Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl with apach-1.3.19

2011-04-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 30.03.11 21:05, satish patel wrote: > I knew this is old but we can't stop production right a way! need some > time to upgrade.. I am looking for small hack... > > After couple of changes in Makefile of mod_ssl i build libssl.so module > with the help of apxs. But what if i want name like mod_

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl with apach-1.3.19

2011-03-30 Thread satish patel
ename libssl.so to mod_ssl.so [satish@donkey mod_ssl-2.8.1-1.3.19]$ ldd ./pkg.sslmod/libssl.so statically linked > From: rbo...@rcbowen.com > Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:57:29 -0400 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl with apach-1.3.19 >

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl with apach-1.3.19

2011-03-30 Thread Rich Bowen
1.3 is no longer supported, and 1.3.19 is an ancient version of 1.3. Over ten years old. However, reaching back into the past ... generally mod_ssl was built statically, rather than as a so. If it *was* built as a so, you might be able to rebuild it using apxs, but I'm not sure. This seems lik

[users@httpd] mod_ssl with apach-1.3.19

2011-03-30 Thread satish patel
Hello Users, We have complicated issue here. let me explain in a bit. We have production machine running on apache-1.3.19 / mod_ssl-2.8.1 / OpenSSL 0.9.5a. Now issue in security scanner we found some issue in openssl 0.9.5a version and mod_ssl-2.8.1 is statically compiled with openssl so we c

[users@httpd] mod_ssl with apach-1.3.19

2011-03-30 Thread satish patel
Hello Users, We have complicated issue here. let me explain in a bit. We have production machine running on apache-1.3.19 / mod_ssl-2.8.1 / OpenSSL 0.9.5a. Now issue in security scanner we found some issue in openssl 0.9.5a version and mod_ssl-2.8.1 is statically compiled with openssl so we c