I think this is a failurebut not 100% certain that it isn't intended
behavior
Typing "systemctl is-enabled h" (followed by tab) give the output of
halt-local.service home-egreshko-misty.mount
halt.service home.mount
Suggesting those are the only choices.
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, stan wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:04:16 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, stan wrote:
> Is it possible that the kernel isn't relocatable? i.e. it expects
> to run from a specific address, and that address isn't available.
> I'm not
Do you mean
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:36:24 -0700 Craig White
wrote:
> The move to grub2 & systemd/systemctl really has nothing to do with the
> user command line interface which you should already understand since
> you said you understand the motivations.
>
> The goal is that the typical user would never act
On 03/23/2012 10:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> In this case the usual suspects (fedora, rpmfusion) plus
> fedora-chromium.
I just updated my system with apper. The list of packages updated on my system
seems
nearly the same...I don't use chromium... But I wasn't able to reproduce. No
po
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:56 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I wonder if I am alone in finding some of the developments in Fedora-16
> actually make life harder for the user?
>
> I'd take grub2 and systemctl as two examples.
> In each case I've read the documentation and understand the motivation
>
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 09:00 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 06:06 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 22:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2012 09:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >>> Or to summarize the summary: WTF?
> >> Actually, your summary should have
Michael D. Setzer II writes:
Seens seems some of the 64 bit files are not in updates, but do
appear to be in testing, but when trying to add them on a test
machine, the get a clang requires 4.6.2 of gcc-c++, but it is about
to upgrade to 4.6.3-2?
Just wait a few days. Stuff like that happens
Getting errors on running updates on x64 systems.
The 32 bit machines upgraded with no problems, but the 64 bit
systems are getting dependency errors.
Seens seems some of the 64 bit files are not in updates, but do
appear to be in testing, but when trying to add them on a test
machine, the get
On 03/23/2012 06:06 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 22:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/22/2012 09:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> Or to summarize the summary: WTF?
>> Actually, your summary should have included the bugzilla you've filed. :-)
> https://bugzilla.red
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 23:27 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Joe Zeff zeff.us> writes:
>
> > On 03/22/2012 03:55 PM, Donald Reader wrote:
> > > I am running a fully updated f16 system on a dual core amd box.
> > > Am wondering if this is a bug or something gone wrong with my box.
> >
> > No, you'
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:04:16 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, stan wrote:
>
> > Is it possible that the kernel isn't relocatable? i.e. it expects
> > to run from a specific address, and that address isn't available.
> > I'm not
>
> Do you mean a RAM address?
> How wo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 23:44, Steven Stern
wrote:
>> You might need to enable the struts feature. Try the command below.
>>
>> $ xfconf-query -c xfce4-panel -p /panels/panel-/disable-struts -t
>> bool -n -s false
>>
>> The n should be the appropriate panel number (it starts from 0). I am
>> not a
On 03/22/2012 04:27 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239
Thank you; I'd only looked in the main Bugzilla for Fedora.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Joe Zeff zeff.us> writes:
> On 03/22/2012 03:55 PM, Donald Reader wrote:
> > I am running a fully updated f16 system on a dual core amd box.
> > Am wondering if this is a bug or something gone wrong with my box.
>
> No, you're not the only one. I'm having the same issue, and I've also
> found
On 03/22/2012 03:55 PM, Donald Reader wrote:
I am running a fully updated f16 system on a dual core amd box.
Am wondering if this is a bug or something gone wrong with my box.
No, you're not the only one. I'm having the same issue, and I've also
found that there aren't any kmod-nvidia updates
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, stan wrote:
Is it possible that the kernel isn't relocatable? i.e. it expects to
run from a specific address, and that address isn't available. I'm not
Do you mean a RAM address?
How would a RAM address not be available?
sure how to check that, but the boot directory
I am running a fully updated f16 system on a dual core amd box.
Am wondering if this is a bug or something gone wrong with my box.
And if there might be a work around. This issue is way over my head
and any help would be much appreciated.
