>> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
>> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
>> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
>> do not shutdown/restart their computers anymore?
> What? You pull down the use
On 27/05/11 06:51, antonio wrote:
> Up to Fedora 14 I had a graphical repo management tool installed
> (Gpk-repo I assume), after update to Fedora 15 such a tool is missing
> (only applet is available, but not working).
>
> What happened to Gnome-packagekit??
>
> Antonio
yum install ailurus
there
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 14:15, fred smith wrote:
> e F15, I spent about 5 minutes with a pre-beta LIVE CD of F15 with Gnome
> 3 and couldn't figure out for the life of me how one was supposed to
> DO anything with it. like, why would you take a perfectly good working
> system and hide everything t
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 15:20, Alan Evans wrote:
> The most obstinate wing has been driving GNOME for a very long time
> now. For a good laugh, just browse the gnome-devel archives.
I agree. I remember six years ago installing a Fedora derivative
(Blag) and finding myself unable to do something a
If I connect a WD USB hard disk, and I right-click on it in File
application and I choose "safely remove" my system freezes (no way to
have it working again)
Where shall I look for any error log???
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F15 (Lovelock) on Acer 5720
http://lugsaronno.altervi
Up to Fedora 14 I had a graphical repo management tool installed
(Gpk-repo I assume), after update to Fedora 15 such a tool is missing
(only applet is available, but not working).
What happened to Gnome-packagekit??
Antonio
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
27.05.2011, 03:46, "James McKenzie" :
> Start with the Wine nOObs that are moving to Linux for 'security'.
> They want that Windows look and feel...
>
> The good part is that those of us that don't want it, don't have to
> have it either.
Completely agree, James, and I hope it would continue to be
27.05.2011, 06:41, "Steve Searle" :
> I'd like to start a thread to help me, and hopefully others use GNOME 3
> more effectively. I've used it for a day now, its very different and
> will take me a while to get used to it. However past experience with
> other new things (e.g. selinux) has shown me
Bill Davidsen tmr.com> writes:
> What? You pull down the user menu, click "shutdown," and a box opens which
> offers suspend-restart-cancel-shutdown buttons. How hidden is that?
You appear to be describing Gnome 3's fallback mode, not Gnome Shell.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
Clyde E. Kunkel cox.net> writes:
> So, I upgraded F15 tonight which included gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.fc15, et
> al, and now the power off option extension is no longer present.
> Reinstalled all extensions, reloaded the shell, rebooted, said some
> incantations, but it seems the shell is ignoring
So, I upgraded F15 tonight which included gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.fc15, et
al, and now the power off option extension is no longer present.
Reinstalled all extensions, reloaded the shell, rebooted, said some
incantations, but it seems the shell is ignoring the power off mod.
Sure, I can, and will,
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 20:06 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the
> Shutdown
> > and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
> > especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume
>
On a new F15 install replacing F14. The boot process pauses at
"Start LSB: The cups scheduler" for 60 seconds before going on
to the text log-in. I don't know what the cups scheduler is or
what to do with it.
Does anyone know what I need to do to fix this?
On 05/27/2011 06:34 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I was using Gnome as an example of how project devs turn their backs on
> the needs of the users. The same thing seems to be happening,
> gradually, with the Fedora devs, at least to the extent of not managing
> to keep such vital things as minimum memo
On 05/26/2011 05:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I am wondering why you think it is.
>
> Care to explain?
I was using Gnome as an example of how project devs turn their backs on
the needs of the users. The same thing seems to be happening,
gradually, with the Fedora devs, at least to the extent
Hi,
>> I have an existing windows7 x86_64 kvm guest running on fedora14
>> x86_64 with a Radeon HD5700 at 1680x1050, and would like to improve
>> the resolution and video response of the Windows guest.
