On 09/08/10 00:26, James McKenzie wrote:
>>
>> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
>> reinstall.
>> Even on Windows
>>
>>
> Not really. Sun's JRE will install over the top of an existing JRE
> install. However, if it breaks, you get to keep the results. I also
>
Hi,
If installing fedora, it would be very helpful in some situations
(producing bug reports,...) if I could use GPM for copying the contents
of console windows -otherwise a painful typing for collecting text is
needed-. But I miss such a feature, especially if no camera is available.
Somebody ha
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 19:35 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you'd like to propose this reasoned and conciliatory position to
> > the list administrators and propose that the Guidelines be changed.
>
> Conciliatory? N
On 08/09/2010 01:54 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> web pages work with 'html format', email works with 'html code'.
>
> I don't quite understand this. Can you elaborate what exactly is the
> difference?
web pages have an *RFC* compliant format that begins with, or similar;
[spacings added in wo
On 08/09/2010 02:27 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday, August 09, 2010 03:02:43 Tim wrote:
> Aaahhh, well, so you are saying that an e-mail can contain both plain text
> version and html version of the same message simultaneously?
if the email client composer or online email composer is se
On 08/09/2010 01:49 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But it seems this is not what I received. You can look back in this thread
> where I quoted the full OP message, as KMail showed it to me. There was no
> mention of html context, nor any tags for line breaks.
that is because kmail is not _showi
Hello group,
this just in. No, I haven't tried it yet, too many beers just now.
Will let everyone know. If the attachment doesn't come through pleas
email me directly and I'll forward.
Cheers!
Dave
--
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."
Krishna
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>
>> Darn, I was hoping you had some experience upon which to recommend
>> them! Yes, I googled and tried some of the places Ed suggested. It
>> looks like there's a whole different WIFI industry out there apart
>> from the prod
On Monday, August 09, 2010 03:02:43 Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 02:49 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > But it seems this is not what I received. You can look back in this
> > thread where I quoted the full OP message, as KMail showed it to me.
> > There was no mention of html context, nor a
On 08/08/2010 07:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, JD said:
>>On 08/08/2010 05:33 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>> Once upon a time, JD said:
I want to burn a bunch of flac files to a vanilla audio CD.
Is there a qualitative audio difference in the resulting wav file
i
On Monday, August 09, 2010 00:29:23 Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:30 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain
> > any html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
>
> A HTML message section doesn't actually have to have an
Bob Goodwin writes:
> Darn, I was hoping you had some experience upon which to recommend
> them! Yes, I googled and tried some of the places Ed suggested. It
> looks like there's a whole different WIFI industry out there apart
> from the product names we usually see in the compute
Once upon a time, JD said:
> On 08/08/2010 05:33 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, JD said:
> >> I want to burn a bunch of flac files to a vanilla audio CD.
> >> Is there a qualitative audio difference in the resulting wav file
> >> if flac is decoded and encoded to wav by ffmpeg
> >
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 02:49 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But it seems this is not what I received. You can look back in this
> thread where I quoted the full OP message, as KMail showed it to me.
> There was no mention of html context, nor any tags for line breaks.
I received the original messa
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 20:53:24 g wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 02:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain any
> > html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
>
> there is a difference between 'html code' and 'html format'.
>
> we
On 08/08/2010 06:49 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday, August 08, 2010 16:45:55 Mike Klinke wrote:
>> On Sunday 08 August 2010 09:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking
>>> specifically about g's mail filter) check the actual contents of
>
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 16:45:55 Mike Klinke wrote:
> On Sunday 08 August 2010 09:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking
> > specifically about g's mail filter) check the actual contents of
> > the message for html stuff, rather than just blin
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 11:38 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 08/08/10 11:27, mike lan wrote:
> > Hello
> > I would like to update a machine offline after a f12 kde livecd
> > default install
> > i.e 200 mb or more of packages update
> > is there a way to save the "yum cache", the .drpm and stuff a
On 08/08/2010 05:33 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, JD said:
>> I want to burn a bunch of flac files to a vanilla audio CD.
