-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 14/06/2013 13:29, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>> However it has been told that FastCGI provide also a performance
>> increase so, we would like to reach it also :)
Faster than CGI, probably, but nearly nobody use CGI nowadays ;)
> ok, fire them real
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2013, staticsafe sent:
> visudo does some syntax checks to check for errors in the edit.
As well as ensuring that your edits are accepted. It's possible to edit
the file, and thanks to the timing of when you did the edit, and other
things happening on the system, th
Doug:
> In my sudoers, that line
... which is this line:%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
> is commented out, and should be. You don't want everybody and his
> brother to have sudo privileges.
It doesn't need to be. Because no users are in the wheel group unless
you customise things when setting up the
On 06/14/2013 07:55 PM, Paul Erickson wrote:
On 06/14/2013 03:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:36 -0700
Paul Erickson wrote:
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today,
if got the following message:
...snip...
I have never encountered this before.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:17:06PM -0700, jackson byers wrote:
> from:
> http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f17.html
>Personal Fedora 17 Installation Guide
>by Mauriat Miranda (http://www.mjmwired.net/contact/)
>echo 'loginname ALL=(ALL) ALL' >> /etc/sudoers
>Where 'loginn
On 06/14/2013 03:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:36 -0700
Paul Erickson wrote:
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today,
if got the following message:
...snip...
I have never encountered this before. Any suggestions?
Try now? Should be fixed.
Am 14.06.2013 23:10, schrieb Clemens Eisserer:
> I am running Fedora 19 + updates-testing and suddenly rsyslogd went crazy,
> and is now consuming constantly 120% cpu
> (and is also constantly expanding allocated memory).
> I first thought it could have something to do with updates I've applied
Am 14.06.2013 20:51, schrieb Steven Stern:
> On 06/14/2013 01:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Doug wrote:
>>> ## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
>>> %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
> This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Am 14.06.2013 14:33, schrieb Rafnews:
> i'm trying to create at home a webserver for testing purposes, having the
> same behavior as webhosting companies offers. the purpose behind that it's
> to have a representative environment when testing to not have particular
> "surprises" with web appli
Am 14.06.2013 13:21, schrieb Rafnews:
> On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
>>> however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
>>> edit/remove/move
>>> files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
>>> d
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
> however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
> edit/remove/move
> files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
> discovered
> that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) to do such thing,
>
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:51:53 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Did I read this right? /var/log/messages have been replaced by binary goo?
Nah, just the systemd crap which no one wants to read anyway
(I think). I certainly still have a /var/log/messages with lots
of junk in it (in fact, lots of syste
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:51:53 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> > http://www.happyassassin.net/2013/06/14/fedora-1920-logfile-explosions/
>
> Did I read this right? /var/log/messages have been replaced by binary
> goo?
No, you didn't read it right.
rsyslog now has the abi
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:36 -0700
Paul Erickson wrote:
> Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today,
> if got the following message:
...snip...
> I have never encountered this before. Any suggestions?
Try now? Should be fixed.
We were rolling out a new mirrormanager
Kevin Fenzi writes:
http://www.happyassassin.net/2013/06/14/fedora-1920-logfile-explosions/
Did I read this right? /var/log/messages have been replaced by binary goo?
pgpECfWLErgPF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today, if
got the following message:
[root@localhost ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
updates/18/x86_64/metalink | 16 kB
00:00
Traceback (most recent c
from:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f17.html
Personal Fedora 17 Installation Guide
by Mauriat Miranda (http://www.mjmwired.net/contact/)
echo 'loginname ALL=(ALL) ALL' >> /etc/sudoers
Where 'loginname' is your user account.
easier for me, no need for that awful 'vi'
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:28:16 +
"Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> > Same thing happens to me. I can run netflix-desktop from the
> > Ubuntu PPA on this same hardware in Debian Wheezy, but my results
> > match yours with the Fedora package.
>
> What desktop are using? I was tempted to try another ho
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:10:08 +0200
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Fedora 19 + updates-testing and suddenly rsyslogd went
> crazy, and is now consuming constantly 120% cpu (and is also
> constantly expanding allocated memory).
> I first thought it could have something to do with u
Hi,
I am running Fedora 19 + updates-testing and suddenly rsyslogd went crazy,
and is now consuming constantly 120% cpu (and is also constantly expanding
allocated memory).
I first thought it could have something to do with updates I've applied
recently, so I rolled back to an older btrfs-snapshot
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> > Same thing happens to me. I can run netflix-desktop from the Ubuntu PPA
> on this
> > same hardware in Debian Wheezy, but my results match yours with the
> Fedora package.
>
> What desktop are using? I was tempted to try another hoping
On 06/14/2013 01:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oh no. Start with 'sudo bash' or 'sudo su'. People do this all the time.
Then `unset HISTFILE`. Then do the above not with sudo.
But this is very off-topic.
