Hi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> yum localinstall *.rpm
> -- otherwise, yum will complain that RPM DB was modified by something
> other than yum (harmless warning, I think..
>
May not be harmless.
http://illiterat.livejournal.com/7834.html
Always use yum if you
OK, you do not want things to continue processing. So what I posted will
not solve your problem.
So what you have for rule 1 is:
not Xforwarded to both kira...@gmail.com and ash...@pcraft.com
and not xforwarded to both kira...@gmail.com and ash...@pcigrafx.com
and not from kira...@gm
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> It seems, based on his last message, that he doesn't have a working system to
> implement the suggestions. He said: "I´m stuck in the meantime with a
> netbook running winblows."
Yea, my power supply started funny noises and when I disassemb
On 01/23/2013 10:14 PM, Doug wrote:
> If you have a directory with a whole batch of RPMs, all part
> of some program suite, is it possible to use a wildcard to
> install all of the RPMs at once, like so:
>rpm -Uvh *.rpm
> If not is there some other simple way ot do it? T
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Edward M wrote:
>In the link enclosed below is to a website, you may of heard of,
> named Distrowatch, that lists
>which packages are pre-bundle with Fedora 18?
>just scrow down to the "Table Notes and Explanations" section and
> choose
>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> Can I email that to you offlist?
Sure, thanks a bunch, Ed!
I originally thought of pastebin as I´d thought it would remain online
and maybe help somebody else looking for the same info. But whatever
suits you best.
Thanks!
FC
--
users maili
If you have a directory with a whole batch of RPMs, all part
of some program suite, is it possible to use a wildcard to
install all of the RPMs at once, like so:
rpm -Uvh *.rpm
If not is there some other simple way ot do it? The program
in question has about 20 RPMs. (No
On 01/24/2013 01:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:03:05 -0300,
> Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>
>> But 19 messages after the original post, I´m still answering why I
>> want to obtain such list, instead of saying ´thank you´ to whoever
>> might have provided it.
>
> I though
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:03:05 -0300,
Fernando Cassia wrote:
But 19 messages after the original post, I´m still answering why I
want to obtain such list, instead of saying ´thank you´ to whoever
might have provided it.
I thought you got multiple reasonable answers (using yum or repoquery)
On 1/23/2013 2:43 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I have tried googling "list of fedora packages" "f18" "fedora 18
packages list" and the like and couldn´t come up with such list.
Why isn´t any such list of packages published for each release?. I´m
sure that if someone does and such list is indexed b
On 01/24/2013 01:03 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I´ll now have to wait until I get the power supply of my F17 box back
> (an Opteron 2216), to boot F17 and do it myself.
>
> I´m stuck in the meantime with a netbook running winblows.
OK
I ran repoquery -qa --releasever=18 > 18.txt.
[egreshko
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> It isn't uncommon for people to ask for a particular solution to a more
> general problem, which is better off being solved a different way. Knowing
> why someone wants a particular solution can lead to being able to provide
> them a better
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:27:49 -0300,
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
C'mon, you are sounding like a troll.
What can one answer when someone question your motives or intent
instead of trying to help with the specific request?.
Answer the fo
HI,
I was wondering if anyone had any further suggestions on this?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:18:06 -0600 Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> Thanks very much for the response.
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:00:44 +0100 Zoltan Hoppar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ranjan,
> >
> > Please
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> C'mon, you are sounding like a troll.
What can one answer when someone question your motives or intent
instead of trying to help with the specific request?.
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
No, the second rule should ONLY process when a message passes the first
rule (and does NOT get bounced out to gmail.) I believe, please correct me
if I'm wrong here, but I believe the way you've rewritten it, rule 2 will
ALWAYS run, regardless of the outcome of rule 1. This will result in
duplica
The basic rule to remember with procmail is that once the email is
delivered processing is ended. So if the rule passes you must then
clone the email and deliver the clone. That allows the rules to keep
on processing.
I imagine you also want the second rule to continue processing as well.
