On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:28:49 +0600
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any RPM for smplayer 2? If not, I want to compile smplayer2
> on my system. Which packages should I require other than mplayer2 and
> smplayer2?
>
> Also, the dependencies?
>
> And it is quite saddening to
On 06/18/2012 09:58 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any RPM for smplayer 2? If not, I want to compile smplayer2 on
> my system. Which packages should I require other than mplayer2 and
> smplayer2?
>
> Also, the dependencies?
>
> And it is quite saddening to see that a pac
On 06/18/2012 12:28 PM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote:
> Is there any RPM for smplayer 2? If not, I want to compile smplayer2 on my
> system.
> Which packages should I require other than mplayer2 and smplayer2?
>
> Also, the dependencies?
>
> And it is quite saddening to see that a package like smp
Hello,
Is there any RPM for smplayer 2? If not, I want to compile smplayer2 on
my system. Which packages should I require other than mplayer2 and
smplayer2?
Also, the dependencies?
And it is quite saddening to see that a package like smplayer2 is not
present on Fedora official repo :(
--
J
My point is, and has been, the OP needs to take all the information
taken in from
this list and elsewhere(?) and make the decision for himself.
You also have see/read all others have said. You too can decide what to worry
about
and what not to worry about.
Hey Woah up this is not the Caul
On 06/18/2012 07:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I've seen a lot of complaints about Gnome 3.
> I don't recall seeing anything about Fedora 17.
>
> Why don't you tell me your worst problem with F-17,
> so I can judge how much to worry about it?
I don't know to who you are addressing your question.
Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> That's a decision you have to make for yourself. You've read about all
>>> the
>>> "problems" and the "dislikes".
>>
>> In this fairly long thread,
>> I haven't seen a single problem or dislike mentioned -
>> just that there are apparently "lots" of them.
>>
>
> Ed was re
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 17:25 -0400, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to hunt these two CTAN packages for Fedora 17 and
> have so far drawn a blank. Are rpms for these available somewhere?
The whole TeXLive 2012 (or close to it) is available at
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texli
Am 17.06.2012 23:42, schrieb Robert G. (Doc) Savage:
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/bin/qpid-python-test from install of
> python-qpid-0.16-1.fc17.noarch conflicts with file from package
> python-qpid-qmf-0.14-1.fc17.2.x86_64
so what
wait before one of the packages is fixed
signa
Ran into a transaction error trying to update python-qpid to 0.16-1 on
my F17 laptop yesterday:
# yum -y update --skip-broken
Here are the qpid packages I have installed:
$ rpm -qa | grep qpid | sort
python-qpid-0.14-1.fc17.noarch
python-qpid-qmf-0.14-1.fc17.2.
Hi,
I have been trying to hunt these two CTAN packages for Fedora 17 and
have so far drawn a blank. Are rpms for these available somewhere?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On 06/17/2012 01:43 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:20 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
That's a decision you have to make for yourself. You've read about all
the
"problems" and the "dislikes".
In this fairly long thread,
I haven't seen a single problem or dis
On 06/17/2012 01:43 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
How about these:
[snip!]
You list a number of things you personally dislike, but Fedora 17 isn't
responsible for any of them. All of them are part of Gnome 3, just one
of the many desktop environments that you can use with Fedora. This is
not,
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:20 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> > That's a decision you have to make for yourself. You've read about all
> > the
> > "problems" and the "dislikes".
>
> In this fairly long thread,
> I haven't seen a single problem or dislike mentioned -
> just t
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 11:53 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
> >
>
> FWIW, I too see the strangeness with the back button in FireFox. Have
> to hit it twice to go back to the previous page. I've seen
> this in some previous versions as well. I'm on rawhide running FF13.
> >>>
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:22:50 +0100, John Austin wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 11:42 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:35:32 +0100, John Austin wrote:
> >
> > > I believe this is just a repo problem
> > > The i686 and x86_64 versions are now available
> > >
> > >
> > > j
On 06/17/2012 09:53 AM, Kevin Martin wrote:
Doc,
That comment really doesn't apply to this discussion as nobody is talking
about the backspace button being used. But thanks for
the information as I didn't even know you could do that.
