On 10/03/2012 07:13 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm attaching a link of a screenshot. This is the kind of problem I'm facing:
> http://i.imgur.com/zg8Bn.png
>
>
> Any tips what to do now? Thanks :-)
>
>
> Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
>
Hi,
seems you are using the samsung package. Di
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:13:14 +1100
Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
> Any tips what to do now? Thanks :-)
Have you tried the stuff listed on this website (found with a fifteen second
Google search):
http://salahuddin66.blogspot.ca/2010/11/samsung-ml-1666-printer-in-linux.html
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D
On 10/02/2012 10:13 PM, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
Hello,
I'm attaching a link of a screenshot. This is the kind of problem I'm
facing: http://i.imgur.com/zg8Bn.png
Any tips what to do now? Thanks :-)
Have you tried reinstalling the driver package? Not uninstalling it and
installing it again,
Hello,
I'm attaching a link of a screenshot. This is the kind of problem I'm facing:
http://i.imgur.com/zg8Bn.png
Any tips what to do now? Thanks :-)
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On 10/03/2012 10:30 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 07:15:38 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
>> I need some help in trying to get to the source of this problem. This
>> the readout of the command traceroute risingstarmbc.com. I am unable
>> to
>> connect to this email address and I don't kno
On 10/02/2012 07:30 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 10/02/2012 07:15 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
I need some help in trying to get to the source of this problem.
What problem? They filter ICMP requests, so traceroute doesn't work.
That's not really a problem.
Actually, traceroute uses UDP probe
On 10/02/2012 07:30 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
First, what _exactly_is the symptom. All the traceroute shows is how to
get to the site. Connecting with a browser proves that the site exists.
Neither has any necessary connection with your problem.
In this case I agree, especially as I had no prob
On 10/02/2012 07:15 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
14 12.123.155.69 (12.123.155.69) 67.570 ms 64.373 ms 64.488 ms
15 12.88.115.134 (12.88.115.134) 76.745 ms 75.159 ms 72.426 ms
Checking, both of those two IP addresses belong to att.net. There seems
to be something wrong between 12.88.115.
On 10/02/2012 07:15:38 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I need some help in trying to get to the source of this problem. This
> the readout of the command traceroute risingstarmbc.com. I am unable
> to
> connect to this email address and I don't know how to resolve it.
[snip]
First, what _exactly_is
On 10/02/2012 07:15 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
I need some help in trying to get to the source of this problem.
What problem? They filter ICMP requests, so traceroute doesn't work.
That's not really a problem.
I am unable to
connect to this email address and I don't know how to resolve it.
On 10/03/2012 10:15 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I need some help in trying to get to the source of this problem. This the
> readout of the command traceroute risingstarmbc.com. I am unable to connect
> to this email address and I don't know how to resolve it. Could somebody give
> me instructio
I need some help in trying to get to the source of this problem. This
the readout of the command traceroute risingstarmbc.com. I am unable to
connect to this email address and I don't know how to resolve it. Could
somebody give me instruction on who I can touch base with to get this
fixed. Ther
On 2012/10/02 13:17, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Tuesday, 2. October 2012. 20.56.34 Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 10/02/2012 03:45 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Another factor is that the drivers may contain a lot of clever stuff. A
long time back one of the problems raised was that vendor A had the
better har
On 10/03/2012 08:07 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> type=AVC msg=audit(1349049826.875:414): avc: denied { getattr } for
> pid=2428 comm="sh" path="/usr/sbin/setfiles" dev="sda3" ino=1451202
> scontext=system_u:system_r:firewalld_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:setfiles_exec_t:s0 tclass=file
>
> typ
On 10/03/2012 02:53 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 07:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 10/01/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> On 30 September 2012 23:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >>> I just started playing around with firewalld and I found something that
> >>> doesn't seem righ
On 10/02/2012 04:18 PM, Alan Evans wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
So final users would have had the best hardware running the best drivers
(open source too).
This is something which must not be permitted to happen. :-/
Not if it helps to sell the competitor's har
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> So final users would have had the best hardware running the best drivers
> (open source too).
> This is something which must not be permitted to happen. :-/
Not if it helps to sell the competitor's hardware.
