Re: [users@httpd] file extensions for CGI

2013-04-03 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Newman, Stuart J. (GSFC-444.0)[HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC] wrote: > The execute bit is set. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/cgi.html#nonscriptalias Because those options are not set, Apache refuses to execute the file. Remove the execute bit if it i

RE: [users@httpd] file extensions for CGI

2013-04-03 Thread Newman, Stuart J. (GSFC-444.0)[HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC]
this email, including any attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. > -Original Message- > From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 08:03 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] file extensions

Re: [users@httpd] file extensions for CGI

2013-04-03 Thread Tom Evans
Is the file executable - ie "does it have it's exec bit set", not "is it a program". Cheers Tom On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Newman, Stuart J. (GSFC-444.0)[HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC] wrote: > I am using RedHat 6.4 with Apache 2.2.15. I send a wget request to the > server for /cobb

[users@httpd] file extensions for CGI

2013-04-03 Thread Newman, Stuart J. (GSFC-444.0)[HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC]
I am using RedHat 6.4 with Apache 2.2.15. I send a wget request to the server for /cobbler/pub/foo.to. The server returns a 403 status. The access_log entry is: 129.165.8.75 - - [02/Apr/2013:11:46:44 +] "GET /cobbler/pub/foo.to HTTP/1.0" 403 220 "-" "Wget/1.10.2 (Red Hat modified)" The e