Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

- Original Message - > > > Igor, > so you are saying this is a bug in the precompiled version of apr > 1.2.2 in sunfreeware.com ? Probably. There shouldn't be an apr_off_t mismatch in OpenCSW, we create Headers to match for 32/64bit systems like this: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

Igor, so you are saying this is a bug in the precompiled version of apr 1.2.2 in sunfreeware.com? 2011/11/24 Igor Galić > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > i am trying to ask this again: > > i supply an apache 2.2 module to my customers. naturally, i need to > > build my module for ea

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

- Original Message - > > > i am trying to ask this again: > i supply an apache 2.2 module to my customers. naturally, i need to > build my module for each OS, cpu architecture & bit scheme. So, if > my customer has Apache 2.2 on solaris sparc 32 bit - that's what i > need to build. > > ho

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

i am trying to ask this again: i supply an apache 2.2 module to my customers. naturally, i need to build my module for each OS, cpu architecture & bit scheme. So, if my customer has Apache 2.2 on solaris sparc 32 bit - that's what i need to build. however, from what i just discovered, there's anot

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

this means that apache modules for 2.2.0 32 bits, on solaris 9 are not compatible across differemt ./configure options. which actually means that if i want to check if my module will run on a given apache - i cannot do it (there's no way to know a priori the size of apr_off_t which apache was comp

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

On 11/21/2011 9:48 AM, Asaf Dalet wrote: Hi all, some interesting news: I downloaded apr-1.2.2-sol9-sparc-local from sunfreeware.com and installed it. the file apr/include/apr-1/apr.h contains this line: typedef long apr_off_t; does this mean apr 1.2.2 does n

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

Hi all, some interesting news: I downloaded apr-1.2.2-sol9-sparc-local from sunfreeware.com and installed it. the file apr/include/apr-1/apr.h contains this line: *typedef long apr_off_t;* does this mean apr 1.2.2 does not support LFS or is it some bug in this precompiled APR? apprec

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

Hi, here's the output of http -V for the precompiled apache: Server version: Apache/2.2.0 Server built: Jan 1 2006 07:22:25 Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:0 Architecture: 32-bit Server MPM: Prefork threaded: no forked: yes (variable process count) Server compiled with -D APACHE_MPM_DIR=

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

On 09.11.2011 23:31, Asaf Dalet wrote: i don't see APR version in httpd -V when i run it on an accidental apache, only "Server version" also, is there a way to compile the APR without LARGE_FILES? i would like to do it so i can test the scenario. It would help, if you provided a bit more info.

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

i don't see APR version in httpd -V when i run it on an accidental apache, only "Server version" also, is there a way to compile the APR without LARGE_FILES? i would like to do it so i can test the scenario. thanks On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 11/9/2011 11:

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

On 09.11.2011 22:17, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 11/9/2011 11:52 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote: the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd -V) and there is definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it and my compiled module. Of course i don't know it for sure

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

On 11/9/2011 11:52 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote: the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd -V) and there is definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it and my compiled module. Of course i don't know it for sure because i don't know the exact sizeof(request

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd -V) and there is definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it and my compiled module. Of course i don't know it for sure because i don't know the exact sizeof(request_rec) in the precompiled apache. In my module

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

On 11/9/2011 3:07 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote: Hi everyone, i have a problem which is bugging me for a couple of days now: i have a module written for apache 2.2.x and compiled as 32-bit on solaris 9 SPARC 64-bit. i have a precompiled apache core on a different solaris 9 (also 64-bit). the problem: s

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

Hi Jeff, thanks for the quick reply. can you by any chance point me out to that patch ID or any other details on that patch? also, is www.sunfreeware.com a good place to download solaris-bundled apxs from? thanks again! asaf On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Nov

Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote: > Hi everyone, > i have a problem which is bugging me for a couple of days now: > > i have a module written for apache 2.2.x and compiled as 32-bit on solaris 9 > SPARC 64-bit. > i have a precompiled apache core on a different solaris 9 (also 64-bi

[users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch

Hi everyone, i have a problem which is bugging me for a couple of days now: i have a module written for apache 2.2.x and compiled as 32-bit on solaris 9 SPARC 64-bit. i have a precompiled apache core on a different solaris 9 (also 64-bit). the problem: sizeof(request_rec) in the module <> sizeof(