On 02/13/2011 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:25:41 -0600,
>Robert Nichols wrote:
>>
>> All the plugins on my F-14 and F-12 machines have context
>> system_u:object_r:lib_t with the exception of nppdf.so which
>> is unconfined_u:object_r:lib_t. Nothing there that
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 08:17:00 AM +0100, Marco Fioretti (mfiore...@nexaima.net)
wrote:
> Almost surely, today I won't be able to try and report about the
> latest suggestions. I have to leave with family in a few minutes, for
> stuff planned weeks ago. So if you don't hear from me again before a
>
Good morning, everybody!
I just woke up and found lots of other suggestions, both here and in
20/30 comments on the web page, which I just approved so are now
readable by everybody.
Almost surely, today I won't be able to try and report about the
latest suggestions. I have to leave with family in
I got FortiClient SSL VPN 4.0.2010 FortiClient SSL VPN for Linu
it works , but forget where I got from
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:14 AM, erikmccaskey64 wrote:
>
> Originally i'm searching for a PPTP VPN howto for OpenWrt...but i just can't
> seem to find one...OpenWrt Backfire 10.03..
> Can some
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:25:41 -0600,
Robert Nichols wrote:
>
> All the plugins on my F-14 and F-12 machines have context
> system_u:object_r:lib_t with the exception of nppdf.so which
> is unconfined_u:object_r:lib_t. Nothing there that's going to
> cause a transition out of unconfined_t.
On 02/12/2011 03:58 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 15:39:03 -0600,
>Robert Nichols wrote:
>> On 02/12/2011 11:15 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>>
>>> Most of selinux enforcement is targeted at services and a few user tools
>>> that commonly process untrusted data (in partic
On 02/13/2011 05:14 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
> On 2/12/11 8:21 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Bill Davidsen said:
>>> I don't know where the AIX version came from, I'll look to BSD for a
>>> solution.
>>> Having used real nslookup on AIX for a decade or so, I'd rather have it
>>>
On 2/12/11 8:21 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Bill Davidsen said:
>> I don't know where the AIX version came from, I'll look to BSD for a
>> solution.
>> Having used real nslookup on AIX for a decade or so, I'd rather have it just
>> for
>> me, even if it didn't skip a training/perc
Once upon a time, Bill Davidsen said:
> I don't know where the AIX version came from, I'll look to BSD for a
> solution.
> Having used real nslookup on AIX for a decade or so, I'd rather have it just
> for
> me, even if it didn't skip a training/perceptual problem.
AFAIK nslookup has always c
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:13:38PM +0100, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 10:52:37 AM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > > http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/help-request-why-is-my-linux-so-damn-slow
> >
> > You have a very interesting problem.
>
> that's the same thing my
On 02/12/2011 05:21 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>
>>
> the "ls" command and being able to see the Hessiod (hinfo) data.
>
> Thanks for the pointer, before I go too far I'm going to try BSD.
>
ls - sounds like you are looking for AXFR from the name server this
should work:
dig @ns-server.
On 02/12/2011 11:23 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 20:57:32 PM +, JB (jb.1234a...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Now, please give us output of:
>> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
>
> Hi, JB. Here is the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> tomorrow I'll check the bios setting.
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
erikmccaskey64 wrote:
>
> Fedora 14, with GNOME:
>
> sudo works without password:
>
> visudo
> MYUSER ALL=(transmission-user) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/transmission-gtk
>
> then:
> xhost local:transmission-user
> sudo -u transmission-user -- /usr/bin/transmission-gtk
>
> ok, it runs without promptin
On 02/12/2011 03:07 PM, James Mckenzie wrote:
> Please don't use multiple dashes in a message. Some readers will drop out
> your response because a double dash is use to annotate the end of a message
> and the beginning of a signature block.
If so, they're wrong. The signature delimiter is two
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:59:45 +
> Andy Blanchard wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, "dig" has a syntax that can be considerably more convoluted
>> than the equivalent in "nslookup".
>
> Yea, I find it hysterical that the reason recommended for switching to
> dig is because nslooku
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:59:45 +
> Andy Blanchard wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, "dig" has a syntax that can be considerably more convoluted
>> than the equivalent in "nslookup".
>
> Yea, I find it hysterical that the reason recommended for switching to
> dig is because nslooku
Craig White wrote:
>Sent: Feb 12, 2011 3:16 PM
>To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Subject: Re: Where can I find a functional nslookup?
