Re: Fedora vs RHEL

On 4/19/2013 10:27, g wrote: > > On 04/19/2013 09:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > <> > >> maybe you should not trust everything some random people >> writes and blindly repeat it instead use official sources > > it is not a matter of just 'some random people' writing. > > thanks to effects of goi

Re: firewalld files

On 4/19/2013 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have just built my first F18 box, and of course it is 'special'; it is > a Pogoplug running the armv5 distro. I have already had a couple issues > with this, and the fedora-arm list told me that these are general fedora > issues, so take it to the ge

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

On 04/20/2013 07:37 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Roger > wrote: It made me start thinking about Fedora vs CentOS because of the problems I'm experiencing with Drupal 7 and php/Apache in Fedora 18 so here goes. It might be hel

Re: I've stopped receiving mail from fedora users

On 4/19/2013 19:41, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > On 04/19/2013 11:11:58 AM, Sherman Grunewagon wrote: >> For the past few days I've stopped receiving e-mail from the fedora >> list. >> >> I' checked my fedora membership mailing list config and found this: >> >>We have received some recent bounces fr

disk spindown

Has anyone succeeded in spinning down disks under Fedora? I've done the following and the "hdparm -C" does show the disk spun down, but the next time I look it is spun up, and it stays up. The disk is unmounted and I've stopped and disabled smartd, so it isn't accessing the disks. I don't think

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 16:29 -0500, g wrote: > On 04/19/2013 04:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > <> > > unless you are the moderator for this list, stop trying acting like one. > > reply with what ever you like, because i will not see any more of your post. > > so again, KAFBA. > > -- Sorry, but t

Re: [Evolution] Problem with evolution passwd

From: Patrick O'Callaghan To: Aaron Konstam Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Fri, April 19, 2013 5:08:22 PM Subject: Re: [Evolution] Problem with evolution passwd On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 13:27 -0700, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > > __

Re: I've stopped receiving mail from fedora users

On 04/19/2013 11:11:58 AM, Sherman Grunewagon wrote: > For the past few days I've stopped receiving e-mail from the fedora > list. > > I' checked my fedora membership mailing list config and found this: > >    We have received some recent bounces from your address. Your > current bounce score is

Re: firewalld files

On 19.04.2013 23:33, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I got a ways to go before I write up a review. Once I at least get it > stablized, rsyncd running and nightly backups working. SAMBA access to > backups would be nice too, but with only 256Mb, that might be a stretch. So far, I see that this is the

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

Am 20.04.2013 00:47, schrieb David Beveridge: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >> http://www.centos.org/ >> CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and >> aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove >> ups

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

Hi On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, David Beveridge wrote: > see > > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html > > Controversy surrounds Red Hat's "obfuscated" source code release > This change, noted by Maxillian Attems a

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > http://www.centos.org/ > CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and > aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove > upstream vendor branding and artwork.) CentOS is free. > se

Re: F18 - no ifcfg-eth0

On 04/20/13 04:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Again this is the pogoplug armv5 install. > > There is no /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 Only an ifcfg-l0 > > Yet the ethernet works, via dhcp. there is no hostname. No hostname line in > /etc/sysconfig/network and of course not in ifcfg-e

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Roger wrote: > It made me start thinking about Fedora vs CentOS because of the problems > I'm experiencing with Drupal 7 and php/Apache in Fedora 18 so here goes. > It might be helpful to tell us what problems you're encountering with PHP, Apache, and Drupal 7 un

Re: firewalld files

On 04/19/2013 05:17 PM, poma wrote: On 19.04.2013 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have just built my first F18 box, and of course it is 'special'; it is a Pogoplug running the armv5 distro. I have already had a couple issues with this, and the fedora-arm list told me that these are general fe

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

Am 19.04.2013 23:29, schrieb g: > > On 04/19/2013 04:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > <> > > unless you are the moderator for this list, stop trying acting like one. i do not be a moderator to qualify FUD as what it is > reply with what ever you like, because i will not see any more of your post.

