Hello,
My F16 system seems to have gotten to a very strange state. It's a Dell
laptop. It started when I have the laptop unplugged, and I closed the lid.
Usually this makes it goes to sleep (i.e. suspend to RAM). This time, it
didn't seem so; the fan started to run in high speed, and after a whi
On 05/19/2012 09:37 AM, JD wrote:
> I looked at Settings->Appearance->Settings->Event Sounds
> It is not checked.
> I continue to get this rattle sound being played many times
> while system is up and running.
> I checked thunderbird, and it has all it's even notifiers unchecked.
> Is there anythin
On 05/12/2012 12:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/12/2012 02:29 PM, JD wrote:
FC16.
What is the daemon that plays a sound, seemingly
at random, and it sounds like a rattle ?
I have heard this while running previous versions of fedora.
I'm fairly sure it is DE dependent. One can make KDE quite
On 18/05/12 20:32, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
OpenOffice then got given to Apache in
what a lot of people consider a face saving exercise.
I guess what puzzles me is why Apache took it.
Does it have a different model in mind?
Maybe Microsoft told them to?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> You are assuming that because your colleague's HP cost €800
> it is of "higher quality" than my daughter's under €300 Asus netbook,
> where by "higher quality" you apparently mean "will last longer".
>
> From my - very long but not broad - experience
> there is little or no
Alan Cox wrote:
> Openoffice was run under a very restrictive policy and many of the
> developers forked it. Most folk switched to Libreoffice which has been
> rapidly evolving since the split. OpenOffice then got given to Apache in
> what a lot of people consider a face saving exercise.
I guess
Out of curiosity, I thought a few years ago that the future would be
hibernate implemented by kexec... And then no one else mentioned it
anymore.
Does anyone know what happened? Lack of interest or techical issues?
Maybe this would be a good time to revive the interest on it, if possible?
--
Pe
On 05/18/2012 12:13 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
I have a 389 DS server replication agreement whith an AD Server and
when I change the password in the windows side it replicates into 389
but via 389 console I can see this field "unhashed#user#password" in
clear text.
How can I encrypt this field?
On 05/18/2012 10:56 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/18/2012 10:35 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/18/2012 10:22 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:22 AM, JD wrote:
I think that's more tolerable than
having to wait anywhere from 10 to 30 seconds to resolve every
new name browsed to; (new relative to contents o
On 05/18/2012 10:35 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/18/2012 10:22 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:22 AM, JD wrote:
I think that's more tolerable than
having to wait anywhere from 10 to 30 seconds to resolve every
new name browsed to; (new relative to contents of the cache).
If the name isn't in your
On 05/18/2012 10:22 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:22 AM, JD wrote:
I think that's more tolerable than
having to wait anywhere from 10 to 30 seconds to resolve every
new name browsed to; (new relative to contents of the cache).
If the name isn't in your cache, you're going to have to loo
On 05/18/2012 12:22 AM, JD wrote:
I think that's more tolerable than
having to wait anywhere from 10 to 30 seconds to resolve every
new name browsed to; (new relative to contents of the cache).
If the name isn't in your cache, you're going to have to look it up and
using a longer TTL isn't goi
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 22:19:26 -0700,
JD wrote:
I have switched to dnsmasq and so far, it is not too bad.
Albeit, it's cache purge algorithm seems to have a very
short ttl for any translation - like about 3 to 5 minutes!!!
I looked for a configuration in dnsmasq.conf that would
force dnsma
On Fri, 18 May 2012 18:30:59 +0200
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What is the exact relation between these two?
Openoffice was run under a very restrictive policy and many of the
developers forked it. Most folk switched to Libreoffice which has been
rapidly evolving since the split. OpenOffice then got
On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
What is the exact relation between these two?
Are they likely to merge?
How do they differ?
They are both free.:-) :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
What is the exact relation between these two?
Are they likely to merge?