I have attached the failed log
22 Mar 15:32:03 akmods: B
On 03/22/2012 04:48 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 18:36, Steven Stern
> wrote:
>> It does. Â I have only one panel defined (named "Panel 1" under Panel ->
>> Panel Preferences and it spans the entire screen.
>
> You might need to enable the struts feature. Try th
2012/3/22, Timothy Murphy :
> Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
>
>> openvpn has special issues with systemd, but once you know the magic
>> recipe, it works fine. See:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744244
>>
>> If your openvpn config file is /etc/openvpn/client.conf, do:
>>
>>
>> ln
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:01:25 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Andras Simon wrote:
>
> > 2012/3/22, Michael Hennebry :
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> #The /boot/f15x directory is where I extracted the vmlinuz
> >> #and initrd.img files from the isolinux directory on
> >> #the is
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/22/2012 02:56 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> It seems as freedesktop.org site is unmaintained or dead. Thus,
>> know anyone, when it is there any other recent actual standard
>> about desktop things?
>
> Does not a
2012/3/22, Michael Hennebry :
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Andras Simon wrote:
>
>> 2012/3/22, Michael Hennebry :
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> #The /boot/f15x directory is where I extracted the vmlinuz
>>> #and initrd.img files from the isolinux directory on
>>> #the iso image, and /zooty/salvage/iso-images/Fedora
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 22:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 09:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Or to summarize the summary: WTF?
>
> Actually, your summary should have included the bugzilla you've filed. :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806109
poc
--
users mailin
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Andras Simon wrote:
2012/3/22, Michael Hennebry :
[...]
#The /boot/f15x directory is where I extracted the vmlinuz
#and initrd.img files from the isolinux directory on
#the iso image, and /zooty/salvage/iso-images/Fedora-15-Beta-x86_64-DVD/
#is the directory where I saved
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:21 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I´ve been using Fedora 17 Alpha on a Dual-core Opteron server with ATI
> X1600 gfx card and dual head display (two 19" LED LCD screens).
Wrong list. Unreleased versions of Fedora should be discussed on the
Test list, not here.
poc
--
u
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > I recently attempted to update my system using apper. It gave me the
> > list of rpms, I said Apply, it started working, then it popped up a
> > message about some packages not being signed and did I want to pr
Hi Steven,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 18:36, Steven Stern
wrote:
> It does. I have only one panel defined (named "Panel 1" under Panel ->
> Panel Preferences and it spans the entire screen.
You might need to enable the struts feature. Try the command below.
$ xfconf-query -c xfce4-panel -p /panel
2012/3/22, Michael Hennebry :
[...]
> #The /boot/f15x directory is where I extracted the vmlinuz
> #and initrd.img files from the isolinux directory on
> #the iso image, and /zooty/salvage/iso-images/Fedora-15-Beta-x86_64-DVD/
> #is the directory where I saved the iso image (where
> #the /zooty m
On 03/22/2012 02:04 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Can you really claim that that is as easy as "chkconfig openvpn on"?
It takes 10 times as long to type, for a start.
No, but then, I'm not a fan of the new system.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscrip
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> openvpn has special issues with systemd, but once you know the magic
> recipe, it works fine. See:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744244
>
> If your openvpn config file is /etc/openvpn/client.conf, do:
>
>
> ln -s /lib/systemd/system/openvpn\@.se
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 16:42 +0100, Chris Rouch wrote:
>
> For grub2, one of the things I like is that it picked up the windows
> installation on the other disk, without any configuration on my part.
> It also picks up other linux installations on a multi-boot machine
This must be my day to be co
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:56 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 11:37 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > On 03/20/2012 11:28 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:52 -0500
> > > Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 21:12 +0100, Emilio Lopez wrote:
On 03/22/2012 01:26 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Incidentally, none of the systemctl advocates has answered my query:
How do I say "chkconfig openvpn on" in systemctl-speak?