>
> You might want to upgrade to fedora 15 so you can use spice
> (http://spice-space.org/) out
On 05/27/2011 06:15 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 05:32 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> You made a assumption (or a accusation if you will) on the entire
>> project with a diverse base of contributors that it was about control or
>> convenience of developers and not users and asserting it would
On 05/26/2011 05:32 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You made a assumption (or a accusation if you will) on the entire
> project with a diverse base of contributors that it was about control or
> convenience of developers and not users and asserting it would only
> demotivate people who work hard to he
On 05/27/2011 05:52 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I know you're frustrated, but don't take it out on me. I'm not the one
> complaining, I haven't (yet) upgraded to F 15 and I've already migrated
> from Gnome to XFCE to avoid Gnome 3. All I did was point out that
> projects tend to get less and less re
On 05/26/2011 04:54 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Look, someone didn't change the Release Notes which they should have, now they
> have. You had an install fail, nobody died, the Earth's magnetic field didn't
> flip, and if you want to bitch about something the users didn't need or want,
> start with
> Second: I fully understand why OpenOffice was dropped in favour of
> LibreOffice. I will (probably) change in the future. However, at work we
> use OpenOffice, and I would like to learn Gnome3 first, before battling
> with a new office suite - and possible compatibility issues.
> I installed F15
Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
> do not shutdown/restart their computers anymore?
>
What? Y
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 02:16 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
>> After reading the bug report I can only shake my head.
>
> This is Yet Another Example of the Iron Law of Bureaucracy in action.
> (http://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/iron.html) In this case,
> the people running the project cle
On 05/26/2011 11:28 PM, Matias Kreder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really don't know where to ask this question, but this may be a good
> point to start.
> Do you know who can check this for the redhat archive or where should
> I ask? I'm trying to get these pretty old red hat .iso's and there is
> nothing b
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> # yum install gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
>
> Alt+F2, press r and enter to restart the shell. You should have a
> permanent power off item in the menu.
A heads up - this extension doesn't work when gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.fc15 from
updates-
Kam Leo wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Mike Williams
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/25/2011 10:44 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
It seems that the installer files
have gotten fatter and more memory is required.
>>>
>>> When I checked http://f
Hi,
I really don't know where to ask this question, but this may be a good
point to start.
Do you know who can check this for the redhat archive or where should
I ask? I'm trying to get these pretty old red hat .iso's and there is
nothing below 6.2.
http://archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/l
Kam Leo wrote:
> I tried upgrading my system using the DVD, Netinstall CD, and
> Preupgrade. Each time boot got stuck at the line "Trying to unpack
> rootfs image as initramfs. . . ". It seems that the installer files
> have gotten fatter and more memory is required.
>
> This is a known problem,
>
On Thu, 26 May 2011 18:00:45 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> A in Activities will be missing
Sorry, I meant the upper case A
in Applications (right next to Windows),
not Activities (in top left corner - it always
seems to have its upper case A intact).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
Lewis NH2 wrote:
> Good Evening,
>
> I have a SOHO, and I like to access/answer my emails from every
> workstations. Of course everything should be kept up-to-sync.
> Furthermore, I'd like to avoid storing all emails on my ISP. Having a
> local IMAP server and fetching automatically the emails from
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Also, the ABI is much better, and this may be almost as significant.
>>
>>> Unfortunately that biggest gain only occurs if the program logic is such
>>> that
>>> registers run out often.
>>
>> Which, in the case of gcc-generated code, is most of the time. gcc
>> was originally
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Installing gnome-tweak-tool allows for some extra customization. In particular
> you can have the date show the day, and switch between 12- and 24-hour time.
> AFAIK there's no way to get it to show seconds in gnome-shell, though you can
> in fallback m
On 05/26/11 12:23, Rich wrote:
> On 5/26/2011 10:38 AM, JD wrote:
>> On 05/26/11 06:46, Rich wrote:
>>> Just a shot in the dark, but do you have multiple dhcp daemons running
>>> on the network. Your router probably has one running. I could buy that
>>> multiple dhcp daemons might cause something
On 26 May 2011 22:45, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/27/2011 02:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to work out why Fedora 15 takes an incredibly long time to
>> start on this machine (Intel Core 2 Duo T5500, 1GB RAM laptop),
>> booting takes several minutes as opposed to F13. No custo
On Thu, 26 May 2011 17:16:05 -0400
Alex wrote:
> I have an existing windows7 x86_64 kvm guest running on fedora14
> x86_64 with a Radeon HD5700 at 1680x1050, and would like to improve
> the resolution and video response of the Windows guest.