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

On 04/19/2013 04:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: <> unless you are the moderator for this list, stop trying acting like one. reply with what ever you like, because i will not see any more of your post. so again, KAFBA. -- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc. hago. g . -- users mai

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

Am 19.04.2013 23:14, schrieb g: > On 04/19/2013 04:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > <<>> > > KAFBA if you have nothing more to say after someone shows that you are only spread unqialified FUD do your self a favour and be quiet signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailin

Re: firewalld files

On 19.04.2013 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have just built my first F18 box, and of course it is 'special'; it is > a Pogoplug running the armv5 distro. I have already had a couple issues > with this, and the fedora-arm list told me that these are general fedora > issues, so take it to the g

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

On 04/19/2013 04:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: <<>> KAFBA -- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc. hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

Am 19.04.2013 22:52, schrieb g: > On 04/16/2013 10:10 PM, Roger wrote: >> >>> so drop centos and run fedora and/or scientific linux. you may well >>> find that scientific linux is very close to current fedora, with the >>> exception of some new !whiz! !bang! software. >>> >>> >> This is just ab

Re: Fedora vs CentOS -- php/apache and Drupal 7

hello roger. On 04/16/2013 10:10 PM, Roger wrote: so drop centos and run fedora and/or scientific linux. you may well find that scientific linux is very close to current fedora, with the exception of some new !whiz! !bang! software. This is just about where I am at now. CentOs is getting t

Re: Problem with cron

On 04/19/2013 01:10 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: I've been very busy recently and only had a brief look at some procmail filtered folders, where the question you had asked was still unanswered. So, I replied. Oh. OK, asked and answered. And, I'd like to mention that I didn't mean to imply tha

F18 - no ifcfg-eth0

Again this is the pogoplug armv5 install. There is no /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 Only an ifcfg-l0 Yet the ethernet works, via dhcp. there is no hostname. No hostname line in /etc/sysconfig/network and of course not in ifcfg-eth0. In /etc/hosts, the system is labeled localhost

Re: recoll and mime-text

On 19.04.2013 21:09, Dave Stevens wrote: > Quoting poma : > >> On 19.04.2013 18:36, Dave Stevens wrote: >>> Quoting poma : >>> On 19.04.2013 14:14, medoc wrote: > > [recoll not properly managing an attachment] > > > Ifirc its uudecode. It has been 14 years since I used it. > >

Re: [Evolution] Problem with evolution passwd

From: Patrick O'Callaghan To: evolution-l...@gnome.org Sent: Fri, April 19, 2013 3:19:59 PM Subject: Re: [Evolution] Problem with evolution passwd On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:02 -0700, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Suddenly this morning when I open evolution it is aski

firewalld files

I have just built my first F18 box, and of course it is 'special'; it is a Pogoplug running the armv5 distro. I have already had a couple issues with this, and the fedora-arm list told me that these are general fedora issues, so take it to the general fedora list. So to start: What are the fi

Re: Problem with cron

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:49:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > What I don't understand is why you're bothering with this three weeks > later. It's just like over at fedoraforum.org where somebody made a > foolish suggestion today about an issue I'd marked as [SOLVED] six days > ago, with a complete exp

Re: recoll and mime-text

Quoting poma : On 19.04.2013 18:36, Dave Stevens wrote: Quoting poma : On 19.04.2013 14:14, medoc wrote: > [recoll not properly managing an attachment] > > Ifirc its uudecode. It has been 14 years since I used it. > > > > Hth > > yes, that's it, in sharutils, too. > > Thanks! > > D

Re: Email clients have gone crazy

Am 19.04.2013 20:53, schrieb Aaron Konstam: > I am running F18. But suddenly this morning my e-mail clients claim not to > accept my server passwd. > When I open evolution it asks for a passwd whxih it has never done before. My > usual mail server passwds do not work.' > Thunderbird claims that