>
>On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:19 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>[four dashes removed]
Please don't use multiple dashes in a message. Some rea
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:09 PM, JD wrote:
> > On 02/12/2011 07:48 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, mike cloaked
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I tested a different laptop with different wireless card:
> >>>
> >>> 03:03.0 N
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:16 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:09 PM, JD wrote:
>
>> I am also plagued by the same problem for rt2xxx driver.
>> So I opened a bug:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28972
>> You might want to add your comment to this bug and report
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:19 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
> > parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
> > source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:09 PM, JD wrote:
> I am also plagued by the same problem for rt2xxx driver.
> So I opened a bug:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28972
> You might want to add your comment to this bug and report
> your device and loaded wireless drivers.
It might be worth
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:59:45 +
Andy Blanchard wrote:
> Unfortunately, "dig" has a syntax that can be considerably more convoluted
> than the equivalent in "nslookup".
Yea, I find it hysterical that the reason recommended for switching to
dig is because nslookup has an arcane user interface :-
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 04:48:46 pm compdoc wrote:
> >> 7.024044] i2c i2c-0: nForce2 SMBus adapter at 0x600
>
> AMD's Socket A. Pretty old, slow system. It's possible it doesn't implement
> APIC and ACPI correctly. Someone suggested a bios update - if there is one,
> that would be a good id
On 12 February 2011 21:19, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> While I appreciate people taking time to provide pointers to other tools,
> that
> really wasn't the question... I don't want to retrain a bunch of people in
> a
> mixed AIX/Linux environment, nor give them the impression that Linux tools
> are
>
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:09 PM, JD wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 07:48 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>>
>>> I tested a different laptop with different wireless card:
>>>
>>> 03:03.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG
>>> [Calexico
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 04:11:22 pm Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I have noi Disk Utility under System->Administration. What is its real
> name?
palimpsest, which is provided by the gnome-disk-utility package.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 15:39:03 -0600,
Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 11:15 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > Most of selinux enforcement is targeted at services and a few user tools
> > that commonly process untrusted data (in particular firefox).
>
> Firefox, really?
I think most of
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:00:03 +0100, M. wrote:
> > A running Firefox, that displays an ordinary News website with several
> > animated GIFs and a couple of Flash ads, here increases the
> > resched.interrupt
> > count by ~100 or more per second. After a few hours of uptime, that will
> > pile up,
> I have noi Disk Utility under System->Administration. What is its real
>name?
Sorry, wrong OS. Use smartctl, which is part of the smartmontools. Look for
reallocated sectors, which is a bad thing...
Example:
smartctl -a /dev/sda
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 02/12/2011 04:43 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Semms to me that nslookup was made obsolete somew versions od Fedora
> ago. dig and hosts are its replacement.
>
>
I kinda thought that too - but its still part of bind 9.5 (not sure
about bind 10) - the docs for it do say:
"Due to its arcane us
On 02/12/2011 12:56 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> Oh, you mean doing this trick:
>
> http://www.gettingclever.com/2008/06/vacuum-your-firefox-3.html
>
> Cool, thanks, I didn't know that. Man, it would be really ironic if
> after years making fun of Windows because it needs defragmenting to
> run faster,
>> 7.024044] i2c i2c-0: nForce2 SMBus adapter at 0x600
AMD's Socket A. Pretty old, slow system. It's possible it doesn't implement
APIC and ACPI correctly. Someone suggested a bios update - if there is one,
that would be a good idea.
Does the command 'smartctl -a /dev/sda' show any reallocated
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:00 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
> parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
> source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
> The lack of functionali
On 02/12/2011 04:19 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
>> parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
>> source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
>> The lack o
On 02/12/2011 11:15 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> Most of selinux enforcement is targeted at services and a few user tools
> that commonly process untrusted data (in particular firefox).
Firefox, really?
$ ps Zax | grep firefox
unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 8847 ? S
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 07:33 -0700, compdoc wrote:
> >when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> >the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> >became almost unusable.
>
>
> Weird problems often have a hardware issue behind them. There are many
>
Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 22:11 +0100, Outway wrote:
>> I don't see in what way a mailing list is superior to a newsgroup. But I
>> do see several advantages of a newsgroup:
>>
>> * Clear thread structure (collapsable trees in standard news readers)
>
> Well, actually, that's also possible
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 21:54:40 PM +0100, Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:42:25 -0600, Rick wrote:
>
> > I am curious about the Rescheduling interrupts.
> > I do not have a dual core system so I have no rescheduling interrupts.