You might want to upgrade to fedora 15 so you can use s
On a new F15 install replacing F14. The boot process pauses at
"Start LSB: The cups scheduler" for 60 seconds before going on
to the text log-in. I don't know what the cups scheduler is or
what to do with it.
Does anyone know what I need to do to fix this?
Seems like random times when I log in to gnome 3 and
move the cursor up to the top left corner, The upper
case W in Windows will be missing and the upper case
A in Activities will be missing.
Anyone else seen this? Is it some kind of strange
radeon driver problem maybe?
--
users mailing list
user
Steve Searle stevesearle.com> writes:
> Anyway to get the ball rolling. To quickly bring up the Activities menu,
> press the "Windows" key. And Esc will take you out of it.
The Windows key also gets you out of it.
Some handy extension packages. In particular, to get a permanent "Power Off..."
o
On 05/27/2011 02:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to work out why Fedora 15 takes an incredibly long time to
> start on this machine (Intel Core 2 Duo T5500, 1GB RAM laptop),
> booting takes several minutes as opposed to F13. No custom modules,
> just stock Fedora, intel wireless and g
On 05/27/2011 03:11 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> I'd like to start a thread to help me, and hopefully others use GNOME 3
> more effectively. I've used it for a day now, its very different and
> will take me a while to get used to it. However past experience with
> other new things (e.g. selinux) has s
I'd like to start a thread to help me, and hopefully others use GNOME 3
more effectively. I've used it for a day now, its very different and
will take me a while to get used to it. However past experience with
other new things (e.g. selinux) has shown me that both they, and I
improve and I do want
Hi,
I have an existing windows7 x86_64 kvm guest running on fedora14
x86_64 with a Radeon HD5700 at 1680x1050, and would like to improve
the resolution and video response of the Windows guest. How can I
change the Windows
driver to something more capable than "standard vga"? It currently
reports
Hi,
I'm trying to work out why Fedora 15 takes an incredibly long time to
start on this machine (Intel Core 2 Duo T5500, 1GB RAM laptop),
booting takes several minutes as opposed to F13. No custom modules,
just stock Fedora, intel wireless and graphics, used preupgrade to go
F13 to F15. I can try
On 5/26/2011 10:38 AM, JD wrote:
> On 05/26/11 06:46, Rich wrote:
>> Just a shot in the dark, but do you have multiple dhcp daemons running
>> on the network. Your router probably has one running. I could buy that
>> multiple dhcp daemons might cause something like what you describe.
>
> $ ps -e
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Alan Evans wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>
>> Looks like the most obstinate wing took it over in GNOME.
>
> The most obstinate wing has been driving GNOME for a very long time
> now. For a good laugh, just browse the gnome-devel
2011/5/26 Tim
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 00:49 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > it doesn't matter wich device I choose as output, the PC simple don't
> > mute one or another and my headphones and speakers sound at the same
> > time,
>
> I recall, on one sound card, going through the preference avai
In Fedora 15 where is gpk-repo as after updating I get the warning the
file is not found??
Tnx
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F15 (Lovelock) on Acer 5720
http://lugsaronno.altervista.org
www.campingmonterosa.com
www.studiodacolpaloschi.it
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
Here is the pastebin of the console log with debugging.
http://pastebin.com/C8iajzXY
The console no longer works on any operating system I've tried. I've tried the
ldap server (CentOS 5.5), a Windows 2003 Server w/Console, a Windows 2008
Server w/console, and Fedora 15. None of them work. Here
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Looks like the most obstinate wing took it over in GNOME.
The most obstinate wing has been driving GNOME for a very long time
now. For a good laugh, just browse the gnome-devel archives.
These are the same fine folks who foisted spacial
On 05/26/2011 07:00 AM, JB wrote:
> Kevin J. Cummings kjchome.homeip.net> writes:
>
>> ...
>> I guess my first question is: Where does Fedora think that Global IPv6
>> forwarding is "disabled in configuration"? What file? What
>> configuration option?
>> ...
