Once upon a time, Cameron Simpson said:
> On 16Oct2011 20:15, Chris Adams wrote:
> | See /dev/disk/by-{id,path,uuid}.
>
> And does this work _before_ boot, in the root= kernel command line, via
> grub.conf?
I'm not sure about the /dev/..., but the UUID does directly (IIRC it is
"UUID=...") with
Quoting "D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr." :
> You might just completely remove Xorg and then completely reinstall it
> to fix your xorg.conf issue.
>
So you think I ought to try "yum remove Xorg" and let it go? Will that
mess up any of my personal settings or will those likely not be touched?
--
users m
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 00:28 -0400, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
> You might just completely remove Xorg and then completely reinstall it
> to fix your xorg.conf issue.
What xorg.conf issue? The *way* Fedora/X Org works now is you DON"T
need the .conf file anymore. It's suppose to just work. No
On 16Oct2011 18:09, Joe Zeff wrote:
| On 10/16/2011 05:47 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > I've got a machine at home whose / drive gets renamed depending on
| > whether the PCI SCSI RAID stuff is broken or not. Hmm, shall root be on
| > sdb or sdc today? Maddening when trying to rescue.
|
| Make
You might just completely remove Xorg and then completely reinstall it
to fix your xorg.conf issue.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:26 AM, John Aldrich wrote:
> A little while ago I inadvertently killed power to my F15 box. Now I'm
> unable to get a better screen size than 1024X768 (previous was
> 128
A little while ago I inadvertently killed power to my F15 box. Now I'm
unable to get a better screen size than 1024X768 (previous was
1280x1024) as well I'm having problems with my keyboard and mouse. The
keyboard will suddenly not work any more (i.e. I can't type) and the
mouse will somewh
On 16Oct2011 20:15, Chris Adams wrote:
| Once upon a time, Cameron Simpson said:
| > I'm all ok with providing sda/hda as discovered, _provided_ one also has
| > nice bus/id type names as well. Solaris' bus/id/partition drive names
| > looked long and complicated but they were reliable - you coul
2011/10/17, suvayu ali :
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
>> There's also "yum search all ...", but in this case it wasn't needed.
>
> That searches for the phrase "all" in package names and descriptions,
> that doesn't make sense to me. Did you mean `yum list all `
> instea
Thanks Patrick. Will do!
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 21:23 -0400, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Yesterday I installed F16B on the laptop and was really excited when I
>> found out it would easily integrate all my Google
On 10/16/2011 11:04 PM, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
> In F16 when you go to "Online Accounts" it prompts to authenticate
> your Google account, and then gives a list of toggle switches if you
> want to "turn on" you calendar, mail, contacts, etc.
What happens if you have multiple Google accounts?
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 21:23 -0400, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Yesterday I installed F16B on the laptop and was really excited when I
> found out it would easily integrate all my Google Services into the
> computer. However, after authenticating and enabling all the things I
> w
In F16 when you go to "Online Accounts" it prompts to authenticate
your Google account, and then gives a list of toggle switches if you
want to "turn on" you calendar, mail, contacts, etc.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Steven Stern
wrote:
> What does it mean that it integrates? I've got my G
What does it mean that it integrates? I've got my Google stuff tied
into Thunderbird.
On 10/16/2011 09:22 PM, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
> I guess I didn't, because I assumed it just worked after I configured it!
>
> Oops!
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, suvayu ali
> wrot
I guess I didn't, because I assumed it just worked after I configured it!
Oops!
Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, suvayu ali
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:23 AM, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr.
> wrote:
>>
>> Yesterday I installed F16B on the laptop and was really excited when I
>> found o
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:23 AM, D. Marshall Lemcoe Jr.
wrote:
>
> Yesterday I installed F16B on the laptop and was really excited when I
> found out it would easily integrate all my Google Services into the
> computer. However, after authenticating and enabling all the things I
> wanted, I could
On 10/17/2011 01:52 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
> It is already available on F14. I am running it. That happened when I
> opened Firefox and I was asked if I wanted to update to Firefox 7.