I'm not that fond of systemctl, but I can help with this:
systemctl start openvpn.service
will start it running and
syste
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 22.03.2012 16:54, schrieb Richard Shaw:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
>>> For grub2, one of the things I like is that it picked up the windows
>>> installation on the other disk, without any configuration on my
Claude Jones wrote:
>> But to return to boot-speed,
>> how could using systemctl be any faster than an exactly equivalent
>> command expressed in chkconfig terms?
> in other words, in can start services up in parallel, instead of waiting
> for each one to initiate before going to the next...
You
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I recently attempted to update my system using apper. It gave me the
> list of rpms, I said Apply, it started working, then it popped up a
> message about some packages not being signed and did I want to proceed.
> However it didn't say *which* packages.
>
> How is th
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, jackson byers wrote:
Michael,
did you follow the Andras->Tom Horsley link?
Yes. See my previous reply.
done some experimenting since.
My machine can still boot from my FC13 installation disk.
I let it get as far as offering to test the media. I can't find my F14 disk.
I
On 03/22/2012 11:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'd take grub2 and systemctl as two examples.
> In each case I've read the documentation and understand the motivation
> behind these developments.
> But I remain unconvinced that the gains outweigh the disadvantages
> of methods that are much harder
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:37:19 +0200
Pasha R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile latest wine rpm on my F14 64-bit system.
Do you mind if I ask why? The 64-bit package works perfectly for things
like TweetDeck and Picassa.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
>>Michael,
>>did you follow the Andras->Tom Horsley link?
>Yes. See my previous reply.
> done some experimenting since.
>My machine can still boot from my FC13 installation disk.
>I let it get as far as offering to test the media. I can't find my F14 disk.
>I copied FC13's vmlinuz to a hard driv
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:58:24 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
and yes you can ignore the "# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE"
as long you do not call "grub2-mkconfig" which is not
needed usually
The actual abomination with grub2 is the fact that
the grub2-mkconfig tool
Am 22.03.2012 18:37, schrieb Claude Jones:
> in other words, in can start services up in parallel, instead of waiting
> for each one to initiate before going to the next...
what can have the opposite effect if the disk is slow and
services are producing much disc activity at start
on most mach
On 03/22/2012 11:56 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 17:48, Steven Stern
> wrote:
>> When I open multiple Libre Office documents, the first one appears
>> cleanly on screen. The second one opens with the title bar just below
>> the top menu bar for XFCE. Â It then jumps up to the to
On 3/22/2012 1:04 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
But to return to boot-speed,
how could using systemctl be any faster than an exactly equivalent command
expressed in chkconfig terms?
from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
"systemd is a system and service manager for Linux, compatible with
On 03/22/2012 01:04 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'd agree that the systemctl syntax is clumsier.
The CLI syntax is different, but the difference is negligible once you
are used to it.
However, the *.service file syntax is much, MUCH simpler than the old
init scripts!
An old-style postgrey
I'd agree that the systemctl syntax is clumsier. But on my machines,
the boot time has reduced dramatically.
I still haven't discovered the equivalent of "chkconfig openvpn on"
under the new dispensation.
openvpn has special issues with systemd, but once you know the magic
recipe, it works fi
On 22/03/12 16:27, Tom Horsley wrote:
Fedora should eradicate grub2-mkconfig and /etc/default/grub
and remove the "do not edit this file" comment so
there is really only one file to edit again and
no confusing conflicting behavior.
Grub2 direction being currently discussed
as part of this thr
Chris Rouch wrote:
> I'd agree that the systemctl syntax is clumsier. But on my machines,
> the boot time has reduced dramatically.
I agree that boot time seems to have been reduced,
at a guess about 15% in my case.
