On 06/26/2010 02:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't use that repository...so it is meaningless to me. :-)
>>
> Your call, but you don't need to have it enabled permanently (I don't).
> Just do:
>
> yum --enablerepo=updat
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/26/2010 02:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
> >> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ...
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 00:19 +, g wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>
> > What about the people who want to store on tapes (they exist!). Should we
> > change the tape archiving software as well?
>
> tape archiving, ie, cpio and tar, as well as any good tape program, already
> have abilit
On 06/26/2010 02:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
>> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-)
>>
> TB 3.1 has been pushed to updates-testing.
>
>
>
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-)
ok. i have not installed f13 or reinstalled f12 yet, i was not able to
check versions and did not recall what was being used.
i use scientific linux 5
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-)
TB 3.1 has been pushed to updates-testing.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe o
I installed tog-pegasus-2.9.0-10.fc13.i686
and found that the following files, which are
listed as provided by the package are missing
even after removing and re installing the package
via yum. To wit: these files are missing:
/usr/bin/cimmof-32
/usr/bin/cimmofl-32
/usr/bin/cimprovider-32
/usr/bin/
>>> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>>>
>>>
>> /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird
>>
> interesting.
>
> was that a 'yum' from fedora, or did you pull from mozilla?
>
Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
available via the F13 reposit
Use '--skip-broken' for now to apply other updates and skip this one,
and just wait for it to be fixed. ;(
It's unfortunate that this update went out in this state. :(
Efforts like autoqa and critical path testing would have caught this,
but they are not yet live.
kevin
signature.asc
Descri
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 21:33 -0700, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Greetings. I hope this doesn't distract anyone from the discussion of
> top
> posting, but I'm getting a dependency problem when doing a yum update
> on a
> freshly-installed, f13, x86_64 system.
It's been noted on the Fedora Test list. I
Ed Greshko wrote:
>> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>>
> /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird
interesting.
was that a 'yum' from fedora, or did you pull from mozilla?
if yum, did you redirect it?
if pulled from mozilla, that was default?
>> enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
>>
> 1.1.1
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 11:32 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > bottom-posting has been the standard on Usenet for basically forever,
>
> To be pedantic, no it hasn't. ;-)
>
> Usenet quoting style has traditionally been "interspersed" (replying
On Fr, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:33:26 -0700, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Greetings. I hope this doesn't distract anyone from the discussion of top
> posting, but I'm getting a dependency problem when doing a yum update on a
> freshly-installed, f13, x86_64 system.
>
> Basically, it appears that some of the
On Friday 25 June 2010 09:47 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>
> $ rpm -qil kernel-headers
>
> This will list all of the component files and their locations.
>
I believe there is no need for the i. This should suffice,
$ rpm -ql kernel-headers
> --Doc
>
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future.
Le 26/06/2010 05:39, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-
2010/6/26 Michael Hannon :
> Greetings. I hope this doesn't distract anyone from the discussion of top
> posting, but I'm getting a dependency problem when doing a yum update on a
> freshly-installed, f13, x86_64 system.
>
> Basically, it appears that some of the gnome applications require a versi
On 06/26/2010 01:17 PM, g wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1.
>>
>> Works fine on F13 under KDE.
>>
> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>
/usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird
> enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
>
1.1.1
--
Happiness isn't
Ed Greshko wrote:
> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1.
>
> Works fine on F13 under KDE.
did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
>
> Ed
>
>
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs ga
I did a little more investigating and I discovered the following:
yum provides */production/bg.conf
dnssec-conf-1.21-8.fc12.noarch : DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming
tool
Repo: updates
Matched from:
Filename: /etc/pki/dnssec-keys/production/bg.conf
So I tried to install dnsse
On 06/26/2010 11:39 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 23:39 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 12:23 +0800, Brett wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to get vmware player running on Fedora 13, and during the setup
> > vmware player is unable to locate the kernel headers (PAE). I have used the
> > "search f
Steven Stern wrote:
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2.fc13.i686
enigmail v1
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 12:23 +0800, Brett wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to get vmware player running on Fedora 13, and during the setup
> vmware player is unable to locate the kernel headers (PAE). I have used the
> "search for files" function to find the location of the kernel headers
> (including
Greetings. I hope this doesn't distract anyone from the discussion of top
posting, but I'm getting a dependency problem when doing a yum update on a
freshly-installed, f13, x86_64 system.