Kevin
Mine was set to 2. This is the first time I have e
>
FWIW, I too see the strangeness with the back button in FireFox. Have to
hit it twice to go back to the previous page. I've seen
this in some previous versions as well. I'm on rawhide running FF13.
>>>
>>>
>>> The mouse rear thumb button does not work for you to
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz <
mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl> wrote:
> On 17.06.2012 08:40, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>
> Recently I have been having problems with my machine completely freezing up
> seemingly randomly. The display freezes in its current frame, and all I/O
On 17.06.2012 08:40, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> Recently I have been having problems with my machine completely freezing up
> seemingly randomly. The display freezes in its current frame, and all I/O
> is completely unresponsive. It is not possible to SSH into it at this stage
> (ssh fails with
On 06/17/2012 08:20 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> That's a decision you have to make for yourself. You've read about all
>> the
>> "problems" and the "dislikes".
> In this fairly long thread,
> I haven't seen a single problem or dislike mentioned -
> just that there are appar
F17/Kde Fresh Install and Updated.
I have this Printer Driver from Samsung , And it is working on two other
F17 Boxes and on same AP Network.
The Troubleshoot.txt is posted on :
http://fpaste.org/dtkk/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 06/17/2012 09:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 17/06/12 14:33, Jim wrote:
On 06/17/2012 08:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 17/06/12 13:35, Jim wrote:
I have a Log file to send to fedora-users-list of 480 lines, 35kib
will
it be accepted by email ?
use fpaste http://fpaste.org/
or similar and
On 17/06/12 14:33, Jim wrote:
On 06/17/2012 08:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 17/06/12 13:35, Jim wrote:
I have a Log file to send to fedora-users-list of 480 lines, 35kib will
it be accepted by email ?
use fpaste http://fpaste.org/
or similar and send the link to the list.
How does one got
On 06/17/2012 08:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 17/06/12 13:35, Jim wrote:
I have a Log file to send to fedora-users-list of 480 lines, 35kib will
it be accepted by email ?
use fpaste http://fpaste.org/
or similar and send the link to the list.
How does one goto http://fpaste.org/ and find a
May this explain?
http://www.iltalehti.fi/iltvuutiset/2012061708188535_v0.shtml
Watch the video
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mail
On 06/17/2012 08:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 17/06/12 13:35, Jim wrote:
I have a Log file to send to fedora-users-list of 480 lines, 35kib will
it be accepted by email ?
use fpaste http://fpaste.org/
or similar and send the link to the list.
Thanks Frank.
--
users mailing list
users@list
On 17/06/12 13:35, Jim wrote:
I have a Log file to send to fedora-users-list of 480 lines, 35kib will
it be accepted by email ?
use fpaste http://fpaste.org/
or similar and send the link to the list.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
I have a Log file to send to fedora-users-list of 480 lines, 35kib will
it be accepted by email ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mai
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 02:10:35PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
notched vcore up to 1.280,
On 17/06/12 13:20, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
That's a decision you have to make for yourself. You've read about all
the
"problems" and the "dislikes".
In this fairly long thread,
I haven't seen a single problem or dislike mentioned -
just that there are apparently "lots" of the
Ed Greshko wrote:
> That's a decision you have to make for yourself. You've read about all
> the
> "problems" and the "dislikes".
In this fairly long thread,
I haven't seen a single problem or dislike mentioned -
just that there are apparently "lots" of them.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayle
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>
>> Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
>> notched vcore up to 1.280, misread one of the original graphs.
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>>
>> Christ
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
notched vcore up to 1.280, misread one of the original graphs.
--
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
### End of Message from Christopher Svanefalk ##
On 17.06.2012, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> Can somebody please answer my OP and point me to what syslogs I can examine
> to figure out what went on the freezes? Thanks!
Works M-sysrq on this machine? If you have a kernel compiled with
support for it (standard Fedora kernels have it), then che
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>
>
> >Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
> >notched vcore up to 1.280, misread one of the original graphs.
> >
>
> So, your problem is fixed? You found the problem was related t
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
>notched vcore up to 1.280, misread one of the original graphs.