>
> On my F14:
> $ grep -ir forwar
I used preupgrade to Upgrade F14 to F15.Finally preupgrade issued a
message to reboot for the upgrade to take place.I have Ubuntu and
Fedora both on my machine.By mistake during the reboot the machine
went into Ubuntu since it was the default selection on the OS section
menu of the Boot loader.I by
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:05:43AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 09:59 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> > Will probably be going XFCE/LXDE soon unless I
> > can find the time to summarise the mistakes Gnome3 seems to have made,
> > there's a good idea in there but it's buried under bad choices and
On 05/26/2011 09:59 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> Will probably be going XFCE/LXDE soon unless I
> can find the time to summarise the mistakes Gnome3 seems to have made,
> there's a good idea in there but it's buried under bad choices and the
> usual Gnome resistance to customisation.
Back when I first
On 26 May 2011 13:19, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> 26.05.2011, 20:24, "Michael Schwendt" :
>>
>> If you log out, they are still available at the top right of the screen.
>
> I find it perfect.
>
> Switch on and off quickly with Suspend, and use Shutdown before going away
> for long (makes you want to
On 05/26/2011 07:23 AM, Tim wrote:
> ;-) I tried to be amusing when naming the computers. One was named
> Pandora, after the mythological box that released evil to the world. I
> thought that was appropriate, since it was running Windows.
For reasons that I'm not going into, I name my computers
2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> On 26/05/11 11:34, Jan Willies wrote:
> > 2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> >
> > On 26/05/11 11:19, Jan Willies wrote:
> > > 2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> > >
> > > On 26/05/11 03:15, Jan Willies wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can first try to boot w
Hi,
Just wanted to say thanks for Fedora-15.
Using xfce and lxdm, my laptop boots from grub to desktop in 13-15s,
which is really impressive.
Thanks again, Clemens
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 26/05/11 11:34, Jan Willies wrote:
> 2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
>
> On 26/05/11 11:19, Jan Willies wrote:
> > 2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> >
> > On 26/05/11 03:15, Jan Willies wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > You can first try to boot with systemd.unit=multi-user.target
> bef
On 05/26/2011 10:47 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/26/11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I have been using an HP2400 duo core
>> for years (is there a way to find
>> the manufacturing date without going into bios?). But
>> this morning it
>> jsut about gave me a heart attack when it woul
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> Most of them are from the sandbox init script NOT from systemd!!
>
> Yes, this was not documented in the release notes. It is part of
> SELinux/pam_namespace usage.
I've been looking, but I haven't found it.
If I do fin
On 05/26/2011 10:47 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/26/11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I have been using an HP2400 duo core
>> for years (is there a way to find
>> the manufacturing date without going into bios?). But
>> this morning it
>> jsut about gave me a heart attack when it woul
> Dear List,
>
> I have got a Linux-based cluster (8 nodes each 4 processors) configured
long
> time ago running Fedora core 5. It was configured at run level 3. When I
change
> the run level of the master node for example to level 5 to use some
programs
> with graphical interface, the
2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> On 26/05/11 11:19, Jan Willies wrote:
> > 2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> >
> > On 26/05/11 03:15, Jan Willies wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > You can first try to boot with systemd.unit=multi-user.target
> before
> > > making any permament change.
> > >
> >
On 26/05/11 11:19, Jan Willies wrote:
> 2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
>
> On 26/05/11 03:15, Jan Willies wrote:
> >
> >
> > You can first try to boot with systemd.unit=multi-user.target before
> > making any permament change.
> >
> > See the other replies for the symlinking iss
Dear List,
I have got a Linux-based cluster (8 nodes each 4 processors) configured long
time ago running Fedora core 5. It was configured at run level 3. When I
change
the run level of the master node for example to level 5 to use some programs
with graphical interface, the lam does not wo
2011/5/26 Bob Goodwin
> On 26/05/11 03:15, Jan Willies wrote:
> >
> >
> > You can first try to boot with systemd.unit=multi-user.target before
> > making any permament change.
> >
> > See the other replies for the symlinking issue.
>
>
>I can enter "a" at the grub screen and then
>
On 05/26/2011 08:58 AM, Albert Teh wrote:
Hi,
We are setting up a new CENTOS-DS version 8.1.0. and CENTOS 5.5 and
attempt to synchronize with the existing 2003 Windows AD server.