Fw: Email clients have gone crazy

--- --- I am running F18. But suddenly this morning my e-mail clients claim not to accept my server passwd. When I open evolution it asks for a passwd whxih it has never done before. My usual mail server passwds do not work.' Thunderbird claims that my login or passwd is wrong. Where the l

Re: I've stopped receiving mail from fedora users

On 04/19/2013 11:11 AM, Sherman Grunewagon wrote: There are no filters and no blocking set. I really don't know what to do at this point. Who should I contact and what else should I check? Normally I don't recommend having replies go to both you and the list (I consider it redundant unless th

Re: recoll and mime-text

On 19.04.2013 18:36, Dave Stevens wrote: > Quoting poma : > >> On 19.04.2013 14:14, medoc wrote: >>> > [recoll not properly managing an attachment] >>> > > Ifirc its uudecode. It has been 14 years since I used it. >>> > > >>> > > Hth >>> > >>> > yes, that's it, in sharutils, too. >>> > >>>

I've stopped receiving mail from fedora users

For the past few days I've stopped receiving e-mail from the fedora list. I' checked my fedora membership mailing list config and found this:    We have received some recent bounces from your address. Your current bounce score is 3.0 out of a maximum of 5.0.    Please double check that your sub

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

Hi On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 19.04.2013 04:16, schrieb g: > > On 04/18/2013 07:26 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hi > > <> > > > >> Since both CentOS and SL are rebuilds of RHEL. the 3rd party repos > should > >> be compatible with either > > > > centos does

Re: recoll and mime-text

Hi, While I appreciate the importance of waging desktop wars :) I really believe that the problem resides elsewhere, it might be a corrupt MIME format for this particular message, or Recoll not identifying the container as a mail folder (unlikely as you wrote that Thunderbird was launched by "Open

Re: Fedora 18 cannot mount any USB device

Hi I see here a problem only with one device,/dev/sdd1 Do you have a problem with another storage device like a disk on key What does fdisk -l show? Rgs Rami Rosen On Apr 18, 2013 9:43 PM, "Marek Miller" wrote: > > Hi all, > > After upgading F18 a week ago I cannot mount any sub device: > > /var

Re: recoll and mime-text

Quoting poma : On 19.04.2013 14:14, medoc wrote: > [recoll not properly managing an attachment] > > Ifirc its uudecode. It has been 14 years since I used it. > > > > Hth > > yes, that's it, in sharutils, too. > > Thanks! > > Dave Hi, Normally, Recoll should properly separate the att

Re: F18 livecd can't play wma files, and no mplayer

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 15:48:50 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote: Yes, I know Rick. I've found the hard way that Fedora's media players, as shipped with the OS, are basically useless for playing any media you find on the Net, no mp3 playback, no wma audio playback, can't even play back *.mp4 (MP

Re: Keyboard LED applet

On 04/19/2013 11:00 AM, Colin J Thomson wrote: > Use the "add widgets" option to download new widgets and do a search for > "lock > keys" of which there are two available, both work very well. Excellent! (I couldn't figure out the correct search term.) Thank you! -- =

Re: Keyboard LED applet

Hi Ian, On Friday 19 Apr 2013 00:04:50 Ian Pilcher wrote: > Just when you think that laptop manufacturers couldn't go any farther > off the rails, Lenovo has apparently decided that physical keyboard > status LEDs are just too darn expensive. > > Does anyone know of a keyboard LED applet/widget t

Re: [389-users] X11 forwarding refused

Ok maybe i didn't quite understand your question and i think i dont get at all the way of this works cause i only have one simple user account in AD with the right of replication and i never done any changes in AD's part is this could be the reason why nothing works ! 2013/4/19 Aziza Lich

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

g wrote: > > are you so naïf to believe that centos would publish such? g, Let it go. You're wrong and you're doing nothing but harm by spreading misinformation that you can't even provide a source for. I don't like to call people out publicly, but people rely on these lists to make important d

