On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40:32AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I remembered that on a non-graphical system (actually I did a
> graphical install, but changed the runlevel to 3) was just to type
> in:
>
> init 5
>
> So I tried it and things seem to just hang. So I rebooted. Probably
> need t
Is this normal for the kswapd to consume 50% of cpu?
And why would it do that?
This is the first time I have seen this.
Kernel is kernel-3.6.6-1.fc16
24 root 20 0 000 R 50.1 0.0 117:08.40 kswapd0
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 8192? :)
.++
..
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 8192? :)
.++
...
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
.++
I remembered that on a non-graphical system (actually I did a graphical
install, but changed the runlevel to 3) was just to type in:
init 5
So I tried it and things seem to just hang. So I rebooted. Probably
need to install more than just gnome on minimal to get gnome?
--
users mailing lis
On 11/26/2012 12:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Oh, and what do I install to get semanage?
yum whatprovides *bin/semange
policycoreutils-python is the answer I believe you seek.
--
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger
and better idiot-proof progra
On 11/26/2012 04:54 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> On 11/26/2012 04:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I did the minimal install on my ee701. At least the first attempt.
>>>
>>> I set my swap at 768Mb, and left /boot at 500Mb (probably could shrin
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 11/26/2012 04:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I did the minimal install on my ee701. At least the first attempt.
I set my swap at 768Mb, and left /boot at 500Mb (probably could shrink
this next time). This left 2.7Gb for /
That swap will be too
On 11/26/2012 04:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I did the minimal install on my ee701. At least the first attempt.
>
> I set my swap at 768Mb, and left /boot at 500Mb (probably could shrink
> this next time). This left 2.7Gb for /
>
> That swap will be too small for hibernate
>
> So a m
I did the minimal install on my ee701. At least the first attempt.
I set my swap at 768Mb, and left /boot at 500Mb (probably could shrink
this next time). This left 2.7Gb for /
That swap will be too small for hibernate
So a minimal install with also selecting Gnome (and deselecting a fe
On 11/25/2012 09:27 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 11/24/2012 10:27 PM, JD wrote:
Here are the values for #197
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
For sdb:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-- 117 099 006 - 131606848
197 Current_Pending_Sector -O--C- 100 100 000 - 0
For sdc:
1 Raw_
On 11/25/2012 02:58 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
You *authorize* it to run, and it features code signing.
Yes, but there's no good reason to streamline the process of
authorization over-much. There is no reason to believe that the vast
majority of users are qualified to recognize valid digital
On 11/25/2012 02:20 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
Is this just a Chrome glitch?
Yes, mostly:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=138386
Chrome can't detect the version of IcedTea or OpenJDK underlying the
IcedTea-web plugin, so there's some concern over how to protect users.
--
user
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Native code bundled and launched through JNLP is no more secure than
> Active X. JNLP is in practice a huge security hole, and should be treated
> as such.
>
You *authorize* it to run, and it features code signing. That is like
saying "in
On 11/25/2012 02:40 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Chrome is the only browser where launching a Java Web Start app (jnlp)
is a totally ugly experience (it brings the download dialog to the
foreground)... or did, I stopped using it because of that.
To be fair, most JNLP applications include native c
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/23/2012 02:56 PM, JD wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
better than you report.
With a keyboard permanently attached ...
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Steven Stern <
subscribed-li...@sterndata.com> wrote:
>
> Is this just a Chrome glitch?
Google is anti-Java (JRE at least) and Chrome is anti-Java. I despise them
for that.
Chrome is the only browser where launching a Java Web Start app (jnlp) is a
totally ugly
I just hit a website that has a java plugin and Chrome displayed a big
box with "Iced Tea is Out of Date". It seems that I have
icedtea-web-1.3.1-1.fc17.x86_64 and
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc17.1.x86_64 installed.
Is this just a Chrome glitch?
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
users@l
Hi,
>> What is the native resolution of the HDTV? As far as I know, Xorg
>> defaults to an extend display setup when booted with multiple displays
>> connected. Also it doesn't do well with unequally sized displays. I'm
>> thinking maybe the HDTV resolution is much larger than the two regular
>
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 09:57 -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Saturday, November 24, 2012 19:11:59 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Frequently when I try to print double sided to this printer I get a
> > single page reading:
> >
> > ERROR NAME;
> > stackunderflow
> > COMMA
On 11/25/2012 02:15 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
>
>>
>> Is there something wrong with this command?
>>
>> [root@box9 simple]# scp -r bobg@box8:/home/bobg/
>> /run/media/bobg/Simple/Box8BkU
>>
>> I would like to copy the contents [roughly 44G per du -
On 11/24/2012 10:27 PM, JD wrote:
Here are the values for #197
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
For sdb:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-- 117 099 006 - 131606848
197 Current_Pending_Sector -O--C- 100 100 000 - 0
For sdc:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-- 114 069 006 - 80733495
19
On Saturday, November 24, 2012 19:11:59 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Frequently when I try to print double sided to this printer I get a
> single page reading:
>
> ERROR NAME;
> stackunderflow
> COMMAND;
> pop
> OPERAND STACK;
>
> Has anyone else seen th
On 11/25/2012 06:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> What line do I place in ifcfg-*
> to make sure eth* fails if ipv4 isn't resolved.
>
>
>
I have
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
in one of my ifcfg-* . I'm assuming NM put it there
So, that would seem reasonable
--
Programming today is a race
> What is the native resolution of the HDTV? As far as I know, Xorg
> defaults to an extend display setup when booted with multiple displays
> connected. Also it doesn't do well with unequally sized displays. I'm
> thinking maybe the HDTV resolution is much larger than the two regular
> displays
What line do I place in ifcfg-*
to make sure eth* fails if ipv4 isn't resolved.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidel
Disclaimer: I have never used HDMI with Fedora myself.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:27:43PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a new fc17 x86_64 install with a Radeon HD5700 and the default
> xorg drivers included with fc17. I have an HDTV connected to the HDMI
> port and two monitors connected to
28 matches
Mail list logo
