Re: Sophos Anti Virus

2010-05-13 Thread Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo
Am Freitag, den 14.05.2010, 15:04 +1000 schrieb Nermin Celik: > I'm requesting ideas/strong arguments so that I don't change from > fedora. Already understood. Please be more specific to get a specific argument, sophos SHOULD RUN on Fedora, as I said, but you repeat what your techs repeated, the s

Re: Installing Windows XP under KVM (SP3 fails)

2010-05-13 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:35 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > As additional info: > > My XP SP2 installation inside KVM had been working perfectly until > the moment I installed XP SP3. After that, it blue-screens on > boot with something related to ACPI. I switched back to SP2 by > restoring the dis

Re: Sophos Anti Virus

2010-05-13 Thread Nermin Celik
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Nermin Celik wrote: > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo < > nosp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am Freitag, den 14.05.2010, 13:44 +1000 schrieb Nermin Celik: >> > At work the IT technicians are insisting on transfering me to Red Hat >> > fro

Re: Sophos Anti Virus

2010-05-13 Thread Nermin Celik
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote: > Am Freitag, den 14.05.2010, 13:44 +1000 schrieb Nermin Celik: > > At work the IT technicians are insisting on transfering me to Red Hat > > from FC12 due to "Anti Virus system. Sophos Anti Virus only supports > > Red Hat not Fedor

Re: Sophos Anti Virus

2010-05-13 Thread Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo
Am Freitag, den 14.05.2010, 13:44 +1000 schrieb Nermin Celik: > At work the IT technicians are insisting on transfering me to Red Hat > from FC12 due to "Anti Virus system. Sophos Anti Virus only supports > Red Hat not Fedora". What does this mean? I'm new to Unix environment, > and this is too tec

Re: Sophos Anti Virus

2010-05-13 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 05/13/2010 11:44 PM, Nermin Celik wrote: > Hi, > > At work the IT technicians are insisting on transfering me to Red Hat > from FC12 due to "Anti Virus system. Sophos Anti Virus only supports Red > Hat not Fedora". What does this mean? I'm new to Unix environment, and > this is too technicial.

ns2-allinone-2.33 fail to install

2010-05-13 Thread ravinder nath rajotiya
Dear All, I get the following warning+error while installing ns2-allinone-2.33 ./common/packet.h:366: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ‘char*’ ./common/packet.h:369: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ‘char*’ ./common/packet.h:372: warning: deprecated conv

Sophos Anti Virus

2010-05-13 Thread Nermin Celik
Hi, At work the IT technicians are insisting on transfering me to Red Hat from FC12 due to "Anti Virus system. Sophos Anti Virus only supports Red Hat not Fedora". What does this mean? I'm new to Unix environment, and this is too technicial. Regards, N -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorapro

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:24 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Would you recommend a low impedance or high impedance mic? As said, that would depend on your sound card. But do you really have a choice of computer microphones with different impedances? Most sound cards are built to connect an elect

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 11:58 -0400, David Boles wrote: > I just have to ask. Why would running Openoffice on Linux impress a > Windows user enough to convince them to switch to Linux? Openoffice is > available for Windows. And at the same price too! :-) I don't think it would, by itself. But it s

Re: Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:08 -0400, Wm_Frank Pont jr wrote: > The main thing I want from a live CD is answering the question: Will > fedora work? Graphics and internet has a history of problems and > the live CD answers this in a fast and easy fashion. Only a partial answer, though. I've seen sys

TeXLive on Install DVD i386/x86_64

2010-05-13 Thread Antonio Olivares
Dear fellow Fedora users, Since Fedora 13 is just around the corner and in Fedora 12 TeXLive was removed from the install DVD, will the install DVD from Fedora 13 be also without TeXLive? Why? I won't yum install texlive on home machine with dialup :( Will install TexLive2009 from install DVD

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

2010-05-13 Thread Rich Megginson
Reinhard Nappert wrote: > How can I make ns-slapd to produce a core. > You first have to start ns-slapd in an environment that you have done ulimit -c unlimited then kill -11 > I got it in the same state again, and I did a > gdb /opt/UMC/jdb/sbin/ns-slapd 16712 > > 0x2b8e908889a2 in poll

