Have a machine that I setup Fedora 17 on some time ago, and
vnc works just fine, but have recently done a clean install on
another machine, and it connects fine, prompts for password, but
then displays the Oh No. Something has gone wrong. The
machines have the same video cards, and have the sam
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:28:39 -0800 Geoffrey Leach
wrote:
> Suddenly my two (count 'em) computers networked together and connected
> to the internet have been booting up in DST - i.e. one hour later than
> the actual time. A pointer to where this setting is stored or can be
> accessed would be
On 11/19/2012 08:28 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Suddenly my two (count 'em) computers networked together and connected
to the internet have been booting up in DST - i.e. one hour later than
the actual time. A pointer to where this setting is stored or can be
accessed would be greatly appreciated.
Suddenly my two (count 'em) computers networked together and connected
to the internet have been booting up in DST - i.e. one hour later than
the actual time. A pointer to where this setting is stored or can be
accessed would be greatly appreciated.
They are set up to get time via NTP, FWIW.
O
I am getting back to this. To my disgust, the Trio Win utility does not
support mp4 as a video input format! So much for truth in advertising.
So now to ffmpeg built for amv output support...
On 11/11/2012 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.11.2012 18:56, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11
On 11/19/2012 01:31 PM, Sergio wrote:
yumex is working just fine here. Don't mess with its desktop files, your issue
is something else.
BTW, that looks like yumex-local.desktop which is made to install local rpm's.
yumex.desktop is attached in case you lost it (?)
I don't have a desktop file f
On 11/19/2012 04:50 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
On 11/19/2012 02:24 PM, Arun SAG wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:28:20AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The weather setup is not letting me change the city. It defaulted
to Cambridge, GB and when I put in any city from its selection list,
the
On 11/19/2012 04:24 PM, Arun SAG wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:28:20AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The weather setup is not letting me change the city. It defaulted
to Cambridge, GB and when I put in any city from its selection list,
the OK button remains greyed out and only cancel is a
On 11/19/2012 02:24 PM, Arun SAG wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:28:20AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The weather setup is not letting me change the city. It defaulted
to Cambridge, GB and when I put in any city from its selection list,
the OK button remains greyed out and only cancel is a
--- Em seg, 19/11/12, Joe Zeff escreveu:
> De: Joe Zeff
> Assunto: [Solved] Re: Yumex issue on new install
> Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Data: Segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012, 19:02
> A correction to my last post: when I
> went to edit the menu to add --update-only to the
Hi Ludwig,
That's an interesting thought. I'm guessing that access to the branch
is covered by the default "Enable anonymous access" ACI. To check my
logic, if I can exclude this single branch from the "anonymous" ACI,
and then add an ACI to the branch to cover access for this single
us
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:28:20AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> The weather setup is not letting me change the city. It defaulted
> to Cambridge, GB and when I put in any city from its selection list,
> the OK button remains greyed out and only cancel is avaiable.
>
> Any tips on getting this
A correction to my last post: when I went to edit the menu to add
--update-only to the yumex command line, I saw this:
/usr/bin/yumex -X install %F
This means that, as installed, yumex is expecting to be given a program
to install on the command line. No wonder it doesn't work! Removing
tha
> Just to close things off, I've logged onto the laptop,
> removed myself from wheel and things are working the way I
> want. However, if I run it from the menu and there are
> no updates, it simply tells me there's nothing to do and
> exits.
I never saw it behave this way (close itself). Maybe
On 11/19/2012 03:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/19/2012 11:38 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Did you select for you to be in the administartors group? If so you can
now do a lot of things previously restricted to root; one of them is
install software. But everytime you have to authenticate YOURSEL
On 11/19/2012 11:38 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Did you select for you to be in the administartors group? If so you can
now do a lot of things previously restricted to root; one of them is
install software. But everytime you have to authenticate YOURSELF.
Just to close things off, I've logge
On 11/19/2012 11:38 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Did you select for you to be in the administartors group? If so you can
now do a lot of things previously restricted to root; one of them is
install software. But everytime you have to authenticate YOURSELF.
I kind of like this move.
OK, that's
On 11/19/2012 11:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went away,
proving that it was a software issue not a kernel
On 11/19/2012 02:26 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went away,
proving that it was a software issue not a kernel
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
> install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went away,
> proving that it was a software issue not a kernel issue. The bad news is
> that after install
I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went
away, proving that it was a software issue not a kernel issue. The bad
news is that after installing yumex I can't get it to run. It asks me
to authen
Am 19.11.2012 19:36, schrieb Ed Greshko:
> On 11/20/2012 01:02 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> -- if so, you won't _need_ the
>>> wrapper, but you may want it anyway, because it keeps the process spaces
>>> separate, which protects you from crashes.
>>
>> Ah. Will install then.
>
> FWIW..
On 11/20/2012 01:02 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> -- if so, you won't _need_ the
>> wrapper, but you may want it anyway, because it keeps the process spaces
>> separate, which protects you from crashes.
>
> Ah. Will install then.
FWIW.