Someth
The way this should work is as follows:
- new e-mail arrives at the recipient's box and procmail picks it up and
checks the X-Forward-For header
- if the header does NOT contain any of those listed, it forwards the
message to the specified gmail address
> STOP <
- if the header exists and conta
On 01/23/2013 07:12 PM, jonc wrote:
It's a perfectly valid way to list commands that need to be run as
root when you're writing a tutorial, without making any assumptions
about the skill level of the user.
I would have seen nothing wrong with using sudo before each command
because that's how
On 01/23/2013 07:02 PM, Lailah wrote:
El lun, 21-01-2013 a las 09:00 +0100, William Murray escribió:
Dear list,
(What do we call the shell thingies which replaced applets?)
Yes, it should be a better way. But is Gnome 3, it has very few
options for everything. Maybe an extension
On 01/23/2013 10:04 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/23/2013 06:50 PM, Temlakos wrote:
Why does the method you linked to, recommend using the "su" method, that
is, "becoming root" with every single command?
Somebody wasn't thinking. If I'd have written that, I'd have
specified using su first, fol
On 01/23/2013 06:50 PM, Temlakos wrote:
Why does the method you linked to, recommend using the "su" method, that
is, "becoming root" with every single command?
Somebody wasn't thinking. If I'd have written that, I'd have specified
using su first, followed by the rest of the commands. You o
On 2013/01/23 15:28, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Ok, I'm still trying to figure this out. On the new, test account, i can get it
to log so I just need to figure out the other two. However, I recreated the
same recipe on the test account and what I'm seeing in the log is the first part
of the reci
On 01/23/2013 09:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.01.2013 03:10, schrieb Temlakos:
Everyone:
I'm trying to sort out the rumors I've heard. Among other things: that using a
Live Spin CD on an existing Fedora
system is not safe, and will destroy all data.
Has that actually happened to anyone
Am 24.01.2013 03:10, schrieb Temlakos:
> Everyone:
>
> I'm trying to sort out the rumors I've heard. Among other things: that using
> a Live Spin CD on an existing Fedora
> system is not safe, and will destroy all data.
>
> Has that actually happened to anyone here?
> What is the safest way to
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 01:22 +, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed F18 yesterday and did updates and everything seemed fine.
>
> Today I am getting a black message box at the bottom of the Gnome Window
> saying "Connection Failed: "
>
> ifconfig says everything is okay and I have success
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 18:10 -0600, Richard Sewill wrote:
> I installed F18. Was previously on F15.
>
> Overall, am pleased with F18.
>
> Have old hardware, 1G RAM. Was afraid to upgrade, but all is well.
>
> I used KDE on F15. Still using KDE on F18.
>
> One thing.
>
> Similar to F15, my cu
Everyone:
I'm trying to sort out the rumors I've heard. Among other things: that
using a Live Spin CD on an existing Fedora system is not safe, and will
destroy all data.
Has that actually happened to anyone here?
What is the safest way to upgrade an existing system from F17->F18?
Temlakos
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:07:53 -0200 Itamar Reis Peixoto
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
> > Reindl Harald writes:
> >
> >> now the damage is done - F18 is a release with a highly dangerous
> >> or partly unuseable installer depending on the usecase/workload
>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 19:06:55 -0500,
Max Pyziur wrote:
Having read Buzilla reports, the packager indicated that Anki 2.0 is
ready for prime time on F18 and F17 on 1/13/2013.
Given that it is 1/23/2013, I'm just curious as to what else needs to
be done.
The builds have requests to pus
Am 24.01.2013 02:00, schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>
>> now the damage is done - F18 is a release with a highly dangerous
>> or partly unuseable installer depending on the usecase/workload
>> and nobody on this planet can change this for F18
>
> In theory, changes to fedup sh
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:26:24 -0500
Doug wrote:
> I'm not familiar with Fedora, but it seems logical that you could
> set up the partitions you want using GParted, format the ones
> you want formatted, and then not let Fedora mess with the
> partitions at all--just install to those that are there a
On 01/23/2013 05:26 PM, Doug wrote:
I'm not familiar with Fedora, but it seems logical that you could
set up the partitions you want using GParted, format the ones
you want formatted, and then not let Fedora mess with the
partitions at all--just install to those that are there already.
