Re: does Fedora need Google search logic?

2010-07-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/29/2010 03:49 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote: >> Have you asked in the infrastructure list? >> >> Rahul > Rahul check out comment on bugzilla: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618829#c5 > > Looks like he is in contact with them. I haven't seen any public discussions in the infrastru

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/30/2010 01:03 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > What I'm looking forward to is RHEL 6 being based on this > new X. I can't wait till large paying corporate customers > find all their video busted. (That's when you'll find the > quality of the drivers suddenly improving at an accelerated > pace :-).

Re: Blue screen of death

2010-07-29 Thread Máirín Duffy
Hi Alex, I talked to the plymouth maintainer and he said this is a known bug; I don't know if the fix is in F13 yet but let me explain what's going on: You've got two bugs. One is a kernel panic. The other is that when the kernel is panicking, rather than showing useful debug information, it is d

Re: HELP! Installed some rawhide packages and now system will not boot! [SOLVED]

2010-07-29 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Well I installed parted/libparted from rawhide to get version 2.3 as I > was bitten by the resize bug and some other issues with the current > version in Fedora 12/13. It pulled in a few dependencies and one of > them broke my system, I'm thin

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread David
On 7/29/2010 5:00 PM, Steve Searle wrote: > Around 09:54pm on Thursday, July 29, 2010 (UK time), James Mckenzie scrawled: > >> And the comment on "Linux on the Desktop". Not ready yet. We need it so >> that users don't have to go through hoops to use what they need. All >> distributions suffe

Overstock Auctions HP Pavilion a6412p Desktop 2GHz 3GB 500GB DVDRW DL Item 45888656

2010-07-29 Thread binarynut
Click on this and check it out. http://auctions.overstock.com/HP-Pavilion-a6412p-Desktop-2GHz-3GB-500GB-DVDRW-DL/Computers-Networking/item/45888656 http://auctions.overstock.com/cgi-bin/auctions.cgi?PAGE=BROWSE&CTG=8441 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or cha

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Mike Wright
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Time to upgrade, I'm afraid. You'll get no support for Fedora 10. It was > end-of-lifed about six months ago. There are no more updates coming for > it, ever. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/IRC/Fedora-EOL-Support Thanks for that but I'm well aware that

Loss of X

2010-07-29 Thread binarynut
Fedora 13 X86_64 /KDE Loss of Video , This computer has been running and no updates for about three weeks. This computer is at A friends house in Panama City, Fla. about 700 miles away and he won't be able to look at the /var/log/messages. (II) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering (II) AI

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 07/29/2010 01:17 AM, Chris Rouch wrote: > I think this was working for f13 too until the last time i applied > updates, though it may just be that i didn't test it. The first thing you should try is probably to boot the oldest F13 kernel that you've got and see if the system's behavior is any

Re: os that rather uses the gpu?

2010-07-29 Thread Robert Myers
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Les wrote: > But unfortunately, Robert, networks are inherently low bandwidth.  To > achieve full throughput you still need parallelism in the networks > themselves.  I think from your description, you are discussing the fluid > models which are generally deconstr

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:48:57 -0400, > Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> If doing a "black-box" only job of "reverse engineering" requires one to >> load memory with a trademark, how does this fall into the realm of >> acceptable? > > There was a court case where a compa

Re: HELP! Installed some rawhide packages and now system will not boot!

2010-07-29 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, David Timms wrote: > ps: is it missing a dracut built /boot/initramfs..img for the kernel > version you are trying to run ? > > That can be solved by ensuring you have an older kernel installed and > running, and uninstall / reinstall the current kernel. Nope,

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
James McKenzie wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: >> And if you run Radeon chipsets which worked with FC6 and FC9, should you >> expect >> that the developers would spend time on gamer features like 3D and compiz >> while >> long time users run in text mode or VESA mode at best? Not everyone can >>

Re: HELP! Installed some rawhide packages and now system will not boot!

2010-07-29 Thread David Timms
On 30/07/10 07:38, David Timms wrote: > On 30/07/10 06:22, Richard Shaw wrote: ... > Then it definitely works; you are running from the in memory kernel from > the rescue cd, but every app/tool you try to access is from the > installed system, and changes affect the installed system. ps: is it miss

Re: HELP! Installed some rawhide packages and now system will not boot!