> >
> > I do not know how many
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 22:41:31 PM +0200, Adrian Sevcenco
(adrian.sevce...@cern.ch) wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 07:13 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> > Oh, and when I said "the system is slow even if firefox isn't running"
> > I meant that I *had* run "killall firefox". I think between this and
> Regarding fire
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 07:33 -0700, compdoc wrote:
> >when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> >the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> >became almost unusable.
>
>
> Weird problems often have a hardware issue behind them. There are many
>
On 02/12/2011 05:01 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
<>
> You can do the same with decent IMAP client.
_decent_ "email client" can accommodate IMAP, POP3, SMTP.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
On 02/12/2011 07:13 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> Oh, and when I said "the system is slow even if firefox isn't running"
> I meant that I *had* run "killall firefox". I think between this and
Regarding firefox ..could you go in
~/.mozilla/firefox/_your_profile_.default and do :
for i in *.sqlite; do ech
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:44:47 -0800,
Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > There is
> > also a generic sandbox setup, but people have to actively
> > use it (or configure
> > their tools to use it).
> > --
>
>
> *IT* would be Great if someone would write a how-to or some documentation on
> how to u
> > *IT* would be Great if someone would write a how-to or
> some documentation on how to use this sandbox setup and thus
> prevent some apps from misbehaving :)
> >
> > There are some nasty web pages out there that can do
> some harm and knowing more about tools that can help would
> benefit mor
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 20:57:32 PM +, JB (jb.1234a...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Now, please give us output of:
> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Hi, JB. Here is the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo.
tomorrow I'll check the bios setting.
Thanks,
Marco
[root@polaris ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
> parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
> source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
> The lack of functionality is becoming a real time-waster!
>
W
M. Fioretti nexaima.net> writes:
>
> Greetings,
>
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> became almost unusable. The problem is, very likely, upstream of
> Fedora, but I would like to understa
Hi, everyone,
I am experiencing internet intermittency. The same computer booted
under windows performs very well, but when running Fedora 14 is very
poor. Videos will only partially load, email (evolution) gives "error
downloading mail", photos and graphics will be interrupted before the
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:42:25 -0600, Rick wrote:
> I am curious about the Rescheduling interrupts.
> I do not have a dual core system so I have no rescheduling interrupts.
>
> I do not know how many rescheduling interrupts is too many.
A running Firefox, that displays an ordinary News website wi
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 02:42:25 pm Rick Sewill wrote:
> I am curious about the Rescheduling interrupts.
> I do not have a dual core system so I have no rescheduling interrupts.
I do; here's my /proc/interrupts and uptime:
lowen@localhost:~$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
On 02/11/2011 09:11 PM, Outway wrote:
> I don't see in what way a mailing list is superior to a newsgroup.
> But I do see several advantages of a newsgroup:
please spec your system.
> * Clear thread structure (collapsable trees in standard news readers)
thunderbird client, ability 'on site', fas
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 20:10:52 PM +, Alan Cox (a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
wrote:
> > [8.984680] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 260.19.29
> > Wed Dec 8 12:08:56 PST 2010
>
> So you've got the Nvidia stuff loaded - well an obvious first test would
> be to run with the prov
Originally i'm searching for a PPTP VPN howto for OpenWrt...but i just can't
seem to find one...OpenWrt Backfire 10.03..
Can someone post a link about PPTP VPN for Fedora? at least to start
somewhere...
thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 02:15:02 pm Rick Sewill wrote:
> Someone help us...I know there is a command to show open files, lsof.
> Does that command include a way to find out disk activity per file or
> is there another command that can find out disk activity per file?
> I'm hoping, if we iden
> What devices are connected to your system?
>
> Perhaps a Linux driver, for a device is having problems.
> Perhaps a device is generating lots of interrupts.
In the case of a continual interrupt storm the kernel will detect and log
it (and take some attempt at avoiding action).
> Can you discon
> [8.984680] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 260.19.29 Wed
> Dec 8 12:08:56 PST 2010
So you've got the Nvidia stuff loaded - well an obvious first test would
be to run with the provided Fedora Nvidia drivers and X. That would be a
quick way to eliminate one possible cause.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:51:25 +0100, M. Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago, the
> system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade) became
> almost unusable. The problem is, very likely, upstream of Fedora, but I
> woul
> There is
> also a generic sandbox setup, but people have to actively
> use it (or configure
> their tools to use it).
> --
*IT* would be Great if someone would write a how-to or some documentation on
how to use this sandbox setup and thus prevent some apps from misbehaving :)
There are some
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:55:12 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:47:13 PM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> > Could you show us the output of twice, the second time a few seconds
> > after the first time so we can see if any interrupt number changes fast.
