RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache problem with soft link

2006-01-24 Thread G . Lams
> A good suggestion. The httpd logs show correct delivery, > including an exactly correct file length, despite failure. > This suggested that the problem might be on the receiving > end. The failure is seen two two boxes of different > hardware, but with similar win2k systems. I did test it > wit

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache problem with soft link

2006-01-24 Thread Michael D. Berger
> > The appropriate directories all have SymLinksIfOwnerMatch (and all > > owners match). In my debugging effort I tried FollowSymLinks. > > > > In case "the last link" made might be the problem, changed the order > > by changing the first letter of the directory in question to upper > > case (th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache problem with soft link

2006-01-23 Thread G . Lams
> The appropriate directories all have SymLinksIfOwnerMatch (and all > owners match). In my debugging effort I tried FollowSymLinks. > > In case "the last link" made might be the problem, changed the order > by changing the first letter of the directory in question to upper > case (they are usual