Re: [users@httpd] unexpected behaviour of default host

2015-12-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Hajo Locke wrote: > > > Am 29.12.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Eric Covener: >> >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hajo Locke wrote: >>> >>> In Apache 2.2 we used additional "Servername *", but with 2.4 it is not >>> allowed to use wildcards with Servername-Directive. >>

Re: [users@httpd] unexpected behaviour of default host

2015-12-29 Thread Hajo Locke
Am 29.12.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Eric Covener: On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hajo Locke wrote: In Apache 2.2 we used additional "Servername *", but with 2.4 it is not allowed to use wildcards with Servername-Directive. I think it was treated as a literal * in 2.2. It's just a shorter/more c

Re: [users@httpd] unexpected behaviour of default host

2015-12-29 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hajo Locke wrote: > In Apache 2.2 we used additional "Servername *", but with 2.4 it is not > allowed to use wildcards with Servername-Directive. I think it was treated as a literal * in 2.2. It's just a shorter/more confusing version of non.existing_host.noTld.

[users@httpd] unexpected behaviour of default host

2015-12-29 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello List, used for years apache 2.2, now trying to upgrade to 2.4 and do some configtests. I noticed an unexpected behaviour of default host. like suggested here, i use a minimal default vhost: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/examples.html DocumentRoot"/www/default" In Apache 2.2