> > m
Rick Sewill gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Someone help us...I know there is a command to show open files, lsof.
> Does that command include a way to find out disk activity per file or
> is there another command that can find out disk activity per file?
> I'm hoping, if we identify the file(s) with
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:43:53 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:27:55 PM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> > Could you show the output of iostat -x 1,
> > not iostat -x 1 | egrep -i 'device|sda'
> > please?
>
> Sure, sorry, here you go (this is with Firefox o
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:47:13 PM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Could you show us the output of twice, the second time a few seconds
> after the first time so we can see if any interrupt number changes fast.
> more /proc/interrupts
here are two runs, 5/6 seconds apart:
[root@po
On 02/12/2011 07:53 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 15:25:54 PM +, Alan Cox (a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
> wrote:
>> There are lots of other things it could be, unfortunately you've not
>> provided any really useful information on the machine, you've not
>> provided any dumps of st
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:27:55 PM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Could you show the output of iostat -x 1,
> not iostat -x 1 | egrep -i 'device|sda'
> please?
Sure, sorry, here you go (this is with Firefox open, right now)
Linux 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64 (polaris.localdomain)
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:27:55 pm Rick Sewill wrote:
> On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:09:34 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 19:03:56 PM +0100, Marco Fioretti
>
> (mfiore...@nexaima.net) wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:55:16 PM -0500, Lamar Owen (lo...@pari.edu)
wro
On Friday 11 February 2011 13:59:30 Jim wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 02:52 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Friday 11 February 2011 07:34:50 Rohit Farmer wrote:
> >> I have just bought Dell Inspiron M501R AMD Phenom Quad Core, which was
> >> bundled with windows7 where all the features are working fine. I t
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:09:34 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 19:03:56 PM +0100, Marco Fioretti
(mfiore...@nexaima.net) wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:55:16 PM -0500, Lamar Owen (lo...@pari.edu) wrote:
> > > On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:19:33 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
>
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 19:03:56 PM +0100, Marco Fioretti (mfiore...@nexaima.net)
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:55:16 PM -0500, Lamar Owen (lo...@pari.edu) wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:19:33 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> > > besides hard drive and DVD burner there are only Logitech webca
On 02/12/2011 07:48 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>
>> I tested a different laptop with different wireless card:
>>
>> 03:03.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG
>> [Calexico2] Network Connection (rev 05)
>>
>> [root@lapmike2
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 12:55:16 PM -0500, Lamar Owen (lo...@pari.edu) wrote:
> On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:19:33 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> > besides hard drive and DVD burner there are only Logitech webcam,
> > wheelmouse and earphone microphone, but everything is plugged in
> > the back which is
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:19:33 pm M. Fioretti wrote:
> besides hard drive and DVD burner there are only Logitech webcam,
> wheelmouse and earphone microphone, but everything is plugged in the
> back which is not really accessible without moving furniture. I'll do
> that if needed, but isn'
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:14 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:06:02 +0100
> Patrick Lists wrote:
>
> > Try dig.
>
> Yea, like try to get useful information from the unbelievably
> cryptic program that is dig :-).
I use it all the time, though mainly for simple things, e.g.:
dig
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 11:01:49 AM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com) wrote:
> What devices are connected to your system?
>
> Perhaps a Linux driver, for a device is having problems.
> Perhaps a device is generating lots of interrupts.
>
> Can you disconnect any devices and see if the slowness
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 10:52:37 AM -0600, Rick Sewill (rsew...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/help-request-why-is-my-linux-so-damn-slow
>
> You have a very interesting problem.
that's the same thing my wife usually tells herself when looking at me
:-)
> May I ask, what is th
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:25:39 -0500,
Darr wrote:
> On Saturday, February 12, 2011 @12:46 zulu, Tim
> scribed:
>
> > Well, it /could/ stop either threat, however we don't run SELinux
> > as tightly as it could be run.
>
> I'm not sure who "we" is, but I run it in restricted mode and rarely
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:06:02 +0100
Patrick Lists wrote:
> Try dig.