2010-07-29 Thread David Timms
On 30/07/10 06:22, Richard Shaw wrote: > My plan at this point is to boot a Fedora LiveCD, mount my LVs and > chroot to it. I'm hoping rpm and yum will work properly from a > chroot'ed environment. Ensure your rescuecd is of similar vintage, if not same kernel version and for the same architecture

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 7/29/10 7:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:48:57 -0400, >Paul Allen Newell wrote: > >> If doing a "black-box" only job of "reverse engineering" requires one to >> load memory with a trademark, how does this fall into the realm of >> acceptable? >> > There

Thinkpad A22p/Improper Video on Install

2010-07-29 Thread JB
James McKenzie earthlink.net> writes: > > JB wrote: > > James Mckenzie earthlink.net> writes: > > > > > >> STOOPID question time from a long time Linux/UNIX sysadmin: > >> > >> How do I select the VESA video driver at the wonderful install screen? > >> > >> I don't readily see the ability to

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Steve Searle
Around 09:54pm on Thursday, July 29, 2010 (UK time), James Mckenzie scrawled: > And the comment on "Linux on the Desktop". Not ready yet. We need it so > that users don't have to go through hoops to use what they need. All > distributions suffer from this, even the more friendly ones. I've s

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread James Mckenzie
"Christofer C. Bell" wrote: >Sent: Jul 29, 2010 11:48 AM >To: Community support for Fedora users >Subject: Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia > >On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, suvayu ali > wrote: >> On 29 July 2010 09:39, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> It is a commentary that computers which ran usin

HELP! Installed some rawhide packages and now system will not boot!

2010-07-29 Thread Richard Shaw
Well I installed parted/libparted from rawhide to get version 2.3 as I was bitten by the resize bug and some other issues with the current version in Fedora 12/13. It pulled in a few dependencies and one of them broke my system, I'm thinking it was dev-mapper. On reboot LVM was able to find all 4

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/30/2010 02:12 PM, Mike Wright wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've come across some sites that only partially render when using > > firefox. I had been using 3.0.15 so upgraded to

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > What I'm looking forward to is RHEL 6 being based on this > new X. I can't wait till large paying corporate customers > find all their video busted. (That's when you'll find the > quality of the drivers suddenly improving at an accelerated >

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:03:34 -0700 suvayu ali wrote: > I think legacy proprietary driver packages exist on RPMFusion. A legacy driver won't do any good, you'd need a legacy X as well since the drivers changed to accommodate the changed requirements of X itself (which is why pretty much all video

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread suvayu ali
On 29 July 2010 11:48, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, suvayu ali > wrote: >> On 29 July 2010 09:39, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> It is a commentary that computers which ran using Fedora drivers in FC6 >>> thru FC9 >>> now must use vendor drivers or run in VESA mode. W

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/30/2010 02:50 PM, Mike Wright wrote: > Both are working fine with firefox-3.6.7-1.fc13.x86_64 and > xulrunner-1.9.2.7-2.fc13.x86_64 for me. > > What version of Fedora are you running? What exact Firefox and xulrunner > packages? > >> Thanks for

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Mike Wright
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/30/2010 02:12 PM, Mike Wright wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've come across some sites that only partially render when using >> firefox. I had been using 3.0.15 so upgraded to 3.6.6 from Remi >> Collet's repository

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Christofer C. Bell
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, suvayu ali wrote: > On 29 July 2010 09:39, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> It is a commentary that computers which ran using Fedora drivers in FC6 thru >> FC9 >> now must use vendor drivers or run in VESA mode. Was that not clear in the >> above >> quoted 1st paragraph

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread jack craig
On 07/30/2010 11:12 AM, Mike Wright wrote: > > Thanks, > Mike Wright > > [1] https://servicing.capitalone.com/c1/login.aspx > [2] http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/software/tws/twsguide.htm > you might find firebug, a firefox debugger, to shed some light on your mystery... -- Jack Craig

Re: F12: tail -f inside .gvfs filesystem fails?

