Re: [users@httpd] lookaround in mod_substitute pattern

2015-07-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi Zimmi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Zimmi wrote: > > Are only lookahead (?=foo) supported in mod_substitute, and not the other > (negative lookahead, lookbehind and negative lookbehind) ? > Other syntax or did I miss something ? A lookbehind assertion needs its subject to be placed *after

[users@httpd] lookaround in mod_substitute pattern

2015-07-10 Thread Zimmi
Hi list! I was testing mod_substitute and lookaheads. I tested with the simple setup below (a simple string in an index.html, and a .htaccess file), and the lookahead yields expected result, the negative lookahead and the lookbehind have no effect. The negative lookbehind has a behaviour that