Yea, like try to get useful information from the unbelievably
cryptic program that is dig :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 02/12/2011 01:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Can someone point me to a source for the real program
You're looking at the wrong tool. The standard tool for troubleshooting
dns issues is "dig":
yum install bind-utils
--
Jorge
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:00 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
> parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
> source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
> The lack of functionali
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:00 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
> parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
> source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
> The lack of functionali
On 02/12/2011 06:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
> parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
> source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
> The lack of functionality is becoming
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:28 +1030, Tim wrote:
> You didn't mention bandwidth saving: You download a list of headers,
> of
> what's become available since your last look, but you only download
> the
> actual body of message when you go to read it. i.e. If there's 2,000
> messages one day, and you
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 09:53:28 am M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 15:25:54 PM +, Alan Cox (a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
wrote:
> > There are lots of other things it could be, unfortunately you've not
> > provided any really useful information on the machine, you've not
> > prov
The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
parts returning "not implemented" status. Can someone point me to a
source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
The lack of functionality is becoming a real time-waster!
--
Bill Davidsen
We are
First of all, an important note: I have realized only now that many,
not all, the times when I was not running firefox myself and
everything was still "freezed as usual" there was one other user
account (this is the "family work computer") that was still keeping
Firefox open. when there is REALLY n
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 07:51:25 am M. Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> became almost unusable. The problem is, very likely, upstream of
> Fedora, but
On 2/12/11 9:02 AM, Darr wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 @23:22 zulu,
> Fernando Cassia scribed:
>
> =b=e=g=i=n==p=a=s=t=e=s=
>
> From: Fernando Cassia
> Precedence: list
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Cc: "fedora-l...@redhat.com"
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> References:<4d54534b.7060..
--- On Sat, 2/12/11, M. Fioretti wrote:
npviewer is causing some type of problem :(
> [12032.976089] npviewer.bin[2721]: segfault at 0 ip
> 00f7ced1 sp ff8a60c0 error 4 in
> libflashplayer.so[bdd000+b2e000]
> [12041.569570] npviewer.bin[5297]: segfault at f74bd0e0 ip
>
(Sorry - forgot to include the list..)
--- Begin Message ---
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 15:56:31 PM +, T. Horsnell
(t...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk) wrote:
Just to convince us all that it's not some subtle hardware problem,
can you make a FC14 live cd and boot from that, and then see i
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 @12:46 zulu, Tim
scribed:
> Well, it /could/ stop either threat, however we don't run SELinux
> as tightly as it could be run.
I'm not sure who "we" is, but I run it in restricted mode and rarely even
get told something has mislabeled files... and when I do get s
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 04:11 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> Hi Valent,
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 01:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Just remove all blender files and start over. Somehow blender doedn't
>>> see python libs.
>>
>> So I d
On Friday, February 11, 2011 @23:22 zulu,
Fernando Cassia scribed:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Darr wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 @21:49 zulu, Fernando Cassia
>> scribed (twice):
>>
>>> Are you using a time machine to report news, from the past? look
>>> at the dates...
>>>
>>>
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 15:56:31 PM +, T. Horsnell
(t...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk) wrote:
> Just to convince us all that it's not some subtle hardware problem,
> can you make a FC14 live cd and boot from that, and then see if
> you still get the same terrible performance?
Not right now (can't move from
M. Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> became almost unusable. The problem is, very likely, upstream of
> Fedora, but I would like to understand where exactly is
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I tested a different laptop with different wireless card:
>
> 03:03.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG
> [Calexico2] Network Connection (rev 05)
>
> [root@lapmike2 ~]# lsmod|grep ipw
> ipw2200 116546 0
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:12 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I am trying to resolve some wireless issue with a laptop running F14,
> and I need to change the "sens" (i.e. Sensitivity) value for the
> wireless interface.
>
> However when trying to run the following command as root it fails:
>
> iwconfig
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:51:25 +0100
"M. Fioretti" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> became almost unusable. The problem is, very likely, upstream of
> Fedora, but I wo
I am trying to resolve some wireless issue with a laptop running F14,
and I need to change the "sens" (i.e. Sensitivity) value for the
wireless interface.
However when trying to run the following command as root it fails:
iwconfig wlan0 sens -65
gives output:
Error for wireless request "Set Sens
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 16:31:58 PM +0200, Adrian Sevcenco
(adrian.sevce...@cern.ch) wrote:
> > when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days
> > ago, the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the
> > upgrade) became almost unusable. The problem is, very likely,
> > ups
>when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
>the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
>became almost unusable.
Weird problems often have a hardware issue behind them. There are many
things to check. Some are easier than others:
>From the deskto
On 02/12/2011 03:51 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> when I upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14, about twenty days ago,
> the system (which wasn't doing really well even before the upgrade)
> became almost unusable. The problem is, very likely, upstream of
IMHO, first step is a clean insta
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
