Re: Blocked Ports

On 03/31/2012 11:23 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > On 03/30/2012 07:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >>> I will check when I get home in the morning. I hide the IP due to a STUPID >>> company >>> security policy! >> One other thing >> >> I think I can assum

Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution

Antonio Olivares wrote: > ``The packaging and patents are issues that hold TeXLive in Fedora back'' Imo, this is a mischaracterization. Read for yourself: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLiveLegalAudit#Why_and_how_to_do_a_legal_audit.3F -- rex -- users mailing list users@lists

Re: Blocked Ports

On 03/30/2012 07:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: I will check when I get home in the morning. I hide the IP due to a STUPID company security policy! One other thing I think I can assume that your eth0 interface is your Internet facing interface and

Re: Blocked Ports

On 03/30/2012 09:05 AM, Tim wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 00:58 -0700, Mike Dwiggins wrote: I hide the IP due to a STUPID company security policy! Which, unless you post through an anonymiser, is showing in your message headers on each and every email that you send, anyway. Have a look through

Re: Blocked Ports

On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > I will check when I get home in the morning. I hide the IP due to a STUPID > company > security policy! One other thing I think I can assume that your eth0 interface is your Internet facing interface and that it has an assigned IP address fro

Re: [OT] Fedora 18 code name

On 03/31/2012 09:13 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I think Fedora 18 should take a radical approach to code > names, one that no one would ever expect. How about: > >Fedora 18 I agree If anyone on this list ever stated "I'm running Fedora Sulfur and have a problem.", I fairly sure most fol

Re: [OT] Fedora 18 code name

I think Fedora 18 should take a radical approach to code names, one that no one would ever expect. How about: Fedora 18 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://f

Re: [OT] Fedora 18 code name

On 03/30/2012 05:40 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote: > I just realized there's a perfect successor name for Beefy Miracle: "Me > GNUsta" For those who are determined to avoid anything that could possibly offend any of the 7 billion people on Earth, I suggest: * Inoffensive Nonentity * Inanimate Carb

Re: Is it me or is it sudo?

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 4:39 AM, James Wilkinson wrote: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> sounds more you do not understand what ACLs are for >> >> how could a private user group replace ACLs? >> if you have different users and groups which needs >> defined permissions you will always need ACLs because >>

[OT] Fedora 18 code name

I just realized there's a perfect successor name for Beefy Miracle: "Me GNUsta" It's related to the previous name (both are meaty) and it's true because we love GNU, even though it's all kinds of weird Conveniently, someone has already done the artwork: http://imgur.com/knjUd :) P.S. For tho

Re: interactive kickstart ?

On 03/29/2012 03:46 PM, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: Is there any way to keep environment variables across different sections of a kickstart file ? E.g., if during %pre I solicit some input: %pre echo "enter bootloader password now:"> /dev/tty read -s GRUBPW< /dev/tty echo "you entered: ${GRUBPW}">

Re: Nightingale RPM or Repo

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote: > Thank you for your effort. I actually setup a desktop file already. Any > update on the repo? I have updated to SRPM to: - include the i686 dependency with conditional to copy in the right tarball. - added the desktop file - properl

Re: Is it me or is it sudo?

Reindl Harald wrote: > sounds more you do not understand what ACLs are for > > how could a private user group replace ACLs? > if you have different users and groups which needs > defined permissions you will always need ACLs because > chmod can only reflect the primary group > > for restrict acce

Re: External eSATA drive not recognized on 2nd power up

Patrick Lists wrote: > I have an up-to-date F16 x86_64 box with 2 eSATA ports on the back > powered by a JMicron JMB362 chip. When I attach an external SATA > drive to the eSATA port and power up the drive it is recognized > fine. But when I power down that drive, wait 2 minutes, and power it > up

Re: Blocked Ports

On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 00:58 -0700, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > I hide the IP due to a STUPID company security policy! Which, unless you post through an anonymiser, is showing in your message headers on each and every email that you send, anyway. Have a look through your message headers, and you'll see

Re: xorg.conf for HDMI

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:34:06 +0530 lokesh kumar wrote: > I want to have a display on tv from a customize board via HDMI port, > what modifications i need to make in xorg.conf and other > configuration files > None. The key in both KDE and Gnome is to UNcheck unify displays. -- users mailing li

Re: [389-users] console and groupOfNames

On 03/30/2012 08:42 AM, Michael R. Gettes wrote: I've been looking through the docs and I can't seem to find anything on this topic - so I figured I would ask. Is there any way to convince the java console to use groupOfNames instead of groupOfUniqueNames for the group look-ups? No. Please f

Re: A bit OT: git - ridiculous memory requirements

Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/30/2012 08:43 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: Hi all, I have a cloned GCC git repository, on PC with 1.5GB of RAM and 3GB swap. When I run "$git gc --aggressive", I will get after few hours an error: I'm curious why you're using git gc --aggressive on a freshly cloned re

Re: Nightingale RPM or Repo

On 03/30/2012 07:18 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote: Tested it. Works very well for a pre-pre alpha SRPM ;) Now, if you add a .desktop file and maybe (just maybe) set up a repo I can add it to the SRPM easy enough but that would require

Re: Nightingale RPM or Repo

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote: > Tested it. Works very well for a pre-pre alpha SRPM ;) > > Now, if you add a .desktop file and maybe (just maybe) set up a repo I can add it to the SRPM easy enough but that would require you to rebuild. It's simple enough to creat

Re: Is it me or is it sudo?

