On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:02:40 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:15:55 -0500, Fedora User wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:48:37 + (UTC)
> > Beartooth wrote:
> >
> >
> >>That failed, too, this time complaining of lots of
> >> "Protected multilib versions."
> >>
>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:48:43AM +, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > It's probably worth checking that /etc/mdadm.conf looks good. If it
> doesn't,
> > fix it and then rebuild your initramfs.
>
> Good point, but "unfortunately" /etc/mdadm.conf looks perfectly f
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> It's probably worth checking that /etc/mdadm.conf looks good. If it doesn't,
> fix it and then rebuild your initramfs.
Good point, but "unfortunately" /etc/mdadm.conf looks perfectly fine.
Also /etc/fstab and all the harddisk-related entries in /dev. I guess,
if its ju
Andreas M. Kirchwitz writes:
Basically the same problem has been reported by Sam Varshavchik
in
but there wasn't a final solution.
Yup. But I did find a final solution, eventually.
Take a survey of all your mdraid UUIDs. Reconcile it against your
/etc/default/grub. GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX shoul
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:49:17 +,
"Andreas M. Kirchwitz" wrote:
> Hello users of Linux software RAID!
>
> I have two identical harddisks, and on a freshly installed Fedora 16
> all my filesystems (/boot, /, /home, /usr/local, /opt, swap) are set up
> as software RAID1 (md).
>
> Occ
"wonderful" news shortly before a new machine
arrives which will NATURLY use RAID and was planned
as first fedora16 setup
are we getting only broken pieces now?
until and including F14 Fedora was a rock stable
distribution, but currently all feels like "let's
see what they have broken now"
Am 16
Hello users of Linux software RAID!
I have two identical harddisks, and on a freshly installed Fedora 16
all my filesystems (/boot, /, /home, /usr/local, /opt, swap) are set up
as software RAID1 (md).
Occasionally (about every second boot), Fedora 16 silently removes
one of the mirrors fr
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 18:16:40 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:45:11 -0500
>
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > Huh? None of that junk is in updates today, that's why people
> > find it broken all the time. The test system using the staging
> > repo can either run "yum update" with no e
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:28:42 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The DVD is a small subset of all available packages. ;)
I know that, but the reason (presumably) packages are
included on the DVD is because they are felt to be
frequently used as opposed to the ones only on the
network repos.
I'm talking
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:35 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:16:40 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Whats on the test system? Everything? It can't have all packages
> > installed due to some conflicting (deliberately, or due to bugs).
>
> Install from the DVD, select custom p
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:16:40 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Whats on the test system? Everything? It can't have all packages
> installed due to some conflicting (deliberately, or due to bugs).
Install from the DVD, select custom packages, right click
every package group and say "select all optional
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 19:45:11 Tom Horsley wrote:
> Yes, that means nothing goes in updates if even one thing
> is broken in the staging repo. But that is NOT a problem.
> Virtually everyone trying to run "yum update" with the current
> process is getting errors and giving up till things wo
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:45:11 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Huh? None of that junk is in updates today, that's why people
> find it broken all the time. The test system using the staging
> repo can either run "yum update" with no errors, or it can't.
> If it gets no errors, the staging repo becomes t
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 19:45 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Virtually everyone trying to run "yum update" with the current
> process is getting errors and giving up till things work
> anyway.
No doubt some people are getting this, but virtually everyone? I don't
usually have any problems of this sort
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 18:33 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Anyone know what causes this?
>
> This is my F14 MythTV box. I've rebooted twice and there's no end in sight.
F14 is EOL, meaning that any bugs are not going to be fixed.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:40:22 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Of course, a temporary staging repo would be needed. Filling it isn't
> trivial, however, and requires lots of iterations and a bullet-proof
> "--skip-broken" finder
Huh? None of that junk is in updates today, that's why people
find it
Anyone know what causes this?
This is my F14 MythTV box. I've rebooted twice and there's no end in sight.
Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://f
firefox -safe-mode
On 02/15/2012 03:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 19:13 +, Beartooth wrote:
What means "safe mode"?
It means "run Firefox with extensions disabled".
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 19:13 +, Beartooth wrote:
> What means "safe mode"?
It means "run Firefox with extensions disabled".