Then, you aren't running the Fedora packaged version.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:20:35 -0500
Chris Adams wrote:
> Define "first". Hint: that's not a solvable problem on general PC
> hardware (thus, biosdevname). There have been many problems over the
> years where the ordering changed on some hardware from one kernel
> release to the next.
Well, eithe
Hello all.
Yesterday I installed F16B on the laptop and was really excited when I
found out it would easily integrate all my Google Services into the
computer. However, after authenticating and enabling all the things I
wanted, I could not find any calendar, mail, or contacts from my
Google accoun
Once upon a time, agraham said:
> That should have translated into eth0 is "ALWAYS" the first device, eth1
> is "ALWAYS" the second device etc.. the biosdevname should have then
> been used to create that relationship and _nothing else_.
Define "first". Hint: that's not a solvable problem on g
Once upon a time, Cameron Simpson said:
> I'm all ok with providing sda/hda as discovered, _provided_ one also has
> nice bus/id type names as well. Solaris' bus/id/partition drive names
> looked long and complicated but they were reliable - you could look at
> the device ids and know what the OS
On 10/16/2011 05:47 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> I've got a machine at home whose / drive gets renamed depending on
> whether the PCI SCSI RAID stuff is broken or not. Hmm, shall root be on
> sdb or sdc today? Maddening when trying to rescue.
Make sure that every partition has a label and use the
On 14Oct2011 23:31, Chris Adams wrote:
| > Older Linux kernels carried along the SCSI ID as the device name,
|
| No, Linux always assigned SCSI devices in order from the start (e.g.
| sda, sg0, sr0, st0). Assigning with the ID was always something
| controversial, because on one hand, it would h
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
wrote:
> You may want to look at the -r option of bash, or bash invoked as
> rbash. Unfortunately, there are ways to get around the restrictions
> of rbash, or most other restricted shells.
>
Although the OP specifically asked for a restricted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/16/2011 08:06 AM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
>
> Chroot is great for securing certain kinds of things, but if the
> intended user is an administrator, he won't be able to administer any
> of the files outside of his chroot jail.
>
> I'm pr
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> There's also "yum search all ...", but in this case it wasn't needed.
That searches for the phrase "all" in package names and descriptions,
that doesn't make sense to me. Did you mean `yum list all `
instead?
--
Suvayu
Open source is the
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> I gave it a retry, and remi's FF7/xulrunner7 definitely does not work
> for certain youtube/flash files, or so it seems.
>
> This one does not work, for example:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK0O30aFT7g&feature=email
>
> So, I am goi
On 10/16/2011 03:08 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 06:04 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>> I also have the Adobe repo so I have the latest flash (version 11) which
>> is so far the best release from them in my opinion.
> Go here:
>
> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/
>
> ...and
On 10/16/2011 06:04 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> I also have the Adobe repo so I have the latest flash (version 11) which
> is so far the best release from them in my opinion.
Go here:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/
...and select Linux 32-bit or 64-bit and then choose the YUM opt
On 10/16/2011 05:21 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Ugh. I installed this for F13, and apparently, I needed
> adobe support - the problem is, that adobe believes that
> firefox is a ubuntu installation.
Hmmm try to remove that one as it was for Fedora 14:
rpm -e firefox
rpm -e remi-release-14
T
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 08:16 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>> On 10/16/2011 11:10 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>>
> Ugh. I installed this for F13, and apparently, I needed
> adobe support - the prob
On 10/16/2011 02:21 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 08:16 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>> On 10/16/2011 11:10 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>>> Is it possible to have Firefox continually updated by rpm on a Fedora 14
>>> system, or do I have to choose between staying on Fedora 3 or using
>>
On 10/16/2011 08:16 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 11:10 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>> Is it possible to have Firefox continually updated by rpm on a Fedora 14
>> system, or do I have to choose between staying on Fedora 3 or using
>> tarball installs?
> You can use the REMI repo for the
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 08:09 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:06:10 +0530
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>>> That seems to be a bug. You should consider reporting it.