2010-07-29 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
On 07/20/2010 06:19 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > I cannot get a tail -f inside of .gvfs with > a remote mounted ntfs filesystem as done via > Nautilus->Places->Network - this has worked prior > to F12. > > Has anyone tried this on F12/13 and got it to work? > > Seems that nobody cares about t

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Roger K. Wells
On 07/30/2010 02:12 PM, Mike Wright wrote: Hi all, I've come across some sites that only partially render when using firefox. I had been using 3.0.15 so upgraded to 3.6.6 from Remi Collet's repository in hopes of better functionality but the problem persists. Note that both of these render co

Re: firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/30/2010 02:12 PM, Mike Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > I've come across some sites that only partially render when using > firefox. I had been using 3.0.15 so upgraded to 3.6.6 from Remi > Collet's repository in hopes of better functionality but

firefox bug (fedora or mozilla?)

2010-07-29 Thread Mike Wright
Hi all, I've come across some sites that only partially render when using firefox. I had been using 3.0.15 so upgraded to 3.6.6 from Remi Collet's repository in hopes of better functionality but the problem persists. Note that both of these render correctly when using Chrome. [1] has three c

Re: SE Linux issue: "Error checking policy version." (sealert -s)

2010-07-29 Thread Roger K. Wells
On 07/29/2010 01:45 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > When I start the SE Linux Troubleshooter, it does not display any > alerts and the following error appears at the bottom of the window; > > Error checking policy version. > I observe this behavior as well. > I don't see a bug on this in bugzill

SE Linux issue: "Error checking policy version." (sealert -s)

2010-07-29 Thread Christofer C. Bell
When I start the SE Linux Troubleshooter, it does not display any alerts and the following error appears at the bottom of the window; Error checking policy version. I don't see a bug on this in bugzilla, at least that I can find, and the tool seems to be working for a friend of mine. I've ensure

Re: [389-users] issue getting schema - Version 1.2.x return no operational attributes

2010-07-29 Thread Nathan Kinder
On 07/29/2010 01:30 AM, Rudolf Hatheyer wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed a difference in behavior between 1.0.x and 1.2.x Version of > FDS. > Version 1.2.x will not return the hole schema (without specifying > attributes objectClasses, matchingRules ). > This change came about from some work to ma

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread suvayu ali
On 29 July 2010 09:39, Bill Davidsen wrote: > It is a commentary that computers which ran using Fedora drivers in FC6 thru > FC9 > now must use vendor drivers or run in VESA mode. Was that not clear in the > above > quoted 1st paragraph? Hardware which was new less than four years ago no > long

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Antonio Olivares
> I mention it because people flame if someone suggests using > vendor drivers which > work. > > -- Sad but true :( Hardware which worked before no longer does with newer software builds. In some cases, one can build the driver(s) but most have to wait for others to do it since they were

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> And if you run Radeon chipsets which worked with FC6 and FC9, should you >> expect >> that the developers would spend time on gamer features like 3D and compiz >> while >> long time users run in text mode or VES

Re: LVMs and "Real" Partitions (was Re: Preupgrade F11 ---> F12 ?)

2010-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
Patrick Bartek wrote: > --- On Tue, 7/27/10, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> Patrick Bartek wrote: > >>> [snip] >>> I never could see any advantage to LVMs (over "real" >> partitions) other than being able to resize them while they >> are mounted. >> They do make it easy to move stuff to new hardware,

Re: Still no kmod for new Nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Michael Miles
On 07/29/2010 12:42 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:14:23 -0500, Christofer wrote: > > >> What, exactly, is your goal in complaining here that RPM Fusion >> doesn't have the latest kmods? What, exactly, are you trying to >> accomplish? If it's simply to complain, then ple

Re: ip address from range script

2010-07-29 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jozsi Vadkan wrote: > TEST-A.txt: list of ip address ranges [AS/isp's in a country] > TEST-B.txt: list of ip addresses > > I just need to know, if an ip in the TEST-B.txt is in a range of Damn, how many places have you crossposted this? -- users mailing list user

Re: How can I make local dnsmasq play nicely with NetworkManager?

