On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:59:16 -0700, KW wrote:
> To those who supply Fedora yum install/update sites with Perl rpm
> pkgs: thank you!
>
> I would like to learn how to do this so that I could contribute.
>
> I know a little bit about cpan2rpm, I know a little bit about rpm; I'd
> like to learn mor
To those who supply Fedora yum install/update sites with Perl rpm
pkgs: thank you!
I would like to learn how to do this so that I could contribute.
I know a little bit about cpan2rpm, I know a little bit about rpm; I'd
like to learn more and contribute.
Could someone who knows, point me in the r
On 04/25/2011 06:59 PM, ssc1478 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Doron Bar Zeev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:08, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>>
>>> He obviously doesn't do any sysadmin type work. The most glaring
>>> difference
>>> I find between the two is the radically different
On 04/25/2011 08:11 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
> I also have 2 other external drives (both 1.5Tb) that work just fine. In
> fact they sit right next to the Seagate Go drive. What's interesting is
> that when I boot to Win 7 and test the drive Windows says there are no
> problems (of course it is
On 04/25/11 18:11, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> On 04/25/11 17:45, JD wrote:
>> On 04/25/11 17:36, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>>> I purchased a 1Tb Seagate Go drive a few months ago. It's formatted as
>>> NTFS. Today I started getting reports from smartd that the disk is
>>> failing. Specifically it's tel
On 04/25/11 17:45, JD wrote:
> On 04/25/11 17:36, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>> I purchased a 1Tb Seagate Go drive a few months ago. It's formatted as
>> NTFS. Today I started getting reports from smartd that the disk is
>> failing. Specifically it's telling me that there are many bad sectors.
>>
On 04/25/11 17:36, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I purchased a 1Tb Seagate Go drive a few months ago. It's formatted as
> NTFS. Today I started getting reports from smartd that the disk is
> failing. Specifically it's telling me that there are many bad sectors.
>There are no messages in /var/log/m
I purchased a 1Tb Seagate Go drive a few months ago. It's formatted as
NTFS. Today I started getting reports from smartd that the disk is
failing. Specifically it's telling me that there are many bad sectors.
There are no messages in /var/log/messages indicating any failures.
Why is smartd
JD wrote:
> Where can I get the most recent rpm for this?
> Fedora dropped it quiet a long time ago??
Homepage is at:
http://asic-linux.com.mx/~izto/checkinstall/
and I think checkinstall was for the last time in Dries repository
for Fedora 7 (in version 1.6.0).
Franta Hanzlík
--
users mailing
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Doron Bar Zeev wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:08, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>> He obviously doesn't do any sysadmin type work. The most glaring
>> difference
>> I find between the two is the radically different sysadmin environment.
>>
>> We had to make a red
Where can I get the most recent rpm for this?
Fedora dropped it quiet a long time ago??
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_g
Oh, I finally did it.
I thought that Fedora 14 don't use SATA3, then I would use SATA2!
And I plugged DVD and HDD in SATA2 port. It perfectly worked!
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: "Beartooth"
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc:
Sent: 11-04-25(월) 22:56:22
Sub
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:08, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> He obviously doesn't do any sysadmin type work. The most glaring difference
> I find between the two is the radically different sysadmin environment.
>
> We had to make a redhat <-> debian translation wiki page at work for
> reference when you
2011/4/25 ssc1478
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Steve Searle
> wrote:
> > Around 10:34am on Monday, April 25, 2011 (UK time), Gregory Hosler
> scrawled:
> >
> >> putting the passphrase into /etc/crypttab does make it readily available
> (which
> >> reduces the effectiveness of encrypting to
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:48:53 +0300
Doron Bar Zeev wrote:
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/04/from-ubuntu-to-fedora-landing-on-foreign-soil-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/
He obviously doesn't do any sysadmin type work. The most glaring difference
I find between the two is the radically different
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 07:14 -0400, ssc1478 wrote:
> I encrypt the home directory - to defend against theft. But entering
> the passphrase at every boot each time is not all that friendly.
I encrypt the main volume, which holds all the partitions. You get
asked to enter a password before boot can
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/04/from-ubuntu-to-fedora-landing-on-foreign-soil-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>>
>> There are ways that these worries can be addressed and we do.