>> Looks like someone already did. I added some info to it:
>>
>>
On 10/16/2011 06:22 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> domsch.com/blog/?p=455
Server timed out so I cannot read it...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedorap
On 10/16/2011 08:09 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:06:10 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> That seems to be a bug. You should consider reporting it.
> Looks like someone already did. I added some info to it:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746393
I read it... wow.
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 21:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 08:40 PM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> > Is it possible to have Firefox continually updated by rpm on a Fedora 14
> > system, or do I have to choose between staying on Fedora 3 or using
> > tarball installs?
>
> Refer to
>
> ht
2011/10/16, linux guy :
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
[...]
>>
>> geeqie is what you're probably looking for. (yum search led me to it.)
>
>
> For future reference, what yum command sequence did you use to find it ?
yum search gqview
There's also "yum search all ...", bu
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2011/10/16, linux guy :
>> Subject says it all.
>>
>> I can't seem to find it with search.
>>
>> Thanks
>
>
> geeqie is what you're probably looking for. (yum search led me to it.)
For future reference, what yum command sequence did you use
2011/10/16, linux guy :
> Subject says it all.
>
> I can't seem to find it with search.
>
> Thanks
geeqie is what you're probably looking for. (yum search led me to it.)
HTH,
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin
Something strange happens with the DE under XFCE. I have determined that
this strangeness results in my difficulty in playing CDs. So I have some
questions:
Primary Question
When I login to an XFCE session on my F15 machine, about half the time
it comes up normally. By this I mean that there is a
Subject says it all.
I can't seem to find it with search.
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
(SGS gmail app again)
I do agree that installing it by default is a mistake, however, IMHO you're
taking it far too seriously - I simply made a habit of removing it as my
first post install step.
Sorry for the top post,
- Gilboa
On Saturday, October 15, 2011, JB wrote:
> Gilboa Davara gmail.com
On 10/16/2011 08:40 PM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> Is it possible to have Firefox continually updated by rpm on a Fedora 14
> system, or do I have to choose between staying on Fedora 3 or using
> tarball installs?
Refer to
http://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/11/when-will-firefox-7-be-available-f
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 09:02 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> .
>
> In your usage, is it through the router(s) that you enforce wired MAC
> access?
No, it's through the DHCP server. Only known MAC addresses can obtain
an IP address.
Yes, it is true that anyone can configure a machine manually,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:48:05 -0700,
Craig White wrote:
> sure - buy a layer 3 managed switch (an unlikely candidate for home
> implementations)
You can implement mac address filtering on consumer gear if you are willing to
reflash it to use something like openwrt.
--
users mailing list
us
On 10/16/2011 11:10 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> Is it possible to have Firefox continually updated by rpm on a Fedora 14
> system, or do I have to choose between staying on Fedora 3 or using
> tarball installs?
You can use the REMI repo for the latest Firefox :
rpm -Uvh http://rpms.famillecolle
Is it possible to have Firefox continually updated by rpm on a Fedora 14
system, or do I have to choose between staying on Fedora 3 or using
tarball installs?
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachmen
> Well, in the case of MAC filtering, it's nothing to do with "security."
> It's merely closing an unlocked door in someone's face.
No.. security is not a boolean. MAC filtering is very useful for stopping
inadvertent plugging in of the wrong system. It helps prevent accidents
and unsafe systems b
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:06:10 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> That seems to be a bug. You should consider reporting it.
Looks like someone already did. I added some info to it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746393
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Craig White wrote:
>
> Revisiting a thread where you tried to pass off poorly informed opinions
> as facts seemed to be rather unnecessary.
>
If you substitute "is" for "seemed to be rather" from the previous
sentence, you obtain a clean, readable sentence in En
Thats what I was looking for, thanks Frank.
Ardhan
--- frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Frank Murphy
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Disable yum update check for PackageKit
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:04:24 +0100
On 15/10/11 17:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> Sorry, It's act
On 10/16/2011 07:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:53:39 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Names don't change in a update ever.