Even i
On 01/23/2013 04:36 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:57:07 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
It's exactly that. It doesn't "move" it, though, but reuses it.
I also used a shared /home, and since it's listed for the other
recognized "Linux" installations, I unfold one of those and fill in
Hi,
I installed F18 yesterday and did updates and everything seemed fine.
Today I am getting a black message box at the bottom of the Gnome Window
saying "Connection Failed: "
ifconfig says everything is okay and I have successfully done a 20 Gig
rsync.
Aaron
--
users mailing list
users@lists.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>
>> now the damage is done - F18 is a release with a highly dangerous
>> or partly unuseable installer depending on the usecase/workload
>> and nobody on this planet can change this for F18
>
>
> In theory, changes t
Reindl Harald writes:
now the damage is done - F18 is a release with a highly dangerous
or partly unuseable installer depending on the usecase/workload
and nobody on this planet can change this for F18
In theory, changes to fedup should be fairly open-ended, it could be
rewritten completely,
I installed F18. Was previously on F15.
Overall, am pleased with F18.
Have old hardware, 1G RAM. Was afraid to upgrade, but all is well.
I used KDE on F15. Still using KDE on F18.
One thing.
Similar to F15, my cursor disappeared several hours after I booted up.
I added the same fix I used
El lun, 21-01-2013 a las 09:00 +0100, William Murray escribió:
> Dear list,
> (What do we call the shell thingies which replaced applets?)
>
> I wanted to have the date at the top of my shiny new FC18 screen, not
> just the time.
> I installed dconf-editor, went to org->gome->shell and
El lun, 21-01-2013 a las 18:35 +0100, William Murray escribió:
> Thanks guys,
>I don't know what you did, but after upgrading my laptop
> FC17->FC18 I
> saw a 5 hr battery life being quoted - I never saw that long before.
>
> It may be something to do with optimus? My nvidia
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 13:59 +, Dave Cross escribió:
> I think that the new Anaconda is missing some functionality that was
> previously available. If it's not missing, then it's really well
> hidden and I'd appreciate some help tracking it down.
>
> As I mentioned in a previous email, FedU
Having read Buzilla reports, the packager indicated that Anki 2.0 is ready
for prime time on F18 and F17 on 1/13/2013.
Given that it is 1/23/2013, I'm just curious as to what else needs to be
done.
Thanks.
Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
Greetings,
I've done a fresh install on a Dell Latitude D630 laptop.
Until now, most issues have been minor.
I'm moving a large amount of Postgresql/PostGIS data from an older Dell
Inspiron 600m laptop.
I've run:
- postgresql-setup initdb
- systemctl start postgresql.service
- su - postg
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> no reason
Can we all just stop claiming this? It is tiring to hear this being
repeated so often. People don't change things for "no reason". This is
not a random mutation. If you don't know the reason, ask. If you know the
reason but
Ok, I'm still trying to figure this out. On the new, test account, i can
get it to log so I just need to figure out the other two. However, I
recreated the same recipe on the test account and what I'm seeing in the
log is the first part of the recipe only, it doesn't seem to do anything
with the
On 01/23/2013 04:35 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/23/2013 07:36 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
We learn by doing, not sure what I learned there though?
Unbalanced quotation marks are a Bad Thing.
Yes, that.
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box9
--
users mailing list
users@lis
On 01/24/2013 09:11 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/23/2013 11:59 AM, James Freer wrote:
Why not consider an
annual release which would give appropriate time for all to take
place?
That would probably be a Good Idea. Personally, I'd be happy if new
systems and re-writes of old ones were given cond
On 01/23/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
/home? There's a "Reformat" checkbox right of the mount-point field.
There are also other fields one would need to activate explicitly before
one could choose them (e.g. the filesystem when reformatting).
Yes. I've been reading about problems wit
On 01/23/2013 11:59 AM, James Freer wrote:
Why not consider an
annual release which would give appropriate time for all to take
place?
That would probably be a Good Idea. Personally, I'd be happy if new
systems and re-writes of old ones were given conditional approval: that
is, instead of ac
Ok, well those recipes are working and logging to /var/log/procmail.
