Re: [users@httpd] problems with delivering precompressed content

2011-04-20 Thread Eric Covener
> Did you mean rewriting /foo.js to /foo? Sounds interesting, especially > with the [PT] flag. yes, had it backwards - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/usersli

Re: [users@httpd] problems with delivering precompressed content

2011-04-20 Thread Edgar Frank
Am 20.04.2011 20:25, schrieb Eric Covener: So I'd like to know, what your suggestions are. Is there a way to get mod_negotiation to work the way I have in mind? Am I missing something or is there an alternative solution? I've never understood this much -- but I thought this worked as long as yo

Re: [users@httpd] problems with delivering precompressed content

2011-04-20 Thread Eric Covener
> So I'd like to know, what your suggestions are. Is there a way to get > mod_negotiation to work the way I have in mind? Am I missing something or is > there an alternative solution? I've never understood this much -- but I thought this worked as long as your links were to /foo instead of /foo.js

[users@httpd] problems with delivering precompressed content

2011-04-20 Thread Edgar Frank
Hi apache folks, I've been struggling with precompressed content for a while now, but I can't find a satisfying solution. There are plenty of .js and .css, which I currently compress at runtime with mod_deflate. To save CPU load, I want to precompress these, put them as .(js|css).gz on the