Performing the full sync completed. There is no user created in the
DS subtree.
We would like to perform one way
On 26/05/11 03:15, Jan Willies wrote:
>
>
> You can first try to boot with systemd.unit=multi-user.target before
> making any permament change.
>
> See the other replies for the symlinking issue.
I can enter "a" at the grub screen and then
"systemd.unit=multi-user.target" and get
Good morning, fellow Fedora users. I love it when products work as
advertised, and I have been happily monitoring our enterprise network
using Nagios with little requirements as of late for help, but recently
I began investigating 2-way alerting via SMS using the following as a
guide:
http://ma
Hi,
We are setting up a new CENTOS-DS version 8.1.0. and CENTOS 5.5 and attempt
to synchronize with the existing 2003 Windows AD server.
Performing the full sync completed. There is no user created in the DS
subtree.
We would like to perform one way Sync: AD > DS. Once it works, we will
set
On 05/26/11 07:18, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>>> I've had two modem routers go bad, I suspect they've been zapped up
>>> the phone line during thunderstorms.
> JD:
>> This thing connects to the coax cable in the wall. The at&t
>> uverse system is on fiber-optic cable until it gets to the curb
>> by the dev
--- On Thu, 5/26/11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have been using an HP2400 duo core
> for years (is there a way to find
> the manufacturing date without going into bios?). But
> this morning it
> jsut about gave me a heart attack when it would not come
> out of
> standby. Reseating the drive
On 05/26/11 06:46, Rich wrote:
> Just a shot in the dark, but do you have multiple dhcp daemons running
> on the network. Your router probably has one running. I could buy that
> multiple dhcp daemons might cause something like what you describe.
$ ps -ef | grep dhcp
jd 12817 5530 0 07:3
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 00:49 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> it doesn't matter wich device I choose as output, the PC simple don't
> mute one or another and my headphones and speakers sound at the same
> time,
I recall, on one sound card, going through the preference available in
the volume control
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:13 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Back when I did tech support, I used to tell people that they could
> name their email profile anything they wanted because the name was
> just window dressing; it was there for their convenience, but the
> program didn't care. One man named his
Tim:
>> I've had two modem routers go bad, I suspect they've been zapped up
>> the phone line during thunderstorms.
JD:
> This thing connects to the coax cable in the wall. The at&t
> uverse system is on fiber-optic cable until it gets to the curb
> by the development. From there it is on buried c
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.3. This release fixes a few bugs found in 1.2.8.2.
Installation
yum install 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install 389-ds
setup-ds-admin.pl
Upgrade
yum upgrade 389-ds-base idm-console-framework 389-admin 389-ds-c
Casimiro said:
> What I noticed is that lots
> of rpmdb registers kept pointing to fc14 stuff and things like
> libxxxyyyzzz is needed for aaa.fc14.xxx and even aaa.fc13.xxx (in fact,
> there were zombie dependencies dating back to fc12).
Hmm, I did the whole:
rpmconf -a
find /etc /var -name '*.
Luc MAIGNAN winxpert.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a F14 that runs as a VirtualBox machine.
>
> After a while, the date/time of the machine is modified ( up to 2
> hours). Then the machine becomes unreachable.
>
> I've installed NTP, but it doesn't change anything.
> ...
Follow (mostly)
On 05/26/2011 07:12 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> Thanks, Patrick, for your clarification. If a display manager provides
> only a login screen, then what is the point of discussing whether a
> display manager is lightweight or not, as the ongoing discussion on
> the this list?
You might want to read
Just a shot in the dark, but do you have multiple dhcp daemons running
on the network. Your router probably has one running. I could buy that
multiple dhcp daemons might cause something like what you describe.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.901
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>> Is the display manager only a login screen? Or is it also the backbone
>> of the desktop manager?
>>
>> Could you please elaborate a bit on this? I have searched on Google
>> for it, and got the impression that a display manager is not
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 13:12 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Is the display manager only a login screen? Or is it also the backbone
> of the desktop manager?
