On 6/4/05, Patrick Donker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly! People dont have the time to read the docs, but do have time to
> subscribe to and write messages to the list asking for solutions and
> wait for them. Where does that time come from then?
For most people, it is much quicker to ask s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All:
Just a comment on what is written below. I've noticed what seems to be a high number of these types of answers (e.g. its in the docs *READ* them!)...Which makes me wonder why ppl don't? I participate in a number of NG and this one seems to have more of its
Hello All:
Just a comment on what is written below. I've noticed what seems to be a high
number of these types of answers (e.g. its in the docs *READ* them!)...Which
makes me wonder why ppl don't? I participate in a number of NG and this one
seems to have more of its share of:"I just turned o
Broming plutonium wrote:
I'm using Xandros Open Circulation 3. I don't think
you know what it is, so I decided to just call it
"Linux".
God I'm so stupid--I didn't even enable the features!
And I deleted my source directory, too. Too bad I
don't have time to read the documentation--I can
hardly
> -Original Message-
> From: Broming plutonium [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ... Too bad I
> don't have time to read the documentation
Yet you managed to find time to mail the list...
It takes an hour to read the docs but days to wait for responses and then try
them out. Find the time to
I'm using Xandros Open Circulation 3. I don't think
you know what it is, so I decided to just call it
"Linux".
God I'm so stupid--I didn't even enable the features!
And I deleted my source directory, too. Too bad I
don't have time to read the documentation--I can
hardly find time to do what I have
When you say programs, you likely mean modules. You likely did not compile
in the modules you are attempting to use. Removing the installation is a
matter of just deleting the files. You do not need source to do that. If
you isolate apache to its own directory I.e. /usr/local/apache, then you
can j
FWIW, I dnloaded same version and compiled it per the installation docs,
took the defaults, and installed under RH9 with all applicable patches.
Proxy works, don't know about SSL - havent tried it.
John
When you say 'programs' I am not sure what you mean...apache is stand
alone. Calls to FTP
If you were missing "programs", as you call them, apache won't even compile.
Show your configure cmnd with arguments, please.
Here's an example
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache2.0.54 --enable-proxy
--enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-http --enable-ssl --disable-status
--disable-negotiation
Broming plutonium wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is anyone here running the UNIX version of Apache
2.0.52 (that you compiled yourself) on a Linux
machine? I am, and there are a lot of problems.
Proxying doesn't work; authentication doesn't work;
headers don't work...
Let's talk about proxying first. When
10 matches
Mail list logo
