Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On 23 Feb 2013 at 13:17, Tim wrote: Subject:Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18 From: Tim To: Community support for Fedora users Date sent: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:17:31 +1030 > Tim: > >> My first computer only had 16k. > > Michael D.

RE: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

> No, but there's a better way! All of our spec files are available in git, > and the "fedpkg" command is a nice wrapper around access to the repository. It sounds amazing. It's a nice trick! > So: > > $ sudo yum install fedpkg > [...] > $ fedpkg clone firefox > Cloning into 'firefox'... > remot

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:10 -0800, Mike Wright wrote: > I wasted more than one afternoon re-coiling a dropped role of paper > tape. When we finally got a "fan-fold" tape reader we thought the > rapture had arrived !D And those of us who've had to deal with 500 metres of 16mm movie films coming

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

Tom Horsley: >> Ha! Punched cards! We would have thanked God for >> punched cards! The Data General Nova in the engineering >> lab at FAU only had an ASR-33 tty with a paper >> tape attachment :-). Joe Zeff: > You have no idea how happy I am that I never needed to mess with that > stuff. Still,

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

Tim: >> My first computer only had 16k. Michael D. Setzer II: > Or even older. My first computer was an IBM 1130 with 4K of core > memory and punch cards. No monitor, but a typewriter like > display. You owned a computer that used punch cards? ;-) I was referring to the one that I owned. I t

Re: con I use fedup with 3.6 kernel?

Maurizio Marini wrote: Hello I have at the moment runing kernel evrsion Linux tikal 3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 I can't use 3.7 as it does not work w/ my radeon card, sadly. I am reading instruction about fedup: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F 1. Do a full s

Re: Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

Am 23.02.2013 01:23, schrieb Bill Davidsen: > because it is quicker to just reinstall than fight with fedup first, then > either > reinstall anyway or spend more time getting back to a stable system than > reinstall > takes you do not need fedup or reinstall at all http://fedoraproject.org/wi

Re: Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:14:50 -0500 jonc wrote: On 02/22/2013 12:01 PM, Maurizio Marini wrote: Hello please excuse very lame question, don't blame me :) I am downloading this iso: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux//releases/18/Live/x8

Re: Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

On 02/23/13 01:45, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > which makes me wonder: why do we still need to make these cds/dvd > install media? why not also make some media that works on usb? > not clear if it can be done: only wondering aloud of course Because several of my my systems can't boot -- From now o

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On 22/02/2013 20:08, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.02.2013 21:01, schrieb Joe Zeff: On 02/22/2013 11:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: Ha! Punched cards! We would have thanked God for punched cards! The Data General Nova in the engineering lab at FAU only had an ASR-33 tty with a paper tape attachment :

Re: UEFI support from command line

On 02/22/2013 08:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Rami Rosen wrote: >> Well, the first line, "efi: EFI v2.31 by American Megatrends", >> is (almost for sure) from /arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c (assuming this >> is intel machine; you only replied that it is 64 bit machine, I assume >> that it is i

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

02/22/2013 11:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:45:41 -0800 Joe Zeff wrote: Ah, yes, core memory, punched cards and a typewriter. Ha! Punched cards! We would have thanked God for punched cards! The Data General Nova in the engineering lab at FAU only had an ASR-33 tty with a pa

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

Am 22.02.2013 21:01, schrieb Joe Zeff: > On 02/22/2013 11:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> Ha! Punched cards! We would have thanked God for >> punched cards! The Data General Nova in the engineering >> lab at FAU only had an ASR-33 tty with a paper >> tape attachment :-). > > You have no idea how ha

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On 02/22/2013 11:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: Ha! Punched cards! We would have thanked God for punched cards! The Data General Nova in the engineering lab at FAU only had an ASR-33 tty with a paper tape attachment :-). You have no idea how happy I am that I never needed to mess with that stuff.

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:45:41 -0800 Joe Zeff wrote: > Ah, yes, core memory, punched cards and a typewriter. Ha! Punched cards! We would have thanked God for punched cards! The Data General Nova in the engineering lab at FAU only had an ASR-33 tty with a paper tape attachment :-). -- users mailing

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On 02/22/2013 03:46 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: Or even older. My first computer was an IBM 1130 with 4K of core memory and punch cards. No monitor, but a typewriter like display. Ah, yes, core memory, punched cards and a typewriter. I cut my teeth on an IBM 1620 Mod 2 in the late '60s.