>> Is there a qualitative audio difference in the resulting wav file
>> if flac is decoded and encoded to wav by ffmpeg
>> or some other decoder/encoder?
> FLAC
Hi,
> No question, you want Conky. Conky can do absolutely anything you want it to
> do, and it draws right onto the
Yes, great, thanks everyone for their ideas.
Thanks,
Alex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedora
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> Perhaps you'd like to propose this reasoned and conciliatory position to
> the list administrators and propose that the Guidelines be changed.
Conciliatory? No. Well reasoned? Yes. You just posted 5267
characters (5.14 k) to a few
Once upon a time, JD said:
> I want to burn a bunch of flac files to a vanilla audio CD.
> Is there a qualitative audio difference in the resulting wav file
> if flac is decoded and encoded to wav by ffmpeg
> or some other decoder/encoder?
FLAC is a lossless compression format, so there should be
Hi All,
I want to burn a bunch of flac files to a vanilla audio CD.
Is there a qualitative audio difference in the resulting wav file
if flac is decoded and encoded to wav by ffmpeg
or some other decoder/encoder?
Thanx.
JD
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:37 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> > That is true, but HTML mail is a bandwidth waster. I routinely get
> > messages with so much garbage in them that just delete them. This
> is
> > what this filter does, dumps HTML mail before it even gets read. We
> > need to remem
On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
>>
>>
>> Added {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0079)}, /* Linksys WUSB600N v2 */to
>> /common/rtusb_dev_id.c file
>>
>> And m
On 08/06/2010 12:00 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 02:33 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>
>I have a feeling this was fixed in f13 - at least I definitely recall
> the problem in F12 and I do not have it in F13 ...
>
FYI: I installed F13, and the problem is still there,
it
On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
>
>
> Added {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0079)}, /* Linksys WUSB600N v2 */to
> /common/rtusb_dev_id.c file
>
> And modify /os/linux/config.mk file
>
> # Supp
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:30 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain
> any html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
A HTML message section doesn't actually have to have any HTML tags, just
needs to be treated as if it might. i.
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 02/08/10 13:22, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>>
>> friend of fedora, i was asking for update only and not reinstalling!!
>>
>
> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
> reinstall.
>
On 08/08/2010 07:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 12:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> I downloaded the RT3572.tar.gz from Ralink and made the changes
>> required, but it won't compile with "make"
>> I have kernel-headers and kernel-devel installed.
>>
> Did you first try without m
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Wed August 4 2010, Clive Hills wrote:
>
>> 3 Primary 615401955 625137344 0 9735390 CP/M / CTOS / . (DB)
>> None
>>
>>
>> What I find amazing in all of this is that no one has asked what 's on
>> sda3. I mean CPM/CTOS. That's pretty unlikely in 2010! Wha
Jan Muhammad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've installed yum-updatesd on my server (run level 3) and nothing
> seems to happen.
> It hasn't reported any updates for a long time on FC11.
>
FC11 is End of Life. You have to upgrade to FC12/FC13 to get this
working again.
James McKenzie
--
users mailing li
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:37 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> people waste more "bandwidth" than HTML email could ever dream of
> by rehashing this crap every other day
Though, if every mail came through as HTML, and *many* would if nobody
complained, the HTML would become the great bandwidth was
On 08/09/2010 12:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> I downloaded the RT3572.tar.gz from Ralink and made the changes
> required, but it won't compile with "make"
> I have kernel-headers and kernel-devel installed.
>
Did you first try without making changes?
What changes did you make?
--
J
On 08/08/2010 01:24 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 09:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 11:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
WUSB600N.
>>
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, James McKenzie
wrote:
>>
> That is true, but HTML mail is a bandwidth waster. I routinely get
> messages with so much garbage in them that just delete them. This is
> what this filter does, dumps HTML mail before it even gets read. We
> need to remember that the
On 08/08/2010 01:15 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Joshua C. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to
>> take.
