Re: "fatal error occurred when installing the module-init-tools"

a funny thing happened. when the installer asks that what repositories do i want, i always ticked fedora i386, and updates. if i doesn't tick them, and only leave the "standard" installer repository - then the installer doesn't gives the error message i'm installing it now... On Fri, 04

Re: F14 New Installation: Unknown Monitor

On 02/04/2011 11:26 PM, Burkhard Plache wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > the xorg.conf file from my last email causes the boot sequence to hang > after starting atd, probably while starting X. I resorted to my install cd > and rescue mode to rename that xorg.conf file to get back to my previous > state. Ou

Re: F14 New Installation: Unknown Monitor

On 02/04/2011 10:47 PM, Burkhard Plache wrote: > Hi Kevin, > learning a bit more than I bargained for when I thought > all I had ahead of me was a simple upgrade ;) B^) >>> Section "Monitor" >>> Identifier "Monitor0" >>> VendorName "Monitor Vendor" >>> ModelName"LCD Pane

Re: F14 New Installation: Unknown Monitor

Hi Kevin, the xorg.conf file from my last email causes the boot sequence to hang after starting atd, probably while starting X. I resorted to my install cd and rescue mode to rename that xorg.conf file to get back to my previous state. - Side question: There must be a way to boot into text mode (

"fatal error occurred when installing the module-init-tools"

i burned 5 cds [Fedora 14 i386] but when the install starts: "fatal error occurred when installing the module-init-tools" "exit install" :( the laptop is a HP Compaq 610 i'm running a memtest on the Fedora 14 CD, but no errors found i had checked the checksums, but all OK. What could be the

Re: F14 New Installation: Unknown Monitor

Hi Kevin, learning a bit more than I bargained for when I thought all I had ahead of me was a simple upgrade ;) On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 02/03/2011 09:09 PM, Burkhard Plache wrote: > >> Ok, here again: >> >> lspci | grep VGA >> >> 01:00.0 VGA compatible contro

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 02/04/2011 10:55 PM, James McKenzie wrote: <> > Thank you for the comments on my quotes. I'll keep this for a reference. welcome. not being a mac user, i did not feel that i could make comment to what you wrote. it was an interesting read. a little difficult to follow, but interesting. ;)

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 2/4/11 3:44 PM, g wrote: > On 02/04/2011 10:21 PM, James McKenzie wrote: >> On 2/4/11 1:56 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: >>> 2011/2/4 Michael Milesmailto:mmami...@gmail.com>> > <> > > james, > > would you please put a blank line, or two between what you are quoting > and what you are writing. > > n

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 02/04/2011 10:21 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 2/4/11 1:56 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: >> 2011/2/4 Michael Miles mailto:mmami...@gmail.com>> <> james, would you please put a blank line, or two between what you are quoting and what you are writing. not doing so makes it difficult to tell what

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 2/4/11 1:56 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > 2011/2/4 Michael Miles mailto:mmami...@gmail.com>> > > > > > James McKenzie > > Very well said > > Michael > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscrib

Re: Hardware for Gnome3

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:05 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > Now downloading the live image linked from the test day page and will > use that as soon as I get a block of time to test. I did take an hour this evening to run a test on a laptop which has nVidia Corporation G86M [Quadro FX 360M] graphics a

RE: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

>I switched to using a Mac after LOTS of investigation and watching the Windows98SE/ME disaster (Microsoft usually screws it up once before getting it right.) 98SE was a stable OS as used in the business world: easy to repair, easy to install, and easy to upgrade hardware for on existing systems

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

2011/2/4 Michael Miles > > > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of James McKenzie > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 10:10 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Is there a better Alternati

Re: [389-users] Performance tuning - where to begin?

On 2/4/2011 1:29 PM, Andrew Kerr wrote: > Since the machine isn't even opening up a socket, it makes me think you are > hitting either a connection limit or related file limit. It won't open the connection once the listen queue has filled up (if it did then all that would happen is the box would

Re: [389-users] Performance tuning - where to begin?