Am 30.03.2012 13:51, schrieb Joel Rees: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >> one of the odd defaults many are not using >> >> why should i have a group with the name of my user >> if it has only one user - or why should i put the >> user "caroline" in group "harry" exce

Re: Is it me or is it sudo?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2012 15:43, schrieb suvayu ali: >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 15:35, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 28.03.2012 15:26, schrieb suvayu ali: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 15:18, Mark Haney wrote: > markh   ALL=(ALL)       NOPASSWD:

Re: F16 security spin, LibreOffice instabilities

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/29/2012 11:18 PM, Joel Rees wrote: >> >> I'm sure I need some library for LibreOffice that didn't get picked up >> in the dependency check when I installed it. Anyone have a suggestion? > > > Try having yum reinstall it. First I tried re-in

Re: A bit OT: git - ridiculous memory requirements

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/2012 04:13 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a cloned GCC git repository, on PC with 1.5GB of RAM and 3GB > swap. > > When I run "$git gc --aggressive", I will get after few hours an > error: > > $ git gc --aggressive Counting ob

Re: openbox not fully logging out

Erk. Za Bog Numer. Ji baggu no bango. On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Joel Rees wrote: >> Filed a bug on this, redhat bugzilla 80286 Make that bugzilla 802086. >> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Joel Rees wrote: >>> I have openbox (from t

Re: openbox not fully logging out

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Joel Rees wrote: > Filed a bug on this, redhat bugzilla 80286 > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Joel Rees wrote: >> I have openbox (from the F16 security live image via live USB install) >> on a lenovo s100 and, sometime in the last couple of kernel updates, >

Re: Fedora disimprovements: am I alone?

I'll just note that you are not alone in questioning the wisdom of the current directions. (Yeah, plural. That's part of the problem.) Not alone in your frustrations, either. -- Joel Rees -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://a

Re: Various Sound Backend - Why?

On 30/03/12 05:27, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote: Hello, I mean, they all are sound backend / codec, right? Then why having many of them? It's called choice. Which is a part of freedom. Choose what works best for you. If you like none, or none work for you. You have then the freedom to write

Re: Various Sound Backend - Why?

On 03/30/2012 04:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 30.03.2012 06:27, schrieb Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor: >> Hello, >> >> This one is general Linux question. Up until Fedora 15, there was xine and >> then there was gstreamer (Which contains >> good,bad & ugly) . Then there was fluendo. Except xine, th

Re: xorg.conf for HDMI

Hi Lokesh, On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 16:49, lokesh kumar wrote: >> >> 2. Were you connected remotely over ssh? >> > > I am trying to connect an LCD TV via HDMI port,i have mounted filesystem on > my board through NFS,and accessing console via SERIAL cable. > Have you tried booting with a regular m

Re: Various Sound Backend - Why?

Am 30.03.2012 06:27, schrieb Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor: > Hello, > > This one is general Linux question. Up until Fedora 15, there was xine and > then there was gstreamer (Which contains > good,bad & ugly) . Then there was fluendo. Except xine, the later ones still > exist. > > I mean, they all

Re: Blocked Ports

On 03/30/2012 12:16 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/30/2012 02:58 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: On 03/19/2012 02:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/20/2012 01:56 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: Good summation. I also did not think I had made any changes at all but somehow I must have inadvertently done so. The

F16 Desktop Vanished

Dear List, I recently installed F16/XFCE-spin on my daughter's laptop (as its hardware can't cope with Gnome 3). The desktop was set up fine, with the usual folders, a few of her documents and a background picture as wallpaper. All of a sudden, the screen desktop is clean, no folder and no wallpa

Re: Blocked Ports

On 03/30/2012 02:58 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > On 03/19/2012 02:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 03/20/2012 01:56 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >>> Good summation. I also did not think I had made any changes at all but >>> somehow I >>> must have inadvertently done so. The point being that I do not kno

Re: grub2 prompt vs LVM

On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 19:49 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > I've had an rpm upgrade from Fedora 15 tio 16 go slightly sideways and I've > > wound up with a grub prompt upon boot. I found > > ; al

Re: F16 security spin, LibreOffice instabilities

On 03/29/2012 11:18 PM, Joel Rees wrote: I'm sure I need some library for LibreOffice that didn't get picked up in the dependency check when I installed it. Anyone have a suggestion? Try having yum reinstall it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscr