It works fine for me on F14 x86_32.
Cheers,
AA
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:16 AM, H Xu wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm using Fedora 14 x86_64. In octave, "xlabel('\mu')" could not show
> the '\mu' correctly. How could I solve this?
> Thanks.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
If i have a fedora 13 iso dvd image
Can I use the iso as an yum repo?
I no I can use a physical cd
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 10:21 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:27 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
>> I surprised that this kind of things/action can be take by the ISP
> Over here, in Australia...
>
> Some ISPs block port 80 by default, though you may enable it. I seem to
> recall that was an
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:55 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 01:52 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> I am well aware of all that but nothing you are saying contradicts what
> >> I said. Openoffice is not under the GPL license.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> Don't forget your menus:
> sudo yum localinstall --nogpgckeck \
> desktop-integration/libreoffice3.3-redhat-menus-3.3-6.noarch.rpm
>
Gah, with "check" spelt right:
sudo yum localinstall --nogpgcheck \
desktop-integration/libreoffice3.3-redhat
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:06 PM, L wrote:
> I tried this
>
> wget
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/3.3.0/rpm/x86_64/LibO_3.3.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>
> tar zxvf LibO_3.3.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>
> cd LibO_3.3.0rc4_Linux_x86_ins
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:12 -0800, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 05:04 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > Why aren't these packages from F14 ?
> >
> > yum list libdvd\*
> > Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit
> >
> > Installed Packages
> > libdvdcss.i386
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:43:15 -0500
> Jim wrote:
>
>> Fedora 14
>>
>> How does one install LibreOffice in Rawhide into Fedora 14.
>> Can I put the rawhide.repos in yum.repos.d ?
>
> I would strongly advise you not to mix rawhide and stable rele
On 2011/1/28 4:14, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:16:54 +0800
> H Xu wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I'm using Fedora 14 x86_64. In octave, "xlabel('\mu')" could not show
>> the '\mu' correctly. How could I solve this?
>> Thanks.
>
> It seems that it's not correctly displayed in
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 04:10:46 pm Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear all,
> just to add something to my problem, this affect only my user, from root
> korganizer starts like a charm. I've noticed that it is bound to the
> akonadi server but also killing all the process related to akonadi
> korgan
On 01/27/2011 05:04 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Why aren't these packages from F14 ?
>
> yum list libdvd\*
> Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit
>
> Installed Packages
> libdvdcss.i386 1.2.10-1
> installed
> libdvdnav.i686
Linuxguy123 writes:
Why aren't these packages from F14 ?
yum list libdvd\*
Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
libdvdcss.i386 1.2.10-1
Ever heard of the DMCA?
pgpIZya47if4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
use
Why aren't these packages from F14 ?
yum list libdvd\*
Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
libdvdcss.i386 1.2.10-1
installed
libdvdnav.i686 4.1.4-0.1.sv
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:43:15 -0500
Jim wrote:
> Fedora 14
>
> How does one install LibreOffice in Rawhide into Fedora 14.
> Can I put the rawhide.repos in yum.repos.d ?
I would strongly advise you not to mix rawhide and stable releases.
If you need libreoffice right now in f14, uninstall open
Fedora 14
How does one install LibreOffice in Rawhide into Fedora 14.
Can I put the rawhide.repos in yum.repos.d ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedorapro
Dear all,
just to add something to my problem, this affect only my user, from root
korganizer starts like a charm. I've noticed that it is bound to the
akonadi server but also killing all the process related to akonadi
korganizer from my user doesn't start.
:-(
any help is appreciated
Walter
O
Dear Anne,
thanks for the reply
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Anne Wilson wrote:
I've not had this problem in korganizer, but I have seen it with other kontact
modules. I find that the best thing is to killall kontact and wait a few
seconds, after which everything works again. I assume that something
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:16:54 +0800
H Xu wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm using Fedora 14 x86_64. In octave, "xlabel('\mu')" could not show
> the '\mu' correctly. How could I solve this?
> Thanks.
It seems that it's not correctly displayed in the plot window. However,
once you export the plot w
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:45:39 Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear all,
> today after an attempt of adding a new calendar korganizer has crashed
> and from that moment on it is impossible to access to the GUI and to my
> data. Doesn't a matter if I launch it from the tray, from the
> commandline or
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> There's a registry hack, which I use on both XP and Vista, and should work on
> Windows 7 as well, that will make Windows interpret the hardware clock as UTC
> (search for "registry UTC"). It works fine for me, though I've heard there may
> be issues wi
Rick Stevens nerd.com> writes:
> IIRC, Windows forces the hardware clock to the local time. If you
> intend to dual-boot between Winblows and Linux, uncheck the "System
> clock uses UTC" button in system-config-date "Time Zone" tab and adjust
> your clock again to make sure it's right.
There's
On 01/28/2011 12:22 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I am well aware of all that but nothing you are saying contradicts what
>> I said. Openoffice is not under the GPL license.
> OpenOffice.org is LGPL.
>
> It was an error on my part, I often
On 01/27/2011 10:14 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:25 -0700, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>>> Windows changed the system clock from UTC to local time, so fedora
>>> needed to do a complete relabelling before I could finally boot up
>>> again.
>>
>> I can't
On 01/27/2011 01:52 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I am well aware of all that but nothing you are saying contradicts what
>> I said. Openoffice is not under the GPL license.
>
> OpenOffice.org is LGPL.
>
> It was an error on my part, I o
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I am well aware of all that but nothing you are saying contradicts what
> I said. Openoffice is not under the GPL license.
OpenOffice.org is LGPL.
It was an error on my part, I often use "GPL" as a generic term to
mean "GPL or LPGL" mean
On 01/27/2011 09:24 AM, Gordon Charrick wrote:
> I wrote a new logwatch module for vnstat and put it in
> /etc/logwatch/scripts/services. If I run logwatch from the command line,
> it works fine. When cron runs it, the vnstat module doesn't run. The
> module is extremely simple - all it does is run
Hello everybody,
I'm using Fedora 14 x86_64. In octave, "xlabel('\mu')" could not show
the '\mu' correctly. How could I solve this?
Thanks.
Regards,
H Xu
01/28/2011
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:25 -0700, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>> Windows changed the system clock from UTC to local time, so fedora
>> needed to do a complete relabelling before I could finally boot up
>> again.
>
> I can't see why that was necessary.
>
I've experienced it before.
Dear all,
today after an attempt of adding a new calendar korganizer has crashed
and from that moment on it is impossible to access to the GUI and to my
data. Doesn't a matter if I launch it from the tray, from the
commandline or from the menu.
When I try to launch it I get the following message:
I wrote a new logwatch module for vnstat and put it in
/etc/logwatch/scripts/services. If I run logwatch from the command line,
it works fine. When cron runs it, the vnstat module doesn't run. The
module is extremely simple - all it does is run the vnstat command.
There are no errors being repo
On 01/26/2011 07:00 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 26.01.2011, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>
>> The real issue is that there isn't a good activity log. While I can
>> install tripwire to watch for changed files
>
> I would have used "aide" instead of tripwire.
>
>> it probably won't tell me how the
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:23:48 -0800
kellyremo wrote:
> what could be the problem? i have to enable it user by user?
http://melvilletheatre.com/articles/squid-privoxy/index.html
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
Hi,
I have an Acer Aspire 4720z. It has an Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter. When I first installed F14 the wireless was
working fine. About a week later it stopped working. Even when it says that
wireless is enabled, it does not see any wireless networks. If I use the
s
On 01/27/2011 08:33 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot
put it in EPEL6 because it would conflict. We are interested in
suggestions about how to provide binary packages on EL6.
pardon my ignorance, but what would it cl
>
>
>
> 389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot put it in
> EPEL6 because it would conflict. We are interested in suggestions about how
> to provide binary packages on EL6.
>
>
> pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?
>
> 389-ds-base in RHEL6.
>
And I assume
i installed a proxy on my Fedora 14 Box
yum -y install privoxy
chkconfig --level 5 privoxy on
ok...it worked fine..
later.. i adduser USERNAME, and logged in with it.
i tried to browse the web, but:
http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/3323/screenshotmm.png
why? i have to restart the privoxy to
On 01/27/2011 06:40 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> yum localinstall is really no different from rpm -ivh in that aspect
>> except for dependency resolving
> When did rpm stop checking for signatures, by default?
RPM checks and posts a mostly ignored wa
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> yum localinstall is really no different from rpm -ivh in that aspect
> except for dependency resolving
When did rpm stop checking for signatures, by default?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private r
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 05:33 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I saw some Blender 2.56 packages in Koji for F15, does anybody know if
>> Blender 2.56 will ship with Fedora 15?
>
> Whatever is in Koji will usually end up in the appropriate re
2011/1/26 Máirín Duffy :
> Hi Valent,
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:03 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi galls and guys,
>> I saw that there are no up to date instuctions for getting Blender
>> 2.56 running on Fedora, not even on Blender wiki so I wrote up this
>> blog post:
>> http://bi
On 01/27/2011 05:16 PM, Tim wrote:
> It still doesn't sound very wise. Good that it's an option, but bad as
> a default. Perhaps we should change all the security options to
> off-by-default?
yum localinstall is really no different from rpm -ivh in that aspect
except for dependency resolving. A
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 01/27/2011 04:49 PM, JB wrote:
> >
> > It should be the other way around.
>
> You are free to suggest that to yum developers via bugzilla or their
> mailing list.
>
> Rahul
>
Let your voice be heard.
Bugzilla # 673088
JB
--
users maili
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> the Fedora 15 version has a change that doesn't check for gpg
>>> signatures for local packages by default
Tim:
>> That doesn't sound very wise.
Rahul Sundaram:
> It is configurable.
It still doesn't sound very wise. Good that it's an option, but bad as
a default. Per
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:25 -0700, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Windows changed the system clock from UTC to local time, so fedora
> needed to do a complete relabelling before I could finally boot up
> again.
I can't see why that was necessary.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.f
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 22:06 +0100, Adel ESSAFI wrote:
> mplayer http://www.radiotunisienne.tn/popup/rtci.asx
>
> I have a problem with my radio on linux.
>
> mplayer could not play the radio on linux. However, the same link
> works fine with windows media player
When the address isn't the musi
On 01/27/2011 04:49 PM, JB wrote:
>
> It should be the other way around.
You are free to suggest that to yum developers via bugzilla or their
mailing list.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 01/27/2011 03:13 PM, Tim wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 03:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> the Fedora 15 version has a change that doesn't check for gpg
> >> signatures for local packages by default
> > That doesn't sound very wise.
>
> It is conf
On 01/27/2011 03:13 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 03:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> the Fedora 15 version has a change that doesn't check for gpg
>> signatures for local packages by default
> That doesn't sound very wise.
It is configurable.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 03:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> the Fedora 15 version has a change that doesn't check for gpg
> signatures for local packages by default
That doesn't sound very wise.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, t
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:49 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> I've gone through every option I could find, right clicked everything,
> grepped through .nautilus and .gnome2* and haven't the slighted idea
> why nautilus insists on opening Chrome when the system default is set
> to Firefox.
Using it for w
50 matches
Mail list logo