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On 02/22/2013 03:27 AM, Tim wrote: On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 10:44 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: Try using CP/M, with a memory limit of 64K. Only once, I think... ;-) It was a computerised teleprompter. My first computer only had 16k. Yeah; I too had (and loved) a TI-994A. -- users mailing list use

Re: NetworkManager update breaks DNS config [SOLVED?]

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:34 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 02/22/13 13:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> [egreshko@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf > >> # Generated by NetworkManager > >> nameserver 192.168.0.1 > >> > >> You've downgraded

Re: What does "mapping=identity" mean in /etc/exports?

On 02/20/13 18:55, ergodic wrote: > Hi Bill running Fedora 18, I tried: > > # rpm -q idmapd > package idmapd is not installed > > then: > > # yum install idmapd > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * fedora: ftp.linux.ncsu.edu > * livna: rpm.livna.org > * rpmfusion-free: mirror.us.l

Re: What does "mapping=identity" mean in /etc/exports?

On 02/16/13 22:09, Greg Scott wrote: > Hello - > > I'm migrating an old NFS server to newer hardware. /etc/exports in the old > environment looks like this: > > /shares/IMSHCS01 > *(rw,insecure,sync,no_root_squash,all_squash,mapping=identity,anonuid=0,anongid=0 > > So the old system is

Re: Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

Am 22.02.2013 18:45, schrieb Ranjan Maitra: > which makes me wonder: why do we still need to make these cds/dvd > install media? why not also make some media that works on usb? > not clear if it can be done: only wondering aloud of course why not? you need a install media only once per new

Re: Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:14:50 -0500 jonc wrote: > On 02/22/2013 12:01 PM, Maurizio Marini wrote: > > Hello > > please excuse very lame question, don't blame me :) > > I am downloading this iso: > > http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux//releases/18/Live/x86_64/Fe

Re: con I use fedup with 3.6 kernel?

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:27:49 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > you will end up simply in a 3.7 kernel > wait a few weeks and look if kernel 3.8 works for you > there will be a build for sure soon > for sure i'll do, thnx :) as i read in a post https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 "trie

Re: con I use fedup with 3.6 kernel?

Am 22.02.2013 18:19, schrieb Maurizio Marini: > Hello > I have at the moment runing kernel evrsion > Linux tikal 3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 > I can't use 3.7 as it does not work w/ my radeon card, sadly. > > I am reading instruction about fedup: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade

con I use fedup with 3.6 kernel?

Hello I have at the moment runing kernel evrsion Linux tikal 3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 I can't use 3.7 as it does not work w/ my radeon card, sadly. I am reading instruction about fedup: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F 1. Do a full system update and reboot

Re: Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

On 02/22/2013 12:01 PM, Maurizio Marini wrote: Hello please excuse very lame question, don't blame me :) I am downloading this iso: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux//releases/18/Live/x86_64/Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso that is 831 MB Well, how can it fit i

Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: lame question

Hello please excuse very lame question, don't blame me :) I am downloading this iso: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux//releases/18/Live/x86_64/Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso that is 831 MB Well, how can it fit into a normal CD? Aren't they still 700MB circa?

RE: What does "mapping=identity" mean in /etc/exports?

I also checked for references to an idmapd RPM, with yum list available and rpm -qa, both on Fedora 18 and RHEL 6.3 and came up empty. > Hi Bill running Fedora 18, I tried: > > # rpm -q idmapd > package idmapd is not installed - Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

RE: What does "mapping=identity" mean in /etc/exports?

Meanwhile, we went into production with the new NFS server and updated /etc/exports file last weekend. The app that depends on the NFS server seems to be working just fine. But in my case, the whole thing is wide open and the app doesn't seem to care a whole lot about mapping user identities.

