On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 17:25 -0700, Mark Space wrote:
> I didn't see any of these messages until the last one. Is
> the list fubared?
Messages aren't always delivered in order, especially if they end up
travelling through different routes. Because of that, some of them can
get seriously delayed.
Can someone help me with this question in #AskFedora?:
http://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/2620/zencoding-in-fedora-with-geditgmate
Thank You.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/use
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 18:36 -0700, jackson byers wrote:
> Followed Rob explicitly, now f16 box using uverse, on internet!
>
Welcome to your F16 box, back on to the Interwebs!
Glad it worked!
--Rob
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
Followed Rob explicitly, now f16 box using uverse, on internet!
ifcfg-eth0:
# Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5702X Gigabit Ethernet
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:e0:18:d2:d1:95
BROADCAST=255.255.255.255
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
TYPE=Ethernet
NM_CONTROLLED=yes
USERCTL=no
PEERDNS=yes
Many, many
Huh, weirdly I didn't see any of these messages until the last one. Is
the list fubared? Or maybe someone replied privately by mistake?
On 10/5/2012 12:49 PM, Patrick Kobly wrote:
Unfortunately, neither of those being platform-independent, it's somewhat
unlikely that this will be supported
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:48 -0700, jackson byers wrote:
> Are you implying that if I do get uverse working, that
> I won't need the netgear access point at all?, i.e.,
> that the uverse modem will handle laptop when wanting to use it wireless?
>
Yes.
> Re your parents' uverse: are they running
Rob, thanks for your response;
You are making me a believer in DHCP.
Will try your suggestion later today.
Nitpicks:
>> And I much prefer static IP for f16.
>> the network 192.168.2.0 is also
>> used in configs of [previously used]
>>:linksys router
>>:netgear wless access point,
>>
>You
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 12:30 -0700, jackson byers wrote:
> Robert Locke responded:
>
> >You have hit the nail on the head. Your iMac is configured for DHCP and
> >was working, but your F16 box is configured for static addressing that
> >does not match what the "new router" is willing to accept.
>
Unfortunately, neither of those being platform-independent, it's somewhat
unlikely that this will be supported under Java...
PK
-Original message-
From: Bruno Wolff III
Sent: Fri 05-10-2012 13:22
Subject:Re: iptables fubared?
To: Patrick Kobly ;
CC: "Community suppo
Terry Polzin responded:
>Does the time stamp on the /etc/resolv.conf correspond to the times of
>your reboots?
>Could you kindly detail your new equipment with some photographs so we
>all might see what these devices look like. Be sure to include
>close-ups of any labels on the devices.
---
time
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 12:50:30 -0600,
Patrick Kobly wrote:
He's running JBoss... Java apps won't drop privs. Non-root can't bind to 80,
so he gets JBoss to bind to 8080 then redirects.
Yuck. There are other ways to do that. I think the systemd route is probably
the way to do it in curre
He's running JBoss... Java apps won't drop privs. Non-root can't bind to 80,
so he gets JBoss to bind to 8080 then redirects.
PK
On 2012-10-05, at 12:01 PM, "Tim" wrote:
> Tim:
>>> Why are you redirecting, though? If there's a block on port 80, then
>>> your attempt to get in on port 80 and
Tim:
>> Why are you redirecting, though? If there's a block on port 80, then
>> your attempt to get in on port 80 and redirect to port 8080 isn't
>> going work. Which way are you *trying* to redirect?
>
Mark Space
> Just that I understand it's good practice to never run apps as root.
> If I lis
On 10/5/2012 1:37 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:45 -0700, Mark Space wrote:
I'm not sure where I could have fubared this. I did try to redirect
the ports from 80 to 8080, perhaps that was done incorrectly?
You've tested that you can browse to localhost on port 80, but have you
also te
On 10/5/2012 1:00 AM, Bill Shirley wrote:
Maybe I didn't understand correctly. You're wanting to redirect
traffic received on eth0 port 80 to port 8080. Is this correct?
"iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
--to-ports 8080"
If so, then you wouldn't expect to s
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 07:59 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sergio
> wrote:
> Sorry again if I missed the whole discussion but it may depend
> on the site visited. Like
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=284580
>
> this does n
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
> Sorry again if I missed the whole discussion but it may depend on the site
> visited. Like http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=284580
>
this does not crash mine, thx!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
Il giorno ven, 05/10/2012 alle 08.11 -0500, Michael Cronenworth ha
scritto:
> Dario Lesca wrote:
> > I have nothing to do with yahoo
> >
> > It Is some gnome-shell-extension witch I have install ?
> >
> > There a way to find out who is making this connection and disable it?
> >
> > Many thanks
On Friday, 5. October 2012. 11.44.53 Reindl Harald wrote:
> but anyways - how would you imagine amarok work only with http?
> amarok is indexing the collection folder
> this is not possible with http at all
I don't expect it to be indexed. It would be enough (for me) to have an URL in
the collect
Dario Lesca wrote:
> I have nothing to do with yahoo
>
> It Is some gnome-shell-extension witch I have install ?
>
> There a way to find out who is making this connection and disable it?
>
> Many thanks
Do you have the weather extension? It uses Yahoo Weather. I would not be
concerned about it
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:45 -0700, Mark Space wrote:
> I'm not sure where I could have fubared this. I did try to redirect
> the ports from 80 to 8080, perhaps that was done incorrectly?
You've tested that you can browse to localhost on port 80, but have you
also tested that web server is listenin
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 08:25 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> Oh, and one more point, if you dont have telnet, many dont anymore,
> find & download netcat, it'll work just fine.
It's only the telnet client that you'd use to test services, that's a
simple installation. It's the telnet server that's a ver
On 10/5/2012 3:18 AM, Mark Space wrote:
On 10/4/2012 11:27 PM, NOSpaze wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 15:00 -0700, Mark Space wrote:
I tried this with tcpdump running on the server. It surprised me
when I
saw tcpdump respond. Firefox still says "cannot connect" from an
external workstation, b
Maybe I didn't understand correctly. You're wanting to redirect traffic
received on eth0 port 80 to port 8080. Is this correct?
"iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
--to-ports 8080"
If so, then you wouldn't expect to see any traffic on eth0 port 8080
(neither
Why my gnome-shell is connect to yahoo.com ?
> [root@dodo ~]# netstat -natp|grep 80
> tcp 0 0 10.9.2.105:47580 98.139.53.227:80ESTABLISHED
> 1555/gnome-shell
> [root@dodo ~]# host 98.139.53.227
> 227.53.139.98.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer yts.yql.vip.ac4.yahoo.com.
I ha
On Friday, 5. October 2012. 1.08.30 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.10.2012 00:08, schrieb Marko Vojinovic:
> > But the streaming server seems to be an overkill for my purposes. All I
> > want is to put a "http://www.server.com/somefile.mp3"; into the Amarok
> > collection (local database, remote file
On 10/4/2012 11:27 PM, NOSpaze wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 15:00 -0700, Mark Space wrote:
I tried this with tcpdump running on the server. It surprised me when I
saw tcpdump respond. Firefox still says "cannot connect" from an
external workstation, but my server is seeing something at least.
27 matches
Mail list logo