>>
>> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
>> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core ap
On 08/08/2010 12:26 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> So now I'm looking for another router and maybe I don't need 5 gHz despite
> what the ad people would have me believe. In the mean time I will put the old
> Netgear WGR614v9 back in operation. I have several Netgear devices and have
> been satisfi
Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
>
> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
> intel might have the lead. When it comes to scal
On 08/08/2010 07:53 PM, g wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 03:56 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
>
>
>> one of the arguments against HTML is that it is a waste of other
>> people's bandwidth.
>
> true.
>
>> Much like this discussion thread.
>
> not really. especially if op gains a better understanding and stops
>
On Sa, 2010-08-07 at 09:43 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
[...]
> Anonymous memory returned by mmap must be cleared. Memory provided by
> sbrk can be cleared and it is on Linux.
I found a couple of messages at the LKML where they talk about zeroing
memory. For example this one:
http://marc.info/?l
On 08/08/2010 04:29 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Or am I misunderstanding something?
or something.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at
On 08/08/2010 03:56 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> one of the arguments against HTML is that it is a waste of other
> people's bandwidth.
true.
> Much like this discussion thread.
not really. especially if op gains a better understanding and stops
sending 'html'.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
***
On 08/08/2010 03:35 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> It IMPLIES that there are mulitple parts, one of which can be text/html.
> The filter is picking up the message as HTML,
*not*
the filter is blocking message because of 'Content-Type: t e x t/h t m l'.
there is a difference. :)
--
peace out.
On 08/08/2010 03:17 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> To do that it would need to parse the contents (it's easy to construct a
> message that looks a lot like HTML but isn't, e.g. a plain text message
> discussing HTML syntax).
and why i have filter for 'Content-Type: t e x t/h t m l'
> Way too
On 08/08/2010 02:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain any
> html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
there is a difference between 'html code' and 'html format'.
web pages work with 'html format', email works with 'html c
On 08/08/10 14:18, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>> department store router prices. see http://www.ubnt.com/ I have one of
>>> their 300mw PCI cards and a now discontinued 300mW AP card.
>>>
>> Where do you buy this "Ubiquiti" stuff?
>>
>> Their site shows some i
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 19:41:33 Joshua C. wrote:
> How can I judge if a particular _linux_ app will work well with a
> 6-/4-core cpu? What to look for? How does the OS interact with the app
> in allowing it to use the resources? Is the app solely responsible for
> utilizing all the system resou
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
>> This is what I mean with scalability. As for the windows-apps: most of
>> them (still) cannot use all the cores and a more-than-2-cores cpu is a
>> waste-of-money in most of the time. Lets go back to linux.
>>
>
> Chrome uses all eight thread
> Subject: Re: Floppy on fc12 could not find
> On 08/08/2010 12:32 PM, Vincent wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am try to use the floppy on Dell Dimension 8300 with fc12 but it
> > didn't mount.
> > Here is what I did:
> > # mkdir /mnt/floppy
> >
> > # mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 mnt/floppy
> > mount: special
I noticed that when I select a desktop background, especially
that of multiple slideshows, clicking into another workspace
reverts back to Fedora's background image. Even if the new
background was added and set as default, it exhibits the same
behaviour when moving to different workspaces
Ha
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
>
> Well, the question is not why I need "that much" power but simply will
> a linux app run better on a 6-core than on a 4-core processor? Of
> course it depends on the ability of this app to utilize all this
> cores/threads. And I know that whate
> Subject: Re: Floppy on fc12 could not find
> On 08/08/2010 12:32 PM, Vincent wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am try to use the floppy on Dell Dimension 8300 with fc12 but it
> > didn't mount.
> > Here is what I did:
> > # mkdir /mnt/floppy
> >
> > # mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 mnt/floppy
> > mount: special
2010/8/8 Michael Miles :
> JD wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
>>> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
>>> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality i
suvayu ali wrote:
> On 8 August 2010 07:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking specifically
>> about
>> g's mail filter) check the actual contents of the message for html stuff,
>> rather
>> than just blindly trust the message header?