Re: wakeup after pm-hibernate

On 02/21/13 08:41, Kevin Wilson wrote: > Hi, > The same is with my desktop - can only be waken up from > suspend by the power-on button. > Last time I played with this, after acpitool obsoletion, echo enabled > /sys/devices/pci…/power/wakeup http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing/sy

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

On 02/22/13 10:19, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:43AM +0100, poma wrote: >> Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git? > > Whoops, sorry; forgot about that. I don't think the default should change > since, since I think the most common use is active Fedo

Re: UEFI support from command line

Rami Rosen wrote: > Well, the first line, "efi: EFI v2.31 by American Megatrends", > is (almost for sure) from /arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c (assuming this > is intel machine; you only replied that it is 64 bit machine, I assume > that it is intel). > > I am not sure that this indeed says that the E

Re: UEFI support from command line

Hi, Well, the first line, "efi: EFI v2.31 by American Megatrends", is (almost for sure) from /arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c (assuming this is intel machine; you only replied that it is 64 bit machine, I assume that it is intel). I am not sure that this indeed says that the EFI is active. does efi_en

Re: UEFI support from command line

On 02/22/2013 07:53 AM, Rami Rosen wrote: > Steven, > I believe that when EFI is enabled, > dmesg | grep EFI should yield results. > > Is it Intel x86 (32 or 64 bit) based machine ? > > Because I see in the efi code this: > ... > pr_info("EFI v%u.%.02u by %s\n", > ... > > http://lxr.free-electr

Re: UEFI support from command line

Steven, I believe that when EFI is enabled, dmesg | grep EFI should yield results. Is it Intel x86 (32 or 64 bit) based machine ? Because I see in the efi code this: ... pr_info("EFI v%u.%.02u by %s\n", ... http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c#L676 I believe it is s

Re: [F18] Cannot mount SD card

On 02/22/2013 06:42 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote: When I plug my SD card, nothing happens. dmesg gives what's written below. On another computer, I have installed kernel-modules-extra. Any link with that? I am also going to update the kernel to 3.7.9. Frédéric [12658.129346] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Acce

Re: UEFI support from command line

On 02/22/2013 07:38 AM, Kevin Wilson wrote: > Thanks Steven. > Following Bill Davidsen comment - did you ran it on a machine > where UEFI is not active ? And if the answer is yes, do you known what > do you get when you run it on a machine where > UEFI is active ? > I think UEFI is active, but I'

Re: UEFI support from command line

Thanks Steven. Following Bill Davidsen comment - did you ran it on a machine where UEFI is not active ? And if the answer is yes, do you known what do you get when you run it on a machine where UEFI is active ? regards, Kevin On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > On 02/18/2013

Re: UEFI support from command line

Hi, What do you mean by telling "if UEFI is active you can't run dmidecode". What happens when you run "dmidecode" on a console of a machine where UEFI is active? do you get an an error ? rgs Kevin On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Kevin Wilson wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Is there

Re: LDAP client authentication on Fedora 16/17

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Pavel Lisy wrote: > Amit Karpe píše v Pá 22. 02. 2013 v 14:40 +0800: > > Hi, > > While configuring LDAP client authentication on Fedora 16/17, I am > > testing this on Fedora 16 & 17. I have install openldap-clients > > nss_ldap . I am facing following problem. >

Re: LDAP client authentication on Fedora 16/17

Amit Karpe píše v Pá 22. 02. 2013 v 14:40 +0800: > Hi, > While configuring LDAP client authentication on Fedora 16/17, I am > testing this on Fedora 16 & 17. I have install openldap-clients > nss_ldap . I am facing following problem. > I have done configuration by following this url [1] > > Just t

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On 22 Feb 2013 at 21:57, Tim wrote: Subject:Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18 From: Tim To: Community support for Fedora users Date sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:57:38 +1030 Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users

[F18] Cannot mount SD card

When I plug my SD card, nothing happens. dmesg gives what's written below. On another computer, I have installed kernel-modules-extra. Any link with that? I am also going to update the kernel to 3.7.9. Frédéric [12658.129346] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access CanonMP610 series 1050 PQ: 0 ANSI:

Re: Custom Partition Fedora 18

On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 10:44 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > Try using CP/M, with a memory limit of 64K. Only once, I think... ;-) It was a computerised teleprompter. My first computer only had 16k. -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public

Re: NFS on Fedora 17

> > Just found this > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868584 > > -- I am going through this bug report. But could not find final solution. Can I force mount to use nfs2 ?? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://

