Thanks, You all went above and beyond trying to help. It was impressive to see
folks going out of their way to help, but it was getting out of hand
> On Apr 30, 2021, at 9:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:40 PM back Button
> wrote:
>
>> I did the the impossible.
>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:40 PM back Button wrote:
> I did the the impossible.
You have been removed for disrupting the list.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h
How about this.
If the software was robust and developed to a professional standard
then I would know what to do because the software would detect the issues
and give me solutions like any professional product.
My friend, any product will give you any solution. You have to study, read the
manual,
t...@aol.com
-Original Message-
From: Nick Folino
To: back Button ; users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 1:11
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_jk hasn't worked
If you think the product isn't developed to professional standards then why are
you trying to use it?If
y
> are doing.
>
>
>
>
> back.but...@aol.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Folino
> To: back Button
> Sent: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 23:19
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_jk hasn't worked
>
> You're seeing that message because you don&
All,
I am attempting to set up a proxy using mod_jk to a backend Tomcat
application. I have switched to using mod_jk from mod_proxy_http as the
application recommends using AJP and I've read that mod_jk provides more
funtionality than mod_proxy_ajp. Here is the layout:
+-+
|
I have a requirement to get the following lines from uriworkermappling.xml
which used mod_jk to be converted to mod_proxybalancer.
/path1/*=Server1
/path2/*=Server2
/path3/*=Server3
/path4/*=Server3
/path5/*=Server4
!/*.png=*
!/*.gif=*
!/*.jpg=*
!/*.jpeg=*
!/*.htm=*
!/*.html=*
I have the abo
Dear all,
I have Apache httpd 2.2.22 with mod_jk 1.2.39 to route traffic to several
tomcat instances. In my jk status manager, I noticed that
the Address:Port value is different with the host that I configured in my
worker.properties. After httpd run for several hours,
mod_jk throw below error
Here's what we are trying to accomplish:
Already have apache 2.22.x running multiple sites and acting as proxy. We are
now looking into using a web app that uses tomcat (port 8080) and will run on
the same server as apache. Users will be accessing the tomcat site using
https://share.domain.com.
Hi All,
I need to load balance the request from apache on to two tomcat instances , in
this case do i need to still use mod_proxy for redirecting the request based on
provided context path in Browser Url or jkmount property ( mod_jk module
property) .
Can someone help in understand the actual
anyone have a recommendation and differences?
can I get precompiles of mok_jk somewhere for Sun Solaris?
> From: Anthony J. Biacco [mailto:abia...@formatdynamics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:19 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [users@httpd] mod_jk type log for mod_proxy_balancer?
>
> I'm testing out mod_proxy_ajp/balancer as a possible replacement for
my
>
I'm testing out mod_proxy_ajp/balancer as a possible replacement for my
mod_jk infrastructure. Apache 2.2.17 on CentOS.
So far the only major hurdle I have is to create a separate mod_jk type
log of requests that are being proxied.
Has anyone done this?
I thought maybe I can do this with the export
Hello Everyone,
I am using apache 2.0.53 alongwith tomcat 5.0.28
I am using mod_jk for integrating them.
But i am getting an error in apache error_logs:
No JkShmFile defined in httpd.conf. LoadBalancer will not function
properly!
Sometimes i am not able to access web page on my site.
Its giv
14 matches
Mail list logo