>
> What you decribe seems OK.
>
> What I find stupid is when you have 20 people on desks using Wi-Fi
> because managem
Hy there
Maybe it's a little too late for this but anyhow:
I encountered the same problem on a MacPro workstation using rEFIt and a
triple-OS setup (OSX 10.6, Win 7 Enterprise, Fedora 14). Syncing the GPT data
onto the MBR was necessary for both Fedora 14 and Win 7 to work, but it was
obviousl
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 09:30 -0600, CS_DBA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone know of any projects / methods to install Fedora on a tablet
> like the iPad or an android tablet?
>
> I have an iPad and I run into things I wish I could do with it every
> day. Linux on my tablet would rock!
I just bought a
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>
> There are ways that these worries can be addressed and we do.
What you decribe seems OK.
What I find stupid is when you have 20 people on desks using Wi-Fi
because management is too cheap or lazy to install proper
networking...
Then the ent
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:13:39 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> Even with F15 abandoning metacity, and possibly also whatever
> is causing the other minor issues, my guess is that I'll be better
> off doing all fresh installs this time, except perhaps on one brand
> new PC.. In fact, I'm already
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:41 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I´d refuse to work on any place that *forces* me to use Wi-Fi instead
> of a proper, Cat5e Ethernet (or fiber) LAN
We do not force people to use wireless; we do have a wired LAN as well.
But lots of people have mobile laptops, smartp
Brian Ericson ptc.com> writes:
> Is it just me or did the upgrade from bash-completion-1.2-5 to 1.3-3
> break ls, rm, mv, etc? Now, when tab-completing a directory, the name
> of the directory completes with a trailing rather than a /
> (Doc completes as "Documents " rather than "Documents/"
Is it just me or did the upgrade from bash-completion-1.2-5 to 1.3-3
break ls, rm, mv, etc? Now, when tab-completing a directory, the name
of the directory completes with a trailing rather than a /
(Doc completes as "Documents " rather than "Documents/").
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On 04/25/2011 10:43 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
2011/4/25 Noriko Hosoi mailto:nho...@redhat.com>>
On 04/25/2011 09:27 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Diego Woitasen
mailto:di...@woitasen.com.ar>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Rich Me
2011/4/25 Noriko Hosoi
> On 04/25/2011 09:27 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/25/2011 10:13 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>> Shall
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> This is primarily why rogue access points
> are forbidden at my workplace; it's not security paranoia, it's
> interference with the production wireless network that is at stake.
I´d refuse to work on any place that *forces* me to use Wi-Fi ins
I use ext4 filesystem
2011/4/23 charles zeitler
> --
>
> Do what thou wilt
> shall be the whole of the Law.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Leon Legorreta
> wrote:
> > I appreciate your help Charles Zeitler, use FSCK the problem was in / var
> > since they had some bad blocks,
>
> gl
On 25 April 2011 15:15, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 07:42 PM, Piscium wrote:
>>
>> Yours is a good point, and also the way I see things. So yes,
>> everything I use on a regular basis is available in the repos I have
>> currently enabled, plus a package or two in Atrpms. And there are al
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 01:06 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Oh yeah, because IT departments are continuously "war driving" around
> the office with directional antennas, scanning the airwaves for access
> points...
It isn't necessary to do that much work to detect "rogue" access points.
Instead,
On 04/25/2011 07:43 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> Iirc, preupgrade (which I've been pleased with in the past) won't
> do anything, or at any rate won't install F15, until that is officially
> released; right?
Not true. You have a checkbox to tick but it would work otherwise.
Rahul
--
users ma
On 04/25/2011 07:42 PM, Piscium wrote:
>
> Yours is a good point, and also the way I see things. So yes,
> everything I use on a regular basis is available in the repos I have
> currently enabled, plus a package or two in Atrpms. And there are also
> two applications that I build from source, but t
Iirc, preupgrade (which I've been pleased with in the past) won't
do anything, or at any rate won't install F15, until that is officially
released; right?