I don't understand why this one, which is a lot shorter and simpler, won't
log. Nor will it work properly.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:45:52 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrot
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:45:52 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> a) selinux doesn't exist on this box
> b) doesn't matter where the log file is
>
> And related to a), I have two other accounts that are successfully logging
> to /var/log/procmail. They dump custom messages. The differences I see
a) selinux doesn't exist on this box
b) doesn't matter where the log file is
And related to a), I have two other accounts that are successfully logging
to /var/log/procmail. They dump custom messages. The differences I see is
that those recipes have this at the top, under the LOGFILE line:
LOGAB
Once upon a time, Ashley M. Kirchner said:
> It works if I use ${HOME} instead of ${HOMEDIR}.
>
> It also works if the path is set to /var/log/procmail
>
> If I log in to the account with the actual recipe, and I echo 'fubar' |
> procmail, that too dumps stuff into the log file.
>
> So why won'
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:57:07 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > It's exactly that. It doesn't "move" it, though, but reuses it.
> > I also used a shared /home, and since it's listed for the other
> > recognized "Linux" installations, I unfold one of those and fill in
> > the mount-point at the right side
On 01/23/2013 07:36 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
We learn by doing, not sure what I learned there though?
Unbalanced quotation marks are a Bad Thing.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
It works if I use ${HOME} instead of ${HOMEDIR}.
It also works if the path is set to /var/log/procmail
If I log in to the account with the actual recipe, and I echo 'fubar' |
procmail, that too dumps stuff into the log file.
So why won't it work when in this recipe:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
VE
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:59:21PM +, James Freer wrote:
>> I have the greatest respect for the developer's that put in
>> considerable effort for each release. The problem with 6 month release
>> cycle is too little time. I've used linu
On 01/23/2013 06:54 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
It's exactly that. It doesn't "move" it, though, but reuses it.
I also used a shared /home, and since it's listed for the other
recognized "Linux" installations, I unfold one of those and fill in
the mount-point at the right side of the screen.
Ca
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:32:29 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Ok, adding those two lines does nothing. I have:
>
> LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
> VERBOSE=on (also tried 'yes')
>
> This is at the top of the recipe. I'm getting nothing in that log file.
> It exists, and it's writable.
Create a
On 01/23/2013 01:29 PM, Picture Book wrote:
Is this https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/406 ?
Yes. Thanks a lot. Rich.
I recently migrated to 389 DS 1.2.10.12 from SUN DSEE. Overall it was a smooth
migration and I am really happy about 389 DS. I asked questions about 3 bugs I
encounter in the
2013/1/12 Niels Weber :
> 2013/1/12 Kevin Fenzi :
>> Spot's repo is back up.
>>
>> I'd advise using that:
>> http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/
>
> That is very helpful, thank you.
Sadly it doesn't seem to be updated with newer steam versions.
Does anyone know the status?
Niels
--
users mailing
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:33 PM, JPAM69 wrote:
> I just found in another post a trick, which worked for me:
>
> just create the 'trash' folder, quit the kontact application, start it
> again. kmail will automatically recognize the 'trash' directory, will
> assign the trash icon to it and all remo
Ok, adding those two lines does nothing. I have:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
VERBOSE=on (also tried 'yes')
This is at the top of the recipe. I'm getting nothing in that log file.
It exists, and it's writable.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 23.01.2013, Ashley M. Kir
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:59:21PM +, James Freer wrote:
> I have the greatest respect for the developer's that put in
> considerable effort for each release. The problem with 6 month release
> cycle is too little time. I've used linux now for almost 6 years with
Having some experience with ti
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:59 PM, James Freer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 01/23/2013 06:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> because first new anaconda was approved and integration
> >> all over the distribution started and after that damage
> >> was done peop
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 06:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> because first new anaconda was approved and integration
>> all over the distribution started and after that damage
>> was done people realized "hm new anaconda is not ready"
>
>
> So what you're s
On 01/23/2013 06:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
because first new anaconda was approved and integration
all over the distribution started and after that damage
was done people realized "hm new anaconda is not ready"
So what you're saying is, it was approved before it was ready. Judging
from what
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:53:31 +0100
William Murray wrote:
> "Connection closed by XXX.YYY.ZZZ.??? [preauth]"
That was one of the errors I was seeing which led me to start
this thread:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-January/429506.html
(but I was always failing to connect, no
On 23.01.2013, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> So perhaps someone here might be able to help. I'm trying to figure out
> why a recipe isn't working (when it used to in the past.)