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gu
On 02/15/2012 02:39 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
$ rpm -qR akmods|grep devel
kernel-devel
...so yes it's listed as a dependency and should get pulled in by yum.
...and that also answers my question.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
htt
On 02/15/2012 02:37 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
I don't know, but I assume yum will pull in any and all dependencies required
to make it work, including the kernel header packages and the development
toolchain for compilation.
That's true if and only if they're properly listed. Back when I
ins
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 15:04:52 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 01:56 PM, Iain Morgan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 19:54:39 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> >> On 02/14/2012 06:37 PM, Iain Morgan wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> On a fairly frequent basis, one of my 389 DS servers
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:22 -0500, TH (Tom) wrote:
> > Secondly, you can only catch the broken dep prior to moving _individual
> > packages_ from updates-testing to updates. Moving alsa-lib plus alsa-utils
> > at once would have been fine.
>
> So don't move them to updates, move them to pushed-b
On 15 February 2012 22:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 12:54:30 Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> > (b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
>>
>> Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
>> kernel-headers, if no
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 12:54:30 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > (b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
>
> Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
> kernel-headers, if not both. (It's been several years, so my memory's a
> tad
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 19:54:39 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 06:37 PM, Iain Morgan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On a fairly frequent basis, one of my 389 DS servers hangs after certain
> > CMP operations. Once this happens, the server cannot be shutdown
> > gracefully. This has been g
On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
(b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
kernel-headers, if not both. (It's been several years, so my memory's a
tad fuzzy.) However, for whatever reason, it didn't list them as
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
>
> I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
> not get any improvements (see below)
>
> Then I even cannot get back with the 1920x1080 resolution even with
> the p
On 15/02/12 14:57, stan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:28:02 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
...
I found that I could expose "hidden" groups under preferences and
was able to add bobg to the audio group. I rebooted and audio
apparently works! Need to test further but some progress at las
Thank for your email.
But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
not get any improvements (see below)
Then I even cannot get back with the 1920x1080 resolution even with
the previous kernel. So reinstalled the removed packag
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:15:55 -0500, Fedora User wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:48:37 + (UTC)
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>
>> That failed, too, this time complaining of lots of "Protected
>> multilib versions."
>>
> I'm pretty sure that means that you have competing versions - 32 bit vs.
>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:28:02 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
...
> I found that I could expose "hidden" groups under preferences and
> was able to add bobg to the audio group. I rebooted and audio
> apparently works! Need to test further but some progress at last.
Sounds like you're back in
Beartooth wrote:
> I tried yum reinstall firefox, and yum claimed to have done so.
> But that didn't help.
Setting up a new Firefox profile might help. Either run
firefox -p
or rename the ~/.mozilla/firefox directory.
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | “It was rare to catch
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:52:11 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2012 18:25:07 Beartooth wrote:
[]
> Umm, I think Dale meant that without the "&" at the end. Also, it's not
> the point to just start it --- I guess you want to start it, try to do
> something with it
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 11:21:49 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With te new kernel 3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64
> I cannot start the graphics mode!
>
> [ 161.451] (II) LoadModule: "glx"
> [ 161.451] (II) Loading
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so
> [ 161.454] (II) Module
On 02/15/2012 07:48 AM, Beartooth wrote:
I did spot "yum check duplicates," and tried that. There are so
many that I can't scroll all the way back up; but most seem to be the
same package except for f14 on one and f15 on the other.
yum check duplicates > tee dupes.txt
Will let you look
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:00:30 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Secondly, you can only catch the broken dep prior to moving _individual
> packages_ from updates-testing to updates. Moving alsa-lib plus alsa-utils
> at once would have been fine.
So don't move them to updates, move them to pushed-but-
On 15/02/12 11:40, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 15/02/12 04:19, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 14/02/12 20:56, stan wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:05:28 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have two F-16/64 bit computers that have sound problems. The
second one has no sound at all.
Beyond that, you need
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:10:00 +0100, RC (Ralf) wrote:
> [...] Playing down the issues and to wipe them under the carpet
> doesn't help anybody.
Who's "playing down the issues"? Don't make up such things.
These issues are a topic not just on this mailing-list, but in (all?)