Basically, it appears that some of the gnome applications require a version of
libedataserver that is older t
I just updated one of my Fedora 12 system. This particular system is
running a local dns server. When I try to restart named on the system I
get:
Starting named:
Error in named configuration:
/etc/pki/dnssec-keys//named.dnssec.keys:1: open:
/etc/pki/dnssec-keys//production/bg.conf: file not f
Hi,
I am trying to get vmware player running on Fedora 13, and during the setup
vmware player is unable to locate the kernel headers (PAE). I have used the
"search for files" function to find the location of the kernel headers
(including "show hiddden & backup files") yet the are nowhere to be f
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 20:48 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> On 06/25/2010 04:58 PM, Tom Horsley was caught red-handed while writing::
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:24:09 -0700
> > Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> >
> >
> >> But... at what cost?
> >>
> >> You want google hold your messages and do whatever
> >> the
On 06/25/2010 04:58 PM, Tom Horsley was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:24:09 -0700
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>
>> But... at what cost?
>>
>> You want google hold your messages and do whatever
>> they deem fit with it?
>>
> Why shucks! Their company slogan
I'm hoping this is a known problem with an easy work-around. It looks
like an RPM versioning problem of some sort, but I'm not 100% sure.
I have a rusty trusty old IBM Thinkpad A22p with a 32-bit PIII/M
processor and 512MB. I've tried F12->F13 upgrades from ISO images on
local hard drive (/dev/sdb
Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2.fc13.i686
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
user
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:24:09 -0700
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> But... at what cost?
>
> You want google hold your messages and do whatever
> they deem fit with it?
Why shucks! Their company slogan is "Don't be evil",
surely we can trust them (or was it "To Serve Man", I forget).
And now they'll h
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> bottom-posting has been the standard on Usenet for basically forever,
To be pedantic, no it hasn't. ;-)
Usenet quoting style has traditionally been "interspersed" (replying
in-line, throughout the message), which is not the same a
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hello,
> trying to use kmail/kontact with Google calendars/contacts integration and
> found some web links regarding possible good results using
> Akonadi Google Calendar
> and
> Akonadi Google Contacts
This is still pending formal package review,
https://bugzilla.redhat.
On 06/25/2010 09:26 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Forgot one thing.
For all the hosts you trust - google mx's, yahoo mx etc.
Remove the GreetPause delay:
e.g.
GreetPause:mail-bw0-f1.google.com0
gene/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:54 -0700, JD wrote:
> I wonder how Google does it. only .01% of my google email is spam.
> The spam folder contains tons of spam, and it is automatically purged
> by google.
When you're a large mail host you have one big advantage in spam
killing: You will receive tons of
On 06/25/2010 05:56 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
Historical thoughts on RBL:
You've had several suggestions so just a couple of comments. The
MAPS list (aka rbl) was an/the original DNSBL - if I remember right it
went weird a long back and required you fill out a long legal doc (with
a pen) which i
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:46:24PM -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
> I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
> of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
> IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
> but I am beginning to suspect that these headers co
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 08:47 +0800, Harish Pillay wrote:
> Daniel -
>
> > I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
> > of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
> > IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
> > but I am beginning to suspect that these he
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
> of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
> IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
> but I am beginning to suspect that these headers could be
> easily spoofed with bogus entries, r
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mikkel wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 04:19 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Mikkel wrote:
>>> You may have to re-install Grub. When you change the size of the
>>> /boot partation, you may change the physical location of Grub's
>>> stage
Daniel -
> I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
> of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
> IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
> but I am beginning to suspect that these headers could be
> easily spoofed with bogus entries, right?
>
> I am
On 06/25/2010 04:20 PM, Daniel B. Thurman was caught red-handed while writing::
> Yeah, I did that and it does not contain that file. For
> fun, I tried yum install rbl.m4, no dice. I have 8.14.x
> so that's fairly "new" for F9...
>
> Guess I will have to scan the Internet for that file...