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i adobe
adobe
-Original message-
From: Reindl Harald
Sent: Mon 19-11-2012 09:08
Subject:Re: Firefox certificates for Fedora sites?
Attachment: signature.asc
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org;
> these are self signed certs because they do the same: encryption
> if you want you certs
-Original message-
From: Blake Hudson
Sent: Mon 19-11-2012 09:42
Subject:Re: Firefox certificates for Fedora sites?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org;
> That is not how HTTPS works. HTTPS does not require an expensive
> commercial CA like Thawte. First, if Fedora/Redhat w
> If the cardbus esata adapter were having HW problems, what sort
> of errors should I see in the system log regarding that card?
Hard to tell - really there is nothing there to identify the root cause.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opt
Am 19.11.2012 17:42, schrieb Blake Hudson:
>
> Reindl Harald wrote the following on 11/19/2012 10:08 AM:
>>
>> Am 19.11.2012 17:03, schrieb Sergio:
>>> Is it the case that these site owners should contact Mozilla for
>>> them to update the certificate bundle or, in the case of official
>>> Fedor
On 11/19/2012 11:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:38:48AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On f17 x86_64 I have installed AdobeReader and it seems to work just
fine without nspluginwrapper.i686
Do I really need nspluginwrapper.i686?
(When I googled about how to yum install
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Sergio wrote:
> Hi. I'm using F18.
> When accessing koji.fedoraproject.org, for instance, Firefox has no
> security certificate for it.
...snip...
koji has it's own cert authority and setup, because it uses certs to
identify packagers and admins. You ca
On 2012/11/19 01:14, Roger wrote:
On 11/19/2012 05:02 PM, Brian West wrote:
On 11/19/2012 12:28 AM, NOSpaze wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 10:16 +1100, Roger wrote:
Is there any way to trace ip addresses back past the originating ISP.
I've been using whois but it seems limited.
Could mtr be of
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:38:48AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On f17 x86_64 I have installed AdobeReader and it seems to work just
> fine without nspluginwrapper.i686
> Do I really need nspluginwrapper.i686?
> (When I googled about how to yum install AdobeReader, the site
> showed needing to
Reindl Harald wrote the following on 11/19/2012 10:08 AM:
Am 19.11.2012 17:03, schrieb Sergio:
Is it the case that these site owners should contact Mozilla for
them to update the certificate bundle or, in the case of official
Fedora sites, should an extra package with Fedora certificates be
cr
On f17 x86_64 I have installed AdobeReader and it seems to work just
fine without nspluginwrapper.i686
Do I really need nspluginwrapper.i686?
(When I googled about how to yum install AdobeReader, the site showed
needing to install nspluginwrapper)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On 2012/11/19 01:02, Brian West wrote:
On 11/19/2012 12:28 AM, NOSpaze wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 10:16 +1100, Roger wrote:
Is there any way to trace ip addresses back past the originating ISP.
I've been using whois but it seems limited.
Could mtr be of any help?
ISP and a rough location i
On 11/19/2012 07:43 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:09:38 -0700
JD wrote:
I am getting lots of ata3 and ata4 errors in the system log.
In spite of these errors, when I unmount the partitions of both drives
and I fsck every partition, no errors are found.
The out of dmesg with the e
Am 19.11.2012 17:03, schrieb Sergio:
> Is it the case that these site owners should contact Mozilla for
> them to update the certificate bundle or, in the case of official
> Fedora sites, should an extra package with Fedora certificates be
> created?
they won't
these are self signed certs be
Allegedly, on or about 19 November 2012, Ed Greshko sent:
> So, you've disabled the DHCP server on the AP and allow the broadcast
> through to your server to service DHCP requests.
I've got a LAN set up that way, too. An access point acting, more or
less, like a network switch. I saw no reason t
On 11/19/2012 09:42 AM, Sergio wrote:
>
>
> --- Em seg, 19/11/12, Steven Stern escreveu:
>
>> De: Steven Stern
>> Assunto: on screen display from audio volume buttons
>> Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
>> Data: Segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012, 13:05
>> 1) I'm using XFCE on F1
--- Em seg, 19/11/12, Steven Stern escreveu:
> De: Steven Stern
> Assunto: on screen display from audio volume buttons
> Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Data: Segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012, 13:05
> 1) I'm using XFCE on F17
>
> 2) I have a Logitech keyboard with multimedi
The weather setup is not letting me change the city. It defaulted to
Cambridge, GB and when I put in any city from its selection list, the OK
button remains greyed out and only cancel is avaiable.
Any tips on getting this to work?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
I killed my old system (f16) with a bottle of pepsi last week at IEEE
802 :( Was rather interesting to do my 'slides' on paper and run off
copies at the business center!
Well I have a new system; basically the same Lenovo x120e, but with the
duo core. I installed f17 and have been rsyncing f
lee wrote:
> what is auditd for? The manpage doesn't tell me, and I can't find any
> documentation about it telling me what the purpose is. Is there
> anything that speaks against disabling it?