>>
>
Jatin K wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 August 2010 06:30 AM, James Mckenzie wrote:
>> JD wrote:
>>
>>> Sent: Aug 3, 2010 11:49 AM
>>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>>> Subject: Re: how to extract .uha files in FC 13
>>>
>>> On 08/03/2010 05:19 AM, Jatin K wrote:
>>>
Dear All
Vincent wrote:
> Hello,
> I am try to use the floppy on Dell Dimension 8300 with fc12 but it
> didn't mount.
> Here is what I did:
> # mkdir /mnt/floppy
>
> # mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 mnt/floppy
> mount: special device /dev/fd0 does not exist
>
Is there a disk in the drive? Sometimes a disk
Bob Goodwin writes:
>> department store router prices. see http://www.ubnt.com/ I have one of
>> their 300mw PCI cards and a now discontinued 300mW AP card.
>>
> Where do you buy this "Ubiquiti" stuff?
>
> Their site shows some interesting equipment but after wading around
> a bit I
JD wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>>
>> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
>> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
>> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality it is only a Phenom 2 with
>>
On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>
> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality it is only a Phenom 2 with
> 2 more cores added.
>
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
>
> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
> intel might have
On 08/08/2010 09:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 11:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
>>> WUSB600N.
>>>
>>> That means it has a different chipset t
john wendel wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 08:12 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to
>> take.
>>
>> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
>> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core a
On 08/08/2010 08:12 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
>
> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
> intel might have the lead.
On 08/08/2010 12:32 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Hello,
> I am try to use the floppy on Dell Dimension 8300 with fc12 but it
> didn't mount.
> Here is what I did:
> # mkdir /mnt/floppy
>
> # mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 mnt/floppy
> mount: special device /dev/fd0 does not exist
>
> I look in the dev directory
Hello,
I am try to use the floppy on Dell Dimension 8300 with fc12 but it
didn't mount.
Here is what I did:
# mkdir /mnt/floppy
# mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 mnt/floppy
mount: special device /dev/fd0 does not exist
I look in the dev directory the fd0 does not exist.
I will appreciate help
and th
On 8 August 2010 07:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking specifically
> about
> g's mail filter) check the actual contents of the message for html stuff,
> rather
> than just blindly trust the message header?
>
I don't understand all this fus
On 08/08/2010 11:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
>> WUSB600N.
>>
>> That means it has a different chipset than Ver. 1 .
> FWIW, I don't have a WUSB600N. I also don't know
> As someone who actually doesn't care much if the mail is HTML or Text,
> can I just point out that one of the arguments against HTML is that it
> is a waste of other people's bandwidth.
>
> Much like this discussion thread.
Yes. Actually I agree with you.
And you too have just contributed to it
As someone who actually doesn't care much if the mail is HTML or Text,
can I just point out that one of the arguments against HTML is that it
is a waste of other people's bandwidth.
Much like this discussion thread.
--
Sam
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
>>> why does a "multipart/mixed" declaration in the header make
>>> it html?
>>
>> It does not.
>>
> It IMPLIES that there are mulitple parts,
Huh? IMPLIES!? Of course multipart IMPLIES multiple-parts. Isn't that
fucking OBVIOUS?
> one of which can be text/html.
Or something else.
> The filte
On Sunday 08 August 2010 09:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking
> specifically about g's mail filter) check the actual contents of
> the message for html stuff, rather than just blindly trust the
> message header?
His original message arrive
Takehiko Abe wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===1539751590095400808=="
>>> This is HTML mail. If it were text, this would be text/plain...
>>>
>
> bah. HTML is text too. It's called "text/html", which is not
> "multipart/mixed"
On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
> WUSB600N.
>
> That means it has a different chipset than Ver. 1 .
FWIW, I don't have a WUSB600N. I also don't know, and didn't make the
claim that the WUSB600N has a
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday, August 08, 2010 14:49:27 James McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the message with full headers, as KMail sees it (forgive me for
>>> not
>>>
>>> trimming anything):
>>> Subject: Hi
>>> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1rp=E1d_Attila_Bakos
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>>
>>> boundary="===1539751590095400808=="
>>
>> This is HTML mail. If it were text, this would be text/plain...
bah. HTML is text too. It's called "text/html", which is not
"multipart/mixed". They are not related.