>
On
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> What about the people who want to store on tapes (they exist!). Should we
> change the tape archiving software as well?
tape archiving, ie, cpio and tar, as well as any good tape program, already
have ability to store to more than one tape.
it is primarily cd/dvd pr
On 06/25/2010 04:19 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Mikkel wrote:
>> You may have to re-install Grub. When you change the size of the
>> /boot partation, you may change the physical location of Grub's
>> stage 1.5 loader that understands the file system. Grub stage
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> It seems I ask this question after every new Fedora release. How do
> I go about transferring my Thunderbird pop mail files from this F-12
> computer to a second computer running F-13.
and you will probably ask again. ;)
in order to transfer your files, read and bookmark the
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hope this was helpful.
Yes, all of the help in this thread has been very helpful. Finally, I have
gotten graphical Linux video editing tools to work! I spent quite a few hours
last night with the video task that spawned this thread, but that was a
learning experience that w
On 06/25/2010 03:44 PM, Greg Woods was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:56 -0700, JD wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>
>> As I have already answered, let'ts not beat a dead horse.
>> Issue already very well explained by Bill Crawford.
>> No need for any followups.
>>
On 06/25/2010 03:24 PM, Daniel B. Thurman was caught red-handed while
writing::
> On 06/25/2010 03:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:54:27 -0700
>> JD wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I wonder how Google does it. only .01% of my google email is spam.
>>> The spam folder contains to
On 06/25/2010 03:04 PM, Tom Horsley was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:54:27 -0700
> JD wrote:
>
>
>> I wonder how Google does it. only .01% of my google email is spam.
>> The spam folder contains tons of spam, and it is automatically purged
>> by google.
>>
On 06/25/2010 04:20 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On 06/25/2010 04:11 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 03:56 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:57 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of
On 06/25/2010 04:11 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 03:56 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:57 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of the offending email spammmers and add these respecti
On 06/25/2010 03:56 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:57 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
IP address and/or host names to the /etc
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 12:05 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> The computers are all tied to our LAN, I can put files on a flash
> drive, cdrom, etc. but my effort never seem to be able to get the
> job done. I will try anything ...
Every mail client I have ever seen can import mbox files. You ju
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:29 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Are you talking about something like this from sendmail.mc:
>
> FEATURE(`dnsbl', `relays.ordb.org', `"Rejected due to Open Relay see
> http://www.ordb.org/lookup/?host="; $&{clientaddr} " for more
> information"')dnl
>
Yes, that is
On 06/25/2010 02:57 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
but I am beginning to suspect tha
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:56 -0700, JD wrote:
> >
> As I have already answered, let'ts not beat a dead horse.
> Issue already very well explained by Bill Crawford.
> No need for any followups.
No need to be so touchy. Sometimes messages cross in the mail.
--Greg
--
users mailing list
users
On 06/25/2010 02:57 PM, jack craig wrote:
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
but I am beginning to suspect tha
On 06/25/2010 03:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/06/10 11:02, Paul Smith wrote:
>
>> I have just installed Gnash on F13 x86_64, but I cannot play YouTube
>> movies on Firefox. Any advice?
>>
> Use Adobe Flash, gnash hasn't kept pace iirc.
>
Yeah, I removed gnash and swfdec (I thin
On 06/25/2010 02:56 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:46 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
>> of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
>> IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
>>
>
On 06/25/2010 03:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:54:27 -0700
> JD wrote:
>
>> I wonder how Google does it. only .01% of my google email is spam.
>> The spam folder contains tons of spam, and it is automatically purged
>> by google.
>>
Probably they pay their workers to
Hello All,
Sorry this is off-topic but I would like some advise from this list and
possibly get an understanding of what other large organizations are doing
for UNIX/Linux authentication management.
I am a Senior Administrator for 3000 UNIX/Linux based devices ranging from
HP-UX 10.20-11.31, Sola
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Is there a way to change a partition's type after its created ?
>
For ext4, yes. Google "ext4 to btrfs". It's reversible, too, at least it
will reverse it to the point you switched from ext4 to btrfs.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chan
Joerg Bergmann wrote:
> IMHO, btrfs has this feature, but the mount option is -o ssd instead
> of -o discard.
No. It is -o discard as well.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gui
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:54:27 -0700
JD wrote:
> I wonder how Google does it. only .01% of my google email is spam.
> The spam folder contains tons of spam, and it is automatically purged
> by google.
Yea, I just use gmail as my mail provider and download the
mail with fetchmail. I think one non-sp
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
but I am beginning to suspect that these headers could be
easily spoofed wit
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:02 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Gnash is already available from Fedora repos.
