ppreciated.
Thank guys.
Richard
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates
(http://voice.yahoo.com)
-
The o
;>7AY1JqoUvK3u/6bYWbOagGgAFbc=
> hash="55e8e87bbde00d1d96cc119ccd94e0c02c9a2768"
> hashalg="SHA1"> xmlns:asmv2="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2"
>
xmlns:dsig="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";>
Algorithm="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identit
649ab77e42f8f91"
> > hashalg="SHA1"> > xmlns:asmv2="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2"
> >
>
xmlns:dsig="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";> >
> >
>
Algorithm="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identity">
Hey everyone,
Last week I wrote about some problems I'd been having
with trying to get Apache to compile on Windows. I
received a lot of great feedback and have narrowed the
problem down to Visual Studio Express. I upgraded to
Visual Studio Professional and all previous
compilation issues have bee
You mentioned mod_security. That to me seems the best
candidate to block these types of requests. Mod
Security has an extensive ruleset and I am certain it
will have a way to accomplish this. Unfortunately, I
am pretty much a novice as it comes to mod_security
myself so I am unable to give you the
The problem is that your certificate has been signed
by a Certificate Authority which is not trusted by
many browsers.
Your HTTPS instance worked fine on my internet
explorer 7, but did indeed fail on firefox. An
examination of the certificate revealed that your
certificate was issued by StarField
wonder if perhaps they updated their CA?
--- Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The problem is that your certificate has been signed
> by a Certificate Authority which is not trusted by
> many browsers.
>
> Your HTTPS instance worked fine on my internet
> ex
To my knowledge there is not module that would give
you realtime statistics, but you can definately
install a stats-analysis package to run analysis on
your weblogs.
I myself use awstats. It's opensource and free.
--- Liz Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Does apache keep stats of viewer
hinking of mod_rewrite perhaps but I have not
been able to find any good information on generating
session IDs etc.
Does anyone have any good recommendations /
suggestions?
Richard
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone
Thanks for the info ... I am definately going to look
into this. From a quick glance I did learn that this
is trictly cookie based. Do you know of anything that
can generate a SID and attach it to the URL?
--- Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:16 AM
I am running the logrotate program that comes with
Apache to manager my logfiles on Windows. It will only
roll them over, but at least this will stop the
logfile from being in use, allowing you to run a daily
batch file to either compress, delete and/or move the
old logs.
Additionally, you can dow
I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect
Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or
still several months out?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS?
It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error
when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for
linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened
... long story!)
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did mod_dav_svn.so
I am not familiar with this module so I don't know how
it is being distributed ... but can't you just locate
the source and compile it yourself?
--- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6?
>
__
D
Hmmm ... perhaps this module got compiled with a
compiler not compatible with the compiler used to
compile apache.
I personally would still try to get a hold of the
source-code, and compile this module with apxs.
R
--- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> []# yum info mod_dav_svn
> -
source-code.
But anyway, thanks for the feedback!
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Richard de Vries wrote:
> > I was just curious if anyone knew when we can
> expect
> > Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or
> > still several
I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite
and I am still going thru some documentation to see
whether I can make it do what I need.
While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured
to post a message on this list as well, just in case
someone knows the answer right from the top of
Sounds like something else is already running on port
80. Is this on unix?
Try finding out what is on port 80. If you have lsof
installed, you can run the following as root:
lsof -i TCP:80
--- "Jain, Abhay K, INFOT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use same instance of Aapche to
> p
Joshua, that is not entirely true.
By making believe you're running a different webserver
than you really are ... you can potentionally buy
yourself some valuable time.
If an attacker wants to attack/criple your site,
he/she will most likely first try all known
vulnerabilities for that webserver
erns, why not!
But this particular mod_security directive aside
mod_security as an overall module is extremely
powerful and can do much much more.
R.
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Richard de Vries
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have mod
Interesting problem.
I am running Apache 2.0.59 as a reverse proxy on multiple Solaris 9 and AIX
servers and have never encountered these types of issues. Perhaps you should
try upgrading to 2.0.59 on one of your development machines and see if that
makes a difference. If not, it is most likely
Did you make sure your scan included all .htaccess
files. Depending on the syntax you ran to "scan" your
Apache directory, it may not have scanned your
.htaccess files.
I am thinking one of these files may contain a
reference to that file.
--- Nathan Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We we
What compiler are you using?
I had a hell of a time trying to get Apache compiled
for windows with Visual Studio Express -- I was
experiencing all kinds of weird behavior.
I finally abandoned the Express edition and tried it
with the regular Visual Studio, which resolved all my
problems.
--- Kev
Hi! I was wondering if RedirectMatch did any stripping of the URL when in a
Directory context?
According to the documentation, a Rewrite rule does have the URL stripped so
that it starts with the directory, but the documentation doesn't say whether or
not this also happens for RedirectMatch.
I
Ricky
On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Morse, Richard E.MGH wrote:
> Hi! I was wondering if RedirectMatch did any stripping of the URL when in a
> Directory context?
>
> According to the documentation, a Rewrite rule does have the URL stripped so
> that it starts with the directo
Hi! I'm trying to get a PSGI app running under Apache. Because I don't actually
manage the box it's running on, it is complicated for me to get an additional
service set up to start when the machine starts, so (unless there is some way
to trigger it via Apache), I can't use the reverse proxy mec
On Feb 24, 2012, at 10:30 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I'd be lying if I said that moving to 2.3.x would magically solve all
> your problems, but it is better documented and various folks that hang
> out on this list are familiar with it.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/mod_fcgid/
> http://httpd.apache.
I am building Apache 2.4.28 on RedHat Linux 2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64 for use as a
reverse proxy server, to upgrade from Apache 2.4.23. I am building with APR
1.6.0 and APR-Util 1.6.2.
When I run apachectl configtest, I get the following message:
httpd: Syntax error on line 43 of /web/conf/httpd_ma
lick links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 19:04 +, Dempsey, Richard C wrote:
> My searches for ap_check_pipeline, both online and in the source, tell me
> that it's declared in ./httpd-2.4.28/modules/http/http
requests are being served from the /var/www/html default DocumentRoot.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
--Richard
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users
Hi Lucien,
Yes. that is the case. It is /etc/httpd/conf.d
The last line of the main config file /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf file is
IncludeOptional conf.d/*.conf
On 12/13/2020 5:38 AM, Lucien Gentis wrote:
Hello Richard,
I don't know how CentOs configures httpd, but I suppose You h
uick review of various tools.
I personally prefer http://awstats.sourceforge.net/ Awstats . Very easy to
set up, and gives lots of useful info.
Hope this helps,
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Need-recommendation-for-apache-log-summary-tool-tf3336650.html#a9285034
s is evident by the already working
instances. I'm either missing the mistake in the vhost directive or
forgot about a configuration in another file.
Regards
--
Richard van der Walt
Product Development
Stracienta SA (Pty) Ltd.
E-mail: richard.vdw...@stracienta.com
E-mail legal disclaimer: http:/
the server this afternoon after core business hours when
all the clients are not working anymore.
Thanks a lot
Richard
On 4 May 2010 03:27, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> You can also resolve it locally on the Suse server in /etc/hosts file if you
> know the ip_address of the sub.domain2.co
a more informational page.
Is there a OCSP status similar to SSL_CLIENT_VERIFY that I can use to
redirect the user?
I've looked everywhere and can't find any information.
Thanks in advance.
--
--------
Richard J. Van Horn
401 - 435 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