2010-07-29 Thread Robert Nichols
On 06/28/2010 02:33 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > I am trying to set up dnsmasq as a local resolver cache on my F-12 > laptop, and can't find any way to pass the nameservers returned by DHCP > to dnsmasq as upstream nameservers and still have 127.0.0.1 appear as > the primary nameserver in /etc/resol

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:28 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/29/2010 07:16 PM, Tim wrote: > > While I think it's fair to ask that Fedora 13 (and its apps) can read > > the configuration left behind by Fedora 12, and update it where needed. > > You can't really expect Fedora 12 (when someone is dual

fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread JB
JB yahoo.com> writes: > > Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I have a duel boot laptop. if i boot it into f12, using kde, and pull > > out the power cord, i get a popup message telling me i've done so and > > the battery monitor icon changes. If i boot into f13, also kde, i get > > no

Re: ip address from range script

2010-07-29 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 14:54:15 Jozsi Vadkan wrote: > TEST-A.txt: list of ip address ranges [AS/isp's in a country] > TEST-B.txt: list of ip addresses > > I just need to know, if an ip in the TEST-B.txt is in a range of > TEST-A.txt > > cat "TEST-A.txt" > 63.31.63.0/24;9007;44536 > 64.65.0.0/

Re: Help fedora 13

2010-07-29 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:30 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:11 -0400, Philip Russell wrote: > > Got rid of windows, Love Fedora 13, Just not familiar with it as much > > yet > > > > Im getting a message "There are unfinished transactions remaining. > > Please run yum-complete-

ip address from range script

2010-07-29 Thread Jozsi Vadkan
TEST-A.txt: list of ip address ranges [AS/isp's in a country] TEST-B.txt: list of ip addresses I just need to know, if an ip in the TEST-B.txt is in a range of TEST-A.txt cat "TEST-A.txt" 63.31.63.0/24;9007;44536 64.65.0.0/19;9000;8263 62.64.14.0/21;9001;6852 cat "TEST-B.txt" 63.31.63.2 64.66.5.

Re: SE Linux error in logwatch (sendmail)

2010-07-29 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/2010 05:29 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > When cron.daily runs, I get the following error related to sendmail > and logwatch: > > /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch: > > Can't exec "sendmail": Permission denied at /usr/sbin/logwatch line > 1032, li

Re: Help fedora 13

2010-07-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:30 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > 1. Open a terminal (Applications>System Tools>Terminal) > 2. Switch user to become the system administrator "root" (type "su" > and > Enter, then enter the root password) > 3. Type the command "yum-complete-transactions". It will try to > comp

Re: Help fedora 13

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Tyler
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:11 -0400, Philip Russell wrote: > Got rid of windows, Love Fedora 13, Just not familiar with it as much > yet > > Im getting a message "There are unfinished transactions remaining. > Please run yum-complete-transaction as root." Hi Philip, Here's what you need to do: 1.

Re: Minimum Required RPM Packages for Running Fedora

2010-07-29 Thread g
siavash ghiasvand wrote: > Thank you very much for your help, I will read them ASAP. welcome very much. i elected to wait a little while so i could ask following questions. :) > P.S: after removign many packages, now, my current "minimal fedora", > has less than 100 packages! ;) how many are

fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread JB
Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes: > > I have a duel boot laptop. if i boot it into f12, using kde, and pull > out the power cord, i get a popup message telling me i've done so and > the battery monitor icon changes. If i boot into f13, also kde, i get > no indication at all when i pull out the cab

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/29/2010 07:41 PM, Chris Rouch wrote: > Good idea. I created a new user, selected a kde session and logged in > as that user. I did not change any configuration. The battery charge > icon had a yellow lightning bolt indication mains power. I pulled the > power lead, and nothing changed - no p

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:48:57 -0400, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > If doing a "black-box" only job of "reverse engineering" requires one to > load memory with a trademark, how does this fall into the realm of > acceptable? There was a court case where a company was using a copyrighted phra

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 20:37:04 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > Manufacturers don't want to give away technical secrets and will go to > great lengths to keep them that way. Their bottom lines depend on it. And the way to change this is to not buy stuff from companies that don't document h

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Rouch
On 29 July 2010 13:28, Ed Greshko wrote: > While I do agree with what you've said  The one thing that hasn't > been determined is if indeed the issue is the differences in settings > between F12 and F13 and jumping between the 2 versions.  The OP "thinks" > it was working before the last upda