Fedora related communit
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:23:53 -0500, TH (Tom) wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:12:43 +0100
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > It's really a scenario where the Fedora Updates System needs to prevent a
> > packager from pushing something. That has not been implemented yet,
> > however. And more will nee
On 15/02/12 04:19, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 14/02/12 20:56, stan wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:05:28 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have two F-16/64 bit computers that have sound problems. The
second one has no sound at all.
Beyond that, you need someone knowledgeable in PA, and that i
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:33:55 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
...
> But since I barely know what I am doing and grasping at
> straws am willing to try anything.
With this new data, your problem sounds, as you said, very much like
Patrick Dupre's. He solved his problem, with the help of some link
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:48:37 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
>
> That failed, too, this time complaining of lots of "Protected
> multilib versions."
>
I'm pretty sure that means that you have competing versions - 32 bit
vs. 64 bit. Do you have WINE installed ion a 64 bit environment? If so
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:06 AM, FRank Murphy wrote:
> On 15/02/12 16:00, linux guy wrote:
>>
>> I received the following error during an update this morning.
>>
>> Installing : kernel-3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64
>> grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
>
>
> Mainly harmless error.
>
>>
>
On 15/02/12 16:00, linux guy wrote:
I received the following error during an update this morning.
Installing : kernel-3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Mainly harmless error.
What is it about ?
Do you have /etc/grub.cfg?
from grub legacy.
if yes rem
I received the following error during an update this morning.
Installing : kernel-3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
What is it about ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 15/02/12 15:48, Beartooth wrote:
Can I do "you remove duplicates" or "yum remove *f14*" or
something?
package-cleanup --cleandupes
--
Regards
FRank
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproj
I tried to do preupgrade on a System76 netbook running F14. It
failed repeatedly, either complaining that I had to go release by
release, which I had told it to do -- or offering to boot F15 on the grub
splash, but failing.
I got out my old F16 install disk, from about two week
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:43:32 -0600,
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Alex said:
> > I really can't believe the default install with two disks is LVM with
> > striped disks and no redundancy. It's such a process just to create a
> > RAID system.
>
> It would be nice if anaconda recogn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/2012 09:23 AM, SES wrote:
> I keep getting this same error message: ideas please and HEL!!
>
> PLUS- ANYONE KNOW WHOIS this IP-10.155.7.70 it's hanging on my
> firewall...
>
> Thanks!
>
> SES
>
> SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/acc
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:23:06 -0500,
SES wrote:
>
> PLUS- ANYONE KNOW WHOIS this IP-10.155.7.70 it's hanging on my
> firewall...
The answer to this part of you question is that addresses starting with 10
are not routable over the public internet. So whois isn't going to show
a meaningful ow
Once upon a time, Alex said:
> I really can't believe the default install with two disks is LVM with
> striped disks and no redundancy. It's such a process just to create a
> RAID system.
It would be nice if anaconda recognized a pair of same-sized disks and
had an easy "click here for redundancy
I looks like that setfacl -m u:user1:rw /dev/snd/*
fixed the issue at least for user1
Thank for your help.
--
---
==
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry| | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-4
It looks like that run setfacl -m u:user1:rw /dev/snd/*
fixed the problem.
On 15 February 2012 11:29, Patrick Dupre wrote:
The sound card works fine with fedora16 live, but not sound device is
detected with the installed fedora16.
This is the lsmod of fedora live:
snd_hda_codec_hdmi 2
I keep getting this same error message: ideas please and HEL!!
PLUS- ANYONE KNOW WHOIS this IP-10.155.7.70 it's hanging on my
firewall...
Thanks!
SES
SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon from read access on
the file cpuinfo.
* Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests
*
On 15 February 2012 14:04, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 15 February 2012 11:29, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>
>> The sound card works fine with fedora16 live, but not sound device is
>> detected with the installed fedora16.
>>
>> This is the lsmod of fedora live:
>>
>> snd_hda_codec_hdmi 21224 4
>> snd_
On 15 February 2012 11:29, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> The sound card works fine with fedora16 live, but not sound device is
> detected with the installed fedora16.
>
> This is the lsmod of fedora live:
>
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi 21224 4
> snd_hda_codec_via 29923 1
> snd_hda_intel 206
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:33:12 +
FRank Murphy wrote:
> A number of virt instances.