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

2010-05-13 Thread Reinhard Nappert
How can I make ns-slapd to produce a core. I got it in the same state again, and I did a gdb /opt/UMC/jdb/sbin/ns-slapd 16712 0x2b8e908889a2 in poll () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (gdb) where #0 0x2b8e908889a2 in poll () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x2b8e906b6a5f in PR_Poll () from

Re: open office freedom

2010-05-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 18:05 -0400, terry wrote: > I thought that this was a matter of individual taste (choice). I'm sure > the emacs users care little about > OOo. If you want to comment on a thread, why not reply to a message in the thread rather than starting a new one (and changing the Subjec

open office freedom

2010-05-13 Thread terry
I thought that this was a matter of individual taste (choice). I'm sure the emacs users care little about OOo. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject

Re: How to only yum install x86_64 modules

2010-05-13 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:46 -0600, David Bartmess wrote: > When I do a yum install subversion, it is trying to install the i386 AND > the x86_64 modules for subversion. My machine is 64 bit, so I only want > to install the x86_64 version of subversion. > > How do I tell yum this? try 'yum i

How to only yum install x86_64 modules

2010-05-13 Thread David Bartmess
When I do a yum install subversion, it is trying to install the i386 AND the x86_64 modules for subversion. My machine is 64 bit, so I only want to install the x86_64 version of subversion. How do I tell yum this? Thanks! -- "Dingo" Dave Bartmess Broomfield, CO. USA http://edingo.net -- us

Re: [OT] replace a word with a multiline with sed

2010-05-13 Thread Adam Hough
2010/5/13 Mohamed El Morabity > Le jeudi 13 mai 2010 à 18:14 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi a écrit : > > Hello, > > sorry for the offtopic. it seems a simple thing but I can't find an > > escape char or something correct... > > I have this setup in place > > source file input.txt: > > > > bla bla > > bl

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 11:44 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:24 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:16 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:35 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > > ALL I need to > > > > do is to be able to create an mp3

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 13 May 2010 12:39:38 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > I made a > series of prompts for a voicemail system a while back using a $4.95 > "computer microphone" and audacity and it worked just fine for that > purpose. It may depend on the sound connection you have. I can't get any of the ordinary che

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:24 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:16 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:35 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > ALL I need to > > > do is to be able to create an mp3 file and send it off via e-mail. > > > > Audacity and a microp

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:24 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Would you recommend a low impedance or high > impedance mic? I eventually want to do some experimenting with speech > recognition. I don't know enough about that to give you a good answer. I made a series of p

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:16 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:35 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > ALL I need to > > do is to be able to create an mp3 file and send it off via e-mail. > > Audacity and a microphone are all you need. > > -- Frank, Thanks for the reply. Would y

Re: Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:35 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > ALL I need to > do is to be able to create an mp3 file and send it off via e-mail. Audacity and a microphone are all you need. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fe

Sound recorder - dictation equipment

2010-05-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
Everyone, I just tried to use some hand held dictation equipment made by Sony on FC12. The equipment was made for MS windows, and I was hopeful that I could get it to work with wine. No success. Does anyone on the list use dictation equipment that will work with Fedora? Or does anyone have exp

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

2010-05-13 Thread Rich Megginson
Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Rich, which debugging level do you suggest? Apparently, I tried to much, > because it would crash the server constantly. Debugging levels should not crash the server - can provide more information about the crash? > For now, I go just with 8 (Connection Management). Seei

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/13/2010 06:25 PM, David Boles wrote: > The list is > endless and Openoffice would be IMO near the end of the list. May-be for you, may-be for some kinds of "hobbist usage". For "serious usage", the first items to check "other OSes" for are "webbrowser", "mailer" and "wordprocessor". Ralf

Re: [OT] replace a word with a multiline with sed

2010-05-13 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
Le jeudi 13 mai 2010 à 18:14 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi a écrit : > Hello, > sorry for the offtopic. it seems a simple thing but I can't find an > escape char or something correct... > I have this setup in place > source file input.txt: > > bla bla > bla bla > TAG > bla bla > > sed command file sed.t

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread David Boles
On 5/13/2010 12:07 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/13/2010 11:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> >> >> I just have to ask. Why would running Openoffice on Linux impress a >> Windows user enough to convince them to switch to Linux? Openoffice is >> available

[OT] replace a word with a multiline with sed

2010-05-13 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
Hello, sorry for the offtopic. it seems a simple thing but I can't find an escape char or something correct... I have this setup in place source file input.txt: bla bla bla bla TAG bla bla sed command file sed.txt: /TAG/c\ BLABLA BLABLA so that the command sed -f sed.txt input.txt gives as