It is and it isn't. If nothing else, it makes it clear just how easy it
is to gain un-log
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:21:44PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > sudo cp /bin/bash /bin/mylocalshell
> > sudo mylocalshell
> >I know this is preventable, but it's something to think about. No one
> >should have sudo who you would not trust with root itself. sudo just
> >adds a layer of accountabil
On 06/14/2013 11:51 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
OK, let's now have some fun
sudo cp /bin/bash /bin/mylocalshell
sudo mylocalshell
I know this is preventable, but it's something to think about. No one
should have sudo who you would not trust with root itself. sudo just
adds a layer of acco
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:51:42PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> >> %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
> This line *IS* uncommented by default.
> >>> Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to do it. In any case,
> >>> it was commented on the two CentOS 6 systems I just set up.
> >> In m
On 06/14/2013 01:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Doug wrote:
>> ## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
>> %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
>>> Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to d
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> ## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
> %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
> >>This line *IS* uncommented by default.
> >Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to do it. In any case,
> >it was commented on the two
On 06/14/2013 12:42 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 06/14/2013 08:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
remove the comment before the 2nd line here so it looks like this:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm... M
On 06/14/2013 08:40 AM, Rafnews issued this missive:
On 14.06.2013 13:21, Rafnews wrote:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account.
On 06/14/2013 08:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> remove the comment before the 2nd line here so it looks like this:
>> > ## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
>> > %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
> This line *IS* uncommented by default.
>
Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've h
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:25:39AM -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 12:37 AM, LingxianGuo wrote:
> >As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
> >the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
> >install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I co
On 14.06.2013 13:21, Rafnews wrote:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on
internet i discovered
that fastCGI
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:25:39AM -0400, Doug wrote:
> While you are "supposed" to use visudo to edit sudoers, that
> requires that you know how to use the vi editor. Visudo is designed
> to catch mistakes that you make. However, you can edit sudoers with
> any editor; it is only a text file and d
On 06/14/2013 12:37 AM, LingxianGuo wrote:
As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
the file of libflashplayer.so to /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugin
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:20:16AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> I'm not familiar with FastCGI, but just looking quickly at it, it looks
> like a replacement program so that *it* runs your CGI instead of Apache
> doing it. I don't know if that's a real advantage, or just a perceived
> one.
It's a real adva
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
...
> (this was my case, an I newer wait so long, thus I newer see
> selectable menu).
newer -> never
(sorry)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guide
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2013, Rafnews sent:
> Goal:
> i'm trying to create at home a webserver for testing purposes, having
> the same behavior as webhosting companies offers.
> the purpose behind that it's to have a representative environment when
> testing to not have particular "surprise
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:07:16PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > for now, all files/folders have correct permissions but owner is
> > apache:apache
> Once again : apache don't need to "own" the files, only to be able to
> read them.
And in fact, letting apache write to files it doesn't need to is
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:38:40AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> remove the comment before the 2nd line here so it looks like this:
> ## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
> %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
> Still as root, edit the groups file:
Le 14/06/2013 14:33, Rafnews a écrit :
> Situation:
> i installed on Fedora 18 a webserver where i need:
> - FastCGI
> - to use my standard fedora user account (let's say "rafnews") to
> edit/move/delete files/folder in my webroot /var/www/html folders, where
> files have 644 as permissions and fo
On 06/13/2013 11:37 PM, LingxianGuo wrote:
> As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
> the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
> install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
> the file of libflashplayer.so to /usr/lib64/mozilla/
On 14.06.2013 13:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 13:21, schrieb Rafnews:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while se
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
discovered
that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora use
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2013, Frantisek Hanzlik sent:
> - when I'm allready logged in before, then after entering bug URL
> I have non-selectable Component item, with clickable '(edit)' item.
> Clicking on it I see (shadowed and non-selectable) my component item
> - but voila - after waiting
Hi,
i have a webserver (apache 2.4/php5/mysql 5.6) and i want to be sure it
is setup to use FastCGI.
when i execute phpinfo(); i can see (in loaded modules):
[CODE]
mod_proxy_fcgi
mod_proxy_scgi
mod_cgi
mod_php5
[/CODE]
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/rem
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/10/13 19:05, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 06/10/13 18:11, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Few moments ago I report bug, but against wrong package (I report it
as x11vnc bug, but it seems be libvncserver bug). How I can change
to which compon
On 14.06.2013 00:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
…
> ...snip...
>
>> http://goo.gl/DXmGg
>
> I'm not sure how to fix that off hand.
>
> I will have to look into it more.
>
> kevin
http://goo.gl/DXmGg - 'About-BFO-shade.png'
poma
diff --git a/bfo/pxelinux.cfg/bfo.conf b/bfo/pxelinux.cfg/bfo.conf
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 12:37 +0800, LingxianGuo wrote:
> As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
> the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
> install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
> the file of libflashplayer.so to /usr/lib
48 matches
Mail list logo