First let procmail write a logfile:
LOGFILE=${HOMEDIR}/procmail.log
And then let it be verbose:
VERBOSE=on
After t
Am 23.01.2013 20:00, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
> Actually there is a LOT in the /home/user directory that can be version
> specific. All those dot directories. From
> F15 to F16 for gnome 2 to 3 would have been VERY painful.
well but this is still there after a new install and restore data
or
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:38:36 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Actually, I just noticed that recipe isn't complete. In my haste I didn't
> type out the complete address. It should read salesd...@pcraft.com - it's
> being forwarded to another e-mail address.
>
> And I have no procmail log ... a
On 01/23/2013 09:38 AM, Andras Simon wrote:
2013/1/23, Dave Cross :
[...]
I have a separate /home partition which contains all of my important
data. Therefore I want to do a new installation of Fedora 18 but reuse
the existing /home partition. In the old Anaconda that was simple. I'd
just use
Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 20/01/2013 alle 22.16 -0600, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
>> I believe you can try to edit
>> /etc/systemd/logind.conf
>> and set
>> HandleLidSwitch=ignore
>
> Ok, this is what I'm looking for.
>
> Question: There is a GUI to do this kind of setting (like f14 do)?
Actually, I just noticed that recipe isn't complete. In my haste I didn't
type out the complete address. It should read salesd...@pcraft.com - it's
being forwarded to another e-mail address.
And I have no procmail log ... anywhere.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> O
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:12:32 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> :0
> * !^X-Forwarded-For: kira...@gmail.com ash...@pcraft.com
> * !^X-Forwarded-For: kira...@gmail.com ash...@pcigrafx.com
> * !^From.*kira...@gmail.com
> * !^To.*ash...@papillon.pcraft.com
> ! kira...@gmail.com
>
> :0c
> * ^X-Forwar
Hey folks,
Seems the procmail list has fallen off of the face of the planet ... at
least, the address given on the procmail.org website doesn't seem to work
anymore.
So perhaps someone here might be able to help. I'm trying to figure out
why a recipe isn't working (when it used to in the past.)
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:35:38 -0700
> From: rmegg...@redhat.com
> To: pictureboo...@hotmail.com
> CC: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: [389-users] referential integrity postoperation plugin 1.10.12
>
> On 01/23/2013 09:44 AM, Picture Book
Thanks>>
On 23/01/13 08:26, William Murray wrote:Allegedly, on or about 23 January 2013,
William Murray sent:
/ in ./NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ and looks at new network
/>>/ connections.
/>>/ If it sees one machine some criteria it calls a backup script
/>>/ in /etc/cron.daily/ which r
On 01/23/2013 05:55 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
What is the problem you are trying solve?
Aliens.
The green kind. With multiple eyes.
*joke* *joke*
C'mon, you are sounding like a troll.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
Am 23.01.2013 18:38, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>> I spent hours at work today getting sshd to function on
>> my desktop which I just switched to booting from the
>> fedora 18 partition. I finally discovered this:
>>
>> [root@zooty ~]# ls -l /etc/ssh
>> total 276
>> -rw--- 1 r
Tom Horsley wrote:
I spent hours at work today getting sshd to function on
my desktop which I just switched to booting from the
fedora 18 partition. I finally discovered this:
[root@zooty ~]# ls -l /etc/ssh
total 276
-rw--- 1 root root 245058 Dec 3 11:43 moduli
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> What is the problem you are trying solve?
Aliens.
The green kind. With multiple eyes.
*joke* *joke*
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la ver
Allegedly, on or about 23 January 2013, William Murray sent:
> in ./NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ and looks at new network
> connections.
> If it sees one machine some criteria it calls a backup script
> in /etc/cron.daily/ which rsyncs various directories between my laptop
> and a desktop machine.