> >
> > Gnash is an alternative to the Adobe plugin that has been discontinued
> > for 64 bits machines. Of course, there are sit
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:46 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
> of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
> IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
Attempting to block the sender addresses will never work beca
On 06/25/2010 02:51 PM, Greg Woods was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 12:33 -0700, JD wrote:
>
>> On 06/25/2010 12:04 PM, Bill Crawford was caught red-handed while writing::
>>
>>> On 25 June 2010 19:38, JD wrote:
>>>
>>>
cd /var/lib
sudo t
I'm getting this in my otherwise clean boot log. What, if anything, do
I need to do about them ?
Thanks
Starting udev: udevd[491]: BUS= will be removed in a future udev
version, please use SUBSYSTEM= to match the event device, or SUBSYSTEMS=
to match a parent device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/85-pcs
On 06/25/2010 02:46 PM, Daniel B. Thurman was caught red-handed while
writing::
> I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
> of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
> IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
> but I am beginning to suspect that the
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 12:33 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> On 06/25/2010 12:04 PM, Bill Crawford was caught red-handed while writing::
> > On 25 June 2010 19:38, JD wrote:
> >
> >> cd /var/lib
> >> sudo tar cjf - rpm> rpm.tar.bz2
> >> sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
> sudo only run
I thought it was sufficient to look into the headers
of the offending email spammmers and add these respective
IP address and/or host names to the /etc/mail/access file,
but I am beginning to suspect that these headers could be
easily spoofed with bogus entries, right?
I am really getting tired o
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Mikkel wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 11:22 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>
>> My initial question remains.
>>
>> Am I correct in assuming I only need to edit /etc/fstab and /etc/grub.conf
>> to boot from the new partitions?
>>
> You may have to re-install Grub. When you
Hi,
On Friday 25 June 2010 10:42 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
>> What further codecs could I need that I don't already have?
>
> OK. I just found it. I need avidemux-plugins from rpmfusion. I must have
> overlooked it when installing. But I am still not sure how
On 06/25/2010 10:19 AM, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just downloaded and installed in /usr/local Firefox 3.6.4 on a F12 and when
> I try to run
> it it gives a SElinux error:
>
> SELinux denied access requested by /usr/local/firefox/firefox-bin.
> /usr/local/firefox/firefox-bin is misla
On Friday, June 25, 2010 03:20:53 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Fool.
>
Regardless of the relative merits of top or bottom posting the 'fool' comment
is uncalled for. How is it that such a trivial issue can drive us to such
comments; unless perhaps the anonymity of the internet has also made us
On 06/25/2010 12:49 PM, Mikkel was caught red-handed while writing::
> On 06/25/2010 01:38 PM, JD wrote:
>
>> cd /var/lib
>> sudo tar cjf - rpm> rpm.tar.bz2
>> sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
>>
>> My username is in /etc/sudoers:
>> jd ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
>>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>>> Just curious but Adobe has been discontinued for 64-bit? Aren't all
>>> CPUs 64-bit nowadays?
>>
>> I am just as surprised as you. Yes, it would seem that all CPUs are 64-bit
>> and
>> also, the 64-bit flash was working just fine and I am sti
Am 25.06.2010 21:33, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
> John Austin wrote:
>
>> Note that AFAIK only ext4 supports the "discard" mount option
>>
> btrfs also supports it.
>
IMHO, btrfs has this feature, but the mount option is -o ssd instead
of -o discard.
--
users mailing list
users@lis
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> John Austin wrote:
> > Note that AFAIK only ext4 supports the "discard" mount option
>
> btrfs also supports it.
Is there a way to change a partition's type after its created ?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On 06/25/2010 11:22 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> My initial question remains.
>
> Am I correct in assuming I only need to edit /etc/fstab and /etc/grub.conf
> to boot from the new partitions?
>
You may have to re-install Grub. When you change the size of the
/boot partation, you may change t
On 06/23/2010 06:27 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>>
>> there are multiple ways to install nvidias drivers. Its really not simple
>> to
>> cover them all. some ways like using the installer directly from nvidia
>> replace a bunch of Xorg bits
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:06:49 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Almost
> every message you see on these systems quote the entire thread in every
> message. Lose lose lose.