Re: NFS on Fedora 17

> > OK quite a bit of memory available. > > Heck, even on my VM (running F18-64) with just over 1GB of memory I have > > [root@f18x ~]# modprobe -v nfs > insmod /lib/modules/3.7.9-201.fc18.x86_64/kernel/fs/fscache/fscache.ko > insmod > /lib/modules/3.7.9-201.fc18.x86_64/kernel/net/dns_res

Re: NFS on Fedora 17

On 02/22/13 17:01, Amit Karpe wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 02/22/13 16:43, Amit Karpe wrote: >>> While loading module I got following error: >>> [root@localhost ~]# modprobe -v nfs >>> insmod /lib/modules/3.6.11-1.fc17.i686.PAE/kernel/fs/nfs/nfs.ko >>> ERROR: c

Re: e1000e problem in Fedora 15

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 22.02.2013 10:24, schrieb Amit Karpe: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Reindl Harald > > h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > > > Am 22.02.2013 10:16, schrieb Amit Karpe: > > >>> [ 1633.233297] e1000e :04:00.0:

Re: e1000e problem in Fedora 15

Am 22.02.2013 10:24, schrieb Amit Karpe: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > Am 22.02.2013 10:16, schrieb Amit Karpe: > >>> [ 1633.233297] e1000e :04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X > >>> [ 1633.284094] e1000e :04:00.

Re: e1000e problem in Fedora 15

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 22.02.2013 10:16, schrieb Amit Karpe: > >>> [ 1633.233297] e1000e :04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X > >>> [ 1633.284094] e1000e :04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X > >>> [ 1633.285079] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready > >>>

Re: e1000e problem in Fedora 15

Am 22.02.2013 10:16, schrieb Amit Karpe: >>> [ 1633.233297] e1000e :04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X >>> [ 1633.284094] e1000e :04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X >>> [ 1633.285079] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready >>> [ 1642.265283] e1000e :04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X >>> [ 164

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:43AM +0100, poma wrote: > Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git? Whoops, sorry; forgot about that. I don't think the default should change since, since I think the most common use is active Fedora contributors. If you find yourself using this a

Re: e1000e problem in Fedora 15

Reply in-line: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 22.02.2013 07:39, schrieb Amit Karpe: >> We having new HP Z820 workstation. Which have Intel 82574L & 82579LM gigabit >> network card. >> While booting in Fedora 15 it just stuck. Following are output in Fedora >> 1

Re: NFS on Fedora 17

On 02/22/13 17:01, Amit Karpe wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 02/22/13 16:43, Amit Karpe wrote: >>> While loading module I got following error: >>> [root@localhost ~]# modprobe -v nfs >>> insmod /lib/modules/3.6.11-1.fc17.i686.PAE/kernel/fs/nfs/nfs.ko >>> ERROR: c

Re: e1000e problem in Fedora 15

Am 22.02.2013 07:39, schrieb Amit Karpe: > We having new HP Z820 workstation. Which have Intel 82574L & 82579LM gigabit > network card. > While booting in Fedora 15 it just stuck. Following are output in Fedora 17 > (where system boot with success.) > [root@localhost ldap_newhp]# lspci -nn |

Re: NFS on Fedora 17

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 02/22/13 16:43, Amit Karpe wrote: >> While loading module I got following error: >> [root@localhost ~]# modprobe -v nfs >> insmod /lib/modules/3.6.11-1.fc17.i686.PAE/kernel/fs/nfs/nfs.ko >> ERROR: could not insert 'nfs': Cannot allocate memor

Re: NFS on Fedora 17

On 02/22/13 16:43, Amit Karpe wrote: > While loading module I got following error: > [root@localhost ~]# modprobe -v nfs > insmod /lib/modules/3.6.11-1.fc17.i686.PAE/kernel/fs/nfs/nfs.ko > ERROR: could not insert 'nfs': Cannot allocate memory What does the output of "free" show? -- From now on,

NFS on Fedora 17

Hi, I am facing problem using nfs on Fedora 17. While mounting nfs partition by following command: [root@localhost ~]# mount borneo:/home/ /mnt/home -v mount.nfs: timeout set for Fri Feb 22 16:40:07 2013 mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=4,addr=172.21.123.225,clientaddr=172.21.123.229' m