--
users mailing list
users@list
On Tuesday, 2. October 2012. 20.56.34 Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 03:45 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Another factor is that the drivers may contain a lot of clever stuff. A
> > long time back one of the problems raised was that vendor A had the
> > better hardware but vendor B the better driv
Tim,
thanks much for your reply.
I am still much in the dark re DNS servers
More on that below
>If you're running different computers and/or OSs on a network that
>between changes. If you have a router between you and them, then that
>shouldn't be a problem. The router would be what they see, al
On 10/2/2012 7:43 AM, Sergio wrote:
--- Em ter, 2/10/12, Doug escreveu:
De: Doug
Assunto: Re: A note on youtube-dl
Para: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Data: Terça-feira, 2 de Outubro de 2012, 1:19
On 10/01/2012 03:18 PM, Joe Zeff
wrote:
On 10/01/2012 03:55 PM, Doug wrote:
OK, sorry about th
On 10/02/2012 03:45 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> Another factor is that the drivers may contain a lot of clever stuff. A
> long time back one of the problems raised was that vendor A had the
> better hardware but vendor B the better drivers. Vendor B's product won
> all the benchmarks. If they open sourc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2012 05:43 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
>
>> Hi: I've no Mac experience and currently run f16 but here are a
>> few comments.
>>
>> The rpmfusion and atrpms packages are generally believed
>> incompatible. If you try one, remove all traces of
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 08:26 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Sergio
> wrote:
> Not really a matter of moving to Chrome. I suggest having both
> installed.
>
>
> well, I've been a long time FF enthusiast, but I've been concerned
> given the
Hi: I've no Mac experience and currently run f16 but here are a few
comments.
The rpmfusion and atrpms packages are generally believed incompatible.
If you try one, remove all traces of the other - lib packages too.
I use ATrpms; the nvidia-graphics package should pull in
nvidia-graphics-help
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Sergio wrote:
> Not really a matter of moving to Chrome. I suggest having both installed.
>
well, I've been a long time FF enthusiast, but I've been concerned given the
recent accelerate feature addition, maybe its finally becoming to
fragile;maybe chrome
being in
Not really a matter of moving to Chrome. I suggest having both installed.
--- Em ter, 2/10/12, Jack Craig escreveu:
De: Jack Craig
Assunto: FF 15.0.1 crashing!
Para: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Data: Terça-feira, 2 de Outubro de 2012, 12:10
Hi Folks,
is anyone else seeing their FF 15.0.1 cr
On 02/10/12 15:03, Andre Massing wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am running fedora 17 on a Macbook Pro 6,2 with an integrated intel
and a nvidia graphic card,
lspci -v | grep VGA
gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor
Integrated Gr
Hi Folks,
is anyone else seeing their FF 15.0.1 crash? today, both my hime and work
FF sessions had crashed
since yesterday.
Is it finally time to move to chrome?
tia, jackc...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am running fedora 17 on a Macbook Pro 6,2 with an integrated intel
and a nvidia graphic card,
lspci -v | grep VGA
gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 18) (prog-if 00 [VG
Another factor is that the drivers may contain a lot of clever stuff. A
long time back one of the problems raised was that vendor A had the
better hardware but vendor B the better drivers. Vendor B's product won
all the benchmarks. If they open sourced it then vendor A would duly have
borrowed all
--- Em ter, 2/10/12, sguazt escreveu:
> De: sguazt
> Assunto: Re: Setting fonts for Xterm from Xresources
> Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Data: Terça-feira, 2 de Outubro de 2012, 4:12
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM,
> Cameron Simpson
> wrote:
> > On 30Sep2012 15:44, sguazt
--- Em ter, 2/10/12, Doug escreveu:
> De: Doug
> Assunto: Re: A note on youtube-dl
> Para: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Data: Terça-feira, 2 de Outubro de 2012, 1:19
> On 10/01/2012 03:18 PM, Joe Zeff
> wrote:
> > On 10/01/2012 03:55 PM, Doug wrote:
> >> OK, sorry about that--I'd like the p
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Sep2012 15:44, sguazt wrote:
> | On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sergio
> | wrote:
> | > Did you leave a blank line as the first line? I think if you don't
> .Xresources won't work.
> [...]
> |
> | You're right. I didn't know about
33 matches
Mail list logo