$ man auditd
>
> Similar with mcelog: What do I need that for? And benefits from it? I
> can proba
> And I still don't see what makes the light of the onboard SATA
> controllers flash all the time. Why is it flashing though nothing
> connected to the controllers is mounted? See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878042
Ask the hardware vendor - the LED is not software controlled.
-
1) I'm using XFCE on F17
2) I have a Logitech keyboard with multimedia buttons
3) Sometimes, when I press the volume-up and volume-down, I see an
on-screen display showing the volume going up or down. Sometimes, not.
Does anyone know how I can control this? I like the effect and I'd like
it on al
Hi,
what is auditd for? The manpage doesn't tell me, and I can't find any
documentation about it telling me what the purpose is. Is there
anything that speaks against disabling it?
Similar with mcelog: What do I need that for? And benefits from it? I
can probably just disable it.
Do I need
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:09:38 -0700
JD wrote:
> I am getting lots of ata3 and ata4 errors in the system log.
> In spite of these errors, when I unmount the partitions of both drives
> and I fsck every partition, no errors are found.
> The out of dmesg with the errors is at
> http://www.sendspace.c
Am 19.11.2012 15:09, schrieb JD:
> I am getting lots of ata3 and ata4 errors in the system log.
> In spite of these errors, when I unmount the partitions of both drives
> and I fsck every partition, no errors are found.
> The out of dmesg with the errors is at
> http://www.sendspace.com/file/761t
I am getting lots of ata3 and ata4 errors in the system log.
In spite of these errors, when I unmount the partitions of both drives
and I fsck every partition, no errors are found.
The out of dmesg with the errors is at
http://www.sendspace.com/file/761te2
The drives are esata-2 (300mbits/s) and
On 11/19/2012 12:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Indeed. Most of the time they are not going to give a crap about a
>> simple abuse report, let alone do anything to stop spam/bruteforcing.
>>
>> Maybe the American and British ISPs but not the others.
>
> The ISPs are mostly not in the loop, but some of
> Indeed. Most of the time they are not going to give a crap about a
> simple abuse report, let alone do anything to stop spam/bruteforcing.
>
> Maybe the American and British ISPs but not the others.
The ISPs are mostly not in the loop, but some of them certainly do care
or collate reports. The
On 11/19/2012 0:57, Roger wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 02:13 PM, staticsafe wrote:
>> On 11/18/2012 18:16, Roger wrote:
>>> Is there any way to trace ip addresses back past the originating ISP.
>>> I've been using whois but it seems limited.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>> In short, no.
>>
I see, thanks!
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
mob: +46762628251
skype: csvanefalk
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Sergio <
sergiocmailbox-userl...@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> No, preupgrade only up to Fedora 17. For Fedora 18 go with yum and when
> functional 'fedup'.
>
> --- Em *seg, 19/11/12, Chr
No, preupgrade only up to Fedora 17. For Fedora 18 go with yum and when
functional 'fedup'.
--- Em seg, 19/11/12, Christopher Svanefalk
escreveu:
De: Christopher Svanefalk
Assunto: Re: Preupgrade vs other upgrade methods, caveats?
Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
Data: Segunda-feir
Use a bonding interface for that
2012/11/15 Frank Pikelner
> Hello,
>
> I'm running a couple of Lenovo T410 with Fedora 16 and 17. The laptops are
> generally connected via LAN or WiFi to the same subnet (typically same DHCP
> address).
>
> Is there a way to bridge both the LAN and Wifi interfa
Thanks everyone for the replies. So, for going 17->18, I should still be
using Preupgrade, and after that this new Fedup application?
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
mob: +46762628251
skype: csvanefalk
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/18/2012 05:45 AM, Sergio wrote
On 11/19/2012 08:30 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2012 06:18:03 Roger wrote:
You are SOooo right, denial of responsibility is what happens!
I am aware of instances recently where windows machines are obviously
hacked and email addresses appropriated. It's no use telling the peo
On Monday 19 November 2012 06:18:03 Roger wrote:
> You are SOooo right, denial of responsibility is what happens!
> I am aware of instances recently where windows machines are obviously
> hacked and email addresses appropriated. It's no use telling the people
> they deny it.
Not always the case, b
On 11/18/2012 05:45 AM, Sergio wrote:
Preupgrade isn't supported any more, AFAIK.
That's only true for Fedora 18 and later releases. For the current
release, PreUpgrade is still the recommended upgrade path:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_PreUpgrade?rd=PreUpgrade
For Fedora 18, y
On 11/14/2012 05:34 PM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
Is there a way to bridge both the LAN and Wifi interfaces so that the
communication is done using the bridge and serviced by either interface
that is currently active?
I'm using the default Network Manager and mostly use the laptops for
working and t
In case anyone is interested, it's now possible to get netflix running
on patched wine.
I've written out the way I did it on my machine, here:
http://how-to.wikia.com/wiki/How_to_watch_Netflix_%28Watch_Instantly%29_in_Linux#Running_with_Wine
For Ubuntu there's a PPA that installs everything for
60 matches
Mail list logo