>
> Could you please elaborate a bit on this? I have searched on Google
> for it, and got the impression that a display manager is
On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:25:41 -0300 (BRT), FEB wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I followed the instructions to enable RPMfusion stable and it works fine
> for vlc, mp3 codecs and so on. But when I try to install proprietary
> drivers or firmware for nvidia and broadcon wireless there's a mismatch to
> my ke
I have been using an HP2400 duo core for years (is there a way to find
the manufacturing date without going into bios?). But this morning it
jsut about gave me a heart attack when it would not come out of
standby. Reseating the drive connector, though did the job.
So I looked on ebay, and see
26.05.2011, 11:17, "Juan R. de Silva" :
> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
> do not shutdown/restart their computers an
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 13:05, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 04:03:48 -0500, M.E. wrote:
>
> rpmfusion's mirrorlist for F15 and F15 updates still points at the
> 'development'
> repo anyway.
Yep, I just use their rawhide package & repo and it works for everything I need.
--
user
On Thu May 26 2011, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> Of course, if you use a KVM switch that has the effect of
> unplugging and replugging the mouse, it gets more complicated
> and you have to rerun the xinput commands every time you
> plug in the mouse.
>
Thanks... I may have to break down and get a new KV
Hi there,
I followed the instructions to enable RPMfusion stable and it works fine
for vlc, mp3 codecs and so on. But when I try to install proprietary
drivers or firmware for nvidia and broadcon wireless there's a mismatch to
my kernel.
Should I enable the rawhide repos to solve this, or is ther
26.05.2011, 20:24, "Michael Schwendt" :
>
> If you log out, they are still available at the top right of the screen.
I find it perfect.
Switch on and off quickly with Suspend, and use Shutdown before going away for
long (makes you want to save your work, close all other stuff and log out).
--
Dear All,
Is the display manager only a login screen? Or is it also the backbone
of the desktop manager?
Could you please elaborate a bit on this? I have searched on Google
for it, and got the impression that a display manager is not more than
a login screen.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users m
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:13 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 07:17 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > Or GNOME folks assume people
> > do not shutdown/restart their computers anymore?
>
> Many of us who use Linux on their desktops leave them running 24/7, only
> rebooting for a kernel update.
harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote on 26-MAY-2011 13:25:19.97
Thanks Harald for the quiack answer, but...
>Am 26.05.2011 13:11, schrieb Jouk Jansen:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today I tried to upgrade one of my machines from F14->F15 (x86-64) using the
>> DVD distribution. All was OK till booting in to the new F
Am 26.05.2011 13:10, schrieb Tom Horsley:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:56:59 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> If I understand your question correctly, you can figure this out by
>> looking at symlinks at /etc/systemd
>
> Well, there is stuff in there all right, but I can tell I'm going
> to have to
On Thu, 26 May 2011 02:17:29 + (UTC), JRDS wrote:
> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
> do not shutdown/restart
Am 26.05.2011 13:11, schrieb Jouk Jansen:
> Hi all,
>
> Today I tried to upgrade one of my machines from F14->F15 (x86-64) using the
> DVD distribution. All was OK till booting in to the new F15. Somewhere in
> the booting process it seems to "hang" forever. The last printed message on
> the screen
Hi all,
Today I tried to upgrade one of my machines from F14->F15 (x86-64) using the
DVD distribution. All was OK till booting in to the new F15. Somewhere in
the booting process it seems to "hang" forever. The last printed message on
the screen is:
Started LSB: Installs coredump handler which sav
On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:56:59 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> If I understand your question correctly, you can figure this out by
> looking at symlinks at /etc/systemd
Well, there is stuff in there all right, but I can tell I'm going
to have to compare the contents before and after a systemctl disa
On Thu, 26 May 2011 04:03:48 -0500, M.E. wrote:
> > http://xenodesystems.blogspot.com/2011/05/rpmfusion-stable-en-fedora-15-lovelock.html
> The problem here is, Until you import the GPG
> keys,
> the STABLE branch of RPMFusion will not work with F15 even when the updated
> packages for F15 are av
Kevin J. Cummings kjchome.homeip.net> writes:
> ...
> I guess my first question is: Where does Fedora think that Global IPv6
> forwarding is "disabled in configuration"? What file? What
> configuration option?
> ...
On my F14:
$ grep -ir forward /etc/sysconfig/
...
$ grep -ir forward /etc/s
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