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Rouch
On 29 July 2010 12:27, JB wrote: > Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes: > >> >> The home directory is >> shared between the two boots, so the configuration is the same. >> > Well, > that may be the problem ... > Unless you really have a specific reason to have a common home dir, > I think you are askin

Re: Still no kmod for new Nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:36:59 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > On 07/28/2010 03:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:10:22 -0700, > >Michael Miles wrote: > > > >> I wish that nouveau would support cuda then this mess would be obsolete. > >> > >> As it is nouveau

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/29/2010 07:16 PM, Tim wrote: > While I think it's fair to ask that Fedora 13 (and its apps) can read > the configuration left behind by Fedora 12, and update it where needed. > You can't really expect Fedora 12 (when someone is dual-booting) to be > able to handle Fedora 13 configurations. >

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:47 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: > It is up to Fedora to make sure that any config files > that it (she?) places in /home are properly updated > during installation of a new distribution. While I think it's fair to ask that Fedora 13 (and its apps) can read the configuratio

Re: fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Timothy Murphy
JB wrote: >> The home directory is >> shared between the two boots, so the configuration is the same. >> > Well, > that may be the problem ... > Unless you really have a specific reason to have a common home dir, > I think you are asking for more or less unpredictability with both > installations

fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread JB
Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes: > > The home directory is > shared between the two boots, so the configuration is the same. > Well, that may be the problem ... Unless you really have a specific reason to have a common home dir, I think you are asking for more or less unpredictability with both i

Re: does Fedora need Google search logic?

2010-07-29 Thread Valent Turkovic
> Have you asked in the infrastructure list? > > Rahul Rahul check out comment on bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618829#c5 Looks like he is in contact with them. -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spi

[389-users] issue getting schema - Version 1.2.x return no operational attributes

2010-07-29 Thread Rudolf Hatheyer
Hi, I've noticed a difference in behavior between 1.0.x and 1.2.x Version of FDS. Version 1.2.x will not return the hole schema (without specifying attributes objectClasses, matchingRules ). This a problem when querying by use of VBScript (i need this ugly stuff in a windows login script to ge

Re: Installing F12 for PPC on Powerbook G4

2010-07-29 Thread ZL
You can purchase a FedoraCore 12 bootable DVD or CD from the LinuxStore --- On 7/22/10 12:40 AM, "JD" wrote: > DVD burned from iso image, and checksumed against > downloaded iso checksums (and computed checksums), > will

Re: Fedora users on powerpc

2010-07-29 Thread ZL
I have tried to install FedoraCore 12 on a PPC G4. The installation remains impossible to achieve. PREPARATION FOR INSTALLATION I unseated all PCI cards. I removed all external enclosures: FireWire, USB, etc. I removed all devices: BlueTooth, PowerMate, printers, scanners, etc. The only device

fedora power management not working in f13

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Rouch
I have a duel boot laptop. if i boot it into f12, using kde, and pull out the power cord, i get a popup message telling me i've done so and the battery monitor icon changes. If i boot into f13, also kde, i get no indication at all when i pull out the cable. The home directory is shared between the

Re: Still no kmod for new Nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:12:16 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > Kmods not available for new Nvidia driver. > It was suggested to ask RPM Fusion which I did with NO reply. Where did you ask? Can't find your name in their list archives. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Still no kmod for new Nvidia

2010-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:14:23 -0500, Christofer wrote: > What, exactly, is your goal in complaining here that RPM Fusion > doesn't have the latest kmods? What, exactly, are you trying to > accomplish? If it's simply to complain, then please stop. If the > goal is to motivate RPM Fusion to releas

Re: does Fedora need Google search logic?

2010-07-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/29/2010 12:50 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 28 July 2010 12:56, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Noone can be bribed. When the code is ready, it will be integrated. If >> you have questions, feel free to ask the developer in question directly. > Well, the code is pretty ready. I just need a infr

Re: does Fedora need Google search logic?

2010-07-29 Thread Richard Hughes
On 28 July 2010 12:56, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Noone can be bribed.  When the code is ready, it will be integrated.  If > you have questions, feel free to ask the developer in question directly. Well, the code is pretty ready. I just need a infrastructure team that are willing to help me deploy t