How do they differ?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
Reindl Harald wrote:
> but for only write some mails and web-brwosing i can not see why 10
> seconds
> more or less are making the difference and as cheaper/slower your
> hardware is as longer wake up from suspend takes
I'm not sure exactly what you are saying.
I don't care if my laptop takes 10
On Fri, 18 May 2012 15:29:06 +0200
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Can someone help me with manual PPTP configuration?
Start with:
yum install pptp pptp-setup
That gets you the pptpsetup command (and a man page)
which allows you to configure the pptp connection
info. But actually connecting is a bi
On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:23:56 +0100
John Horne wrote:
> Anyway, thanks. I'll make sure I have /etc/libvirt/qemu backed up, and
> will use the 'virsh define' command to restore the definitions of the
Right. I always have problems with the obscure keywords, "define"
is the right one, I wasn't thinki
Hi all,
I'm trying to grab some vectorized screenshots of web-pages using Gtk3,
Webkit & Cairo, but I cant get it to behave on Fedora 17 beta.
Got it working on two F16 machines, but it fails on both the F17
machines I've tried.
I get my PDF files, but their just PNG images wrapped in PD
Hi,
I need to configure a VPN connection to a PPTP server
without NetworkManager.
The reason: I had to configure my network in a way so there's
a bridge interface so a KVM/QEMU guest can get its IP address
via DHCP from my router and this way VNC can be NAT-ed
from the router to go directly to t
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 08:28 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 13:10:43 +0100
> John Horne wrote:
>
> > As said, the images already exist and will be available to the F17 PC,
> > so things like using virsh 'dumpxml' then 'create' don't seem to work
> > since they are trying to create
On Fri, 18 May 2012 13:10:43 +0100
John Horne wrote:
> As said, the images already exist and will be available to the F17 PC,
> so things like using virsh 'dumpxml' then 'create' don't seem to work
> since they are trying to create an image that already exists.
Actually dumpxml and create are exa
On 18/05/12 13:10, John Horne wrote:
As said, the images already exist and will be available to the F17 PC,
so things like using virsh 'dumpxml' then 'create' don't seem to work
since they are trying to create an image that already exists.
Thanks,
John.
Copy over the "/etc/libvirt/qemu/*
Hello,
Next week (hopefully) F17 comes out, and I will be rebuilding my PC from
F15 to a fresh F17 install. This will be a completely new installation,
with the disks being reformatted. I currently have some virtual machines
on the F15 PC created with KVM, and stored on an external disk. Only the
Am 18.05.2012 13:25, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> You mention having machines with 16GB RAM.
> How exactly is this used?
> I just checked my 2 servers;
> the one here (I'm in Italy) has 5GB RAM, 4GB of which is free
> ("Mem: 4829188k total, 847540k used, 3981648k free").
> The server in Ireland
On Thu, 17 May 2012 23:19:10 -0700 Konstantin Svist
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looks like Pidgin/libpurple package is behind the upstream lately, who
> should I ping about building a fresh one?
Just file a request (RFE?) in Bugzilla: bugzilla.redhat.com.
Ranjan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
Reindl Harald wrote:
> but that was never a reason to buy low quality
You are assuming that because your colleague's HP cost €800
it is of "higher quality" than my daughter's under €300 Asus netbook,
where by "higher quality" you apparently mean "will last longer".
From my - very long but not br
Rick,
> Are you sure that the local /home disk partition is mounted BEFORE the
> NFS mount occurs? It could be that the NFS mount occurs at /home first,
> then the local /home mount occurs, overlays the NFS mount and hides it.
> Ditto with the /share mountpoint.
>
> Before you do the "mount -a",
Am 18.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Alan Cox:
> I would question your maths on disk costs and electricity pricing too. To
> an extent its an open question given there's a human work cost involved
> but even a reasonably efficient modern machine running 24 x 7 is using a
> fair amount of kWh with associa
On 05/18/2012 05:52 PM, JD wrote:
>
> 0.00user 0.00system 0:00.08elapsed 12%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2628maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (0major+743minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Yep That is much better
BTW, dig is in bind and can be download from
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/990/download/b
> 10 years ago i lived more than 3 years without a job
> and in this time you have not much money
And if you were doing that in most of Western Europe/Canada/etc you would
have been receivign vastly more than someone in many other countries
working 50hours a week.