> why does a "multipart/mi
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:30 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking
> specifically about
> g's mail filter) check the actual contents of the message for html
> stuff, rather
> than just blindly trust the message header?
To do that it would nee
Hi,
I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
intel might have the lead. When it comes to scalability then amd is on
the move
On 08/07/2010 10:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 09:51 AM, JD wrote:
>> It's good to hear there is another person using the rt2860.
>> I just wonder when will the kernel dev team will finally fix
>> the rt2860 driver already in the staging drivers and make it
>> work.
>> What I have he
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 14:49:27 James McKenzie wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Here is the message with full headers, as KMail sees it (forgive me for
> > not
> >
> > trimming anything):
> > Subject: Hi
> > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1rp=E1d_Attila_Bakos?=
>
> He is using the GMail send ag
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Here is the message with full headers, as KMail sees it (forgive me for not
> trimming anything):
>
> Subject: Hi
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1rp=E1d_Attila_Bakos?=
>
He is using the GMail send agent, probably the Web Mail interface. It
creates HTML mail by default.
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 09:21 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Why the separate /usr? Unless you plan to use network mounts for it,
> it won't be beneficial to put it onto its own partition. It will only
> require you to resize it in the near future when suddenly you want to
> put more stuff into /us
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 20:32 +0200, li...@gabriel-striewe.de wrote:
> They say that not every home dvd player is able to play DVD-Audio.
For what it's worth, I haven't come across any that do. I get the
impression that it's really a niche market, like the original laser
(video) discs.
--
[...@lo
On 08/07/2010 10:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 09:51 AM, JD wrote:
>> It's good to hear there is another person using the rt2860.
>> I just wonder when will the kernel dev team will finally fix
>> the rt2860 driver already in the staging drivers and make it
>> work.
>> What I have he
On 08/07/2010 08:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 08:51 AM, JD wrote:
>>On 08/07/2010 03:56 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> fedora 13
>>>
>>> A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
>>>
>>> Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless sites
>>> they say a ve
On 08/08/2010 08:41 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Newegg search "Ubiquiti" turns up nothing?
FWIW, Amazon carries some of their products.
--
Fast ship? You mean you've never heard of the Millennium Falcon? -- Han
Solo 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
user
On 08/08/2010 08:41 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> Where do you buy this "Ubiquiti" stuff?
>
> Their site shows some interesting equipment but after wading around
> a bit I find nothing about price or ordering. Perhaps I missed
> "clicking" somewhere? Newegg search "Ubiquiti" turns up
On 08/08/10 06:10, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
>> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
>> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought
On 08/08/10 11:27, mike lan wrote:
> Hello
> I would like to update a machine offline after a f12 kde livecd
> default install
> i.e 200 mb or more of packages update
> is there a way to save the "yum cache", the .drpm and stuff and copy
> that onto on a newly f12 default install, to make update
Hello
I would like to update a machine offline after a f12 kde livecd default
install
i.e 200 mb or more of packages update
is there a way to save the "yum cache", the .drpm and stuff and copy that
onto on a newly f12 default install, to make update offline ?
thanks
--
users mailing list
users@
Bob Goodwin writes:
> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought a
> Netgear WNDR330 dual band "N" wireless router an
I just install 4 partitions as you may see from /etc/fstab:
[r...@casablanca ~]# cat /etc/fstab
#
# /etc/fstab
# Created by anaconda on Tue Jul 27 13:18:24 2010
#
# Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk'
# See man pages fstab(5), findfs(8), mount(8) and/or blkid(8)
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:29:04 -0700, Marvin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using Fedora 12 now..
>
> Am planing on going to 13..
>
> But, am thinking I need to resize my partitions
>
> This is what I currently have.
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sdb6 27G
93 matches
Mail list logo