Allegedly, on or about 23 January 2013, Dave Cross sent:
> I have a separate /home partition which contains all of my important
> data. Therefore I want to do a new installation of Fedora 18 but reuse
> the existing /home partition. In the old Anaconda that was simple. I'd
> just use set up a custo
After enabling the refertial integrity postoperation plugin, I created a user
and a group with the user as member. When I changed the user's rdn: uid. I got
the following error, and the uniquememeber of the group didn't change.
Is this a known problem?
[23/Jan/2013:11:01:34 -0500] - 389-Direct
Allegedly, on or about 23 January 2013, Dario Lesca sent:
> I would like to to know why such important features (tree
> view and many others) have been removed. I can not imagine a valid
> reason.
Probably little more than the programmer doesn't use such features, and
sees no reason why anybody el
I had a strange thing start up yesterday with my 389-console.
I have 4 directory servers in 2 data centers. I have been using
389-console to manage them. Yesterday, I opened 389-console for server 1
in datacenter 2 (DC2_1) and it ended up showing me server 1 in DC1
(DC1_1). Then I opened 389-conso
On 01/23/2013 04:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> To expand: when clients browse to a directory, the webserver daemon has
> to generate a directory listing (usually sorted, which means the daemon
> has to retrieve the whole directory into memory, sort it, and then
> generate the HTML to send to the cli
On 01/23/2013 03:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:37:40PM +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>>>
>>> http://fedora.inode.at/fedora/linux/releases/18/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/
>>> There's a lot of them... ;-)
>> And someone decided to split them in 30 directories for no re
On 01/23/2013 08:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
the "[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$" aka promt is red
not a background-color change which is not possible AFAIk and unuseable
Apparently running that line without the ["] on the end caused the
odd characters I was seeing. Logging out and back did not co
Il giorno mer, 23/01/2013 alle 14.14 +, Alan Cox ha scritto:
> It was removed intentionally, like a lot of the other stuff that was
> useful.
Fantastic! I would like to to know why such important features (tree
view and many others) have been removed. I can not imagine a valid
reason.
Thanks
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller said:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:00:14PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > Not for no reason. Directories with a very large number of files place
> > > undue
> > > strain on the mirrors.
> > can you elaborate on the nature of such ´strain´?. Sounds
Am 23.01.2013 16:18, schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:00:14PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> wrote:
>>> Not for no reason. Directories with a very large number of files place undue
>>> strain on the mirrors.
>> can you elaborate on the nature of such ´strain´?. Sounds like
On 01/23/2013 12:47 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
You *are* aware that such a list would be surely incomplete, since
noone actually installs all packages on their system?
Perhaps what you want is
http://fedora.inode.at/fedora/linux/rele
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's exactly that. It doesn't "move" it, though, but reuses it.
> I also used a shared /home, and since it's listed for the other
> recognized "Linux" installations, I unfold one of those and fill in
> the mount-point at the right side of the screen.
I'd file an RFE on th
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:00:14PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> wrote:
> > Not for no reason. Directories with a very large number of files place undue
> > strain on the mirrors.
> can you elaborate on the nature of such ´strain´?. Sounds like an
> excuse taken straight out of the BOFH excuses
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:51:10 -0600 Bruno Wolff III
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:41:31 -0600,
>Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> >Therefore, I would like to suggest that Fedora put this current
> >installer (F18) in abeyance and re-roll the release using the old
> >installer while the new one
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> Not for no reason. Directories with a very large number of files place undue
> strain on the mirrors.
can you elaborate on the nature of such ´strain´?. Sounds like an
excuse taken straight out of the BOFH excuses dice.
FC
--
During ti
On 01/23/2013 09:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I think we have a problem with text encoding or something? Your
>message contains odd characters.
>
>This is a new F-18 and Thunderbird installation and I am trying to
>copy and paste from your message, obviously there is a problem that
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:26:18 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Dave Cross wrote:
> > I have a separate /home partition which contains all of my important
> > data. Therefore I want to do a new installation of Fedora 18 but reuse
> > the existing /home partition. In the old Anaconda that was simp
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