I would question your maths on d
On 05/18/2012 02:44 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/18/2012 05:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I can't see how your router or ISP could add to the "real" time. I suppose you
don't
have another system to check it
Could you try the non-builtin time command?
/usr/bin/time dig @8.8.8.8 www.ny.com
App
On 05/18/2012 02:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/18/2012 05:21 PM, JD wrote:
That value is good for comparison only as it is not
the real time. Take a look at this:
time dig @8.8.8.8 www.ny.com
;<<>> DiG 9.8.2-RedHat-9.8.2-1.fc16<<>> @8.8.8.8 www.ny.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +
On 05/18/2012 05:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I can't see how your router or ISP could add to the "real" time. I suppose
> you don't
> have another system to check it
Could you try the non-builtin time command?
/usr/bin/time dig @8.8.8.8 www.ny.com
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, a
Am 18.05.2012 10:18, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> On 18.05.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> buying a cheaper machine than 800 € results usually
>> in buy much more machines in a relative short term
>
> Maybe for you, but not for folks who hardly can afford a low end
> machine. Not having a computer i
Am 18.05.2012 10:36, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> You've repeated this several times,
> so I thought I'd test it on my laptop,
> a Thinkpad T60 running Fedora-16/KDE.
>
> I did each test twice.
> Hibernate (ie suspend to disk) and shutdown
> both took the same time, 18-20 seconds.
> Waking from hi
On 05/18/2012 05:21 PM, JD wrote:
> That value is good for comparison only as it is not
> the real time. Take a look at this:
>
> time dig @8.8.8.8 www.ny.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2-RedHat-9.8.2-1.fc16 <<>> @8.8.8.8 www.ny.com
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HE
On 05/18/2012 01:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/18/2012 03:47 PM, JD wrote:
I am indeed pointing my resolv.conf to the 2 google
nameservers.
You're probably right about our home network.
I think the router has a very low bandwidth (hardware wise),
probably because it doubles up as the decoder fo
Reindl Harald wrote:
> waking up from suspend to disk takes much longer as a cold
start
You've repeated this several times,
so I thought I'd test it on my laptop,
a Thinkpad T60 running Fedora-16/KDE.
I did each test twice.
Hibernate (ie suspend to disk) and shutdown
both took the same time, 1
On 05/18/2012 03:47 PM, JD wrote:
> I am indeed pointing my resolv.conf to the 2 google
> nameservers.
> You're probably right about our home network.
> I think the router has a very low bandwidth (hardware wise),
> probably because it doubles up as the decoder for the TV
> contents being viewed on
On 18.05.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
> buying a cheaper machine than 800 € results usually
> in buy much more machines in a relative short term
Maybe for you, but not for folks who hardly can afford a low end
machine. Not having a computer is no longer an alternative these days
either.
> cheaper
On 05/18/2012 12:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/18/2012 03:22 PM, JD wrote:
So, what's to prevent someone from simply modifying dnsmasq
(or any other open source caching name resolver) to change
the expiration time to a value greater than what the owner
of the domain wants? Sure it may result in
On 05/18/2012 03:22 PM, JD wrote:
> So, what's to prevent someone from simply modifying dnsmasq
> (or any other open source caching name resolver) to change
> the expiration time to a value greater than what the owner
> of the domain wants? Sure it may result in using stale
> ip addresses once in a
On 05/17/2012 10:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/18/2012 01:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
There should not be a configuration for that. If there is, then dnsmasq would be
going against the recommendations of the DNS RFCs. The response to a DNS request
includes a TTL (Time To Live). According to the R
45 matches
Mail list logo