something like the Fn+F5. > So, after 4 days of research, many many people said that using a fedora > live cd and then pressing

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

> lspci -nn | grep VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation G80 [GeForce 8800 GTX] [10de:0191] (rev a2) > yum install > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel/3.11.0/0.rc0.git6.1.fc20/x86_64/kernel-3.11.0-0.rc0.git6.1.fc20.x86_64.rpm Should I be able to test th

Re: Computer blocked because of error smpboot CPU2: Not responding

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19: >> >> smpboot: CPU2: Not responding. >> >> The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it >> without having to power off the computer? > > https://www.kern

Re: Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released?

On 07/12/2013 12:51 PM, Temlakos wrote: Today we have an upgrade tool that makes the upgrade process almost seamless. That is, as long as you upgrade every time. Miss a version, and you're in trouble. Miss two or three versions, and any major change will force you to do a complete, wipe-your-driv

Re: Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released?

On 07/12/2013 03:45 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All, Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What are the main reasons? Thanks in advance, Paul As far as it was explained to me: you're not REALLY required to upgrade, if the version you're using suits your purposes. Th

Re: Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released?

On 07/12/2013 03:45 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All, Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What are the main reasons? Thanks in advance, Paul Today we have an upgrade tool that makes the upgrade process almost seamless. That is, as long as you upgrade every time.

Re: Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released?

On 07/12/2013 02:45 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All, > > Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What > are the main reasons? > Assuming you're on a version that still gets support, patches, and updates: 1. If you've chosen Fedora, it's because you like living near t

Re: what has 'yum update' done?

On 07/12/2013 03:33 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 07/12/2013 09:10 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: See?...it's stuff like the stories above that make me hesitant to go from 18 to 19 Why? Something went wrong. Once. I spent several days, off and on, cleaning up cruft and duplicate packages from a

Re: Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released?

On 12/07/13 15:45, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All, Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What are the main reasons? Thanks in advance, Paul Access to newer versions of software and the features they add. In general, it's personal preference. How "bleeding edge" do yo

Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released?

Dear All, Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What are the main reasons? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: ht

Re: what has 'yum update' done?

On 07/12/2013 09:10 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: See?...it's stuff like the stories above that make me hesitant to go from 18 to 19 Why? Something went wrong. Once. I spent several days, off and on, cleaning up cruft and duplicate packages from a CLI, got the GUI working and all was we

Fwd: Touchpad is not working anymore

Hello All, I just wanted to let you know that I fixed my problem. Finally. It seems Windows unactivated the touchpad with something like the Fn+F5. So, after 4 days of research, many many people said that using a fedora live cd and then pressing the Fn+F5 there it will activate it. Even that solut

Re: how to pxe boot using Fedora 19 live CDs

On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Jerome Yanga wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > > > I have tried many configs and have failed to pxe boot a live Fedora 19 cd. > > I need help in the boot parameters. Here is my current one. > > > > LABEL fedora_x86_64_19 > > MENU

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

On 12.07.2013 18:44, Fernando Lozano wrote: … > So, ifconfig or ip or whatever would have to disable IPv6 for any > interface that does not having an explicit IPv6 address. I'd think it > would be easier to have the default eth*-cfg files and Network Manager > disable IPv6 unless the user tells the

Re: Computer blocked because of error smpboot CPU2: Not responding

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19: > > smpboot: CPU2: Not responding. > > The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it > without having to power off the computer? I believe that the cause of

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Fernando Lozano lozano.eti.br> writes: > > Hi, > > > [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel. Just the network interfaces configs Perhaps Fedora is the wrong distribution for you. The whole idea behind Fedora is for it to be an "engineering proving groun

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

On 12.07.2013 18:56, Jon Dufresne wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently running F17. As it is nearing end of life, I am anxious to > upgrade. Around kernel 3.7, I started to experience very heavy graphics > slowdown and corruption. I reported a bug around the time I experienced it < > https://bugzill

Re: Problems running emacs under Fedora-19

On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 09:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/12/13 08:35, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > When I attempt to run emacs it fails: > > > > $ emacs > > emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls.so.26: > > cannot open shared object file: No such file or

Computer blocked because of error smpboot CPU2: Not responding

Dear All, I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19: smpboot: CPU2: Not responding. The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it without having to power off the computer? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi, hence it would be enough if "ifup" would respect the configuration i can not see "just having IPv6 enabled means there is an IPv6 address" below - where is there ipv6 enabled? there is even a "IPV6INIT=no" I have overlooked that. I'm not a Fedora developer, have to check if IPV6INIT means wh