Re: recoll and mime-text

On 19.04.2013 14:14, medoc wrote: > > [recoll not properly managing an attachment] > > > Ifirc its uudecode. It has been 14 years since I used it. > > > > > > Hth > > > > yes, that's it, in sharutils, too. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Dave > > Hi, > > Normally, Recoll should properly sepa

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

Am 19.04.2013 16:27, schrieb g: >> http://www.centos.org/ >> CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and >> aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove >> upstream vendor branding and artwork.) CentOS is free. > > well, KAFBA. > >

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

On 04/19/2013 09:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: <> maybe you should not trust everything some random people writes and blindly repeat it instead use official sources it is not a matter of just 'some random people' writing. thanks to effects of going thru chemotherapy, my recall is not as good a

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

Am 19.04.2013 15:57, schrieb g: > On 04/19/2013 03:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 19.04.2013 04:16, schrieb g: >>> On 04/18/2013 07:26 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Since both CentOS and SL are rebuilds of RHEL. the 3rd party repos should be compatible with either >>> >>> centos does a l

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

On 04/19/2013 03:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.04.2013 04:16, schrieb g: On 04/18/2013 07:26 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi <> Since both CentOS and SL are rebuilds of RHEL. the 3rd party repos should be compatible with either centos does a lot of chop and remove from rhel package and

F18 OpenJDK 7 caused crash in Java Image Editor -> GTK file requester (fixed with OpenJDK7 update)

Just FYI... The OpenJDK 7 build of Java included in the Fedora 18 LiveCD includes a bug that causes Java Image Editor http://www.jhlabs.com/ie/ (a Paint Shop Pro look-alike written in Pure Java) to crash when trying to open a file. Luckily, after updating to the latest OpenJDK 7, the app works fi

Re: recoll and mime-text

> [recoll not properly managing an attachment] > > Ifirc its uudecode. It has been 14 years since I used it. > > > > Hth > > yes, that's it, in sharutils, too. > > Thanks! > > Dave Hi, Normally, Recoll should properly separate the attachment. What you are seeing looks like a bug in R

Re: SELinux fails to apply local policy module

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/18/2013 05:07 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:32:23PM -0700, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> You seem to have a lot of cruft in your policy directory. >> >> Could you just remove the directory and reinstall policy. >>

Re: Can't upgrade Fedora 17

2013-04-19 10:15 keltezéssel, Reindl Harald írta: Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing regular system update (or at la

Re: selinux-policy syntax errors?

On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:22:53 +0200 Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > Hi, > > I was running "yum upgrade" and these were printed: > Update already on the way. -- Regards, Frank http//www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options

selinux-policy syntax errors?

Hi, I was running "yum upgrade" and these were printed: ... Frissítés : selinux-policy-targeted-3.11.1-90.fc18.noarch 47/139 *** Frissítés : selinux-pol

Re: Can't upgrade Fedora 17

Am 19.04.2013 10:50, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: > I don't like arguments about terms. and i don't like discussions about clear subjects like "yum does not solve dependencies" instead "can't upgrade" while it is pretty clear that such dep-problems in case of a normal update are going away as t

Re: Can't upgrade Fedora 17

On 19.04.2013 10:15, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: >> On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing regular system update (o

Re: Keyboard LED applet

On 04/19/2013 11:14 AM, g wrote: > > On 04/19/2013 12:04 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> Just when you think that laptop manufacturers couldn't go any farther >> off the rails, Lenovo has apparently decided that physical keyboard >> status LEDs are just too darn expensive. > > if you consider the oem c

Re: Can't upgrade Fedora 17

Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: > On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: >>> No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing >>> regular system update (or at last, I'm trying) >> * so please do NOT

Re: Fedora vs RHEL

Am 19.04.2013 04:16, schrieb g: > On 04/18/2013 07:26 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi > <> > >> Since both CentOS and SL are rebuilds of RHEL. the 3rd party repos should >> be compatible with either > > centos does a lot of chop and remove from rhel package and adds a lot of > their own crud.