Re: Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Wm_Frank Pont jr
I always load open office. I can not imagine a work computer not to have open office. I can see how it could be left off due to space constraints. It is not a big deal, I just load it after the first boot. The main thing I want from a live CD is answering the question: Will fedora work? Graphi

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Tom H
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, David Boles wrote: > On 5/13/2010 11:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Tom H wrote: >> >>> True, but if a Linux distribution wants to attract Windows and OSX >>> desktop users (_IF_), OO is an essential package because it is what >>> tho

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Tom H
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> Tom H : >>True, but if a Linux distribution wants to attract Windows and OSX >>desktop users (_IF_), OO is an essential package because it is what >>those users expect, an integrated office application suite that is >>compatible

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread David Boles
On 5/13/2010 11:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Tom H wrote: > >> True, but if a Linux distribution wants to attract Windows and OSX >> desktop users (_IF_), OO is an essential package because it is what >> those users expect, an integrated office application suite that

Re: Installing Windows XP under KVM (SP3 fails)

2010-05-13 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 13 May 2010 17:35:52 +0200 Roberto Ragusa wrote: > My XP SP2 installation inside KVM had been working perfectly until > the moment I installed XP SP3. After that, it blue-screens on > boot with something related to ACPI. Weird, my XP SP2 worked, but just barely, until I did install SP3, t

Re: Installing Windows XP under KVM (SP3 fails)

2010-05-13 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Thomas Cameron wrote: > This might have been covered elsewhere, if so I'm sorry for the noise. > > I tried to install XP SP3 as a KVM guest yesterday and it just hung at > "installing devices." The little flashing scroll bar at the bottom of > the page was still going, and it was pingable, but th

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

2010-05-13 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Tom H wrote: > True, but if a Linux distribution wants to attract Windows and OSX > desktop users (_IF_), OO is an essential package because it is what > those users expect, an integrated office application suite that is > compatible with MS Office. I understand

denyhost

2010-05-13 Thread Marvin Kosmal
HI All I started getting this error.. May 12 21:53:03 - denyfileutil: INFO purging entries older than: Wed Apr 14 21:53:03 2010 May 12 21:53:04 - denyfileutil: INFO num entries purged: 0 May 12 22:23:04 - sync: ERROR Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/denyho

Re: logwatch schedule control

2010-05-13 Thread Steve Blackwell
On Wed, 12 May 2010 15:31:07 -0700 jack craig wrote: > AARRGGg! > > No wonder i couldnt find the control, its out of control!!! > > Thx Tom! > > On 05/12/2010 03:03 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:33:18 -0700 > > jack craig wrote: > > > >

Re: "Be excellent to each other" / Call people out for doin a good job

2010-05-13 Thread Thomas Cameron
On 05/11/2010 10:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I was disappointed when I read through the Go / No Go meeting log tonight > when I read that we would have to slip. Then I remembered the evidence of > hard work I observed over the last couple of weeks and thought, that people > are going to notice

Installing Windows XP under KVM

2010-05-13 Thread Thomas Cameron
This might have been covered elsewhere, if so I'm sorry for the noise. I tried to install XP SP3 as a KVM guest yesterday and it just hung at "installing devices." The little flashing scroll bar at the bottom of the page was still going, and it was pingable, but the installation progress bar stal

Re: Removing shutdown menu item

2010-05-13 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 06:21 +, Troels Arvin wrote: > In the "general" area, I've un-checked can_hibernate and can_suspend. > And in the "ui" area, I've un-checked "show_actions_in_menu". I > changes nothing, however: I still get a working shutdown panel menu > item. Have you logged out and bac

Re: logwatch schedule control

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 12:54 -0700, jack craig wrote: > Hi Folks, > > On my FC11, logwatch has suddenly begun arriving at 10:48 am. i prefer > it runs over night. > > I am not finding its crontab control, any clues out there ? > I see /etc/cron.daily, .hourly, .weekly, but i see no entries fro th

Re: rootless X

2010-05-13 Thread Alan Cox
> However I still don't understand one question, does this mean X will run > as its own user or as a daemon and let regular "human" users interact > with it? Or will we have one server for every one logged in using a GUI? The kernel doesn't really care at that point. It's job is to make sure a u