> Where sound\souncards are irrelevant.
If you don't need sound/soundcard in your virt instance then remove the
virtual sound hardware in virt-manager.
Linux is just driving what is there.
Alan
--
users maili
On 15-02-12 13:10, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am not blaming the alsa-utils/libs packager(s), I am blaming those
people who are supposed to assure the distros' releases and updates are
consistent.
Isn't that the packagers/maintainers responsibility? They create and
push the updates that have an
A number of virt instances.
Where sound\souncards are irrelevant.
Joystick is easy "blacklist joydev"
Sound seems to be all over the place.
Best way to block, oneliner?
lsmod
Module Size Used by
nfs 343220 1
lockd 73368 1 nfs
fscache
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 15.02.2012 03:52, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
>> Alex writes:
>>> I understand /boot on RAID1 on fedora16 isn't supported.
>>
>> That's news to me.
>
> It is apparently the "official" stance; see the F16 common bugs page.
and why in
On 02/15/2012 12:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:19 +0100, RC (Ralf) wrote:
Wasn't this kind of bugs supposed to be caught by AutoQA?
It caught it,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1132/alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16
but obviously only after the aut
On 15/02/12 11:21, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
With te new kernel 3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64
I cannot start the graphics mode!
You have a mix of nVidia and nouveau drivers, and probably need a nVidia
kmod that matches your new kernel.
See recent posts about 'no more nvidia' for hints.
John P
--
u
The sound card works fine with fedora16 live, but not sound device is
detected with the installed fedora16.
This is the lsmod of fedora live:
snd_hda_codec_hdmi 21224 4
snd_hda_codec_via 29923 1
snd_hda_intel 20691 3
snd_hda_codec 73545 3
snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_h
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:12:43 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's really a scenario where the Fedora Updates System needs to prevent a
> packager from pushing something. That has not been implemented yet,
> however. And more will need to be implemented to get it right.
Yes, but it is the insane q
Hello,
With te new kernel 3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64
I cannot start the graphics mode!
X.Org X Server 1.11.4
Release Date: 2012-01-27
[ 161.446] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 161.446] Build Operating System: x86-01 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
[ 161.446] Current Operating System: Linux Homere
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:19 +0100, RC (Ralf) wrote:
> >> Wasn't this kind of bugs supposed to be caught by AutoQA?
> > It caught it,
> >
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1132/alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16
> >
> > but obviously only after the automatic request to push it
On 15 February 2012 09:15, Emilio Lopez wrote:
>>The symptom is not being able to select the correct audio output device.
>>What seems to work is, from root, pulseaudio --kill && pulseaudio -D
>
> The same problem here, but I can do it without root.
>
Yes it's quite strange to have to do it as ro
Am 15.02.2012 03:52, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
>> Alex writes:
>>> I understand /boot on RAID1 on fedora16 isn't supported.
>>
>> That's news to me.
>
> It is apparently the "official" stance; see the F16 common bugs page.
and why in the world was a release
On 14/02/12 20:40, Fedora User wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:05:28 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
Suggestions?
Bob
Try the "messy" PA solution that I posted earlier in the day. Sometimes
things that work for me actually work for other people.
"In Pulse v. Me, this is just some
On 02/15/2012 09:46 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:53:54 +0100, RC (Ralf) wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:28 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:21:05 +0100, HD (Heinz) wrote:
Hi,
seems like alsa-lib update is broken, does anybody see the same with F16?
*sigh*
h
On 14/02/12 20:56, stan wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:05:28 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have two F-16/64 bit computers that have sound problems. The
second one has no sound at all.
I can see sound moving the indicator trace in PA Volume Output
Devices but it does not get to
>The symptom is not being able to select the correct audio output device.
>What seems to work is, from root, pulseaudio --kill && pulseaudio -D
The same problem here, but I can do it without root.
Emilio.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:53:54 +0100, RC (Ralf) wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 10:28 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:21:05 +0100, HD (Heinz) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> seems like alsa-lib update is broken, does anybody see the same with F16?
> >
> > *sigh*
> >
> > https://admin.fed
74 matches
Mail list logo