>
> They just did. My ethernet port was p4p1 when I
> installed f15. I got the latest biosdevname update
> the other day and the name changed to p6p1.
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:53:39 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Names don't change in a update ever.
They just did. My ethernet port was p4p1 when I
installed f15. I got the latest biosdevname update
the other day and the name changed to p6p1.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On 10/16/2011 05:57 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> We've had folks in this thread talking about the challenges of
> managing server farms with gazillions of ethernet ports on each server.
> Just how helpful are consistent names if they change when the server
> gets an update? Wouldn't that be fun on a s
On 10/16/2011 02:18 PM, agraham wrote:
> I agree in principle with this change, but not the "renaming" of
> existing "well know" device names such that the opposite effect is
> caused by the implementation.
Then you missed out on some important reasons why the current
implementation is the way it
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 14:17 +0530, Benjamin wrote:
>> I want to allow specific commands only to my local admin , means he
>> can use only commands which i allowed for him.no more commands or any
>> other bash facility he can't use.
>
> You can look in
Hi Tim,
Can u provide me any good document or any example to get proper idea of
chroot
Regards,
Benjo
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 14:17 +0530, Benjamin wrote:
>> I want to configure restricted shell for one of my server.
>>
>> I want to allow specific commands only to my local admin , means he
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 16:35 +1100, Roger wrote:
> > Isn't eth0 for ethernet?
>
> Ethernet was badly named in the first place, it's carried by wires, not
> going through the ether (wireless). :-\
>
The original Ethernet was based on CSMA techniques,
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 14:17 +0530, Benjamin wrote:
> I want to configure restricted shell for one of my server.
>
> I want to allow specific commands only to my local admin , means he
> can use only commands which i allowed for him.no more commands or any
> other bash facility he can't use.
You
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:48:29 +0100
agraham wrote:
> I agree in principle with this change, but not the "renaming" of
> existing "well know" device names such that the opposite effect is
> caused by the implementation.
This whole thread seems to have missed the point I complained
about wayyy bac
Nearly 700,000 attend gay pride parade in Rio
http://articles.boston.com/2011-10-10/news/30264047_1_lavish-carnival-costumes-gay-pride-parade-rainbow-flags--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On 10/16/2011 09:34 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 01:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>>
>> The real problem here is the designers of the concept lost sight of the
>> actual benefit to the user, the problem as I would state is:
>>
>> "Provide a means that allows consistent naming of network device
Hi Friends,
I want to configure restricted shell for one of my server.
I want to allow specific commands only to my local admin , means he can
use only commands which i allowed for him.no more commands or any other
bash facility he can't use.
Please guide me , how to setup such kind of envi
Benjamin,
Can you also include the network statistics, it may helpful to know
exactly what type of errors these are:
ethtool -S em1
Are you in a position to change the cable?
I see this is a Supermicro, does the machine have a IPMI card using the
same IP address by any chance ?
Albert.
On 1
On 10/16/2011 01:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>
> The real problem here is the designers of the concept lost sight of the
> actual benefit to the user, the problem as I would state is:
>
> "Provide a means that allows consistent naming of network devices".
>
> That should have translated into eth0 is
The real problem here is the designers of the concept lost sight of the
actual benefit to the user, the problem as I would state is:
"Provide a means that allows consistent naming of network devices".
That should have translated into eth0 is "ALWAYS" the first device, eth1
is "ALWAYS" the seco
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2011, 09:57 +0800 schrieb Ed Greshko:
> Works fine on stock F15 with the FF from Fedora.
I downloaded F15 live cd and it worked on my machine as well!
>
> Do you have any add-ons installed? Try starting from a command line
> with -safe-mode specified.
that didn't help
thank you!
Sorry, I don't know how to force NetworkManager to do whatever you
> want it to do (I don't use it at all). But I suggest you to completely
> disable pin code request. You can use minicom for that purpose or
> simply send needed command directly to device. For example:
> $ echo -e «AT+C
68 matches
Mail list logo