However, I hardly ever re-boot,
so any saving there was outweighed many times
by
On 03/22/2012 05:29 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Hi,
One other thing I noticed is the use of `make install-strip`. RPM
will strip the debugging symbols for you and create a debuginfo
package, which might be useful someday if^H^Hwhen it crashes, so you
should probably just `make install` here.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 17:48, Steven Stern
wrote:
> When I open multiple Libre Office documents, the first one appears
> cleanly on screen. The second one opens with the title bar just below
> the top menu bar for XFCE. It then jumps up to the top of the physical
> screen, pushing the title bar
When I open multiple Libre Office documents, the first one appears
cleanly on screen. The second one opens with the title bar just below
the top menu bar for XFCE. It then jumps up to the top of the physical
screen, pushing the title bar behind XFCE's menu bar. To close that
window, I have to use
Hi,
Sorry for the delay...
/var/log/dirsrv/admin-serv/access
127.0.0.1 - cn=Directory Manager [22/Mar/2012:12:43:32 -0400] "GET
/admin-serv/authenticate HTTP/1.0" 401 478
/var/log/dirsrv/admin-serv/error
[Thu Mar 22 12:43:26 2012] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Thu Mar 22 12:43:27 2012
Hi,
> One other thing I noticed is the use of `make install-strip`. RPM
> will strip the debugging symbols for you and create a debuginfo
> package, which might be useful someday if^H^Hwhen it crashes, so you
> should probably just `make install` here.
Thanks very much for the e-mail! Then, I
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:58:24 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> and yes you can ignore the "# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE"
> as long you do not call "grub2-mkconfig" which is not
> needed usually
The actual abomination with grub2 is the fact that
the grub2-mkconfig tool exists. One of the main forces
that le
I´ve been using Fedora 17 Alpha on a Dual-core Opteron server with ATI
X1600 gfx card and dual head display (two 19" LED LCD screens).
So far so good, but two notes, one on performance the other on usability:
1. Dragging windows across one screen to the other shows a noticiable
slowdown vs Fedora
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, jackson byers wrote:
Michael,
did you follow the Andras->Tom Horsley link?
Yes. See my previous reply.
I've done some experimenting since.
My machine can still boot from my FC13 installation disk.
I let it get as far as offering to test the media. I can't find my F14 dis
Am 22.03.2012 16:54, schrieb Richard Shaw:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
>> For grub2, one of the things I like is that it picked up the windows
>> installation on the other disk, without any configuration on my part.
>> It also picks up other linux installations on a mu
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
> For grub2, one of the things I like is that it picked up the windows
> installation on the other disk, without any configuration on my part.
> It also picks up other linux installations on a multi-boot machine.
I just wish system-config-boot
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:57 +, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> Whilst I feel email is still a very important part of my workflow,
> gone are the days (for me at least) of a database of a quarter of a
> million emails with hundreds of mailboxes sorted by hundreds of
> filters.
This is where news servers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2012 03:23 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> I don't think he wanted to report problems as much as inquire into
> whether someone here knew anything about the status of the
> freedesktop.orgproject...seems legit to me at least, since it is
On 03/21/2012 05:54 AM, Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
Hi
We have done a plugin that dynamically change some attributes of the
search results. The main code is like this:
int smbhack_hook( Slapi_PBlock* pb ) {
// ...
Slapi_Entry** s_entradas = NULL;
Slapi_PBlock* pbi = NUL
On 03/22/2012 08:01 AM, mja...@guesswho.com wrote:
*From:*389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of
*mja...@guesswho.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:10 PM
*To:* 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Subject:* Re: [389-users
On 22 March 2012 12:56, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I wonder if I am alone in finding some of the developments in Fedora-16
> actually make life harder for the user?
>
> I'd take grub2 and systemctl as two examples.
> In each case I've read the documentation and understand the motivation
> behind thes
I don't think he wanted to report problems as much as inquire into whether
someone here knew anything about the status of the
freedesktop.orgproject...seems legit to me at least, since it is
relevant to Fedora.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2012 02:56 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> It seems as freedesktop.org site is unmaintained or dead. Thus,
> know anyone, when it is there any other recent actual standard
> about desktop things?
Does not appear dead according to:
http://www.
Maybe slightly OT, but...