Re: F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

On 07/12/13 11:56, Jon Dufresne wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently running F17. As it is nearing end of life, I am anxious to > upgrade. Around kernel 3.7, I started to experience very > heavy graphics slowdown and corruption. I reported a bug around the time I > experienced it >

F19 nouveau corrupted graphics

Hello, I am currently running F17. As it is nearing end of life, I am anxious to upgrade. Around kernel 3.7, I started to experience very heavy graphics slowdown and corruption. I reported a bug around the time I experienced it < https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912459>. Because F17 has

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi, [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel. Just the network interfaces configs that should come with IPv6 disabled by default, if the user wants it should be easy to enable] exactly *that* is my point it is ridiculous that i bave a clearly static ipv4 conf

Re: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv4/6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi, If you got scared, why not keep the entire network down? If you want it, sure you can enable it ;-) By your reasoning, Fedora doesn't need to provide secure installation defaults. Anyone could craft their own iptables rules and selinux policies if they feed a need for better security. And

RE: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv4/6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: If you got scared, why not keep the entire network down? If you want it, sure you can enable it ;-) That is what I do. If I'm using my computer and need internet access, I just click on the start-listening icon. Said icon then becomes a stop-lis

Re: services vs firewall

On 07/11/2013 10:41 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:09:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> One question. Is the nfs server running? >> > > Thanks, good catch! I too figured it wasn't running because nmap reports > closed if the port is open, but nothing's listening on it. So I

Re: what has 'yum update' done?

On 07/12/2013 03:19 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 07/11/2013 11:38 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote: Only speaking for myself: I always try to upgrade first, having a complete backup, of course. If it doesn't work, I reinstall. There's nothing to loose, since I'm expecting to reinstall anyway. I've had an updat

RE: Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv4/6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

If you got scared, why not keep the entire network down? If you want it, sure you can enable it ;-) Enjoy your weekend. -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Fernando Lozano Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 5

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi, I took me time to recover this one, another more techinical content about IPv6 security: http://w3.antd.nist.gov/iip_pubs/Montgomery-ipv6-security-findings.doc []s, Fernando Lozano Hi, You keep talking about IPv6 security risks (over IPv4), but haven't cited any. While I don't know o

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 07/12/2013 08:22 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/09/2013 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/09/2013 06:43 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: Hi! We are having problems with some our 389-DS instances. They crash after receiving an update from the provider. After looking at the stack trace, I thin

Re: idea for F20 release name to honor Seth

I agree, but we are not suggesting naming the release after him, but something that some of us think would be a good but indirect way of honoring him. Of course, I would not mind dropping the naming process altogether Ranjan On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:31:03 +0100 Clive Hills wrote: > +1 to do

Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Hi Chris, [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel. Just the network interfaces configs that should come with IPv6 disabled by default, if the user wants it should be easy to enable] Once upon a time, Fernando Lozano said: IPv6 has alot of "under the carpe

Re: Fedup 17->18 won't boot, all partitions are GPT

Hi Ian, > > I did a fedup from F17 to F18 on my work desktop. Now I get an > > infinite boot loop. Fdisk can't look at the partition table of > > /dev/sda because it has been coverted to GPT format (who did that?). Ian Chapman writes: > When dealing with GPT partition tables, parted is proba

Re: [GW-C] [ECOTONE] Re: rant of the day: installing fedora

Hi On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:45 AM, François Patte < francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 12/07/2013 05:45, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > > > File a bug report on what? So many problems with this "new" anaconda! > the partitionning pro

Re: idea for F20 release name to honor Seth

+1 to do what we did re Dennis. On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > When this came up in reference to Dennis Ritchie's death during the F16 > development cycle, the decision was made to do a dedication rather than > naming the release after him. This isn't identical to the

Re: idea for F20 release name to honor Seth

When this came up in reference to Dennis Ritchie's death during the F16 development cycle, the decision was made to do a dedication rather than naming the release after him. This isn't identical to the situation with Seth since he was a community member, but I still think the reasoning applies.

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi, NAT is a fact today, has been for years, and people have been using Bittorrent and Skype regardless. And sometimes they (and other applications) don't work, because of things like layered NAT. Fix NAT issues instead of ditch it altogether. For home users and SMBs, NAT is something that w

idea for F20 release name to honor Seth

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:48:00AM -0300, Sylvia Sánchez wrote: > +1 to Yummy Cycles The F20 name nomination period is officially over, but we haven't had the vote yet. I suppose this should be a ticket with FESCO or the Fedora Board if people are really interested in making this happen. https://

Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba

Hi Andrew, I work on a NAS product myself, and at this vendor and my previous vendor Samba 4.0 as an AD DC was all I ever needed to use to test the AD integration features of the NAS. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett Please tell me which product this is, so I can contact the local reseller. :-) You ca

Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw

On 07/12/2013 08:33 AM, Barton, Joseph B. wrote: Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:55:01 -0600 From: Rich Megginson To: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw Message-ID: <51df1ba5.5010...@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 07/11/

Re: [OT] Seth Vidal, creator of "yum" killed in bike accident

+1 to Yummy Cycles LAILAH -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraprojec

Re: Fedup from 17 -> 19 okay?

Me also, except for the Java issue (which is easy to fix using alternatives). If anyone is interested, it worked fine. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Can I skip 18 and upgrade from 17 to 19 with fedup? Has anyone tried this with success or failure? -- users maili

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi, Tim: If manufacturers and software programmers don't pull their fingers out, we'll be faced with even more ISPs subjecting their clients to NAT. Fernando Lozano: Would this be so bad? Most people at work have been working using NAT for years. NAT increases security. Most internet users do

Re: [OT] Seth Vidal, creator of "yum" killed in bike accident

On Friday 12 July 2013 04:29 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: I liked the suggestions of Biker Yum or Yummy Cycles as names for F20. Perhaps could use one of these or similar and have the dedication to him also. Ranjan FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAV

Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw

>Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:55:01 -0600 >From: Rich Megginson >To: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org >Subject: Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw >Message-ID: <51df1ba5.5010...@redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed >On 07/11/2013 02:32 PM, Barton, Joseph B. wrote: >>

Re: Disabling ipv6

Once upon a time, Fernando Lozano said: > IPv6 has alot of "under the carpet" issues because vendors fear too > much discussion about this will delay large-scale use even more. Again: citation needed. Without any actual issues sited, you are just spreading FUD. > I propose we let the billion do

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi Chris, The best practices have largely been agreed to (as much as any best practices ever are). IPv6 is as mature as it can get until a billion end-users get on it. Large ISPs around the world have rolled it out in production. Major OSes support it out-of-the-box. If you don't even try to

Re: psmouse-alps-1.3 and f19

Maybe I founded the problem: $ fgrep MOUSE_PS2 /usr/src/kernels/3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64/.config CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ALPS=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LOGIPS2PP=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_SYNAPTICS=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_CYPRESS=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LIFEBOOK=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TRACKPOINT=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_E

Re: Disabling ipv6

Hi, You keep talking about IPv6 security risks (over IPv4), but haven't cited any. While I don't know of security risks of IPv6, itself, there is this: If you follow IPv6 on the net you should have found lots of articles about this, and how it affects specially home users and SMBs. Here are so

Re: Disabling ipv6

Once upon a time, Tim said: > How is your firewall set up? When you allow something for IPv4, does it > make a corresponding rule for IPv6, at the same time. Likewise, for if > you block something. And I mean that in two ways, dealing with ports, > and addresses. I may decide to block all port

Re: [OT] Seth Vidal, creator of "yum" killed in bike accident

On Wednesday 10 July 2013 01:59 AM, staticsafe wrote: http://durham.io/2013/07/09/seth-vidal-creator-of-yum-open-source-software-killed-in-bike-accident-off-hillandale-rd/ May he rest in peace. RIP ... condolences to his family -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Jatin Khatri RHCSA,RHCE,CCNA Regis

Re: Disabling ipv6

Once upon a time, Fernando Lozano said: > I don't know there, but here ISPs are not well known for investing > in human resources. :-( I'd guess some big corporations will really > adopt IPv6 before most ISPs. I just don't think it's time for SMBs > to work (fight) with IPv6, they should wait for

Re: [GW-C] [ECOTONE] Re: rant of the day: installing fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 12/07/2013 05:45, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > Hi > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:11 PM, D. Hugh RedelmeierAnaconda's screens > need to be more wordy to make things clearer > > and less scary to the user. > > > Perhaps you can file a bug rep

  1   2   >