That seems to have developed from rancidly bad email customer support
systems which couldn't be bothered to keep track of old
From: "Ardhan Madras"
>> 1. I don't like that the startup is now text-only until when the
>> graphical drivers load. Is there a way to obtain the old graphical
>> boot without the nouveau drivers?
>
> Plymouth (Fedora boot animation) require frame-buffer, try to enable
> frame-buffer at boot time
On 06/23/2010 04:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm setting up a cgi application (the Web part of the MythTV application).
>
> I'd like to try to run it with SELINUX enabled if possible. The perl
> script writes to STDOUT and it produces a SELINUX error that recommends
> executing this c
On 06/25/2010 01:38 PM, JD wrote:
> cd /var/lib
> sudo tar cjf - rpm > rpm.tar.bz2
> sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
>
> My username is in /etc/sudoers:
> jd ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
>
> Yeah... I know it is not safe to set NOPASSWD and all that...
> but that is not w
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:20 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> The best that can be said about top-posting is that
> it is better than bottom-posting without trimming.
> Internal- and bottom-posting allow responses
> to be near their inspirations.
Agreed, but in reality either method would be accep
John Austin wrote:
> Note that AFAIK only ext4 supports the "discard" mount option
btrfs also supports it.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org
On 06/25/2010 12:04 PM, Bill Crawford was caught red-handed while writing::
> On 25 June 2010 19:38, JD wrote:
>
>> cd /var/lib
>> sudo tar cjf - rpm> rpm.tar.bz2
>> sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
>>
>> My username is in /etc/sudoers:
>> jd ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:
On 06/25/2010 12:02 PM, Bill Crawford was caught red-handed while writing::
> On 25 June 2010 19:11, JD wrote:
>
>
>> error: db3 error(-30974) from dbenv->failchk: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal
>> error, run database recovery
>>
> cd /var/lib/rpm
> /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover
>
Thank you Bi
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 09:06 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Update
>
> I cloned my old conventional 160 GB hard drive onto a new Intel X25-M
> SSD using gparted. In doing so, the new partitions ended up being ext3
> instead of ext4.
>
> The performance improvement is dramatic. It boots super fast.
Fool.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/06/10 16:53, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> --snip--
> People do, continue to and will always top post
>>
>> Thanks for the comment. Although I do try to work within the standards of a
>> group, I do prefer top posting, but do not mind reading emails
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:18:33PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> O> At that point, after the installer's vmlinux has been
> > booted, the keystrokes on the usb keyboard are not
> > recognized when attempting to select the installation
> > media check options. This is quite odd because the
> > same usb k
On 06/25/2010 08:50 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 03:16 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 06/25/2010 09:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>>
>>> I keep hearing about this, how does o
JD wrote:
> cd /var/lib
> sudo tar cjf - rpm > rpm.tar.bz2
> sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
Why use f - and then redirect stdout when you could just do:
sudo tar cjf rpm.tar.bz2 rpm
?
> Is this an established legacy behaviour of sudo?
This is the way it has always been and
On 25 June 2010 19:38, JD wrote:
> cd /var/lib
> sudo tar cjf - rpm > rpm.tar.bz2
> sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
>
> My username is in /etc/sudoers:
> jd ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
>
> Yeah... I know it is not safe to set NOPASSWD and all that...
> but that is not why
On 25 June 2010 19:11, JD wrote:
> error: db3 error(-30974) from dbenv->failchk: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal
> error, run database recovery
cd /var/lib/rpm
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
On 06/25/2010 11:37 AM, Craig White was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:11 -0700, JD wrote:
>
>> On 06/25/2010 11:04 AM, stan was caught red-handed while writing::
>>
>>> rpm --rebuilddb
>>>
>>>
>> Thank you stan. I tried it:
>> $ sudo rpm --rebuildd
cd /var/lib
sudo tar cjf - rpm > rpm.tar.bz2
sh: rpm.tar.bz2: cannot create [Permission denied]
My username is in /etc/sudoers:
jd ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
Yeah... I know it is not safe to set NOPASSWD and all that...
but that is not why I am asking about.
Is this an established legacy
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:11 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> On 06/25/2010 11:04 AM, stan was caught red-handed while writing::
> > rpm --rebuilddb
> >
> Thank you stan. I tried it:
> $ sudo rpm --rebuilddb
> rpmdb: Thread/process 7604/3079239360 failed: Thread died in Berkeley DB
> library
> error: db3
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