When searching some informations about freedesktop.org standards,
I found that
*) search engine at freedesktop.org is non-functional,
*) articles at this site are without timestamps (e.g.
http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec-latest.html
)
Hey Herb,
You should refer to the Red Hat Directory Server administration guide for
detail about setting up replication which you can locate in here.
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/
>> 1. How can I find out which system(s) is/are master, consumer, hub, etc?
You should
On 03/22/2012 09:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Or to summarize the summary: WTF?
Actually, your summary should have included the bugzilla you've filed. :-)
--
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You
may both
be wrong. -- Dandemis
--
users mailing lis
Pasha R wrote:
Are there any additional options I missed?
You need to use mock if you want to do this.
mock -r fedora-16-i386 wine.src.rpm
Give it a long time. You'll eventually get your RPMs out.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription option
From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of
mja...@guesswho.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:10 PM
To: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [389-users] user cn=Directory Manager does not have permissions
From: Ric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*n.b.* I originally sent this as a c.c. to the list but it doesn't seem
to have happened...
On 21/03/2012 21:47, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 21Mar2012 11:48, Phil Dobbin wrote: |
> Cameron Simpson | > On 21Mar2012 00:49, suvayu ali
> | > wrote: | |
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Patrick Lists
wrote:
> On 22-03-12 12:37, Pasha R wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile latest wine rpm on my F14 64-bit system. I
>> grabbed latest SRPM from rawhide, and do rpmbuild --rebuild
>> wine.src.rpm to build x86_64 version. But, when I'm trying to
I recently attempted to update my system using apper. It gave me the
list of rpms, I said Apply, it started working, then it popped up a
message about some packages not being signed and did I want to proceed.
However it didn't say *which* packages.
How is the user supposed to make an intelligent d
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:17 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/03/12 12:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On updating my F16 system via yum I got the following:
> >
> > Installing : kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2012 01:05 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I'll say this. I recently went to read the grub2 documentation and
> found this product rather obtuse and complex. As an example trying
> to figure out the camparative roles of grub2-mkconfig and
> grub2-i
On 22/03/12 12:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On updating my F16 system via yum I got the following:
Installing : kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64
28/56
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
so w
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:56 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I wonder if I am alone in finding some of the developments in Fedora-16
> actually make life harder for the user?
>
> I'd take grub2 and systemctl as two examples.
> In each case I've read the documentation and understand the motivation
>
On updating my F16 system via yum I got the following:
Installing : kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64
28/56
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
However the system boots fine with no apparent proble
I wonder if I am alone in finding some of the developments in Fedora-16
actually make life harder for the user?
I'd take grub2 and systemctl as two examples.
In each case I've read the documentation and understand the motivation
behind these developments.
But I remain unconvinced that the gains ou
On 22-03-12 12:37, Pasha R wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile latest wine rpm on my F14 64-bit system. I
grabbed latest SRPM from rawhide, and do rpmbuild --rebuild
wine.src.rpm to build x86_64 version. But, when I'm trying to build
32-bit version using rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686 wine.src.rp
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:22:28 +0100,
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Is it possible to switch back to grub1 even when the system is a fresh
installation?
Will grub1 continue be packaged for new fedora releases?
You can use grub to boot systems using F16+. grubby will still update
the kernel entr
Hi,
I'm trying to compile latest wine rpm on my F14 64-bit system. I
grabbed latest SRPM from rawhide, and do rpmbuild --rebuild
wine.src.rpm to build x86_64 version. But, when I'm trying to build
32-bit version using rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686 wine.src.rpm, it
starts to compile, but somewhe
Hi,
I've just installed Fedora16 (previously used an updated installation
which didn't update grub) and Grub2 isn't able to render its
user-interface on this Notebook.
All I see is the "toshiba" logo with some distortions, until the linux
kernel takes over and does mode-setting.
I filed a bug in
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> OK, playing with a different spec file (attached), I get the following
> error:
>
>
> $ rpmbuild -ba wbar.spec
>
> Question: why does it not do the /usr/bin/gzip? Shouldn't it do
> that first, or alternatively use /bin/tar
84 matches
Mail list logo