Since the machine isn't even opening up a socket, it makes me think you are hitting either a connection limit or related file limit. Have you set things such as fs.file-max, tcp keepalive, and file limits (check ulimit) per the docs? -Original Message- From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fed

LDAP/SASL/GSSAPI

Hello everyone, I am having some difficulty. I am using dovecot. I have it working with LDAP as the backend for userdb. Unfortunately, the LDAP I am using is now requiring SASL binds (GSSAPI/Kerberos is what I am going for). Dovecot uses OpenLDAP/Cyrus SASL (at least in Fedora). I can't seem to b

RE: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

-Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of James McKenzie Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 10:10 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ? > On 02/03/2011 1

RE: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

-Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Callaghan Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:40 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ? On Fri, 2011-0

Re: Hardware for Gnome3

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:15 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > I have the latest live image (from 30th!) from the nightly directory - > and it depends on getting a block of time to run the tests - though I > will try through the weekend if possible... Now downloading the live image linked from the test d

Re: Fedora 14: Shutdown problem

On 02/04/2011 12:21 PM, Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:47 +, Terry Barnaby wrote: >> There is no need for NetworkManager in a home network anyway, it >> just adds complications, gets in the way and consumes resources. > > Maybe on *your* home network. But it's good for mine, and when I

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

> On 02/03/2011 11:20 AM, Robert Myers wrote: > You can't say Linux won't be a factor on the desktop. I have a number > of relatively unsophisticated users running CentOS as their desktop > and they're quite happy. Oh, they look at my stuff and "ooh" and "aah" > at some of the niftiness, but the

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 02/04/2011 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: <> > Despite talking about Seamonkey, he's using Outlook to post, which may > have something to do with it (not to mention the wierd quoting style). yes. i looked at his header before replying because i was curious as to what email client he was

Re: Hardware for Gnome3

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:02 PM, mike cloaked wrote: >> >> In the meantime it will be very valuable to see as many tests as >> possible being executed on as wide a set of different types of >> hardware as possible for the gnome 3 test days

Re: Hardware for Gnome3

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:02 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > > In the meantime it will be very valuable to see as many tests as > possible being executed on as wide a set of different types of > hardware as possible for the gnome 3 test days to maximise the chance > that the largest number or users will

Re: Printer marker levels -

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 13:04 -0600, Steven Stern wrote: > I get the same thing for my HP inkjet and it seems unrelated to the > amount of ink in the cartridge. Yes, it was a bug in the HPLIP package, now fixed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675151 Tim. */ signature.asc Descripti

Re: mplayer doesn't like me again

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 02/03/2011 09:32 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> yum search drv-ati prooduced >> xorg-x11-drv-ati.i686 : Xorg X11 ati video driver >> >> yum provides xorg-x11-drv-ati.i686 produced >> Warning: 3.0.x versions of yum would erroneously match against >>

Hardware for Gnome3

With the advent of Gnome3 not far around the corner and with a huge array of different desktop and laptop machines with many different chipsets and graphics cards in use by the community, I wondered if there is a list of likely supported hardware that will have a reasonable chance of being able to

Re: Gnome3 test repos for F14?

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi, > > I've read about the gnome3 testing week, I would like to give Gnome3 a > try and maybe switch over from KDE. > Are there repos with the packages available for F14, or do I have to > use the live-cd? > You will have to use the Live

Re: Recommendations: Simple Audio Recorder

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:22 +0530, santosh wrote: > When I record online audio using audacity, it also records surrounding > noise. How do you block it in audacity ? > > Few days before I was recording online audio in my laptop. At the same > time I was talking with my friend. Audacity recorded

Re: Problems exporting partitions via NFS

don fisher: >> Thanks. I turned off iptables using system-config-services and was able >> to mount the system remotely. The addition of nsf4 in the fstab did no >> appear to be required. >> >> Thanks again. Now I have to relearn how to edit iptables:-) Patrick O'Callaghan: > Just use system-con

Re: Fedora 14: Shutdown problem

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:47 +, Terry Barnaby wrote: > There is no need for NetworkManager in a home network anyway, it > just adds complications, gets in the way and consumes resources. Maybe on *your* home network. But it's good for mine, and when I take the laptop around to visit other plac

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:11 +, g wrote: > do not enter a reply to an email below a "-- ". that is a line with > 2 dashes followed by a space. > > this is known as a 'delimiter' and when replying to your post, what > you > wrote gets cut off and all that is in reply is what you see above. Desp

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 02/03/2011 11:44 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Svist > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 15:33 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Is t

Re: Is there a better Alternative to Thunderbird ?

On 02/03/2011 11:33 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote: > On 02/03/2011 03:05 PM, g wrote: >> *anytime* a 'folder file' is edited, *or* a '.msf' file is deleted, the >> 'panacea.dat' file in 'profile' directory *must* be deleted also. > > Huh, didn't know that.. I've deleted .msf files a few times in the