>
So, your problem is fixed? You found the problem was related to your over
clocking settings after all?
--
Sent from my Andro
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Christopher Svanefalk <
christopher.svanef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Christopher Svanefalk <
> christopher.svanef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.06.2012 13
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Christopher Svanefalk <
christopher.svanef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 17.06.2012 13:08, schrieb Christopher Svanefalk:
>> > Heinz and Steve - thank you for taking time to reply. The reason I
>> add
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.06.2012 13:08, schrieb Christopher Svanefalk:
> > Heinz and Steve - thank you for taking time to reply. The reason I added
> stable is because the CPU is stable at
> > that voltage. In fact, it is stable at even lower vcores, I put
Am 17.06.2012 13:08, schrieb Christopher Svanefalk:
> Heinz and Steve - thank you for taking time to reply. The reason I added
> stable is because the CPU is stable at
> that voltage. In fact, it is stable at even lower vcores, I put it higher to
> avoid any margins. Thanks anyway.
> For the re
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Svanefalk <
christopher.svanef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
>
>> On 06/17/2012 04:42 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>
>>> On 17.06.2012, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>>>
>>> i7-3930K clocked at 4.2Ghz wit
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 04:42 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>
>> On 17.06.2012, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>>
>> i7-3930K clocked at 4.2Ghz with 1.240 vcore (stable)
>>>
>> I bet your problem lies here. Correct the overclocking to the
>> parameters your
On 06/17/2012 04:42 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 17.06.2012, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
i7-3930K clocked at 4.2Ghz with 1.240 vcore (stable)
I bet your problem lies here. Correct the overclocking to the
parameters your CPU is designed for, and your problems will presumably
be gone.
I like the
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 11:42 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:35:32 +0100, John Austin wrote:
>
> > I believe this is just a repo problem
> > The i686 and x86_64 versions are now available
> >
> >
> > ja@avon ~ 1$ rpm -qa|grep redhat-lsb
> > redhat-lsb-core-4.1-4.fc17.i686
> [There's a small chance that fundamental changes in the
> redhat-lsb packaging influenced the multiarch repo composing. Its package
> changelog doesn't mention anything obvious, however.]
I've now also filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/832771
The new redhat-lsb moved /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 f
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:41:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > Still doesn't seem to be in the repos.
> >
> > I've reported it just in case:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5220
>
> Thanks. Should I have done this myself? What's the relation between
> tickets on this "Hosted" pa
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:35:32 +0100, John Austin wrote:
> I believe this is just a repo problem
> The i686 and x86_64 versions are now available
>
>
> ja@avon ~ 1$ rpm -qa|grep redhat-lsb
> redhat-lsb-core-4.1-4.fc17.i686
> redhat-lsb-cxx-4.1-4.fc17.i686
> redhat-lsb-submod-multimedia-4.1-4.fc17.
On 17.06.2012, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> i7-3930K clocked at 4.2Ghz with 1.240 vcore (stable)
I bet your problem lies here. Correct the overclocking to the
parameters your CPU is designed for, and your problems will presumably
be gone.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
I just got one-worded. It worked.
Thanks! ;)
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:54:04 +0200
> Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
>
> > I currently have a desktop running Fedora 17. Is it possible for me to
> > install F17 on another computer, in such a way that
Am 17.06.2012 04:56, schrieb Julian C. Dunn:
> Thought this info might be useful to anyone else installing F17 from scratch
> and trying to port old Postfix configs.
> It seems that installing Postfix does not, by default, install
> cyrus-sasl-plain. This means that AUTH LOGIN PLAIN mechanism w
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:54:04 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> I currently have a desktop running Fedora 17. Is it possible for me to
> install F17 on another computer, in such a way that it shares the same home
> folder as my desktop? The folder itself should still be physically present
> on t
I have had the same problem with the Buffalo router. Try the following
script and see if it solves your problem:
http://dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Buffalo_WZR-HP-G300NH#Fix_for_WiFi_Dropouts
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA <
bobgood...@wildblue.net> wrote:
> O
53 matches
Mail list logo