Also, I have a couple of odd minor issues on different PCs,
relating to metacity a/o the monitor (HP w2207h) a/o the KVM s
Yep, you just set up master/slave replication (the documentation calls it
single master replication):
http ://docs. redhat .com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/ html
/Administration_Guide/Managing_Replication-Configuring_Single_Master_Replication.
html
Hope that helps!
Deon
On 25 April 2011 13:16, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> The total of 25 K is misleading as some packages are counted twice, so
>> the Fedora total is probably around 20-22 K. Also there are other
>> repos that I have not enabled, such as Atrpms.
>
> This isn't really a good comparison as the same comman
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:39:04 +0900, 신승원 wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm a student in Korea, and I'm in sixth grade. I'm not good at English,
> so please understand :) I have a DVD which Fedora 14 Installing ISO is
> burned, and I have a computer. []
Just checking a couple of things. If I under
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:07:27 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hey, it's a long shot, but I just thought of something. Have you
> updated your PPD's for your printer?
I installed from scratch when I installed f14, but that doesn't
mean there aren't newer ppd files available from some update now.
When I
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I don't print DVDs often enough to notice when it first broke,
> but I can't print them with fedora 14:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699241
>
> If I boot my old fedora 13 partition, it works fine
> with the same hardware.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/23/2011 03:12 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> SELinux is preventing khidpd_0d620558 from write access on the socket Unknown.
>
> * Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ***
>
> If you believe that khidpd_0d6205
On 04/25/2011 05:32 PM, Piscium wrote:
> Debian has an advantage on number of packages available. Debian claims
> on its website to have 30 K packages. And this is on Fedora:
>
> [xx@d3000 ~]$ yum repolist
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto
> Adding en_IE to language list
> repo id
On 25/04/2011 12:14, ssc1478 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
>> Around 10:34am on Monday, April 25, 2011 (UK time), Gregory Hosler scrawled:
>>
>>> putting the passphrase into /etc/crypttab does make it readily available
>>> (which
>>> reduces the effectiveness of
On 18 April 2011 14:01, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Nothing of this is really essential, but these are nice Debian features
> that Fedora apparenttly doesn't have. Now I would like to know about
> stuff comparable to this that Fedora has, but Debian hasn't (I'm sure
> there are many).
Debian has an a
Hello.
I'm a student in Korea, and I'm in sixth grade.
I'm not good at English, so please understand :)
I have a DVD which Fedora 14 Installing ISO is burned, and I have a computer.
CPU : Intel i5-2300
Motherboard : ASUS P8H67-M LX
HDD : SATA3(6Gbps) 500GB
VGA : NVIDIA GT240
And when I finish
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 10:34am on Monday, April 25, 2011 (UK time), Gregory Hosler scrawled:
>
>> putting the passphrase into /etc/crypttab does make it readily available
>> (which
>> reduces the effectiveness of encrypting to begin with).
>>
>> However ...
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Roger writes:
>> Hi Nikolaus
>>
>> I'm thinking that you could make yourself a list of what apps you would
>> like to have and another of what apps you really need to do your thing
>> for both and compare. I have not found the problem you m
Thanks for the info.
En 22/04/2011 17:11:21, James Wilkinson
escribió:
Lázaro Morales wrote:
But the user is an Active Directory user in an existing domain, so when
I
try
http://DOMAIN\user:pass@proxy:8080
The environment variable take the value:
http://DOMAINus
Around 10:34am on Monday, April 25, 2011 (UK time), Gregory Hosler scrawled:
> putting the passphrase into /etc/crypttab does make it readily available
> (which
> reduces the effectiveness of encrypting to begin with).
>
> However ... crypttab has allowance of putting the passphrase into a file.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2011 01:01 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
> On 04/24/2011 11:58 PM, Gregory Hosler wrote:
>
>> alternately, you can setup /etc/crypttab so that the password is not entered
>> manually.
>
>> All the best,
>
>> -Greg
>
>
>
> Would this not then d
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:24 AM, JD wrote:
> If the company has
> an intelligent gateway/router, it will detect NAT'ed
> packets, and if the IP address being NAT'ed is not
> in the list of allowed IP adresses, then some messages
> would be sent to a network cop.
If you work for a 3-letter paranoi
50 matches
Mail list logo